ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 4, 536-547
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVPerspectiveNEXT

Advancing Computational Toxicology in the Big Data Era by Artificial Intelligence: Data-Driven and Mechanism-Driven Modeling for Chemical Toxicity

Cite this: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 4, 536–547
Publication Date (Web):March 14, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00393
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
Request reuse permissions

    Article Views

    3403

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    115
    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options
    Get e-Alerts
    SUBJECTS:

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    In 2016, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act became the first US legislation to advance chemical safety evaluations by utilizing novel testing approaches that reduce the testing of vertebrate animals. Central to this mission is the advancement of computational toxicology and artificial intelligence approaches to implementing innovative testing methods. In the current big data era, the terms volume (amount of data), velocity (growth of data), and variety (the diversity of sources) have been used to characterize the currently available chemical, in vitro, and in vivo data for toxicity modeling purposes. Furthermore, as suggested by various scientists, the variability (internal consistency or lack thereof) of publicly available data pools, such as PubChem, also presents significant computational challenges. The development of novel artificial intelligence approaches based on public massive toxicity data is urgently needed to generate new predictive models for chemical toxicity evaluations and make the developed models applicable as alternatives for evaluating untested compounds. In this procedure, traditional approaches (e.g., QSAR) purely based on chemical structures have been replaced by newly designed data-driven and mechanism-driven modeling. The resulting models realize the concept of adverse outcome pathway (AOP), which can not only directly evaluate toxicity potentials of new compounds, but also illustrate relevant toxicity mechanisms. The recent advancement of computational toxicology in the big data era has paved the road to future toxicity testing, which will significantly impact on the public health.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 115 publications.

    1. Haoyue Tan, Jinsha Jin, Chao Fang, Ying Zhang, Baodi Chang, Xiaowei Zhang, Hongxia Yu, Wei Shi. Deep Learning in Environmental Toxicology: Current Progress and Open Challenges. ACS ES&T Water 2024, 4 (3) , 805-819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00152
    2. Xuelian Jia, Tong Wang, Hao Zhu. Advancing Computational Toxicology by Interpretable Machine Learning. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (46) , 17690-17706. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00653
    3. Daniel P. Russo, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Katy Goyak, Hua Qian, Hao Zhu. Integrating Concentration-Dependent Toxicity Data and Toxicokinetics To Inform Hepatotoxicity Response Pathways. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (33) , 12291-12301. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02792
    4. Xiliang Yan, Tongtao Yue, David A. Winkler, Yongguang Yin, Hao Zhu, Guibin Jiang, Bing Yan. Converting Nanotoxicity Data to Information Using Artificial Intelligence and Simulation. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (13) , 8575-8637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00070
    5. Elena Chung, Daniel P. Russo, Heather L. Ciallella, Yu-Tang Wang, Min Wu, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Hao Zhu. Data-Driven Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling for Human Carcinogenicity by Chronic Oral Exposure. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (16) , 6573-6588. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00648
    6. Claudio N. Cavasotto, Valeria Scardino. Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (51) , 47536-47546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05693
    7. Haoyue Tan, Jinqiu Wu, Rong Zhang, Chi Zhang, Wei Li, Qinchang Chen, Xiaowei Zhang, Hongxia Yu, Wei Shi. Development, Validation, and Application of a Human Reproductive Toxicity Prediction Model Based on Adverse Outcome Pathway. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (17) , 12391-12403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02242
    8. Jaeseong Jeong, Jinhee Choi. Artificial Intelligence-Based Toxicity Prediction of Environmental Chemicals: Future Directions for Chemical Management Applications. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (12) , 7532-7543. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07413
    9. Haobo Wang, Zhongyu Wang, Jingwen Chen, Wenjia Liu. Graph Attention Network Model with Defined Applicability Domains for Screening PBT Chemicals. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (10) , 6774-6785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c00765
    10. Heather L. Ciallella, Daniel P. Russo, Swati Sharma, Yafan Li, Eddie Sloter, Len Sweet, Heng Huang, Hao Zhu. Predicting Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Based On the Combination of Chemical Structures and Biological Data. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (9) , 5984-5998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01040
    11. Deming Xia, Jingwen Chen, Zhiqiang Fu, Tong Xu, Zhongyu Wang, Wenjia Liu, Hong-bin Xie, Willie J. G. M. Peijnenburg. Potential Application of Machine-Learning-Based Quantum Chemical Methods in Environmental Chemistry. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (4) , 2115-2123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05970
    12. Xian Liu, Dawei Lu, Aiqian Zhang, Qian Liu, Guibin Jiang. Data-Driven Machine Learning in Environmental Pollution: Gains and Problems. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (4) , 2124-2133. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06157
    13. Jeremy Feinstein, Ganesh Sivaraman, Kurt Picel, Brian Peters, Álvaro Vázquez-Mayagoitia, Arvind Ramanathan, Margaret MacDonell, Ian Foster, Eugene Yan. Uncertainty-Informed Deep Transfer Learning of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (12) , 5793-5803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01204
    14. Rui Zhang, Qiuxuan Wu, Xiaoyi Qi, Xiaoxiang Wang, Xuesheng Zhang, Chao Song, Ying Peng, Doug Crump, Xiaowei Zhang. Using In Vitro and Machine Learning Approaches to Determine Species-Specific Dioxin-like Potency and Congener-Specific Relative Sensitivity among Birds for Brominated Dioxin Analogues. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (23) , 16056-16066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05951
    15. Heather L. Ciallella, Daniel P. Russo, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Fabian A. Grimm, Hao Zhu. Revealing Adverse Outcome Pathways from Public High-Throughput Screening Data to Evaluate New Toxicants by a Knowledge-Based Deep Neural Network Approach. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (15) , 10875-10887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02656
    16. Liguo Wang, Lu Zhao, Xian Liu, Jianjie Fu, Aiqian Zhang. SepPCNET: Deeping Learning on a 3D Surface Electrostatic Potential Point Cloud for Enhanced Toxicity Classification and Its Application to Suspected Environmental Estrogens. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (14) , 9958-9967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01228
    17. Zhongyu Wang, Jingwen Chen, Huixiao Hong. Developing QSAR Models with Defined Applicability Domains on PPARγ Binding Affinity Using Large Data Sets and Machine Learning Algorithms. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (10) , 6857-6866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07040
    18. Xiaoqing Wang, Fei Li, Jingwen Chen, Chenglong Ji, Huifeng Wu. Integration of Computational Toxicology, Toxicogenomics Data Mining, and Omics Techniques to Unveil Toxicity Pathways. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (11) , 4130-4138. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09196
    19. Jingwen Chen, (Associate Editor)Siyu Zhang, (Early Career Board)David T. Allen, (Editor-in-Chief)Bala Subramaniam, (Executive Editor)Peter Licence (Executive Editor). Expectations for Manuscripts Contributing to the Field on Management of Synthetic Chemicals in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (9) , 3376-3378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01134
    20. Yu-Tang Wang, Daniel P. Russo, Chang Liu, Qian Zhou, Hao Zhu, Ying-Hua Zhang. Predictive Modeling of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Using Various Machine Learning Approaches. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2020, 68 (43) , 12132-12140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04624
    21. Yong-jian Wang, Yi Ming Ren, Hong-guang Li. Symbolic Multivariable Hierarchical Clustering Based Convolutional Neural Networks with Applications in Industrial Process Operating Trend Predictions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2020, 59 (34) , 15133-15145. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02084
    22. Suqing Zheng, Jun Xiong, Yibing Wang, Guang Liang, Yong Xu, Fu Lin. Quantitative Prediction of Hemolytic Toxicity for Small Molecules and Their Potential Hemolytic Fragments by Machine Learning and Recursive Fragmentation Methods. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2020, 60 (6) , 3231-3245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00102
    23. Zhongyu Wang, Jingwen Chen, Huixiao Hong. Applicability Domains Enhance Application of PPARγ Agonist Classifiers Trained by Drug-like Compounds to Environmental Chemicals. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2020, 33 (6) , 1382-1388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00498
    24. Andy H. Vo, Terry R. Van Vleet, Rishi R. Gupta, Michael J. Liguori, Mohan S. Rao. An Overview of Machine Learning and Big Data for Drug Toxicity Evaluation. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2020, 33 (1) , 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00227
    25. Kazi Asraf Ali, SK Mohin, Puja Mondal, Susmita Goswami, Soumya Ghosh, Sabyasachi Choudhuri. Influence of artificial intelligence in modern pharmaceutical formulation and drug development. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-024-00625-1
    26. Elena Chung, Xia Wen, Xuelian Jia, Heather L. Ciallella, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Hao Zhu. Hybrid non-animal modeling: A mechanistic approach to predict chemical hepatotoxicity. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 471 , 134297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134297
    27. Shuo Wang, Tianzhuo Zhang, Ziheng Li, Jinglan Hong. Exploring pollutant joint effects in disease through interpretable machine learning. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 467 , 133707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133707
    28. Mengyuan Ren, Tianxiang Wu, Shuo Yang, Ning Gao, Changxin Lan, Han Zhang, Weinan Lin, Shu Su, Lailai Yan, Lili Zhuang, Qun Lu, Jia Xu, Bin Han, Zhipeng Bai, Fangang Meng, Yuanchen Chen, Bo Pan, Bin Wang, Xiaoxia Lu, Mingliang Fang. Ascertaining sensitive exposure biomarkers of various metal(loid)s to embryo implantation. Environmental Pollution 2024, 347 , 123679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123679
    29. Sunghwan Kim, Evan E. Bolton. PubChem: A Large‐Scale Public Chemical Database for Drug Discovery. 2024, 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527830497.ch2
    30. Duc-Viet Nguyen, Jihae Park, Hojun Lee, Taejun Han, Di Wu. Assessing industrial wastewater effluent toxicity using boosting algorithms in machine learning: A case study on ecotoxicity prediction and control strategy development. Environmental Pollution 2024, 341 , 123017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123017
    31. Wenting Zhang. The application of cloud accounting in enterprise financial decision making in the era of big data. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 2024, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00153
    32. Shristi Modanwal, Nidhi Mishra, Ashutosh Mishra. How to Neutralize Chemicals that Kill the Environment and Humans: An Application of Computational Toxicology. 2023, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815196986123010007
    33. Ayesha Sultana, Rahath Maseera, Abdul Rahamanulla, Alima Misiriya. Emerging of artificial intelligence and technology in pharmaceuticals: review. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2023, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00517-w
    34. Akriti Rai, Kamal Shah, Hitesh Kumar Dewangan. Review on the Artificial Intelligence-based Nanorobotics Targeted Drug Delivery System for Brain-specific Targeting. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2023, 29 (44) , 3519-3531. https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128279248231210172053
    35. D. V. Kurkin, E. I. Morkovin, D. A. Bakulin, Yu. V. Gorbunova, Yu. A. Kolosov, M. A. Dzhavakhyan, I. E. Makarenko, R. V. Drai, A. V. Zaborovsky, O. V. Shatalova, A. V. Strygin, V. I. Petrov, A. P. Pleten, A. A. Prokopov, T. Yu. Tatarenko-Kozmina. Overview of drugs approved by the FDA in 2022. Pharmacy & Pharmacology 2023, 11 (3) , 193-210. https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2023-11-3-193-210
    36. Yanyan Qu, Ting Li, Zhichao Liu, Dongying Li, Weida Tong. DICTrank: The largest reference list of 1318 human drugs ranked by risk of drug-induced cardiotoxicity using FDA labeling. Drug Discovery Today 2023, 28 (11) , 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103770
    37. Shuoli Ma, Wen-Xiong Wang. Physiological trade-off of marine fish under Zn deficient and excess conditions. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 901 , 166187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166187
    38. Pasquale Capone, Pieranna Chiarella, Renata Sisto. Advanced technologies in genomic toxicology: current trend and future directions. Current Opinion in Toxicology 2023, 35 , 100444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2023.100444
    39. M. Viljanen, J. Minnema, P.N.H. Wassenaar, E. Rorije, W. Peijnenburg. What is the ecotoxicity of a given chemical for a given aquatic species? Predicting interactions between species and chemicals using recommender system techniques. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2023, 34 (10) , 765-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2023.2254225
    40. Muhammad Sufyan, Zeeshan Shokat, Usman Ali Ashfaq. Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspective. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2023, 165 , 107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107356
    41. Shixuan Cui, Yuchen Gao, Yizhou Huang, Lilai Shen, Qiming Zhao, Yaru Pan, Shulin Zhuang. Advances and applications of machine learning and deep learning in environmental ecology and health. Environmental Pollution 2023, 335 , 122358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122358
    42. Bojana Stanic, Nemanja Milošević, Nataša Sukur, Dragana Samardzija Nenadov, Svetlana Fa Nedeljkovic, Srđan Škrbić, Nebojsa Andric. An in silico toxicogenomic approach in constructing the aflatoxin B1-mediated regulatory network of hub genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 2023, 33 (7) , 552-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2023.2196686
    43. Saian Chen, Aziguli Wulamu, Qiping Zou, Han Zheng, Li Wen, Xi Guo, Han Chen, Taohong Zhang, Ying Zhang. MD-GNN: A mechanism-data-driven graph neural network for molecular properties prediction and new material discovery. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2023, 123 , 108506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108506
    44. Sourajyoti Goswami, Mohit Kumar Singh. Artificial Intelligence used in Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Industry: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology 2023, , 428-438. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-12471
    45. Yaroslav Chushak, Jeffery M. Gearhart, Rebecca A. Clewell. Structural alerts and Machine learning modeling of “Six-pack” toxicity as alternative to animal testing. Computational Toxicology 2023, 27 , 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2023.100280
    46. Ricardo Stefani. State of the Art and Outlook of Data Science and Machine Learning in Organic Chemistry. Current Organic Chemistry 2023, 27 (16) , 1393-1397. https://doi.org/10.2174/0113852728249020230921072236
    47. Heba Askr, Enas Elgeldawi, Heba Aboul Ella, Yaseen A. M. M. Elshaier, Mamdouh M. Gomaa, Aboul Ella Hassanien. Deep learning in drug discovery: an integrative review and future challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review 2023, 56 (7) , 5975-6037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10306-1
    48. Yu Zhang, L. Ramanathan, M. Maheswari. RETRACTED ARTICLE: A hybrid approach for risk analysis in e-business integrating big data analytics and artificial intelligence. Annals of Operations Research 2023, 326 (S1) , 99-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04412-6
    49. Madhumita Basu, Kembra L. Howdeshell, Sonja A. Rasmussen, Kristal A. Rychlik, Thomas B. Knudsen, Dana L. Shuey, William Slikker. Society for birth defects research and prevention's multidisciplinary research needs workshop 2022: A call to action. Birth Defects Research 2023, 115 (10) , 959-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2186
    50. Jaeseong Jeong, Jiwan Kim, Jinhee Choi. Identification of molecular initiating events (MIE) using chemical database analysis and nuclear receptor activity assays for screening potential inhalation toxicants. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2023, 141 , 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105391
    51. Subrat Kumar Bhattamisra, Priyanka Banerjee, Pratibha Gupta, Jayashree Mayuren, Susmita Patra, Mayuren Candasamy. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Research. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 2023, 7 (1) , 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010010
    52. Isadora Silva Luna, Thalisson Amorim de Souza, Marcelo Sobral da Silva, Klinger Antonio da Franca Rodrigues, Luciana Scotti, Marcus Tullius Scotti, Francisco Jaime Bezerra Mendonça-Junior. Computer-Aided drug design of new 2-amino-thiophene derivatives as anti-leishmanial agents. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 250 , 115223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115223
    53. Shaikh Habeeba. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and its Application in Drug Development. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry 2023, , 83-90. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00014
    54. Tong Wang, Daniel P. Russo, Dimitrios Bitounis, Philip Demokritou, Xuelian Jia, Heng Huang, Hao Zhu. Integrating structure annotation and machine learning approaches to develop graphene toxicity models. Carbon 2023, 204 , 484-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.065
    55. Douglas McNair. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Lead-to-Candidate Decision-Making and Beyond. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2023, 63 (1) , 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-023255
    56. Rodney Hull, Mosebo A. Manabile, Zodwa Dlamini. Intelligent Drug Design and Use for Cancer Treatment: The Roles of AI and Precision Oncology in Targeting Patient-Specific Splicing Profiles. 2023, 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21506-3_11
    57. Thulo Molefi, Rahaba Marima, Demetra Demetriou, Afra Basera, Zodwa Dlamini. Employing AI-Powered Decision Support Systems in Recommending the Most Effective Therapeutic Approaches for Individual Cancer Patients: Maximising Therapeutic Efficacy. 2023, 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21506-3_13
    58. Tanmayee Basu, Rashi Chugh, Ranjit Singh Gujjar, Atul Kumar Upadhyay. Approaches for In Silico Validation of Safety (Toxicity) Data for Cosmetics. 2023, 187-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2804-0_11
    59. Ze Wang, Min Li, Muyun Tang, Guang Hu. From big data to complex network: a navigation through the maze of drug–target interaction. 2023, 407-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85713-0.00016-5
    60. Subhash C. Basak. Chemoinformatics and bioinformatics by discrete mathematics and numbers: an adventure from small data to the realm of emerging big data. 2023, 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85713-0.00028-1
    61. Ibtihag Yahya Elhag. Role of AI in ADME/Tox toward formulation optimization and delivery. 2023, 301-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89925-3.00011-3
    62. Alexander Tropsha. Development of QSAR models as reliable computational tools for regulatory assessment of chemicals for acute toxicity. 2023, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15339-6.00003-5
    63. Fei Li, Xiaoqing Wang, Yuefa Teng. QSAR models in marine ecotoxicology and risk assessment. 2023, 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15339-6.00027-8
    64. Pathan Mohsin Khan, Gopala Krishna Jillella, Kunal Roy. Recent advancements in QSAR and machine learning approaches for risk assessment of organic chemicals. 2023, 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15339-6.00035-7
    65. Tran Quang Quy, Nguyen Duc-Binh, Pham Chien Thang. Data-Driven Narratives: Unleashing the Potential of R for Journalistic Storytelling. 2023, 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49529-8_26
    66. Qingbin Yuan, Siyao Qu, Rong Li, Zheng-Yang Huo, Yan Gao, Yi Luo. Degradation of antibiotics by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs): Performance, mechanisms, and perspectives. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 856 , 159092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159092
    67. Patricia Ruiz, George Loizou. Editorial: Application of computational tools to health and environmental sciences, Volume II. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1102431
    68. Eslam Elkaeed, Reda Yousef, Hazem Elkady, Aisha Alsfouk, Dalal Husein, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Mohamed Alswah, Heba Elzahabi, Ahmed Metwaly, Ibrahim Eissa. A New Theobromine-Based EGFRWT and EGFRT790M Inhibitor and Apoptosis Inducer: Design, Semi-Synthesis, Docking, DFT, MD Simulations, and In Vitro Studies. Processes 2022, 10 (11) , 2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112290
    69. Maryam Zare Jeddi, Nancy B. Hopf, Henriqueta Louro, Susana Viegas, Karen S. Galea, Robert Pasanen-Kase, Tiina Santonen, Vicente Mustieles, Mariana F. Fernandez, Hans Verhagen, Stephanie K. Bopp, Jean Philippe Antignac, Arthur David, Hans Mol, Robert Barouki, Karine Audouze, Radu-Corneliu Duca, Peter Fantke, Paul Scheepers, Manosij Ghosh, An Van Nieuwenhuyse, Joana Lobo Vicente, Xenia Trier, Loïc Rambaud, Clémence Fillol, Sebastien Denys, André Conrad, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Alicia Paini, Jon Arnot, Florian Schulze, Kate Jones, Ovnair Sepai, Imran Ali, Lorraine Brennan, Emilio Benfenati, Francesco Cubadda, Alberto Mantovani, Alena Bartonova, Alison Connolly, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Yuri Bruinen de Bruin, Jacob van Klaveren, Nicole Palmen, Hubert Dirven, Trine Husøy, Cathrine Thomsen, Ana Virgolino, Martin Röösli, Tim Gant, Natalie von Goetz, Jos Bessems. Developing human biomonitoring as a 21st century toolbox within the European exposure science strategy 2020–2030. Environment International 2022, 168 , 107476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107476
    70. Shubham Srivastava, Deepika Paliwal. Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Drug Development. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening 2022, 25 (13) , 2141-2152. https://doi.org/10.2174/1386207325666220304112914
    71. Prem Shankar Mishra, Rakhi Mishra, Rupa Mazumder. Deep Learning on Site‐Specific Drug Delivery System. 2022, 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119857983.ch3
    72. Xiaotong Wu, Qixing Zhou, Li Mu, Xiangang Hu. Machine learning in the identification, prediction and exploration of environmental toxicology: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 438 , 129487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129487
    73. Zhoumeng Lin, Wei-Chun Chou. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences. Toxicological Sciences 2022, 189 (1) , 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfac075
    74. Xiaoqing Wang, Yuefa Teng, Chenglong Ji, Huifeng Wu, Fei Li. Critical target identification and human health risk ranking of metal ions based on mechanism-driven modeling. Chemosphere 2022, 301 , 134724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134724
    75. Rebecca N. Ram, Domenico Gadaleta, Timothy E.H. Allen. The role of ‘big data’ and ‘in silico’ New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in ending animal use – A commentary on progress. Computational Toxicology 2022, 23 , 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100232
    76. Xuelian Jia, Xia Wen, Daniel P. Russo, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Hao Zhu. Mechanism-driven modeling of chemical hepatotoxicity using structural alerts and an in vitro screening assay. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 436 , 129193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129193
    77. Ping Yuan, Jie Gao, Ling Chen. Observer Based Event-triggering Control of Unmanned Surface Vehicles under DoS Attacks. 2022, 4263-4269. https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC55666.2022.9902220
    78. Eslam B. Elkaeed, Reda G. Yousef, Hazem Elkady, Ibraheem M. M. Gobaara, Bshra A. Alsfouk, Dalal Z. Husein, Ibrahim M. Ibrahim, Ahmed M. Metwaly, Ibrahim H. Eissa. Design, Synthesis, Docking, DFT, MD Simulation Studies of a New Nicotinamide-Based Derivative: In Vitro Anticancer and VEGFR-2 Inhibitory Effects. Molecules 2022, 27 (14) , 4606. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144606
    79. Song Hu, Guohong Liu, Jin Zhang, Jiachen Yan, Hongyu Zhou, Xiliang Yan. Linking electron ionization mass spectra of organic chemicals to toxicity endpoints through machine learning and experimentation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 431 , 128558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128558
    80. Natalia Lidmar von Ranke, Reinaldo Barros Geraldo, André Lima dos Santos, Victor G.O. Evangelho, Flaminia Flammini, Lucio Mendes Cabral, Helena Carla Castro, Carlos Rangel Rodrigues. Applying in silico approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential. Computational Toxicology 2022, 22 , 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100225
    81. Heather L. Ciallella, Elena Chung, Daniel P. Russo, Hao Zhu. Automatic Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling to Fill Data Gaps in High-Throughput Screening. 2022, 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2213-1_16
    82. Meetali Sinha, Praveen G., Deepak Kumar Sachan, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Toxicology. 2022, 1487-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64573-1_137
    83. Zhiguo Wang, Baofeng Yang. Polypharmacology in Predicting Drug Toxicity: Drug Promiscuity. 2022, 593-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04998-9_14
    84. Aglaia Kavidopoulou, Konstantinos N. Syrigos, Stylianos Makrogkikas, Zodwa Dlamini, Rodney Hull, Rahaba Marima, Amanda Skepu, Elias P. Koumoulos, George Bakas, Ioannis Vamvakaris, George Evangelou, Georgios Lolas. AI and Big Data for Drug Discovery. 2022, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11199-0_7
    85. Chiho Watanabe. Issues of Environmental Risks in the Anthropocene. 2022, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6249-2_18
    86. Xiaoqing Wang, Li Wang, Fei Li, Yuefa Teng, Chenglong Ji, Huifeng Wu. Toxicity pathways of lipid metabolic disorders induced by typical replacement flame retardants via data-driven analysis, in silico and in vitro approaches. Chemosphere 2022, 287 , 132419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132419
    87. Yong Oh Lee, Baeckkyoung Sung. In Silico Platforms for Predictive Ecotoxicology. 2021, 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119681397.ch23
    88. Priti Tagde, Sandeep Tagde, Tanima Bhattacharya, Pooja Tagde, Hitesh Chopra, Rokeya Akter, Deepak Kaushik, Md. Habibur Rahman. Blockchain and artificial intelligence technology in e-Health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021, 28 (38) , 52810-52831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16223-0
    89. Jaewon Lee, Seokyoung Hong, Hyungtae Cho, Byeonggil Lyu, Myungjun Kim, Junghwan Kim, Il Moon. Machine learning-based energy optimization for on-site SMR hydrogen production. Energy Conversion and Management 2021, 244 , 114438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114438
    90. Daniel Ribeiro Rodrigues, Diego César Batista Mariano, Lucianna Helene Silva Santos, Carlos Alberto Tagliati. ToxAnalyzer: A user-friendly web tool for interactive data analysis and visualization of chemical compounds from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)™. Computational Toxicology 2021, 19 , 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100170
    91. José T. Moreira-Filho, Arthur C. Silva, Rafael F. Dantas, Barbara F. Gomes, Lauro R. Souza Neto, Jose Brandao-Neto, Raymond J. Owens, Nicholas Furnham, Bruno J. Neves, Floriano P. Silva-Junior, Carolina H. Andrade. Schistosomiasis Drug Discovery in the Era of Automation and Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Immunology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.642383
    92. Kyu-Bong Kim, Seung Jun Kwack, Joo Young Lee, Sam Kacew, Byung-Mu Lee. Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 2021, 24 (4) , 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1907264
    93. Vinicius M. Alves, Scott S. Auerbach, Nicole Kleinstreuer, John P. Rooney, Eugene N. Muratov, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha, Charles Schmitt. Curated Data In — Trustworthy In Silico Models Out: The Impact of Data Quality on the Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Models as Alternatives to Animal Testing. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 2021, 49 (3) , 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929211029635
    94. Thomas B Knudsen, Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick, K Nadira De Abrew, Linda S Birnbaum, Anne Chappelle, George P Daston, Dana C Dolinoy, Alison Elder, Susan Euling, Elaine M Faustman, Kristi Pullen Fedinick, Jill A Franzosa, Derik E Haggard, Laurie Haws, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Germaine M Buck Louis, Donna L Mendrick, Ruthann Rudel, Katerine S Saili, Thaddeus T Schug, Robyn L Tanguay, Alexandra E Turley, Barbara A Wetmore, Kimberly W White, Todd J Zurlinden. FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children. Toxicological Sciences 2021, 180 (2) , 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfab013
    95. Vinita Chauhan, Ruth C. Wilkins, Danielle Beaton, Magdalini Sachana, Nathalie Delrue, Carole Yauk, Jason O’Brien, Francesco Marchetti, Sabina Halappanavar, Michael Boyd, Daniel Villeneuve, Tara S. Barton-Maclaren, Bette Meek, Catalina Anghel, Crina Heghes, Chris Barber, Edward Perkins, Julie Leblanc, Julie Burtt, Holly Laakso, Dominique Laurier, Ted Lazo, Maurice Whelan, Russell Thomas, Donald Cool. Bringing together scientific disciplines for collaborative undertakings: a vision for advancing the adverse outcome pathway framework. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2021, 97 (4) , 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2021.1884314
    96. Heather L. Ciallella, Daniel P. Russo, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Fabian A. Grimm, Hao Zhu. Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches. Laboratory Investigation 2021, 101 (4) , 490-502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-020-00477-2
    97. Xian Liu, Huazhou Zhang, Qiao Xue, Wenxiao Pan, Aiqian Zhang. In silico health effect prioritization of environmental chemicals through transcriptomics data exploration from a chemo-centric view. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 762 , 143082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143082
    98. Manfred Hauben, Craig G. Hartford. Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: Scoping Points to Consider. Clinical Therapeutics 2021, 43 (2) , 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.014
    99. Sunghwan Kim, Jie Chen, Tiejun Cheng, Asta Gindulyte, Jia He, Siqian He, Qingliang Li, Benjamin A Shoemaker, Paul A Thiessen, Bo Yu, Leonid Zaslavsky, Jian Zhang, Evan E Bolton. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 2021, 49 (D1) , D1388-D1395. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa971
    100. Meetali Sinha, Praveen G, Deepak Kumar Sachan, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Toxicology. 2021, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_137-1
    Load all citations
    Download PDF

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect