In Vivo PET Assay of Tumor Glutamine Flux and Metabolism: In-Human Trial of 18F-(2S,4R)-4-Fluoroglutamine

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162610

Preclinical and trial data support fluorine 18–(2S,4R)-4-fluoroglutamine (FGln) avidity as a PET biomarker of glutamine flux and metabolism and suggest possible correlations between tumor FGln PET phenotype, oncometabolic genotype, and tumor aggressiveness.

Purpose

To assess the clinical safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor imaging characteristics of fluorine 18–(2S,4R)-4-fluoroglutamine (FGln), a glutamine analog radiologic imaging agent.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board and conducted under a U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved Investigational New Drug application in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. All patients provided written informed consent. Between January 2013 and October 2016, 25 adult patients with cancer received an intravenous bolus of FGln tracer (mean, 244 MBq ± 118, <100 μg) followed by positron emission tomography (PET) and blood radioassays. Patient data were summarized with descriptive statistics. FGln biodistribution and plasma amino acid levels in nonfasting patients (n = 13) were compared with those from patients who fasted at least 8 hours before injection (n = 12) by using nonparametric one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Tumor FGln avidity versus fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity in patients with paired PET scans (n = 15) was evaluated with the Fisher exact test. P < .05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference.

Results

FGln PET depicted tumors of different cancer types (breast, pancreas, renal, neuroendocrine, lung, colon, lymphoma, bile duct, or glioma) in 17 of the 25 patients, predominantly clinically aggressive tumors with genetic mutations implicated in abnormal glutamine metabolism. Acute fasting had no significant effect on FGln biodistribution and plasma amino acid levels. FGln-avid tumors were uniformly FDG-avid but not vice versa (P = .07). Patients experienced no adverse effects.

Conclusion

Preliminary human FGln PET trial results provide clinical validation of abnormal glutamine metabolism as a potential tumor biomarker for targeted radiotracer imaging in several different cancer types.

© RSNA, 2018

Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Clinical trial registration no. NCT01697930

References

  • 1. DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104(49):19345–19350. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Mullen AR, Wheaton WW, Jin ES, et al. Reductive carboxylation supports growth in tumour cells with defective mitochondria. Nature 2011;481(7381):385–388. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Wise DR, Ward PS, Shay JES, et al. Hypoxia promotes isocitrate dehydrogenase–dependent carboxylation of α-ketoglutarate to citrate to support cell growth and viability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(49):19611–19616. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Yang C, Ko B, Hensley CT, et al. Glutamine oxidation maintains the TCA cycle and cell survival during impaired mitochondrial pyruvate transport. Mol Cell 2014;56(3):414–424. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009;324(5930):1029–1033. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, et al. Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(48):18782–18787. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, et al. c-Myc suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature 2009;458(7239):762–765. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Qing G, Li B, Vu A, et al. ATF4 regulates MYC-mediated neuroblastoma cell death upon glutamine deprivation. Cancer Cell 2012;22(5):631–644. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Ren P, Yue M, Xiao D, et al. ATF4 and N-Myc coordinate glutamine metabolism in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cells through ASCT2 activation. J Pathol 2015;235(1):90–100. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Lieberman BP, Ploessl K, Wang L, et al. PET imaging of glutaminolysis in tumors by 18F-(2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine. J Nucl Med 2011;52(12):1947–1955. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Venneti S, Dunphy MP, Zhang H, et al. Glutamine-based PET imaging facilitates enhanced metabolic evaluation of gliomas in vivo. Sci Transl Med 2015;7(274):274ra17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Qu W, Zha Z, Ploessl K, et al. Synthesis of optically pure 4-fluoro-glutamines as potential metabolic imaging agents for tumors. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133(4):1122–1133. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–150S. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Cheng DT, Mitchell TN, Zehir A, et al. Memorial Sloan Kettering–integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets (MSK-IMPACT): a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for solid tumor molecular oncology. J Mol Diagn 2015;17(3):251–264. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Franco J, Balaji U, Freinkman E, Witkiewicz AK, Knudsen ES. Metabolic reprogramming of pancreatic cancer mediated by CDK4/6 inhibition elicits unique vulnerabilities. Cell Reports 2016;14(5):979–990. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Basak NP, Roy A, Banerjee S. Alteration of mitochondrial proteome due to activation of Notch1 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 2014;289(11):7320–7334. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Sheikh TN, Patwardhan PP, Cremers S, et al. Abstract 4450: CB839, an orally bioavailable glutaminase inhibitor, shows potent antitumor activity in vitro against models of soft tissue sarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):4450. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Qie S, Chu C, Li W, Wang C, Sang N. ErbB2 activation upregulates glutaminase 1 expression which promotes breast cancer cell proliferation. J Cell Biochem 2014;115(3):498–509. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Kim MM, Parolia A, Dunphy MP, Venneti S. Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016;13(12):725–739. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Salamanca-Cardona L, Keshari KR. (13) C-labeled biochemical probes for the study of cancer metabolism with dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Metab 2015;3(1):9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Hu W, Zhang C, Wu R, Sun Y, Levine A, Feng Z. Glutaminase 2, a novel p53 target gene regulating energy metabolism and antioxidant function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107(16):7455–7460. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Chen R, Nishimura MC, Kharbanda S, et al. Hominoid-specific enzyme GLUD2 promotes growth of IDH1R132H glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111(39):14217–14222. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Yang C, Sudderth J, Dang T, Bachoo RM, McDonald JG, DeBerardinis RJ. Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling. Cancer Res 2009;69(20):7986–7993. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Chen CC, et al. Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(16):2262–2269. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 2013;499(7456):43–49. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab 2016;23(1):27–47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Carey BW, Finley LW, Cross JR, Allis CD, Thompson CB. Intracellular α-ketoglutarate maintains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2015;518(7539):413–416. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Gross MI, Demo SD, Dennison JB, et al. Antitumor activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2014;13(4):890–901. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Szeliga M, Bogacińska-Karaś M, Różycka A, Hilgier W, Marquez J, Albrecht J. Silencing of GLS and overexpression of GLS2 genes cooperate in decreasing the proliferation and viability of glioblastoma cells. Tumour Biol 2014;35(3):1855–1862. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Lieberman B, Qu W, Ploessl K, et al. Uptake of optically pure 18F-4-fluoro-L-glutamines in tumor cells by glutaminolysis. J Nucl Med 2010;51(Suppl 2):249. Google Scholar
  • 31. Boza JJ, Dangin M, Moënnoz D, et al. Free and protein-bound glutamine have identical splanchnic extraction in healthy human volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2001;281(1):G267–G274. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Cooper AJ, Krasnikov BF, Pinto JT, Kung HF, Li J, Ploessl K. Comparative enzymology of (2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamine and (2S,4R)4-fluoroglutamate. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 2012;163(1):108–120. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Ploessl K, Wang L, Lieberman BP, Qu W, Kung HF. Comparative evaluation of 18F-labeled glutamic acid and glutamine as tumor metabolic imaging agents. J Nucl Med 2012;53(10):1616–1624. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Rabinovitz M, Olson ME, Greenberg DM. Effect of glutamine analogs on amino acid incorporation into protein of some normal and neoplastic cells in vitro. Cancer Res 1959;19(4):388–392. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Salwiczek M, Nyakatura EK, Gerling UI, Ye S, Koksch B. Fluorinated amino acids: compatibility with native protein structures and effects on protein-protein interactions. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41(6):2135–2171. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received November 17, 2016; revision requested January 10, 2017; revision received September 20; accepted December 10; final version accepted December 27.
Published online: Jan 31 2018
Published in print: May 2018