Volume 53, Issue 7 p. 680-690
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Supratherapeutic Oral Doses of Δ9-THC in Cannabis Users

Joshua A. Lile PhD

Corresponding Author

Joshua A. Lile PhD

Department of Behavioural Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA

Corresponding Author:

Joshua A. Lile, Department of Behavioural Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas H. Kelly PhD

Thomas H. Kelly PhD

Department of Behavioural Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard J. Charnigo PhD

Richard J. Charnigo PhD

Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Audra L. Stinchcomb PhD

Audra L. Stinchcomb PhD

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lon R. Hays MD

Lon R. Hays MD

Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 June 2013
Citations: 28

Abstract

Oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) has been evaluated as a medication for cannabis dependence, but repeated administration of acute oral doses up to 40 mg has not been effective at reducing drug-taking behavior. Larger doses might be necessary to affect cannabis use. The purpose of the present study was therefore to determine the physiological and behavioural effects of oral Δ9-THC at acute doses higher than those tested previously. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of oral Δ9-THC, administered in ascending order in 15 mg increments across separate sessions, up to a maximum of 90 mg, was determined in seven cannabis users. Five subjects received all doses and two experienced untoward side effects at lower doses. Δ9-THC produced a constellation of effects consistent with previous clinical studies. Low cannabinoid concentrations were associated with significant effects on drug-sensitive measures, although progressively greater levels did not lead to proportionately larger drug effects. Considerable variability in Cmax and tmax was observed. Doses of oral Δ9-THC larger than those tested previously can be administered to individuals with a history of cannabis use, although given the pharmacokinetic variability of oral Δ9-THC and individual differences in sensitivity, individualized dose adjustment is needed to avoid side effects and maximize therapeutic response.