Elsevier

Phytomedicine

Volume 21, Issue 5, 15 April 2014, Pages 631-639
Phytomedicine

Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2013.11.006 Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Colon cancer is a major public health problem. Cannabis-based medicines are useful adjunctive treatments in cancer patients. Here, we have investigated the effect of a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol (CBD), here named CBD BDS, i.e. CBD botanical drug substance, on colorectal cancer cell proliferation and in experimental models of colon cancer in vivo.

Methods

Proliferation was evaluated in colorectal carcinoma (DLD-1 and HCT116) as well as in healthy colonic cells using the MTT assay. CBD BDS binding was evaluated by its ability to displace [3H]CP55940 from human cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. In vivo, the effect of CBD BDS was examined on the preneoplastic lesions (aberrant crypt foci), polyps and tumours induced by the carcinogenic agent azoxymethane (AOM) as well as in a xenograft model of colon cancer in mice.

Results

CBD BDS and CBD reduced cell proliferation in tumoral, but not in healthy, cells. The effect of CBD BDS was counteracted by selective CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists. Pure CBD reduced cell proliferation in a CB1-sensitive antagonist manner only. In binding assays, CBD BDS showed greater affinity than pure CBD for both CB1 and CB2 receptors, with pure CBD having very little affinity. In vivo, CBD BDS reduced AOM-induced preneoplastic lesions and polyps as well as tumour growth in the xenograft model of colon cancer.

Conclusions

CBD BDS attenuates colon carcinogenesis and inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation via CB1 and CB2 receptor activation. The results may have some clinical relevance for the use of Cannabis-based medicines in cancer patients.

Introduction

Cancer is a prominent health problem in the world. One in 4 deaths in the United States is due to cancer (Siegel et al. 2013). Colorectal cancer represents the third most common cancer worldwide, both in men and women, with 142,820 new cases and 50,830 deaths estimated to occur in 2013 (Siegel et al. 2013). Pharmacoeconomic studies have highlighted a trend for rising costs associated with colorectal cancer, which is linked to the increasing use of targeted biological therapies (Kriza et al. 2013). Screening strategies are utilized but have not reduced disease incidence or mortality (Derry et al. 2013). Furthermore, therapeutic intervention, which is by itself very toxic, may fail to prevent disease progression to metastatic disease (Ebos and Kerbel 2011). Therefore, there is an interest in both cancer preventive strategies – which include experimentation with safe phytochemical agents – and new curative treatments (Franceschi and Wild 2013).

Cannabis extracts and plant-derived cannabinoids (named phytocannabinoids) have demonstrated direct anti-cancer effects and are also used in cancer patients to stimulate appetite and as antiemetics (Fowler et al., 2010, Carter et al., 2011, Pertwee, 2012, Velasco et al., 2012, Massi et al., 2013). Recent progress in plant biotechnology has made possible the cultivation of Cannabis chemotypes rich in specific phytocannabinoids, from which standardized extracts, containing known amounts of phytocannabinoids, may be obtained (Russo 2011). The best studied among these extracts is generally referred as cannabidiol (CBD) botanical drug substance (CBD BDS, that is a standardized Cannabis extract with high content of CBD). In several pharmacological assays, CBD BDS has been shown to be more potent or efficacious than pure CBD (Comelli et al., 2008, Capasso et al., 2011, De Petrocellis et al., 2013, Russo, 2011), suggesting additive or synergistic interactions can occur between CBD and minor phytocannabinoids (or the non-cannabinoid fraction) contained in the extract, which, in turn might be useful from a therapeutic viewpoint. CBD is the most common phytocannabinoid in fibre (hemp) plants, it is non-psychotropic and, among potent and different pharmacological actions, it exerts antitumoural actions both in vitro and in vivo (Ligresti et al., 2006, Wilkinson and Williamson, 2007, Sreevalsan et al., 2011, McAllister et al., 2011, Maor et al., 2012, Ramer et al., 2012, Solinas et al., 2012, Hernán Pérez de la Ossa et al., 2013). Of relevance to the present investigation, is our recent discovery that CBD exerts antiproliferative effects in colorectal carcinoma cells and chemopreventive actions in an experimental model of colon cancer (Aviello et al. 2012).

Therefore, here we extended our previous investigations of the intestinal antitumoural action of CBD (Aviello et al. 2012) by exploring the effect and the mode of action of CBD BDS in colorectal carcinoma cells and in in vivo murine models of colon carcinogenesis.

Section snippets

Plant material and extraction

A Cannabis sativa chemotype with a controlled high amount of CBD was used (de Meijer et al. 2003). Cannabis sativa was grown in highly secure computer-controlled glasshouses. All aspects of the growing climate, including temperature, air change and photoperiod, were computer-controlled and the plants were grown without the use of pesticides (see details at: http://www.gwpharm.com ). Cannabis dry flowers and leaves were extracted at room temperature with CO2 to give an extract which, evaporated

CBD BDS and CBD do not affect cell viability

The effect of CBD BDS and CBD on viability was evaluated in colorectal (DLD-1 and HCT116) cells and in healthy colonic epithelial cells (HCEC) by using the neutral red assay. CBD BDS and CBD, at concentration ranging from 1 µM to 5 µM, did not affect cell viability (expressed as percentage of viability ± SEM) after 24-h exposure (DLD-1 cells: control 100 ± 5.84; CBD BDS 1 µM: 106 ± 4; CBD BDS 3 µM: 103 ± 3.3; CBD BDS 5 µM: 99.6 ± 3.7; CBD 1 µM: 106.0 ± 5.4; CBD 3 µM: 102.8 ± 6.99; CBD 5 µM: 102.9 ± 5.18; HCT 116

Discussion

CBD BDS is one of the main components of Sativex (Nabiximols in the USA), a cannabinoid formulation actually used for the treatment of pain and spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. Clinical studies have shown that Sativex may provide a protection against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (Duran et al. 2010) and may be a useful add-on analgesic for patients with opioid-refractory cancer pain (Johnson et al., 2010, Johnson et al., 2012, Portenoy et al., 2012). In the present

Conflict of interest

This investigation was partly supported by grants from GW Pharmaceuticals (Porton Down, Wiltshire, UK).

Acknowledgement

BR is grateful to the “Fondazione Enrico & Enrica Sovena”.

References (49)

  • G. Aviello et al.

    Potent antioxidant and genoprotective effects of boeravinone G, a rotenoid isolated from Boerhaavia diffusa

    PLoS ONE

    (2011)
  • G. Aviello et al.

    Chemopreventive effect of the non-psychotropic phytocannabinoid cannabidiol on experimental colon cancer

    J. Mol. Med. (Berl.)

    (2012)
  • G.P. Boivin et al.

    Pathology of mouse models of intestinal cancer: consensus report and recommendations

    Gastroenterology

    (2013)
  • G.T. Carter et al.

    Cannabis in palliative medicine: improving care and reducing opioid-related morbidity

    Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care

    (2011)
  • M.G. Cascio et al.

    Evidence that the plant cannabinoid cannabigerol is a highly potent alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist and moderately potent 5HT1A receptor antagonist

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • Y.-C. Cheng et al.

    Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 percent inhibition (IC50) of an enzymatic reaction

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1973)
  • F. Cianchi et al.

    Cannabinoid receptor activation induces apoptosis through tumor necrosis factor alpha-mediated ceramide de novo synthesis in colon cancer cells

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2008)
  • F. Comelli et al.

    Antihyperalgesic effect of a Cannabis sativa extract in a rat model of neuropathic pain: mechanisms involved

    Phytother. Res.

    (2008)
  • E.P. de Meijer et al.

    The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L.

    Genetics

    (2003)
  • L. De Petrocellis et al.

    Non-THC cannabinoids inhibit prostate carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo: pro-apoptotic effects and underlying mechanisms

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2013)
  • M.M. Derry et al.

    Identifying molecular targets of lifestyle modifications in colon cancer prevention

    Front. Oncol.

    (2013)
  • M. Duran et al.

    Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • J.M. Ebos et al.

    Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2011)
  • C.J. Fowler et al.

    Targeting the endocannabinoid system for the treatment of cancer – a practical view

    Curr. Top. Med. Chem.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Nutrition Security of Hemp for Human Consumption

      2023, Sustainable Food Science - A Comprehensive Approach: Volumes 1-4
    • Biological effects of cannabidiol on human cancer cells: Systematic review of the literature

      2022, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Different results were obtained using these assays. No significant effect was observed in 5 different studies: in Caco2 cells with 10 and 20 μg/mL CBD [75], in DLD-1 cells up to 5 μM CBD [74], in AGS, SW480 and HT-29 cells from 0.5 to 10 μM CBD [77], in HCT116 cells up to 2.5 μM [71], 5 μM [74] and 10 μM of CBD [66]. While on other studies there was a significant reduction in cell viability in 7 studies, in particular in DLD-1 and in HCT116 cells with 8 μM of CBD [70], in SW480 with 10 μM [66], in HNSCC cells from 0.1 to 15 μM [68], in SCC-25 cells from 30 to 300 μM [69], in PANC-1 cells from 12.5 to 100 μM [73] and in HepG2 cells from 5 to 30 μg/mL [48].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text