How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2015 Barcoding of Cryptic Stages of Marine Brown Algae Isolated from Incubated Substratum Reveals High Diversity in Acinetosporaceae (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae)
Akira F. Peters, Lucía Couceiro, Konstantinos Tsiamis, Frithjof C. Küpper, Myriam Valero
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

To identify cryptic stages of marine brown macroalgae present in the “bank of microscopic forms”, we incubated natural substrata of different geographical origins and isolated emerging Phaeophyceae into clonal cultures. A total of 431 clones were subsequently identified by barcoding using 5′-COI. A proportion of 98% of the isolates belonged to the Ectocarpales. The distribution of pairwise genetic distances revealed a K2P divergence of 1.8% as species-level cut-off. Using this threshold, the samples were ascribed to 83 different species, 39 (47%) of which were identified through reference sequences or morphology. In the Ectocarpaceae, 16 lineages of Ectocarpus fulfilled the barcode criterion for different species, while three putative new species were detected. In the Chordariaceae, numerous microthalli were microstages of known macroscopic taxa. A separate cluster contained Hecatonema maculans and other microscopic species. Taxa traditionally classified in Acinetosporaceae were split in two species-rich groups containing Pylaiella and Hincksia in one and Acinetospora in the other. Feldmannia species were present in both clusters. The present study shows that the germling emergence method is suited to reveal the diversity of hidden life-history stages, albeit with a bias towards early successional species.

INTRODUCTION

Natural substrata in the marine phytobenthic zone receive a “rain” of algal reproductive cells, which after settling form the so-called “bank of algal microscopic forms” (Hoffmann & Santelices, 1991). Different “crypticisms” complicate the identification of the members of this biota. Such algae may be microscopic species (cryptic size), they may represent the microscopic form of well-known macroalgae (cryptic stage), they may hardly present discernible morphological characters (cryptic morphology), or they may include different species of similar morphology (cryptic species).

The study of macroalgal microstages in situ is difficult, and knowledge on this part of the life history comes mainly from culture studies in the laboratory. Following the discovery of microscopic gametophytes in kelp (Sauvageau, 1915), such stages were detected in many species through the isolation of cultures from meiospores produced on the macroscopic sporophytes (e.g. Sauvageau, 1917), or inversely by following the development of zygotes after gamete fusions between zoids produced on macroscopic gametophytes (e.g. Tatewaki 1966). Although such studies provided a general knowledge of the alternation of generations in many species, the ecological role of the “bank of microscopic forms” as supplier of recruits is little studied (e.g. Chapman, 1984; see also references in Robuchon et al., 2014).

Incubation of natural substratum in a nutrient-rich and herbivore-free (Lotze et al., 2001) environment and subsequent isolation of developing germlings appears the logical approach to studying the natural diversity of the microscopic stages. In the present article we refer to this technique as “germling emergence method” in analogy to the “seedling emergence method” for land plants (Roberts, 1981). The approach has, though, rarely been used for marine macroalgae. Ramirez & Müller (1991) and Müller & Ramírez (1994) isolated small brown algae from incubated substrata (scrapings and millimetre-sized fragments of larger algae, small pebbles and sand grains) collected at Easter Island and the Juan Fernandez Archipelago off Chile. They morphologically identified eight strains appearing in culture, which all represented new records, showing the potential of the approach to increase floristic knowledge of smaller taxa escaping standard methods of phytogeographic surveys.

Combining germling emergence with DNA barcoding allows identifying isolates more rapidly if reference sequences are present. Zuccarello et al. (2011) and West et al. (2012) used several substratum-grown isolates for their molecular-morphological revision of small red algae of the Erythropeltidales. Robuchon et al. (2014) identified juvenile kelp sporophytes emerging in culture from cryptic stages present on field-collected substratum. By a similar approach (germling emergence followed by molecular identification using specific primers), Couceiro et al. (unpublished) have characterised cryptic stages of Ectocarpus spp.

The aim of the present paper was to use the germling emergence method in combination with 5′-COI barcoding to identify the diversity of small brown algae that is hidden in the bank of microscopic forms. The species obtained belonged mainly to the Ectocarpales and included numerous representatives of little-studied groups such as Acinetosporaceae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Field material

Collections were realised at historically well-studied localities (Roscoff, Northeast Atlantic Ocean (Cardinal, 1964), and Naples, western Mediterranean (Cormaci et al., 2012)) as well as several localities in the less intensely studied Eastern Mediterranean (Tsiamis et al., 2013), including Cyprus where a first comprehensive checklist has appeared only recently (Tsiamis et al., 2014; Table 1). Also, a small number of samples came from Jeju Island, Korea. Abiotic natural substrata, such as rock fragments, pebbles and old shells, were collected on the shore at low tide, by snorkelling in near-surface habitats, or by SCUBA diving. In the latter cases, to avoid contamination with spores from surface water, the collecting tubes (15 or 50 ml FALCON tubes) were filled with sterile seawater in advance of the dive and not opened before reaching the sampled depth.

Incubation of substratum

After transport or posting of the samples to the laboratory of the first author, the substrata were placed in 90 mm Petri dishes filled with 35 ml culture medium (Provasoli-enriched natural autoclaved sea water, Starr & Zeikus, 1993) and incubated at 15°C in natural light at a north-facing window. Preliminary experiments showed that with this dish size nutrients were not depleted too fast, and the cultures were amenable to examination under a stereomicroscope. They also revealed that the absence of gastropod or polychaete grazers in the samples was crucial for the emergence of macroalgal germlings. Decreasing the surface of the incubated substratum to about 0.5 cm2 was found an efficient way to exclude these grazers. Small copepods, in contrast, rather played a positive role, as they prevented diatom proliferation. There was thus no need to add germanium dioxide, which might have affected growth of brown algae (Wang, 1993).

Isolation of strains

Clonal strains of filamentous brown algae were isolated after 1–3 months by cutting and pipetting fragments of emerging algae (Fig. 1) under the stereomicroscope; green and red algae were not sampled. From each dish we isolated 1–5 individuals, taking care to sample isolates exhibiting different morphologies, for example, erect filaments with ribbon-shaped versus discoid plastids, prostrate algae of different filament densities and cell shapes, or microcrusts. Duplicate isolates from the same dish revealed by identical sequences (see below) were excluded from further analyses because they possibly originated by direct reproduction during cultivation and not from different original individuals. Additional clones of ectocarpoid algae were isolated directly from field material. In several of these, as in a few isolates from emerging germlings, identification was possible based on morphological characters. Clones isolated from incubated substratum and those directly from field material, either macroscopic (≥5mm) or microscopic (<5mm), are together henceforth referred to as “environmental isolates” (categories Sub, MA, Mi, respectively, in  Table 2 (f04_03.tif)Table 2 (f04_03.tif) available on-line as supplementary material,  doi/10.7872/crya.v36.iss1.2015.S1 (03_Peters_Supp_mat_CRYA_2015_36_S1.pdf)).

Table 1.

Collecting information

t01a_03.gif

continued.

t01b_03.gif

Figs 1–3.

1. Pebble with emerging filamentous algae after seven weeks in culture. 2. Distribution (y-axis) of the total of 124750 pairwise genetic K2P distances (PWDs) of 5′-COI (568 bp) of 500 sequences of brown algae, in intervals of 0.5% (x-axis). Position of the barcode gap indicated by an arrow, with 4162 intraspecific (1.5%) and 120544 interspecific distances (>2.5%). A total of 44 PWDs lay in the interval between 1.5 and 2.5%. The largest 4337 PWDs (>20.5%) are not shown. 3. Distribution (y-axis) of the 2027 PWDs between 0.045% and 4.05%, in intervals of 0.05% (x-axis). Based on these data, the species-limit cut-off was placed at 1.8% (arrow).

f01_03.jpg

Barcoding

For identification by DNA barcoding we chose partial cytochrome c oxidase I (5′-COI), a marker recently much used in larger red and brown algae (e.g., Saunders, 2005; Le Gall & Saunders, 2010; Mattio & Payri, 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Saunders & McDevit, 2012, 2013; Yang et al., 2014). COI sequences of reference taxa (category RG in Table 2) are scarce for Ectocarpales because previous molecular phylogenies employed rather nrITS, Rubisco spacer (Stacheafter Crain et al., 1997) or rbcL (Siemer et al., 1998). The most comprehensive phylogenetic work dedicated to the Ectocarpales (Silberfeld et al., 2011) included 34 taxa, however it provided 5′-COI only for 17 of these. In addition, morphological identification of Ectocarpales is difficult, for example, of 1466 COI sequences of Ectocarpales publicly available in the Barcode of Life Databases (BOLD) on 27 December 2014, 75% were referred to as “undetermined Ectocarpales”, and another 4% determined only to genus level. The samples determined to species level belonged to just 25 species, mostly with comparatively large and easily identifiable fronds. We therefore sequenced 5′-COI of 45 clonal cultures available from previous collections, representing 39 well-identified species of the Ectocarpales, many of which had been used in life-history studies. In addition, some of the environmental isolates, which we could identify morphologically, served as 14 additional reference strains (category RN in  Table 2 (f04_03.tif) available on line,  doi/10.7872/crya.v36.iss1.2015.S1 (03_Peters_Supp_mat_CRYA_2015_36_S1.pdf)). They included several type species of higher taxa described in the past. For Ectocarpaceae, the reference taxa included representatives of all lineages so far known (Stache-Crain et al., 1997; Peters et al., 2010a, b). In Ectocarpus and Kuckuckia, available (Stache-Crain et al., 1997; Peters et al., 2010a, b) or newly generated ITS1 and Rubisco spacer sequences (Peters, unpublished data) allowed classification in the lineages defined by Stache-Crain et al. (1997). In this work, we append their lineage designations to the species names in Ectocarpus (e.g. E. fasciculatus5b, Ectocarpus sp.2a). If these lineages included more than a single species according to our data (e.g. Ectocarpus sp.1b), a further appendix was used to identify the strain origin.

Supplementary Fig.

1. Sampling of 263 different 5′-COI sequences from 500 brown algae. A majority of 198 sequences was sampled once.

fS01_03.jpg

Supplementary Fig.

2. Sampling frequency of 118 species of brown algae raised from incubated substratum. A majority of 64 species were sampled once.

fS02_03.jpg

DNA was extracted from a few mg of living algae using the NucleoSpin® 96 Plant Kit. Partial 5′-COI sequences (658bp) were amplified using the primers GAZF2 and GAZR2 (Lane et al., 2007). PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 20 µL containing 0.2 µM of each primer, 150 µM of each dNTP, 2 mM of MgCl2, 1x GoTaq® Flexibuffer, 0.85 units of GoTaq® FlexiDNA polymerase, and 2 µL of 1:30 diluted template DNA. Cycling conditions included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified and sequenced with both forward and reverse primers at Genoscope facilities (Evry, France). The sequences were aligned manually with Se-Al™ v2.0a11 (Sequencing Alignment Editor Version 2.0 alpha 11;  http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/) and meticulously checked for correctness by inspecting the chromatogrammes. Pairwise Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) distances between sequences and neighbour-joining (NJ) trees based on them were calculated in PAUP4.0b10. Sequences were deposited in EEDB/GenBank/DDBJ, with accessions from LM994971 to LM995441.

Vouchers (herbarium specimens or permanent microscopic preparations) of 23 field-collected reference taxa and two putatively new species were deposited in the phycological herbarium of the Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle at Paris (PC). Strains are maintained in the culture collection of the first author.

A species-level cut-off was estimated from the analysis of the distribution of pairwise K2P distances (see Results). In this article a “species” is understood to contain isolates diverging from each other by less than the cut-off value.

RESULTS

Small algae developed in most cultures of incubated substrata (Fig. 1). For example, only three out of the 60 dishes (5%) incubated in September 2011 showed no brown algae, possibly due to overlooked grazers. In positive dishes, the emergent algae belonged mostly to the green and brown lineages, while red algae were rare. Of the 430 isolated clones of brown algae, 362 emerged from incubated abiotic substratum, while 34 were from microscopic and 34 from macroscopic field individuals (Table 3).

For molecular identification, we used a final alignment of 500 sequences (Table 2), which included 25 reference sequences obtained from public databases or BOLD and 59 newly determined sequences of additional reference taxa, of which 24 belonged to the Ectocarpaceae. Pruning duplicate sequences left 263 different sequences, of which 198 were sampled once. The most frequent sequence (a haplotype of Hincksia granulosa) was encountered 35 times (Supplementary Fig. 1).

The 124750 PWDs showed divergence values from 0 (n=1669; sequence identity) to 44%, with a maximum of n = 12328 in the interval between 14 and 14.5%. In the distribution of distance intervals (Fig. 2), the “barcode gap” corresponding to the transition from intraspecific to interspecific distances was located between 1.4% PWD and 2.8% PWD (66 pairs). Within this “valley”, the first large interval without any hit lay between 1.75 and 1.85% PWD (Fig. 3). We therefore chose a K2P sequence divergence of 1.8% as the species-level cut-off, and using this limit, the 500 sequences were broken down to 118 species, of which 71 were represented by the reference taxa. Of the 83 species present among the environmental isolates, 39 (47%) were identified to species because of sequence similarity with reference taxa or morphology (Table 3). A proportion of 93% of the environmental isolates belonged to the Ectocarpales. Of the 118 species, 64 were sampled once. The most frequent species isolated was Hincksia granulosa (isolated 43 times), followed by Hecatonema maculans (n=39), Ectocarpus sp.2a (35), Ectocarpus siliculosusla (35), E. fasciculatus5b (28), and Myrionema strangulans (27) (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Table 3.

Summary statistics. Note that some morphologically recognised environmental isolates also served as reference sequences

t03_03.gif

NJ phylograms were calculated from all 500 sequences (available upon request from the first author) and from the 263 different sequences (Figs 410). The trees must not be interpreted as rigorous phylogenies because of limited resolution of the barcoding sequence. Nevertheless, some of the clusters were in agreement with orders or families revealed in recent multi-gene phylogenies (Silberfeld, 2010, 2011). Within Ectocarpales, the families Scytosiphonaceae, Ectocarpaceae and Chordariaceae formed monophyletic groups (Figs 67). A clade close to Chordariaceae included microscopic species, such as Hecatonema maculans (Fig. 8). Species classified in Acinetosporaceae according to previous studies formed two separate clades (Figs 910).

At the main study site in Brittany, Roc'h Ar Bleiz (=Le Loup), close to Roscoff, sampling was repeated three times, in spring 2011 (22 isolates representing 9 species), autumn 2011 (181 isolates, 25 species), and spring 2012 (39 isolates, 12 species). Of the 30 taxa isolated at this site, only four were not obtained in autumn 2011. Similarly, 63 samples (32 species) from Greece were isolated in spring 2011 and 10 more samples (7 species), from other Greek sites, in spring 2012. A single species of the total of 33 species was not present among the isolates from 2011. In contrast, the two western Mediterranean sites sampled both in spring 2012, were more different from each other: Naples (49 isolates, 17 species) and Ischia (29 isolates, 13 species) shared only five species.

Comparisons between regions (Brittany, Italy representing the western Mediterranean, Greece+Cyprus the eastern Mediterranean, Korea) revealed that Brittany shared ten out of its 39 species with the Mediterranean regions (Fig. 11). The western Mediterranean shared 11 of its 25 species with the Eastern Mediterranean, from where we obtained in total 35 species. Of the six species isolated from Korea, two were also present in Europe, where they were isolated in the Eastern Mediterranean.

DISCUSSION

The present work for the first time applied the germling emergence method with subsequent barcoding to a large number and diversity of brown algae, and has shown the feasibility of this approach. However, sampling the natural diversity required a considerable effort. The largest collection at one of the sites (Roc'h Ar Bleiz) resulted in 28 species from 179 isolates; of these species, 12 (43%) were sampled once. Isolation of 24 and 39 additional clones yielded only one and three further species, respectively. A number of 250 isolates appears thus necessary to obtain a reasonable coverage of the species diversity present on the substratum at a given site.

Fig. 4.

Neighbour-Joining phylogram displaying 5′-COI clustering of 263 different brown algal sequences obtained from 430 clonal cultures raised from environmental samples. A number of 25 public reference sequences (labels in red) and 59 new reference sequences (species names in black) allowed identification of 312 environmental samples (strain designations in black). Strain designations of undetermined samples (n=118) are printed in grey. Designations of eight major clusters, in part agreeing with known higher taxa, are provided. Bootstrap support ≥ 95% from 1000 resamplings is shown by thicker black lines. To facilitate recognition, the roots of the six clusters comprising the Ectocarpales are printed in thick grey lines, note that these do not have strong statistical support. Duplicate (identical) sequences were pruned to calculate this tree. A phylogram of all sequences (duplicates not pruned) is available upon request from the first author. Enlarged sub-sectors of the tree are provided in Figs 510.

f04_03.jpg

Fig. 5.

Detail of Fig. 4 comprising the outgroup (Chondrus crispus) and early branching brown algal lineages. See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f05_03.jpg

Fig. 6.

Detail of Fig. 4 comprising the clusters corresponding to Scytosiphonaceae, Ectocarpaceae and Petrospongium. See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f06_03.jpg

Fig. 7.

Detail of Fig. 4 showing a cluster corresponding to Chordariaceae. See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f07_03.jpg

Fig. 8.

Detail of Fig. 4 showing a cluster containing microscopic species similar to Hecatonema maculans (“Hecatonema cluster”). See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f08_03.jpg

Fig. 9.

Detail of Fig. 4 showing a cluster containing species classified in Pylaiella, Hincksia and Feldmannia (PHF group). See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f09_03.jpg

Fig. 10.

Detail of Fig. 4 showing a cluster containing species classified in Acinetospora and Feldmannia (“Acinetospora cluster”). See legend to Fig. 4 for explanations.

f10_03.jpg

Fig. 11.

Distribution of brown algal species isolated from four sampling areas. WMED: West Mediterranean, EMED: East Mediterranean. Diagram produced on-line entering data in  http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/.

f11_03.jpg

The isolated taxa did hardly represent the diversity of all cryptic stages present in the field, as there was obviously a bias favouring rapidly growing and proliferating early successional species. By selecting filamentous brown algae we deliberately excluded other life forms, for instance, we did not isolate the green and red algae, germlings of Giraudyopsis stellifer Dangeard (Chrysomeridales), Dictyotales, Fucales, sporophytes of Desmarestia and most of the kelp sporophytes; only the samples of kelp sporophytes developing in our dishes of spring 2011 (Robuchon et al., 2014) and a sporophyte from Korea (see below) were raised and identified. In addition, imperfect match of PCR primers may have excluded amplification of DNA of certain lineages. For instance, in six of our eight Greek isolates morphologically identified as Sphacelariales the DNA did not amplify. Improved primers may overcome this problem.

Despite their commonness in the field, the proportion of red algae was insignificant in the raw cultures. For the emergence of Rhodophyta, the culture medium, culture conditions or other factors may have been less suitable. Our method did also not allow distinction between long-term cryptic stages and reproductive cells having settled just before collection of the substrata. On the other hand, the germling emergence method does only reveal the presence of living microstages and thus avoids contamination by fragments of algal fronds or non-surviving propagules, which might compromise metabarcoding approaches using direct isolation of DNA from substratum.

The clones obtained belonged mostly to the Ectocarpales, an order in which reference taxa are limited. Comparison with published as well as new reference sequences obtained from our culture collection of well-identified taxa led to the identification of 47% of the 83 species encountered. We regard this success as encouraging, however it points to the need of comprehensive revisions in difficult groups. Morphological examination of the isolated strains has only started and further scrutiny may result in the identification of additional species.

Our data suggested a species-level cut-off at a K2P divergence of about 1.8% in the Ectocarpales, which is slightly larger than the value of 1.2% inferred for Laminariales and Desmarestiales (Yang et al., 2014). However, this value is arbitrary and should not be mistaken as a strict biological border. Placing the cut-off at 2.7% (the upper end of the “valley” in the distribution of PWD values; Fig. 3) would have rendered only 39 additional values intraspecific, affecting 5 species pairs. Pairs of sequences showing divergences of 1–3% (in our data set n = 523 pairs; 0.42% of all 124750 values; 27 species involved) are situated in a transition zone; such taxa may be examples of recent or ongoing speciation possibly still capable of forming fertile hybrids. Additional markers, particularly from the nuclear genome, and populations-size sampling would be needed to examine the genetic exchange in these cases in detail. At larger distances, genetic exchange may cease: for example, Ectocarpus siliculosus1a and the genome-sequenced Ectocarpus from Peru (lineage 1c), which may produce viable but meiosis-incapable hybrids in the laboratory (Peters et al., 2004), showed a divergence of 3.5%; E. siliculosus and E. crouaniorum, which in nature may form similar hybrids (Peters et al., 2010a), showed a divergence of 5.4%.

In the following we discuss particular results, in the order (from top to bottom) the taxa appear in Figs 410.

Basal taxa (outgroups)

There were so far no COI sequences of Discosporangium mesarthrocarpum (Discosporangiales) and Verosphacela silvae (Onslowiales); their positions in the tree and a number of amino acid substitutions compared to most other brown algae confirmed that these orders form basal branches in brown algal phylogenies (Fig. 5). The two species developed in substratum samples from Greece, obtained by diving at 25 and 15m, respectively, and were identified in culture because of their distinctive characters (Kawai et al., 2007; Alongi et al., 2007). Verosphacela silvae, so far only known from the original description based on fixed field material, was isolated for the first time into culture and represents a new record for Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean.

So far there are only two COI sequences from Sphacelariales in the public databases, maybe due to primer mismatches (see above). Like Cladostephus and Sphacelaria radicans (Dillwyn) C. Agardh (JX572040, not used in our analyses), our sequences of two unidentified species of Sphacelaria from Greece (Fig. 5) showed a deletion of 3nt at positions 98–100 of the alignment, which is absent in other brown algae and apparently represents a synapomorphy of the Sphacelariales. Shared amino acid differences to all other taxa (20/219; ∼9%) are likewise particular to this order.

Three isolates from the Mediterranean belonged to Cutleria multifida (Fig. 5); one from Naples was collected as macroscopic female gametophyte, two (from Greece and Cyprus) developed from substratum. Their COI showed 1.3 and 1.7% genetic divergence to the reference sequence of an isolate from Brittany (Silberfeld et al., 2010).

The five reference sequences of Laminariales (Fig. 5) formed a clade, in which a substratum-grown kelp sporophyte from Korea was nested. Its sequence was similar to public data for Ecklonia radiata (C. Agardh) J. Agardh (BLAST: 98% identity, AB775229, Kawai et al., 2013) and Eisenia arborea Areschoug (BLAST: 97% identity, FJ409145, McDevit & Saunders, 2009). Our isolate belongs to Ecklonia cava, which is the only species of Ecklonia recorded at Jeju Island (Ga Youn Cho, personal communication). There is no published COI sequence yet for E. cava.

1. Scytosiphonaceae

The members of the Ectocarpales were contained in six main clusters. The first one, Scytosiphonaceae (Fig. 6, upper cluster), consisted of Colpomenia peregrina, Scytosiphon lomentaria, and Petalonia fascia. Two substratum-raised cultures from Roscoff were highly similar to reference sequences from the published data for Colpomenia and a field gametophyte of Scytosiphon lomentaria collected by ourselves at Naples. However, our two Scytosiphon isolates differed by 4.6 and 4.2%, respectively, from another reference sequence of S. lomentaria from an individual collected in Brittany (Silberfeld et al., 2010), suggesting the presence of cryptic species within the genus Scytosiphon in Europe. Three sequences of substratum-raised P. fascia from Brittany and a macroscopic field sample from Greece showed between 1.38 and 1.54% divergence to the reference sequence of P. fascia collected by Silberfeld et al. (2010) in Normandy.

2. Ectocarpaceae and Petrospongium

A cluster of 24 species (from 151 original sequences; Fig. 6) contained members of the Ectocarpaceae and the published sequence of Petrospongium berkeleyi. The little studied Petrospongiaceae was proposed by Silberfeld et al. (2011), where it was resolved as sister group to Ectocarpaceae in a multi-gene phylogeny. We generated COI of all known lineages of Ectocarpus, Kuckuckia, and of an additional isolate of Spongonema tomentosum, confirming the position of Spongonema in the Ectocarpaceae found by Silberfeld et al. (2011). The pairwise distance data suggested that our sequences of Ectocarpus belonged to 16 different species; some species pairs showed genetic distances slightly above our species-level cut-off, these are possibly cases of recent speciation. Other lineages were clearly more separated. We propose to reinstate the species E. subulatus Kützing (Kützing, 1843) for individuals referred to as lineage 2d by Stache-Crain et al. (1997). Our reference isolate of this species was raised from mud collected in a salt marsh at Pill, Somerset, England. The site is the type locality of E. amphibius Harvey (Harvey, 1846), which is a later synonym of E. subulatus (Kim, 2010). Two more isolates of E. subulatus, with identical COI sequences, were raised from substratum collected in a freshwater-influenced saltmarsh habitat at Terenez, Bay of Morlaix, Brittany. Based on unpublished rbcL sequences, Kim (2010) treated individuals of E. subulatus from Korea as variation of E. siliculosus1a but our COI sequences strongly suggest that this lineage represents an independent species, showing >6% genetic distance to other Ectocarpi, including an autapomorphic non-synonymous substitution L > F. E. subulatus is able to tolerate elevated temperatures (Bolton, 1983; isolate from the southernmost Ectocarpus population in the Gulf of Mexico at Port Aransas, Texas) and salinity stress (Dittami et al., 2012; isolate from fresh water, Australia). Another Ectocarpus isolate from Korea belonged to a lineage (1d) not studied by Stache-Crain et al. (1997). This is probably the species Kim (2010) referred to as E. acutus Setchell & N.L. Gardner.

Our data included three different lineages of Kuckuckia, which were polyphyletic and not markedly separated from Ectocarpus. Two of them were also found among clones raised from substratum, however only in Mediterranean samples, in agreement with the principal distribution of Kuckuckia in warm-temperate regions (Pedersen, 1989).

Putative new species — From substratum collected at Ischia, Italy, we obtained seven independent isolates of a so far unknown lineage of Ectocarpus. All isolates of this entity had highly similar sequences (PWD ≤ 0.3%). The distance to the closest lineage of Ectocarpus (E. siliculosusla) was 3.1%, suggesting that this Ectocarpus from Ischia is a separate, possibly undescribed species. Isolate BLZ11-180 from Roscoff was also a member of the Ectocarpus-Kuckuckia cluster but herein different from all other lineages. The plastids were ribbon-shaped (this is the diagnostic character of Ectocarpaceae; Peters & Ramírez, 2001; Silberfeld et al., 2011) and the morphology did not differ from that of Ectocarpus (Fig. 12). The three isolates CY12-01, CY12-03 and CY12-07, which possessed a single COI sequence, clustered with Ectocarpaceae and Petrospongium on a long branch. They showed ribbon-shaped plastids, dichotomous branching, phaeophycean hairs, terminal slender plurilocular and lateral unilocular sporangia (Fig. 13). BLZ11-180 and the three isolates from Cyprus likely represent two so far undescribed species.

3. Chordariaceae

A cluster of 39 species (from 119 sequences, 94 thereof from environmental isolates; Fig. 7) included Chordaria flagelliformis, the type species of the Chordariaceae. Reference sequences from 23 species allowed identification of 55 environmental isolates. By DNA barcoding we not only recognised life forms with erect fronds, which would also be amenable to identification by morphology, but also cryptic stages that are part of a heteromorphic life history. Examples among our samples were filamentous microscopic stages of Myrionema strangulans, Myriotrichia claviformis and Striaria attenuata. These species possess haploid-diploid life histories involving filamentous prostrate microscopic gametophytes (Loiseaux, 1967; Peters 1988, 1991a). Striaria attenuata has been isolated previously at Roscoff from a field-collected microstage (Loiseaux 1969, as Myriotricha sp.). The sporophytes of M. strangulans and M. claviformis are generally found as epiphytes on Ulva and Scytosiphon, respectively, and are possibly obligate epiphytes on these algae. Molecular sex markers, so far only present for Ectocarpus (Ahmed et al., 2014) or cross-fertility experiments would be required to prove that the microstages we isolated are gametophytes.

Figs 12–13.

12. Strain BLZ11-180 from Roscoff. putatively a new species of Ectocarpus. Erect filament with ribbon-shaped plastids, rhizoids (Rh), and a plurilocular sporangium (P). 13. Strain CY12-01 from Cyprus, putatively a new species. Habit, with phaeophycean hair (H), plurilocular (P) and juvenile unilocular (U) sporangium. Insert: Ribbon-shaped plastids in erect filament.

f12_03.jpg

There are species in Chordariaceae lacking a macroscopic stage. Because their small size and lack of conspicuous morphological characters render their distinction difficult, DNA barcoding is essential for their reliable identification. For example, the sequence of isolate BLZ11-35 resembled that of Laminariocolax isolates from Chile (L. macrocystis), South Africa (L. eckloniae), and Pacific Canada (unidentified Ectocarpales samples ABMMC12605-10 and MACRO1242-09 in BOLD). Applying the species-limit cut-off at 1.8% PWD, these five samples belong to a single species, probably L. aecidioides known to be present at Roscoff as common endophyte in Laminaria hyperborea (Gunnerus) Foslie (Peters, 2003). Sexuality found in Chilean L. macrocystis has not been demonstrated for Atlantic or North Pacific L. aecidioides. However, unilocular sporangia were described in L. aecidioides from Greenland (Rosenvinge, 1893), which suggests that it might occur more generally in this common kelp endophyte. Another microscopic species, Microspongium tenuissimum, which is likewise not easy to identify morphologically, was known from previous works as endophyte in red algae (Burkhardt & Peters, 1998; Peters, 2003). In the present study, it was raised from abiotic substratum six times in Brittany and once in Italy. At Roscoff it has been reported previously among species appearing in culture (Dangeard, 1970, as Streblonema tenuissimum Hauck). An unidentified ectocarpalean small brown alga in BOLD (MACRO752-07) from Rhode Island, USA, had the same sequence.

In Chordariaceae, a number of 36 clones from 17 species were not identified and possibly represent other microscopic Phaeophyceae or microstages of other species. The eleven reference species not present among the environmental isolates included four taxa the geographical distributions of which do not encompass the sample sites (Chordaria flagelliformis, Dictyosiphon spp.); the lack of their microstages among the environmental samples is not surprising. The other species (Cladosiphon zosterae, Laminariocolax tomentosoides, Laminarionema elsbetiae, Leathesia marina, Mesogloia vermiculata, Spermatochnus paradoxus, Stilophora tenella) are known to occur at or near the study sites (Feldmann, 1954; Peters, unpublished), however we did not find them in the bank of microscopic stages. Their microstages may inhabit environments different from the rock surface, pebbles and shell fragments sampled in our study, or may be too inconspicuous or slow growing to be isolated in our experiments.

4. Hecatonema cluster

A group of eight species (47 sequences) formed a cluster including a large number of microscopic algae that did not form erect filaments and morphologically resembled Hecatonema maculans (= H. terminale (Kützing) Kylin; Fig. 8). We confirmed the identity of these isolates by adding the reference sequence of an isolate of H. maculans from the area of the type (Maine, NW Atlantic) and the habitat (epiphytic on Palmaria palmata; Collins, 1896). Isolates of H. maculans were abundant in Brittany and also present in Greece and Italy. Two isolates from Korea differed from H. maculans by approximately 3.5% and represent North Pacific members of the same genus. Other identified microscopic isolates in this cluster included the reference taxon Myrionema balticum (material from the Western Baltic Sea, close to the type locality) and an isolate from Greece identified in field material as Ascocyclus orbicularis, both found as epiphytes on seagrass. None of the taxa from the Hecatonema cluster has previously been included in molecular phylogenetic studies. The genetic separation of the cluster from Chordariaceae, if confirmed in multi-gene phylogenies, would justify re-instatement of the family Hecatonemataceae (tribu Hécatonématées in Loiseaux, 1967).

5. Acinetosporaceae

The remaining 29 species were forms that based on previous phylogenetic works (Peters & Ramirez, 2001; Silberfeld, 2011) would have been included in Acinetosporaceae, represented in Silberfeld et al. (2011) by Pylaiella littoralis and Hincksia granulosa. Algae in this group possess several discoid plastids per cell and heterotrichy, i.e. they have basal creeping filaments issuing erect, usually monosiphonous filaments; the latter grow by means of intercalary meristematic regions. The life history is of the direct type or involves an alternation of similar generations. Sexuality has been reported for three species, with monoicous gametophytes and anisogamy (Sauvageau 1896a, b; Müller, 1969; Müller & Ramírez, 1994). In our analyses, these algae were placed in two separate clusters.

5A. Pylaiella-Hincksia-Feldmannia cluster — A number of 17 species formed a cluster henceforth referred to as “PHF group” (Fig. 9). From Roscoff we isolated P. littoralis and its cryptic sibling species (Geoffroy et al., 2015), forming a clade together with the North Pacific taxon P. washingtoniensis. The latter is also the host of the virus PlitV-1 (Maier et al., 1998), for which there was so far no molecular identification. The PHF group further included Hincksia hincksiae (the type species of Hincksia; Guiry & Guiry, 2014). The species is morphologically characterised by adaxial series of conical plurilocular sporangia (Cardinal 1964). This feature was also present in our reference material isolated as epiphyte on its common host Saccorhiza polyschides at Roscoff. Another Hincksia, H. granulosa, was the most frequent isolate from Roscoff and also found twice in Greece, which constitutes new records of this species for Greece. However, COI did not place H. hincksiae and H. granulosa in a single clade. In addition to Pylaiella and Hincksia, the PHF cluster contained a minute Feldmannia found as epiphyte on Cystoseira sp. at Plougonvelin, Brittany. This Feldmannia may correspond to F. lebellii, the type species of Feldmannia Hamel (Hamel, 1939). Two isolates from Italy and one from Greece agreed morphologically with F. simplex, which is another minute species of Feldmannia (Sauvageau, 1933; Cardinal, 1964). The putative F. lebelii and F. simplex formed a clade together with three undetermined species. In total, the PHF cluster included ten undetermined species.

5B. Acinetospora cluster — The cluster of the last 12 species (Fig. 10) included Acinetospora crinita, the type species of Acinetosporaceae, characterised by monosporangia in addition to plurilocular and rare unilocular reproductive organs (Sauvageau, 1899). A. crinita was not included in molecular phylogenies of the brown algae, except for a very early study on 5S ribosomal RNA (Lim et al., 1986). We isolated A. crinita both from Brittany and Greece. The cluster also included three species currently placed in Feldmannia. A number of seven isolates of F. irregularis, for which we used the available culture of the host of the FirrV-1 virus from the Canary Islands (Müller & Frenzer, 1993) as reference, developed from environmental isolates from Italy and Greece. Feldmannia globifera, isolated four times from Roscoff and once from Naples, was morphologically identified in culture because of characteristic globular plurilocular sporangia, born directly on the filaments or on short pedicels branching at right angles from the filaments (Cardinal, 1964). Feldmannia mitchelliae, characterised by its symmetrical ovoid plurilocular sporangia, was also a member of the Acinetospora cluster. In F. mitchelliae, COI revealed cryptic speciation between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean: whereas our two isolates of this taxon from Brittany had an identical COI, our four isolates from Greece and Italy, despite showing a similar morphology, were separated from the Atlantic strains by 5.3–5.7% PWDs. In addition to the five identified species, the Acinetospora cluster included seven species yet to determine.

Our study has shown that barcoding of small brown algae obtained by the germling emergence method is practicable to reveal the diversity of cryptic stages of the Ectocarpales, however depending on the availability of reference taxa the identification success differed markedly among taxonomic subgroups (Table 4). COI resolved three of the presently accepted families of the Ectocarpales (Silberfeld et al., 2011) as clades. Scytosiphonaceae was confirmed but represented by only a few samples, which were all identified. Maybe the microstages of other members of this family are too rare or slow growing to be well represented among the emergent algae. Ectocarpaceae was also confirmed. Similar to Desmarestiales (Yang et al., 2014), this family is comprehensively sampled (Stache-Crain et al., 1997, Peters et al., 2010a, b; this paper), and exemplifies a group in which COI sequences, combined with a diagnostic morphological character, can reveal undescribed species. A major taxonomic problem in the Ectocarpaceae consists in finding the scientific names corresponding to the different lineages. Chordariaceae, with a number of reference species available, was also confirmed and showed that DNA barcoding permits identification of microscopic taxa and microstages, which would hardly be recognisable morphologically. Other microscopic isolates belonged to a genetically different group of microscopic species, which included Hecatonema maculans and other microcrusts so far classified in Myrionema, such as Ascocyclus orbiculare (=Myrionema magnusii) and Myrionema balticum. Genetic barcoding of cultures will add to the revision of these difficult taxa. Filamentous algae resembling Acinetospora, Pylaiella, Hincksia and Feldmannia are less well studied than Ectocarpus. Their considerable morphological diversity (Hamel, 1939; Cardinal, 1964) was born out by a large genetic diversity found in the present account, however the scarcity of reference sequences left 60% of the species inferred from COI data unidentified. There will be no progress without thorough and comprehensive taxonomic revision of these forms. Maybe our cultures at closer scrutiny will reveal morphological characters that allow identification of more taxa. Because of the isomorphic life history, characteristic morphological features described from field material are more likely to appear in culture in these algae than in the micoscopic stages of the Chordariaceae.

Table 4.

Distribution of species among COI clusters in Ectocarpales

t04_03.gif

The new sequences from the present study will be useful references in future surveys of small brown algal diversity. As exemplified above by two endophytic genera in Chordariaceae, comparing our data with those present in BOLD will also help to identify previously collected samples that were only roughly classified taxonomically and therefore suppressed in the public databases.

The germling emergence method coupled to DNA barcoding has obvious advantages for capturing cryptic elements of the macroalgal flora of remote locations, where high access and logistics costs, limited time in the field and laboratory facilities typically complicate algal surveys. In particular and in addition to these aspects, it enhances the potential of scientific diving at such locations (Sayer et al., 2013) considering the ease of collection of substratum samples in sterile tubes by a research diver. Environmental 5′-COI barcoding has previously found to uncover significant diversity in microalgal groups such as dinoflagellates (Stern et al., 2010; the present study has detected a higher proportion of environmental isolates than the study on dinoflagellates) — arguably, culturing and isolation of germlings emerging from substratum samples adds a new tool with added scope and enhanced capability of detecting cryptic biodiversity to environmental barcoding approaches. Recent examples, albeit with limited numbers of samples, were contributions to marine macroalgal surveys at Adelaide Island, a high-latitude West Antarctic locality (Mystikou et al., 2014) and Ascension, a remote tropical island (Tsiamis et al., 2015).

Even if efficient for a rapid and large-scale screening of species diversity, the single gene DNA-barcoding approach used in this study has been criticized since it relies on the assumption that a single gene genealogy is representative of the species phylogeny (DeSalle et al., 2005; Chase et al., 2005). Problems linked to a single-gene approach, such as incomplete lineage sorting or introgression, were reviewed by Leliaert et al. (2014) for DNA-based species delimitation in algae. In order to improve our knowledge of species diversity and delineation within the Ectocarpales, the strategy would be to increase the gene sampling to two or more, unlinked genes and to combine methods of phylogenetics and population genetics with various data and criteria (referred to as integrative taxonomy, Dayrat, 2005) to selected taxa.

The brown algae of Roscoff are historically well studied (Feldmann, 1954; Cardinal, 1964; Feldmann & Magne, 1964) and evident changes are noticed rapidly because of constant observations. However, DNA barcoding is required for monitoring modifications in the community composition of cryptic stages and species. Data like those presented in this work may help to follow the floristic changes that are expected to happen in the future due to the introduction of Indo-Pacific fouling algae travelling by ships through the Northeast and Northwest passages.

Acknowledgements.

We wish to thank Dieter G. Müller, Hiroshi Kawai, Ergün Taskin and Eric C. Henry for help with identification of selected field material and cultures, Dieter G. Müller for five reference strains from his culture collection, Declan C. Schroeder for a raw isolate and Ga Youn Cho for information on the distribution of Korean kelps. Sampling in Italy greatly benefitted from the advice and logistic support by members of the Stazione Zoologica di Napoli. Our work was funded by the EU INTERREG programme France (Channel)-England (project MARINEXUS), the EU FP7 “capacities” specific programme ASSEMBLE (grant no. 227788), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France; projects BI-CYCLE ANR-2010-BLAN-1727 and IDEALG ANR-10-BTBR-04-02), the project “Bibliothèque du vivant” (France: INRA-MNHN-INEE-CNRS), the TOTAL Foundation (Project “Brown algal biodiversity and ecology in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea”), and the Marine Biological Association (Plymouth, UK: Ray-Lankester fellowship to AFP). This work also received support from the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland pooling initiative. MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011) and contributing institutions.

REFERENCES

1.

S. Ahmed , J.M. Cock , E. Pessia , R. Luthringer , A. Cormier , M. Robuchon , L. Sterck , A.F. Peters , S.M. Dittami , E. Corre , M. Valero , J.-M. Aury , D. Roze , Y. Van De Peer , J. Bothwell , G.B. Marais & S.M. Coelho , 2014 — A haploid system of sex determination in the brown alga Ectocarpus sp. Current biology 24: 1945–1957. Google Scholar

2.

G. Alongi , M. Cormaci & G. Furnari , 2007 — Verosphacela silvae sp. nov. (Onslowiaceae, Phaeophyceae) from the Mediterranean Sea. Phycological research 55: 42–46. Google Scholar

3.

L. Bittner , C.E. Payri , A. Couloux , C. Cruaud , B. De Reviers & F. Rousseau , 2008 — Molecular phylogeny of the Dictyotales and their position within the Phaeophyceae, based on nuclear, plastid and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 49: 211–226. Google Scholar

4.

J.J. Bolton , 1983 — Ecoclinal variation in Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) with respect to temperature growth optima and survival limits. Marine biology 73: 131–138. Google Scholar

5.

E. Burkhardt & A.F. Peters , 1998 — Molecular evidence from nrDNA ITS sequences that Laminariocolax (Phaeophyceae, Ectocarpales sensu lato) is a worldwide clade of closely related kelp endophytes. Journal of phycology 34: 669–681. Google Scholar

6.

A. Cardinal , 1964 — Etude sur les Ectocarpacées de la Manche. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 15: 1–86. Google Scholar

7.

A.R.O. Chapman , 1984 — Reproduction, recruitment and mortality in two species of Laminaria in Southwest Nova Scotia. Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 78: 99–109. Google Scholar

8.

M.W. Chase , N. Salamin , M. Wilkinson , J.M. Dunwell , R.P. Kesanakurthi , N. Haidar & V. Savolainen , 2005 — Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B 360: 1889–1895. Google Scholar

9.

J.M. Cock , L. Sterck , P. Rouzé , D. Scornet , A.E. Allen , G. Amoutzias , V. Anthouard , F. Artiguenave , J. -M. Aury , J.H. Badger ., 2010 — The Ectocarpus genome and the independent evolution of multicellularity in the brown algae. Nature 465: 617–621. Google Scholar

10.

F.S. Collins , 1896 — Notes on New England Marine Algae-VII. Bulletin of the Torrey botanical club 23: 458–462. Google Scholar

11.

M. Cormaci , G. Furnari , M. Catra , G. Alongi & G. Giaccone , 2012 — Flora marina bentonica del Mediterraneo: Phaeophyceae. Bollettino dell' accademia gioenia di Catania 45: 1–508. Google Scholar

12.

B. Dayrat , 2005 — Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological journal of the Linnean society 85: 407–415. Google Scholar

13.

P.J.L. Dangeard , 1970 — Réflexions sur quelques Ectocarpales nées en culture et particulièrement sur les Streblonema. Le botaniste 53: 23–61 Google Scholar

14.

R. Desalle , M.G. Egan & M. Siddall , 2005 — The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B 360: 1905–1916. Google Scholar

15.

S.M. Dittami , A. Gravot , S. Goulitquer , S. Rousvoal , A.F. Peters , A. Bouchereau , C. Boyen & T. Tonon , 2012 — Towards deciphering dynamic changes and evolutionary mechanisms involved in the adaptation to low salinities in Ectocarpus (brown algae). The plant journal 71: 366–377. Google Scholar

16.

J. Feldmann , 1954 — Inventaire de la flore marine de Roscoff. Algues, champignons, lichens et spermatophytes. Travaux de la station biologique de Roscoff, nouvelle série, supplément 6: 1–152. Google Scholar

17.

J. Feldmann & M.F. Magne , 1964 — Additions à l'inventaire de la flore marine de Roscoff. Algues, Champignons, Lichens. Travaux de la station biologique de Roscoff, nouvelle série, supplément 15: 1–23 Google Scholar

18.

A. Geoffroy , S. Mauger , A. De Jode , L. Le Gall & C. Destombe , 2015 — Molecular evidence for the coexistence of two sibling species in Pylaiella littoralis (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) along the Brittany coast. Journal of phycology (in press). Google Scholar

19.

M.D. Guiry & G.M. Guiry , 2014 — AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway,  http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 27 December 2014. Google Scholar

20.

G. Hamel , 1939 — Phéophycées de France. Paris, 432 p. Google Scholar

21.

A.J. Hoffmann & B. Santelices , 1991 — Banks of algal microscopic forms: hypotheses on their functioning and comparisons with seed banks. Marine ecology progress series 79: 185–194. Google Scholar

22.

W.H. Harvey , 1846 — Phycologia britannica. London, Reeve & Benham. Google Scholar

23.

H. Kawai , T. Hanyuda , S.G.A. Draisma & D.G. Müller , 2007 — Molecular phytogeny of Discosporangium mesarthrocarpum (Phaeophyceae) with a reinstatement of the order Discosporangiales. Journal of phycology 43: 186–194 Google Scholar

24.

H. Kawai , T. Hanyuda , L.M. Ridgway & K. Holser , 2013 — Ancestral reproductive structure in basal kelp Aureophycus aleuticus. Scientific reports 3: 2491. DOI:10.1038/srep02491. Google Scholar

25.

H.-S. Kim , 2010 — Ectocarpaceae, Acinetosporaceae, Chordariaceae. In: H.-S. Kim & S.-M. Boo (eds), Algal Flora of Korea, Vol. 2, No 1. Heterokontophyta: Phaeophyceae: Ectocarpales. Marine brown algae I. Incheon, National Institute of Biological Resources, 195 p. Google Scholar

26.

M.S. Kim , M.Y. Yang & G.Y. Cho , 2010 — Applying DNA barcoding to Korean Gracilariaceae (Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie, Algologie 31: 387–401. Google Scholar

27.

F.T. Kützing , 1843 — Phycologia generalis. Leipzig, F.A. Brockhaus. Google Scholar

28.

C.E. Lane , S.C. Lindstrom & G.W. Saunders , 2007 — A molecular assessment of northeast Pacific Alaria species (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) with reference to the utility of DNA barcoding. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 44: 634–48. Google Scholar

29.

L. Le Gall & G.W. Saunders , 2010 — DNA barcoding is a powerful tool to uncover algal diversity: a case study of the Phyllophoraceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) in the Canadian flora. Journal of phycology 46: 374–389. Google Scholar

30.

C. Leblanc , C. Boyen , O. Richard , G. Bonnard , J.M. Grienenberger & B. Kloareg , 1995 — Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the rhodophyte Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales). Gene content and genome organization. Journal of molecular biology 250: 484–495. Google Scholar

31.

F. Leliaert , H. Verbruggen , P. Vanormelingen , F. Steen , J.M. Lopez-Bautista , G.C. Zuccarello , O. De Clerck , 2014 — DNA-based species delimitation in algae. European journal of phycology 49: 179–196. Google Scholar

32.

B.-L. Lim , H. Kawai , H. Hori & S. Osawa , 1986 — Molecular evolution of 5S ribosomal RNA from red and brown algae. Japanese journal of genetics 61: 169–176. Google Scholar

33.

S. Loiseaux , 1967 — Recherche sur les cycles de développement des Myrionématacées (Phéophycées). I–II. Hécatonématées et Myrionématées. Revue générale de botanique 74: 529–578. Google Scholar

34.

S. Loiseaux , 1969 — Sur une espèce de Myriotrichia obtenue en culture à partir de zoïdes d'Hécatonema maculans. Phycologia 8: 11–15. Google Scholar

35.

H.K. Lotze , B. Worm & U. Sommer , 2001 — Strong bottom-up and top-down control of early life stages of macroalgae. Limnology and oceanography 46: 749–757. Google Scholar

36.

G.C. McDevit & G.W. Saunders , 2009 – On the utility of DNA barcoding for species differentiation among brown macroalgae (Phaeophyceae) including a novel extraction protocol. Phycological research 57: 131–141. Google Scholar

37.

I. Maier , S. Wolf , N. Delaroque , D.G. Müller & H. Kawai , 1998 — A DNA virus infecting the marine brown alga Pilayella littoralis (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) in culture, European journal of phycology 33: 213–220. Google Scholar

38.

L. Mattio & C. Payri , 2010 — Assessment of five markers as potential barcodes for identifying Sargassum subgenus Sargassum species (Phaeophyceae, Fucales). Cryptogamie, Algologie 31: 467–485. Google Scholar

39.

D.G. Müller , 1969 — Anisogamy in Giffordia (Ectocarpales). Naturwissenschaften 56: 220. Google Scholar

40.

D.G. Müller , 1981 — Culture studies on reproduction of Spermatochnus paradoxus (Phaeophyceae, Chordariales). Journal of phycology 17: 384–389. Google Scholar

41.

D.G. Müller & K. Frenzer , 1993 — Virus infections in three marine brown algae: Feldmannia irregularis, F. simplex, and Ectocarpus siliculosus. Hydrobiologia 260/261: 37–44. Google Scholar

42.

D.G. Müller & M.E. Ramírez , 1994 — Filamentous brown algae from the Juan Fernandez Archipelago (Chile): Contribution of laboratory culture techniques to a phytogeographic Survey. Botanica marina 37: 205–211. Google Scholar

43.

A. Mystikou , A.F. Peters , A.O. Asensi , K.I. Fletcher , P. Brickle , P. Van West , P. Convey & F.C. Küpper , 2014 — Seaweed biodiversity in the south-western Antarctic Peninsula: surveying macroalgal community composition in the Adelaide Island/ Marguerite Bay region over a 35-year time span. Polar biology 37: 1607–1619. Google Scholar

44.

M.-P. Oudot-Le Secq , J.M. Fontaine , S. Rousvoal , B. Kloareg & S. Loiseaux-De Goer , 2001 — The complete sequence of a brown algal mitochondrial genome, the ectocarpale Pylaiella littoralis (L.) Kjellm. Journal of molecular evolution 53: 80–88. Google Scholar

45.

M.-P. Oudot-Le Secq , B. Kloareg & S. Loiseaux-De Goer , 2002 — The mitochondrial genome of the brown alga Laminaria digitata: a comparative analysis. European journal of phycology 37: 163–172 Google Scholar

46.

P.M. Pedersen , 1989 — Studies on Kuckuckia spinosa (Fucophyceae, Sorocarpaceae): life history, temperature gradient experiments, and synonymy. Nordic journal of botany 9: 443–447. Google Scholar

47.

A.F. Peters , 1988 — Culture studies of a sexual life history in Myriotrichia clavaeformis (Phaeophyceae, Dictyosiphonales). British phycological journal 23: 299–306. Google Scholar

48.

A.F. Peters , 1991a — Primer registro de Striaria attenuata (Phaeophyceae, Dictyosiphonales) en Sudamérica, y su ciclo de vida en cultivos de laboratorio. Revista Chilena de historia natural 64: 261–269. Google Scholar

49.

A.F. Peters , 1991b — Field and culture studies of Streblonema macrocystis sp. nov., Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) from Chile, a sexual endophyte of giant kelp. Phycologia 30: 365–377. Google Scholar

50.

A.F. Peters , 1992 — Culture studies on the life history of Dictyosiphon hirsutus (Dictyosiphonales, Phaeophyceae) from South America. British phycological journal 27: 177–183. Google Scholar

51.

A.F. Peters & E. Ellertsdóttir , 1996 — New record of the kelp endophyte Laminarionema elsbetiae (Phaeophyceae, Ectocarpales) at Helgoland and its life history in culture. Nova Hedwigia 62: 341–349. Google Scholar

52.

A.F. Peters & E. Burkhardt , 1998 — Systematic position of the kelp endophyte Laminarionema elsbetiae (Phaeophyceae, Ectocarpales sensu lato) inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Phycologia 37: 114–120. Google Scholar

53.

A.F. Peters & M.E. Ramírez , 2001 — Molecular phylogeny of small brown algae, with special reference to the systematic position of Caepidium antarcticum (Adenocystaceae, Ectocarpales). Cryptogamie, Algologie 22: 187–200. Google Scholar

54.

A.F. Peters , 2003 — Molecular identification, taxonomy and distribution of brown algal endophytes, with emphasis on species from Antarctica. In: A.R.O. Chapman , R.J. Anderson , V. Vreeland , I.R. Davison (eds), Proceedings of the 17th International Seaweed Symposium. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 293–302. Google Scholar

55.

A.F. Peters , D. Scornet , D.G. Müller , B. Kloareg & J.M. Cock , 2004 — Inheritance of organelles in artifical hybrids of the isogamous multicellular chromist alga Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae). European journal of phycology 39: 235–242. Google Scholar

56.

A.F. Peters , S. Van Wijk , G.Y. Cho , D. Scornet , T. Hanyuda , H. Kawai , D.C. Schroeder , J.M. Cock & S.M. Boo , 2010a — Reinstatement of Ectocarpus crouaniorum Thuret in Le Jolis as a third common species of Ectocarpus (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) in Western Europe, and its phenology at Roscoff, Brittany. Phycological research 58: 157–170. Google Scholar

57.

A.F. Peters , A.D. Mann , C.A. Córdova , J. Brodie , J.A. Correa , D.C. Schroeder & J.M. Cock , 2010b — Genetic diversity of Ectocarpus (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) in Peru and northern Chile, the area of origin of the genome-sequenced strain. New phytologist 188: 30–41. Google Scholar

58.

M.E. Ramírez & D.G. Müller , 1991 — New records of benthic marine algae from Easter Island. Botanica marina 34: 133–137. Google Scholar

59.

H.A. Roberts , 1981 — Seed banks in soils. Advances in applied biology 6: 1–55. Google Scholar

60.

M. Robuchon , L. Couceiro , A.F. Peters , C. Destombe & M. Valero , 2014 — Examining the bank of microscopic stages in kelps using culturing and barcoding. European journal of phycology 49: 128–133. Google Scholar

61.

L.K. Rosenvinge , 1893 — Grønlands Havalger. Meddelelser om Grønland 3: 763–981. Google Scholar

62.

G.W. Saunders , 2005 — Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philosophical transactions of the royal society (B) 360: 1879–1888. Google Scholar

63.

G.W. Saunders & D.C. Mcdevit , 2012 — Methods for DNA barcoding photosynthetic protists emphasizing the macroalgae and diatoms. Methods in molecular biology 858: 207–222. Google Scholar

64.

G.W. Saunders & D.C. Mcdevit , 2013 — DNA barcoding unmasks overlooked diversity improving knowledge on the composition and origins of the Churchill algal flora. BMC ecology 13: 9. Google Scholar

65.

C. Sauvageau , 1896a — Sur la fécondation hétérogamique d'une algue phéosporée. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'académie des sciences, Paris 123: 360–361. Google Scholar

66.

C. Sauvageau , 1896b — Observations relatives à la sexualité des Phéosporées. II. Ectocarpus secundus. Journal de botanique 10: 388–398. Google Scholar

67.

C. Sauvageau , 1899 — Les Acinetospora et la sexualité des Tiloptéridacées. Journal de botanique 13: 107–127. Google Scholar

68.

C. Sauvageau , 1915 — Sur la sexualité hétérogamique d'une Laminaire (Sacchorhiza bulbosa). Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'académie des sciences, Paris 161: 796–799. Google Scholar

69.

C. Sauvageau , 1917 — Sur un nouveau type d'alternance des générations chez les algues brunes (Dictyosiphon foeniculaceus). Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'académie des sciences, Paris 164: 829–831. Google Scholar

70.

C. Sauvageau , 1933 — Sur quelques Phéosporées de Guéthary. VII. Ectocarpus simplex Crouan. Bulletin de la station biologique d'Arcachon 30: 80–92. Google Scholar

71.

M.D.J. Sayer , F.C. Küpper , P. Van West , C.M. Wilson , H. Brown & E. Azzopardi , 2013 — Managing scientific diving operations in a remote location: the Canadian high Arctic. Diving and hyperbaric medicine 43: 239–243 Google Scholar

72.

B.L. Siemer , W.T. Stam , J.L. Olsen & P.M. Pedersen , 1998 — Phylogenetic relationships of the brown algal orders Ectocarpales, Chordariales, Dictyosiphonales and Tilopteridales (Phaeophyceae) based on rubisco large subunit and spacer sequences. Journal of phycology 34: 1038–1048. Google Scholar

73.

T. Silberfeld , J.W. Leigh , H. Verbruggen , C. Cruaud , B. de Reviers & F. Rousseau , 2010 — A multi-locus time-calibrated phylogeny of the brown algae (Heterokonta, Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae): Investigating the evolutionary nature of the “brown algal crown radiation”. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 56: 659–674. Google Scholar

74.

T Silberfeld , M.-F.L.P Racault , R.L. Fletcher , A. Couloux , F. Rousseau & B. de Reviers , 2011 — Systematics and evolutionary history of pyrenoid-bearing taxa in brown algae (Phaeophyceae). European journal of phycology 46: 361–377. Google Scholar

75.

B. Stache-Crain , D.G. Müller & L.J. Goff , 1997 — Molecular systematics of Ectocarpus and Kuckuckia (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) inferred from phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and plastid-encoded DNA sequences. Journal of phycology 33: 152–68. Google Scholar

76.

R.C. Starr & J.A. Zeikus , 1993 — UTEX-The culture collection of algae at the University of Texas at Austin. Journal of phycology 29, Suppl.: 1–106. Google Scholar

77.

R. Stern , A. Horak , R. Andrew , R.A. Andersen , F.C. Küpper , M.-A. Coffroth , I. Jameson , M. Hoppenrath , B. Véron , F. Kasai , J. Brand & P.J. Keeling , 2010 — Environmental barcoding reveals massive dinoflagellate diversity in marine environments.- PLoS ONE 5(11), e13991. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013991 Google Scholar

78.

M. Tatewaki , 1966 — Formation of a crustaceous sporophyte with unilocular sporangia in Scytosiphon lomentaria. Phycologia 6: 62–66. Google Scholar

79.

K. Tsiamis , P. Panayotidis , A. Economou-Amilli & C. Katsaros , 2013 — Seaweeds of the Greek coasts. I. Phaeophyceae. Mediterranean marine science 14: 141–157. Google Scholar

80.

K. Tsiamis , E. Taskin , S. Orfanidis , P. Stavrou , M. Argyrou , P. Panayotidis , T. Tsioli , B.A. Cicek , M. Marcou , F.C. Küpper , 2014 — Checklist of seaweeds of Cyprus (Mediterranean Sea). Botanica marina 57: 153–166. Google Scholar

81.

K. Tsiamis , A.F. Peters , D. Shewring , A.O. Asensi , P Van West & F.C. Küpper , 2015 — Marine benthic algal flora of Ascension Island, South Atlantic. Journal of the marine biological association of the United Kingdom. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315414000952 Google Scholar

82.

X.Y. Wang , 1993 — Morphological study on the inhibitory effect of germanium dioxide on growth and development of brown algae. Scientific papers of the institute of algological research, Faculty of science, Hokkaido university 9: 33–91 Google Scholar

83.

J.A. West , S. Loiseaux-De Goër & G.C. Zuccarello , 2012 — Upright Erythropeltidales (Rhodophyta) in Brittany, France and description of a new species, Erythrotrichia longistipitata. Cahiers de biologie marine 53: 255–270. Google Scholar

84.

E.C Yang , A.F. Peters , H. Kawai , R. Stern , T. Hanyuda , I. Bárbara , W.F. Prud'Homme Van Reine & F.C. Küpper , 2014 — Ligulate Desmarestia (Desmarestiales, Phaeophyceae) revisited: D. japonica sp. nov. and D. dudresnayi differ from D. ligulata. Journal of phycology 50: 149–161. Google Scholar

85.

G.C. Zuccarello , H.S. Yoon , H.J. Kim , L. Sun , S. Loiseaux-De Goër & J.A. West , 2011 — Molecular phylogeny of the upright Erythropeltidales (Compsopogonophyceae, Rhodophyta): Multiple cryptic lineages of Erythrotrichia carnea. Journal of phycology 47: 627–637. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] 1. Dedicated to Dieter G. Müller on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

© 2015 Adac. Tous droits réservés
Akira F. Peters , Lucía Couceiro , Konstantinos Tsiamis , Frithjof C. Küpper , and Myriam Valero "Barcoding of Cryptic Stages of Marine Brown Algae Isolated from Incubated Substratum Reveals High Diversity in Acinetosporaceae (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae)," Cryptogamie, Algologie 36(1), 3-29, (1 February 2015). https://doi.org/10.7872/crya.v36.iss1.2015.3
Published: 1 February 2015
KEYWORDS
Acinetospora
biogeography
brown algae
COI
COX1
cryptic stages
cytochrome c oxidase 1
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Access provided by
Back to Top