Advertisement
No access
Report

Visual Pigment Gene Structure and the Severity of Color Vision Defects

Science
1 Nov 1996
Vol 274, Issue 5288
pp. 801-804

Abstract

Rearrangements of the visual pigment genes are associated with defective color vision and with differences between types of red-green color blindness. Among individuals within the most common category of defective color vision, deuteranomaly, there is a large variation in the severity of color vision loss. An examination of specific photopigment gene sites responsible for tuning photopigment absorption spectra revealed differences that predict these variations in the color defect. The results indicate that the severity of the defect in deuteranomalous color vision depends on the degree of similarity among the residual photopigments that serve vision in the color-anomalous eye.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Neitz J., Jacobs G. H., Nature 323, 623 (1986);
Vision Res. 30, 621 (1990).
2
Neitz M., Neitz J., Jacobs G. H., Vision Res. 35, 2095 (1995).
3
The degree of color vision defect can be expressed quantitatively from measurements of the colors in the designs as specified by their coordinates, in this case in units of the Commission International de l'Éclairage (CIE) u′ v′ diagram [following (4)]. For normal color vision, this represents an approximation of a two-dimensional color diagram in which equal distances in different locations correspond to equal perceptual differences. Thus, the extent of the defect can be expressed numerically as the distance (D) in the color diagram that must differentiate the symbol from its background before the person can interpret it correctly.
4
Regan B. C., Reffin J. P., Mollon J. D., Vision Res. 34, 1279 (1994).
5
Nathans J., Thomas D., Hogness D. S., Science 232, 193 (1986).
6
Nathans J., Piantanida T. P., Eddy R. L., Shows T. B., Hogness D. S., ibid., p. 203.
7
Deeb S. S., et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51, 687 (1992).
8
Neitz M., Neitz J., Science 267, 1013 (1995).
9
Neitz J., Neitz M., in Molecular Genetics of Inherited Eye Disorders, Wright A. S., Jay B., Eds. (Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, 1994).
10
Pokorny J., Smith V. C., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1196 (1977);
Color Res. Appl. 7, 159 (1982);
DeMarco P., Pokorny J., Smith V. C., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1465 (1992);
Piantanida T. P., Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53, 647 (1976).
11
Pokorny J., Smith V. C., in Frontiers of Visual Science: Proceedings of the 1985 Symposium, Committee on Vision, Ed. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1987), pp. 150–159
12
Neitz J., Neitz M., Jacobs G. H., Nature 342, 679 (1989).
13
Neitz M., Neitz J., Jacobs G. H., Science 252, 971 (1991).
14
Chan T., Lee M., Sakmar T. P., J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9478 (1992);
Williams A. J., Hunt D. M., Bowmaker J. K., Mollon J. D., EMBO J. 11, 2039 (1992).
15
Merbs S. L., Nathans J., Science 258, 464 (1992).
16
Asenjo A. B., Rim J., Oprian D. D., Neuron 12, 1131 (1994).
17
The Expand Long Template PCR System (Boehringer Mannheim) was used exactly as recommended by the manufacturer to do long PCR. The first gene in the array was amplified in long PCR with primers 5′ -GAGGCGAGGCTACGGAGT and 5′-ACGGTATTTTGAGTGGATCTGCT, which correspond to sequences 862 base pairs (bp) upstream of the first exon of the first gene (23) and to the 3′ end of intron 5 (8), respectively. The PCR product served as a template to amplify exons 2, 3, 4, and 5 as described previously (2, 8, 24)
18
Restriction analysis was done on exons 3, 4, and 5 from the first gene and on exons 3 and 4 from downstream L genes. The presence of an Rsa I site in exon 5 from the first gene from each male identified it as a L pigment gene (8). Whether exon 3 contains a Bso FI restriction site or not indicates whether codon 180 specifies alanine or serine, respectively (24). A Dde I site is found in exon 4 only when serine is specified by codon 233, and this was used to deduce whether the first gene or the downstream L genes were M4L5 hybrids. The results of the restriction analyses were confirmed by direct sequence analysis (24), which was also used to determine whether the sequence of exon 2 differed among the L pigment genes in individual men
19
For men whose L pigment genes did not differ in exon 4 (Fig. 1C), all L genes except the first gene in the array were amplified by long-PCR (17) with primers 5′ -TTAGTCAGGCTGGTCGGGAACT and 5′ -CATGATGATAGCGAGTGGGATG, which correspond to sequences 465 bp upstream of the first exon of all genes in the array except the first one (5), and to L gene-specific exon 4 sequences (24), respectively. For men whose L genes differed in exon 4 (Fig. 1C), no PCR product was obtained with this primer pair, presumably because their downstream L genes were hybrid genes with an M gene exon 4 sequence. For these men, downstream L pigment genes were selectively amplified by long PCR (17) with the use of an exon 2 primer (5′ -CCTTCGAAGGCCCGAATTA) paired with a L gene-specific exon 5 primer (24). The PCR product was used to amplify only the downstream L pigment genes with the use of the same exon 2 primer and an M gene-specific exon 4 primer (24)
20
Nagy A. L., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 571 (1982).
21
Jameson D., Hurvich L. M., ibid. 46, 1075 (1956).
22
An exception, however, is a model, progressive for its time, forwarded by M. Alpern and J. Moeller who proposed variation in normal L pigments [J. Physiol. (London) 266, 647 (1977)]
23
Wang Y., et al., Neuron 9, 429 (1992).
24
Neitz M., Neitz J., Grishok A., Vision Res. 35, 2395 (1995).
25
Winderickx J., Battisti L., Motulsky A. G., Deeb S. S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 9710 (1992).
26
We thank P. Summerfelt for help in preparing the manuscript and G. H. Jacobs for his many helpful suggestions and comments. Supported by NIH grants EY09303, EY09620, and EY01931, and by Research to Prevent Blindness James. S. Adams Scholar Award to M.N

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 274 | Issue 5288
1 November 1996

Submission history

Received: 21 May 1996
Accepted: 5 August 1996
Published in print: 1 November 1996

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jay Neitz*
Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy and Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Maureen Neitz
Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy and Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Pamela M. Kainz
Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy and Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media