Advertisement
No access
Reports

Origin of Mountains on Io by Thrust Faulting and Large-Scale Mass Movements

Science
6 Mar 1998
Vol 279, Issue 5356
pp. 1514-1517

Abstract

Voyager stereoimages of Euboea Montes, Io, indicate that this mountain formed when a large crustal block was uplifted 10.5 kilometers and tilted by approximately 6 degrees. Uplift triggered a massive slope failure on the northwest flank, forming one of the largest debris aprons in the solar system. This slope failure probably involved relatively unconsolidated layers totaling approximately 2 kilometers in thickness, overlying a rigid crust (or lithosphere) at least 11 kilometers thick. Mountain formation on Io may involve localized deep-rooted thrust faulting and block rotation, due to compression at depth induced during vertical recycling of Io's crust.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
A. McEwen et al., in Time-Variable Phenomena in the Jovian System (NASA Spec. Publ. 494, NASA, Washington, DC, 1989), pp. 3–46;
Veeder G., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 99, 17095 (1994).
2
G. Schaber, in Satellites of Jupiter, D. Morrison, Ed. (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 1982), pp. 556–597.
3
Schenk P., et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2467 (1997).
4
M. Carr, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs 29, A-311 (1997).
5
This software was developed in 1995–96 at the Lunar and Planetary Institute by P. Schenk and B. Fessler for use with Voyager images and employs a scene-recognition algorithm to locate features in each image and determine parallax (3).
6
McCauley J., et al., Nature 280, 736 (1979);
Moore J. M., et al., Icarus 122, 63 (1996).
7
H. J. Moore, U.S. Geol. Surv. Misc. Investig. Map I-1851 (1987).
8
P. W. Francis and G. L. Wells, Bull. Volcanol. 50, 258 (1988).
9
Shreve R. L., Science 154, 1639 (1966).
10
P. J. Shaller, thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (1991); M. H. Bulmer, thesis, University of London (1994).
11
J. E. Guest, in Geology and Physics of the Moon, G. Fielder, Ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1971), pp. 93–103.
12
P. J. Shaller, Can. Geotech. J. 28, 584 (1991).
13
A. Heim, Bergstruz und Menschenleben (Fretz und Wasmuth, Zurich, 1932), p. 218.
14
Lucchitta B., Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 89, 1601 (1978).
15
Yarnold J. C., ibid. 105, 345 (1993).
16
L. Muller, Rock Mech. Eng. Geol. 6, 1 (1968).
17
B. Voight and W. Pariseau, in Geotechnical Engineering, B. Voight, Ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 1–67.
18
Lopes R., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 87, 9917 (1982);
; R. Lopes et al., Moon Planets 22, 221 (1980);
Francis P. W., Wadge G., J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8333 (1983);
; M. Bulmer and P. McGovern, Lunar Planet. Sci., in press.
19
R. Dingle, J. Geol. Soc. London 134, 293 (1977); C. Summerhayes et al., Mar. Geol.31, 265 (1979).
20
See P. Schenk and M. Bulmer [Lunar Planet Sci.XXVIII, 1247 (1997)] and M. Bulmer (in preparation), and references therein.
21
The average friction coefficient is given by the tangent of the slope connecting the pre- and postevent centers of gravity of a failed mass (30). Because it is not possible to determine the pre- and postevent centers of gravity for masses on Io or most other planets, we use the tangent of the slope angle of the line connecting the top of the scarp to the toe of the apron (13) to derive the ratio H:L. The value derived using this method approximates the center of gravity gradient for those slope failures whose center of gravity lies near the toe (10), which may be the case for Euboea. Taking these caveats into consideration, we use H:L as an estimate of the coefficient of friction.
22
M. H. Bulmer and J. E. Guest, in Volcano Instability on the Earth and Other Planets, W. J. McGuire, A. P. Jones, J. Neuberg, Eds. (Geological Society of London, London, 1996), p. 349.
23
At 16 km height, Boosaule Montes (10°S, 270°W) is the highest mountain identified to date on Io. The automated stereogrammetry (5) measurement we report has been confirmed by manual measurement of parallax in the Voyager images.
24
Previous estimates that the crust of Io is ∼30 km thick (31) assumed that mountain heights are due to isostatic buoyancy of material that is lower in density than the surrounding crust. Our interpretation of the formation of Euboea Montes suggests that mountains may have the same density as the surrounding crust, indicating that these crustal thickness estimates are not generally relevant to Io.
25
R. Allmendinger, in Geology of North America—An Overview, vol. G-3 of Geology of North America, B. Burchfiel, P. Lipman, M. Zoback, Eds. (Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1992), pp. 583–608; D. Miller, T. Nilsen, W. Bilodeau, ibid., pp. 205–260.
26
Jordan T., Allmendinger R., Am. J. Sci. 286, 737 (1986).
27
Smithson S., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 84, 5955 (1979).
28
On Io, it is not known whether such faults penetrate the crust or the lithosphere.
29
Lopes-Gautier R., et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2439 (1997);
; M. Carr, paper presented at the Lowell Observatory during the Galileo Era Conference, Flagstaff, AZ, 22 to 24 September 1997.
30
Cruden D., Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 91, 63 (1980).
31
D. Nash et al., in Satellites, J. Burns and M. Matthews, Eds. (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 1986), pp. 629–688.
32
This report is Lunar and Planetary Contribution No. 940. This work was done while M.H.B. was a Garber Fellow at the National Air and Space Museum. We are grateful to J. Moore, W. McKinnon, and an anonymous reviewer for comments.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 279 | Issue 5356
6 March 1998

Submission history

Received: 31 October 1997
Accepted: 27 January 1998
Published in print: 6 March 1998

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P. M. Schenk, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058, USA.
M. H. Bulmer, Center for Earth and Planetary Science, National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC 20560, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. The geology of Pluto and Charon through the eyes of New Horizons, Science, 351, 6279, (1284-1293), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aad7055
    Abstract
  2. Galileo at Io: Results from High-Resolution Imaging, Science, 288, 5469, (1193-1198), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.288.5469.1193
    Abstract
  3. The Galilean Satellites, Science, 286, 5437, (77-84), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.286.5437.77
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media