Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T17:39:36.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Forgiveness interventions for optimal close relationships: problems and prospects

from Part III - Effective interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

C. Raymond Knee
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Harry T. Reis
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Get access

Summary

After providing a historical context for understanding the three core constructs explored in this chapter, forgiveness, optimal functioning and close relationships, the chapter offers a conceptual analysis of each construct. This is followed by a review of basic research on forgiveness in close relationships and of efficacy research on forgiveness interventions. Existing research is briefly critiqued before addressing how relationships can be improved through forgiveness. We identify a number of issues that need to be addressed in this task, including context, how forgiveness occurs, type of forgiveness offered, relationship history, the focus and beneficiary of forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. This lays the groundwork for considering forgiveness interventions that change the way people think, feel and behave in daily life to promote optimal functioning. These interventions target underlying psychological processes that amplify effects and change downstream consequences. Finally, prayer is considered as a way in which forgiveness might be related to optimal functioning that goes beyond the identification of dynamic psychological processes for interventions. The chapter concludes by noting that there is evidence to support the value placed on forgiveness in close relationships but that it is not yet clear how best to facilitate forgiveness in such a way that it optimizes relationship development.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allemand, M., Amberg, I., Zimprich, D., & Fincham, F. D. (2007). The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 199217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, T. W., Rhody, M., Schoolmeesters, S., & Ellingson, C. (2011). Supporting special-needs adoptive couples: Assessing an intervention to enhance forgiveness, increase marital satisfaction, and prevent depression. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 933955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In Worthington, E. L. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 79106). Philadelphia: Templeton Press.Google Scholar
Beach, S. R. H., & Whisman, M. (2012). Relationship distress: Impact on mental illness, physical health, children, and family economics. In Beach, S. R. H., Heyman, R., Smith Slep, A., & Foran, H. (Eds.), Family problems and family violence (pp. 91100). New York, NY: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, S., Selby, E., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Forgiveness and relationship satisfaction: Mediating mechanisms. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 551559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2010). The flourishing literature on flourishing relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, B., & Yi, J. (2010). Marital status and satisfaction five years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 225235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2005). The nonobvious social psychology of happiness. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 162167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, J., Struthers, C. W., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). Dispositional and state forgiveness: The role of self-esteem, need for structure, and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 371380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenell, D. L. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15, 446460.Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D. (2015). Facilitating forgiveness using group and community interventions. In Joseph, S. (Ed.), Positive Psychology in Practice (pp. 659680). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Marital conflict: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 4777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9, 239251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2007). Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 260268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Towards a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 7281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 542545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, F. D., Lambert, N. M., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Faith and unfaithfulness: Can praying for your partner reduce infidelity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 649659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Slotter, E. B., Luchies, L. B., Walton, G. M., & Gross, J. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24, 15951601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandhi, M. (2000). The collected works of Mahatma Gandhi (2nd Rev. ed.). New Delhi, India: Veena Jain Publications.Google Scholar
Gordon, K., Baucom, D., & Snyder, D. (2005). Treating couples recovering from infidelity: An integrative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 13931405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, K. C., Burton, S., Porter, L. (2004). Predicting the intentions of women in domestic violence shelters to return to partners: Does forgiveness play a role? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 331338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, K. C., Hughes, F. M., Tomcik, N. B., Dixon, L. J., & Litzinger, S. (2009). Widening circles of impact: The effects of forgiveness on family functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, L. S., Warwar, S. H., & Malcolm, W. M. (2010). Emotion-focused couples therapy and the facilitation of forgiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 2842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Self-forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 621637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrave, T.D., & Sells, J.N. (1997). The development of a forgiveness scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 4162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heintzelman, A., Murdock, N. L., Krycak, R. C., & Seay, L. (2014). Recovery from infidelity: Differentiation of self, trauma, forgiveness, and posttraumatic growth among couples in continuing relationships. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3(1), 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, P. L., & Allemand, M. (2010). Forgivingness and adult patterns of individual differences in environmental mastery and personal growth. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, M.R. (1993). Forgiveness and the intrinsic value of persons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 342352.Google Scholar
Hoyt, W. T., Fincham, F., McCullough, M. E., Maio, G. & Davila, J. (2005). Responses to interpersonal transgressions in families: Forgivingness, forgivability, and relationship-specific effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 375394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, S. T., & Enright, R. D. (2000). Forgiveness and anger-related emotions in Taiwan: Implications for therapy. Psychotherapy, 37, 7179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karney, B. R. (2010). A science of healthy relationships is not a healthy relationship science. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 4246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., & Beach, S. R. H. (2013). Shifting toward cooperative goals: How partner-focused prayer facilitates forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 20, 184197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., Stillman, T. F., Graham, S. M., & Beach, S. R. M. (2010). Motivating change in relationships: Can prayer increase forgiveness? Psychological Science, 21, 126132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundahl., B. W., Taylor, J., Stevenson, R., & Roberts, K. D. (2008). Process-based forgiveness interventions: A meta-analytic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 465478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, F. (2007). Forgive for love: The missing ingredient for a healthy and lasting relationship. San Francisco, CA: HarperOne/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Maniaci, M. R., & Reis, H. T. (2010). The marriage of positive psychology and relationship science: A reply to Fincham and Beach. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauger, P. A., Perry, J. E., Freeman, T., Grove, D. C., McBride, A. G., & McKinney, K. E. (1992). The measurement of forgiveness: Preliminary research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170180.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McCullough, M.E., Fincham, F.D., & Tsang, J. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2010). Evolved mechanisms for revenge and forgiveness. In Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (eds.), Human aggression and violence (pp. 221239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K. (2008). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 19, 161171.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K. (2008). Forgiveness in marriage: Putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 171175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNulty, J. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Beyond Positive Psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 101110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K. & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: a contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, J. (1998). The “ideal” of forgiveness: A philosopher’s exploration. In Enright, R.D. & North, J. (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp. 1545). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paleari, G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: The Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21, 194209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paleari, F. G, Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Inequity in forgiveness: Implications for personal and relational well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 297324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Paul, G. L. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 109118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelucci, S., Regalia, C., Paleari, F. G., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Self-forgiveness in romantic relationships: It matters to both of us. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 541549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, B.M., & Mania, E.W. (2012). The antecedents and consequences of interpersonal forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Personal Relationships, 19, 304325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In Worthington, E. L. Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185206). New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Schumann, K. (2012). Does love mean never having to say sorry? Associations between relationship satisfaction, perceived apology sincerity, and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 9971010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strelan, P., McKee, I., Dragana, C., Cook, L., & Shaw, S. (2013). For whom do we forgive? A functional analysis of forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 20, 124139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoresen, C. E., Luskin, F., & Harris, A. H. S. (1998). Science and forgiveness interventions: Reflections and recommendations. In Worthington, E. L. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 321340). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Wade, N. G., Hoyt, W. T., Kidwell, J. E., & Worthington, E. L. (2014). Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 154170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2003). Overcoming interpersonal offenses: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness?, Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 343353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, N. G., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Meyer, J. E. (2005). But do they work? A meta-analysis of group interventions to promote forgiveness. In Worthington, E. L. Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 423440). New York, NY: Brunner/Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, A. J., & Hirayama, R. (2010), Missing pieces of a positive relationship science: Comment on Fincham and Beach. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 3641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 23, 7382.Google Scholar
Witvliet, C. V. O., DeYoung, N. J., Hofelich, A. J., & DeYoung, P. A. (2011). Compassionate reappraisal and emotion suppression as alternatives to offense-focused rumination: Implications for forgiveness and psychophysiological well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 286299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1994). Marriage counseling: A Christian approach. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 13, 166173.Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L., Jennings, D. J., & DiBlasio, W. (2010). Interventions to promote forgiveness in couple and family context: Conceptualization, review, and analysis. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 38, 231245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, E. L., Sandage, S. J., & Berry, J. W. (2000). Group interventions to promote forgiveness. In McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 228253). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L. Jr., Witvliet, C. V. O., Pietrini, P., & Miller, A. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health and wellbeing: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 291302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×