Skip to main content

4 Principles of Taxonomy and Classification: Current Procedures for Naming and Classifying Organisms

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Paleoanthropology

Abstract

Taxonomy deals with the naming and classification of organisms and is an integrative part of biological systematics, the science of biodiversity. The information provided by taxonomic research is a fundamental basis for all fields of biology. Current taxonomy focuses on multicharacter integrative approaches, considering all potentially useful sources of information provided by the various fields of biology. The resulting supraspecific classification should be based on the genealogy of organisms, that is, on a phylogenetic analysis, to be objectively testable. However, for pragmatical reasons, a classification based on overall similarity and diagnostically relevant characters might be a heuristically important step in taxonomy and should be perceived as an approximation to a classification tested by phylogenetic methods. The nested levels in a classification of organisms are usually not only named but also ranked, that is, a set of hierarchical terms like genus, family, and class, are applied to reflect the hierarchical structure of the classification. Assigning these so-called Linnaean categories to a classification is (1) a voluntary action to make a classification notionally more easy to access; and (2) a linguistic activity that is done subsequent to obtaining the scientific results of the systematic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauhin K (1623) Pinax theatri botanici. Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwelder RE (1967) Taxonomy—a text and reference book. John Wiley & Sons, New York London Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwelder RE, Boyden AA (1952) The nature of systematics. Syst Zool 1: 26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Rukus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431: 1055–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (2003) Invertebrates, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantino PD, de Queiroz K (2000) PhyloCode: A phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature (http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/)

  • Carpenter JM (2003) Critique of pure folly. Bot Rev 69: 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayrat B (2005) Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linn Soc 85: 407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Salle R, Egan MG, Siddall M (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc B 360: 1905–1916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (2002) Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417: 17–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Porter CA, Czelusniak J, Page SL, Schneider H, Shoshani J, Gunnell G, Groves CP (1998) Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9: 585–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths GCD (1974) On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheor 23: 85–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths GCD (1976) The future of Linnaean nomenclature. Syst Zool 25: 168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves C (2001a) Why taxonomic stability is a bad idea, or why are there so few species of primates (or are there?). Evol Anthropol 10: 192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves C (2001b) Primate taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL, Bisby FA (1988) Systematics: the keystone of biology. In: Hawksworth DL (ed) Prospects in systematics (The systematics association special volume no. 36). Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. Translated by DD Davis and R Zangerl. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1969) Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Verlag Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (ed) (1940a) The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1940b) Towards the new systematics. In: Huxley J (ed) The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edn. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroeceology and conservation. Tree 19: 464–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longino JT (1993) Scientific naming. Natl Geogr Res Explor 9: 80–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Mägdefrau K (1992) Geschichte der Botanik, 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Jena New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RD (2002) Primatology as an essential basis for biological anthropology. Evol Anthropol Suppl 1: 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1995) Systems of ordering data. Biol Philos 10: 419–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Ashlock PD (1991) Principles of systematic zoology, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York etc

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Bock WJ (2002) Classifications and other ordering systems. J Zool Syst Evol Res 40: 169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minelli A (2004) Fossils, genes and adaptation. TREE 20: 14–15 (a review of Valentine, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, Johnson WE, Zhang YP, Ryder OA, O'Brien SJ (2001) Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon KC, Carpenter JM (2000) On the other “phylogenetic systematics.” Cladistics 16: 298–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon KC, Carpenter JM (2003) The PhyloCode is fatally flawed, and the “Linnaean” system can easily be fixed. Bot Rev 69: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson C, Rosen DE (1977) Review of ichthyodectiform and other mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 158: 81–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel F, Rouse GW (2003) Ceci n'est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature. J Zool Syst Evol Res 41: 162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Hector A (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405: 212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasnitsyn AP (2002) Order Hymenoptera Linné, 1758. In: Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ (eds) History of insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Boston London, pp 242–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richter S, Sudhaus W (2004) Vorspann zu den Kontroversen in der phylogenetischen Systematik der Metazoa. Sber Ges Naturf Freunde Berlin (NF) 43: 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh RT (2000) Biological systematics: principles and applications. Cornell University Press, Ithaca London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh RT (2003) The Linnaean system and its 250-year-persistence. Bot Rev 69: 59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1961) Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spamer EE (1999) Know thyself: responsible science and the lectotype of Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758. Proc Acad Natl Sci Philos 149: 109–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE, Samways MJ (1995) Inventorying and monitoring. In: Heywood VH (ed) Global biodiversity assessment. United Nations environment programme. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 453–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhaus W, Rehfeld K (1992) Einführung in die Phylogenetik und Systematik. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Jena New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavaré S, Marshall CR, Will O, Soligo C, Martin RD (2002) Using the fossil record to estimate the age of the last common ancestor of extant primates. Nature 416: 726–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine JW (2004) On the origin of phyla. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane- Wright RI (2001) Methods of taxonomy. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 5. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 589–606

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wägele J-W (2005) Foundations of Phylogenetic systematics. Verlag F Pfeil, München [English translation of Gundlagen des Phylogenetischen Systematik. Verlag F Pfeil, München 2nd, revised edition 2001]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeham- Dawson A, Morris S, Tubbs P (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bull Zool Nomenclat 59: 282–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler QD (2005) Losing the plot: DNA “barcodes” and taxonomy. Cladistics 21: 405–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler QD, Raven PH, Wilson EO (2004) Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science 303: 285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Will KW, Rubinoff D (2004) Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20: 47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2003) The encyclopedia of life. TREE 18: 77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston JE (1999) Describing species—practical taxonomic procedure for biologists. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ohl, M. (2007). 4 Principles of Taxonomy and Classification: Current Procedures for Naming and Classifying Organisms. In: Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics