Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T14:32:25.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electoral rule choice in transitional economies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

JESSICA CLEMENT
JESSICA CLEMENT*
Affiliation:
Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne, University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France
*
*Email: jessica.clement@univ-paris1.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Arab Spring and subsequent global unrest sparked a debate about whether a fourth wave of democracy emerged in the global political arena starting in 2010. A key issue arises from these emerging democracies, or ‘countries in transition’, about what types of government institutions will be adopted by the new democracies. The previous literature on advanced democracies shows the economic structure of a nation impacted its choice of electoral rule system. This paper looks at what determines electoral rule choice in transitional nations. Using a panel database with 65 transitional countries with data for 18 years (1995 to 2012), this paper tests the argument that more coordinated market economies (CMEs) tend to adopt more proportional representative electoral rule systems during a political transition. Findings show that countries characterized as CMEs due to widespread primary education, which supports co-specific assets, and prominent industrial sectors have more proportional electoral rule systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 895 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2001), ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, The American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, B. (2016), ‘Institutional Complementarities in the Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Capitalism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, The American Political Science Review, 89 (3):634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2001), ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, World Bank Economic Review, 15 (1): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K. (2001), ‘District Magnitude, Electoral Formula, and the Number of Parties’, European Journal of Political Research, 39 (2): 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizberg, I. (2014), ‘Types of Capitalism in Latin America’, Revue Interventions Économiques, [online] 49: 1–26. Available at: file:///Users/utilisateur/Downloads/interventionseconomiques-1772-49-types-of-capitalism-in-latin-america%20(1).pdf [Accessed 17 May 2016].Google Scholar
Blight, G., Pulhman, S. and Torpey, P. (2012), ‘Arab Spring: An Interactive Timeline of Middle East Protests’, [online] The Guardian. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2011/mar/22/middle-east-protest-interactive-timeline [accessed 17 May 2016].Google Scholar
Boix, C. (1999), ‘Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 93 (3): 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, J., Djankov, S. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004), ‘The Regulation of Labor’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (4): 1339–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2007), ‘Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems’, American Political Science Review, 101 (3): 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2010), ‘Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems’, American Political Science Review, 104 (2): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L. (2011), ‘A Forth Wave or a False Start? Democracy After the Arab Spring’, [online] Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2011-05-22/fourth-wave-or-false-start. [accessed 17 May 2016].Google Scholar
Dibben, P. and Williams, C. C. (2012), ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Employment Relations: Informally Dominated Market Economies’, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 51(issue supplement s1):563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M. (1991), ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality, and Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 10 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golosov, G. V. (2010), ‘Party System Classification: A Methodological Inquiry’, Party Politics, 7 (5): 539–560.Google Scholar
Grand, S. (2011),‘Starting in Egypt: The Fourth Wave of Democratization’, [online] Brookings. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/02/10-egypt-democracy-grand. [accessed 17 May 2016].Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., and Gingerich, D. W. (2009), ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy’, British Journal of Political Science, 39 (3): 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, France: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). ‘Global Database on Elections and Democracy’. (accessed May 2015)Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2009), ‘Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the 19th Century’, World Politics, 61 (3): 438–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2011), ‘Inequality and Redistribution. A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions’, Revue Économique, 62 (4): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2012) ‘Two Paths to Democracy’ The Minda De Gunzburg Center for European Studies, CES Papers – Open Forum #1: 1–37.Google Scholar
Jackson, G. and Deeg, R. (2006), ‘How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity’, MPlfG Discussion Paper, 06 (2): 1–48.Google Scholar
Jo Martin, C. and Swank, D. (2012), The Political Construction of Business Interests, Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, L. (2002), ‘Corporatism and Unemployment in the 1980s and 1990s,’ American Sociological Review, 67 (3): 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979), ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Practices in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G. and Marshall, D. R. (2016), ‘Codebook: Coup d’État Events, 1946–2015’, [online] Center for Systemic Peace. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/CSPCoupsCodebook2015.pdf. [accessed 22 June 2016].Google Scholar
Nölke, A. and Vliegenthart, A. (2009), ‘Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe’, World Politics, 61 (4): 670–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, J. (2005), Inequality and Prosperity in Contemporary Capitalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puddington, A. (2012), ‘Freedom in the World 2012: The Arab Uprisings and their Global Repercussions’, [online] Freedom House. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/inline_images/FIW%202012%20Booklet--Final.pdf. [accessed 22 June 2016].Google Scholar
Turner, T. (2006), ‘Industrial Relations Systems, Economic Efficiency and Social Equity in the 1990s’, Review of Social Economy, 64 (1): 93–118. World Development Indicators, The World Bank. (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, E., Wood, G. and Brookes, M. (2006), ‘International Homogenization or the Persistence of National Practices? The Remaking of Industrial Relations in Mozambique’, Industrial Relations, 61 (2): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Women and men in the informal economy: a statistical picture’, (2013), International Labour Office, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar