Abstract
Previous research has shown that targets whose physical and vocal attractiveness do not match (one channel being high and the other being low in attractiveness) elicit more negative impressions. The present study replicated this result and showed that the mediator and, hence, the reason for this effect is not simply a perception that the face and voice are discrepant but rather some disappointment with the less attractive channel. The finding that perceivers are overly disappointed with the less attractive channel is consistent with a large literature indicating that effects of negative events such as unattractive face or voice are stronger than effects of positive events.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
-
Recall that disappointment with the less attractive channel was constructed from two separate variables: disappointment with the face and disappointment with the voice. Conceptually, neither of these two variables can fully explain the Physical × Vocal attractiveness interaction and neither can fully mediate the effects of this interaction on favorability scores. Indeed, regression analyses showed that although disappointment with the voice was significantly predicted from the Physical × Vocal interaction (p < .05), disappointment with the face was not (p > .20). In the mediation analysis, disappointment with the face was significantly related to favorability (p < .01) but disappointment with the voice was not (p > .16). Thus, it is disappointment with the less attractive channel that accounts better for the full effects of the face-voice discrepancy on interpersonal impressions.
References
Adams, G. R. (1977). Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Human Development, 20, 217–239.
Alicke, M. D., Smith, R. H., & Klotz, M. L. (1986). The role of faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 381–389.
Ambady, N., & Rule, N. (2007). Thin slices of behavior. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1–9.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
Berry, D. S. (1990). Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141–153.
Berry, D. S. (1992). Vocal types and stereotypes: Joint effects of vocal attractiveness and vocal maturity on personal perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 41–54.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 158–215). New York: Academic Press.
Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluation and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152–1162.
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.
Hamilton, D. L., & Huffman, L. J. (1971). Generality of impression formation processes for evaluative and nonevaluative judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 200–207.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror…the importance of looks in everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hodges, B. H. (1974). Effect of valence on relative weighting in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 378–381.
Hodgins, H. S. (1991). Creating confirmation: Potential biases in spontaneous questions, answers, and conclusions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
Jarvis, B. G. (2006). MediaLab (version 2006) [computer software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
Miyake, K., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Beyond personality impressions: Effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on false consensus, social comparison, affiliation, and assumed and perceived similarity. Journal of Personality, 61, 411–437.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanation. Psychological Review, 105, 131–142.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.
Vonk, R. (1993). The negativity effect in trait ratings and in open-ended descriptions of persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 269–278.
Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67–82.
Zuckerman, M., & Hodgins, H. S. (1993). Developmental changes in the effects of the physical and vocal attractiveness stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 349–364.
Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotype: Replication and elaboration. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 97–112.
Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Elkin, C. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253–272.
Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Hodgins, H. S. (1991). Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 545–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuckerman, M., Sinicropi, V. When Physical and Vocal Attractiveness Differ: Effects on Favorability of Interpersonal Impressions. J Nonverbal Behav 35, 75–86 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0106-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0106-5