Volume 37, Issue 3 p. 261-267
Original Research Article

Interaction Between Atypical Antipsychotics and the Gut Microbiome in a Bipolar Disease Cohort

Stephanie A. Flowers

Stephanie A. Flowers

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Simon J. Evans

Simon J. Evans

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Kristen M. Ward

Kristen M. Ward

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Melvin G. McInnis

Melvin G. McInnis

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Vicki L. Ellingrod

Corresponding Author

Vicki L. Ellingrod

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Address for correspondence: Vicki L. Ellingrod, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Rm 2060, 428 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 December 2016
Citations: 180
Manuscript presented in part at the following meetings: (1) Keystone symposia: Gut Microbiota, Metabolic Disorders and Beyond (D4), April 17–21, 2016, Newport, Rhode Island. (2) Society of Biological Psychiatry 71st Annual Scientific Convention, May 12–14, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract

Objectives

The atypical antipsychotic (AAP) class is often associated with metabolic disease, but the mechanistic underpinnings of this risk are not understood. Due to reports linking gut bacteria function to metabolic disease, we hypothesize that AAP treatment in adults results in gut dysbiosis potentiating metabolic criteria. This report describes recent findings linking AAP treatment with differences in gut microbiota communities in a human cohort with bipolar disorder (BD).

Methods

In a cross-sectional design, we obtained 16S ribosomal sequences from 117 BD patients (49 AAP treated, 68 non-AAP treated). Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was used to detect significant clustering of microbial communities between groups, and the inverse Simpson Diversity Index was used to calculate alpha diversity. Detection of differentially abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between groups was performed using linear discriminant analysis effect size.

Results

The AAP-treated cohort was significantly younger and had an increased body mass index compared with non-AAP-treated patients. Groups did not differ in other psychotropic medication use with the exception of higher use of benzodiazepines in the AAP cohort. We detected significant separation between microbiota communities of AAP-treated and nontreated patients (AMOVA; p=0.04). AAP-treated females showed significant decreased species diversity when compared with non-AAP-treated females (p=0.015). Males showed no significant diversity between treatment groups (p=0.8). Differentially abundant OTUs between treatment groups were OTU1, OTU25, and OTU32 that classified to Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia, and Sutterella, respectively.

Conclusions

These data suggest that AAP treatment is associated with specific representation of gut bacterial families in AAP-treated patients. In addition, AAP treatment is associated with decreased species richness in female AAP-treated patients.