Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 20, 2017

State capacity and the resilience of electoral authoritarianism: Conceptualizing and measuring the institutional underpinnings of autocratic power

Abstract

This article discusses three main challenges to gaining a better understanding of whether state capacity contributes to the resilience of electoral authoritarian regimes. First, the concept of state capacity is multi-dimensional and can be entangled with regime organizational structures. Second, there is a range of different mechanisms through which elections may draw upon capacity in these different dimensions to affect authoritarian resilience. Third, good indicators of the dimensions of state capacity for empirical work are sorely lacking. To address these challenges, this article outlines the connections between extractive, coercive and administrative dimensions of state capacity with regard to how electoral authoritarian regimes address threats arising from society and from within the ruling elite. It then assesses different approaches to measuring these dimensions for empirical work.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Andersen David, Møller Jørgen, Rørbæk Lasse Lykke, Skaaning Svend-Erik (2014a) State Capacity and Political Regime Stability. Democratization 21(7): 1305–1325.
Andersen David, Møller Jørgen, Skaaning Svend-Erik (2014b) The State-Democracy Nexus: Conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization 21(7): 1203–1220.
Arbetman-Rabinowitz Marina, Kugler Jacek, Abdollahian Mark, Johnson Kristin, Kang Kyungkook (2011) Replication data for: Relative political capacity dataset. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/16845. Transresearch Consortium [Distributor] V3 [Version].
Bockstette Valerie, Chanda Areendam, Putterman Louis (2002) States and markets: The advantage of an early start. Journal of Economic Growth 7: 347–369.
Brownlee Jason (2009) Portents of Pluralism: How hybrid regimes affect democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 515–532.
Centeno Miguel (2002) Blood and Debt: War and the nation-state in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Cingranelli David L, Richards David L, Clay K Chad (2014) The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. Available at: http://www.humanrightsdata.com.
Darden Keith (2008) The Integrity of Corrupt States: Graft as an informal state institution. Politics & Society 36(1): 35–60.
Fishman Robert M (1990) Review: Rethinking State and Regime: Europe’s transition to democracy. World Politics 42(3): 422–440.
Fortin-Rittenberger Jessica (2014a) The Role of Infrastructural and Coercive State Capacity in Explaining Different Types of Electoral Fraud. Democratization 21(1): 95–117.
Fortin-Rittenberger Jessica (2014b) Exploring the Relationship Between Infrastructural and Coercive State Capacity. Democratization 21(7): 1244–1264.
Gandhi Jennifer, Lust-Okar Ellen (2009) Elections Under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422.
Gibney Mark, Cornett Linda, Wood Reed (2011) Political Terror Scale, 1976–2008. Available at http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/.
Grzymala-Busse Anna (2008) Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent state capture and state formation. Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5): 638–673.
Haber Stephen (2006) Authoritarian Government. In Weingast Barry R, Wittman Donald A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 693–707.
Hanson Jonathan K (2015) Democracy and state capacity: Complements or substitutes? Studies in Comparative International Development 50(3): 304–330.
Hanson Jonathan K, Rachel Sigman (2013) Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. Unpublished Manuscript.
Hendrix Cullen S (2010) Measuring State Capacity: Theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research 47(3): 273–285.
Higashijima Masaaki (2015) Beat Me If You Can: Electoral dilemma and the manipulation of elections under dictatorship. Working Paper. Department of Political Science, Tohoku University.
Howell Llewellyn D (2011) International Country Risk Guide Methodology. The PRS Group, Inc.
Institute for Management and Development (2011) World Competitiveness Yearbook. http://www.imd.org/wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-competitiveness-yearbook-ranking/.
Knutsen Carl Hendrik, Nygård Håvard Mokleiv, Wig Tore (2015) Autocratic Elections: Stabilizing tool or force for change? Manuscript. Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
Lee Melissa M, Nan Zhang (2013) The Art of Counting the Governed: Census accuracy, civil war, and state presence. Working Paper. Department of Political Science, Stanford University.
Levitsky Steven, Way Lucan (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman Evan S (2002) Taxation Data as Indicators of State-Society Relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research. Studies in Comparative International Development 36(4): 89–115.
Lust-Okar Ellen (2006) Elections Under Authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan. Democratization 13(3): 446–471.
Magaloni Beatriz (2008) Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5): 715–741.
Magaloni Beatriz (2010) The Game of Electoral Fraud and the Ousting of Authoritarian Rule. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 751–765.
Mann Michael (1984) The Autonomous Power of the State: Its origins, mechanisms, and results. European Journal of Sociology 25(2): 185–213.
Mazzuca Sebastián L (2010) Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power: Reconceptualizing the quality of democracy in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 45: 334–357.
Miller Michael K (2015) Elections, Information, and Policy Responsiveness in Autocratic Regimes. Comparative Political Studies 48(6): 691–727.
Powell Jonathan (2012) Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(6): 1017–1040.
Schedler Andreas (2006) The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism. In Schedler Andreas (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1–23.
Schedler Andreas (2002) The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36–50.
Seeberg Merete Bach (2014) State Capacity and the Paradox of Authoritarian Elections. Democratization 21(7): 1265–1285.
Sikkink Kathryn (1991) Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Singer J David, Bremer Stuart, Stuckey John (1972) Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Russert Bruce M (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 19–48.
Skaaning Svend-Erik (2006) Political Regimes and Their Changes: A conceptual framework. Stanford University. Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law. Working Paper No. 55.
Skocpol Theda (1985) Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of analysis in current research. In Evans Peter B, Rueschemeyer Dietrich, Skocpol Theda (eds) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–37.
Soifer Hillel David (2013) State power and the economic origins of democracy. Studies in Comparative International Development 48(1): 1–22.
Soifer Hillel, Hau Matthias vom (2008) Unpacking the Strength of the State: The utility of state infrastructural power. Studies in Comparative International Development 43(3/4): 219–230.
Sudduth Jun Koga (2016) Coup Risk, Coup-proofing Strategy and Leadership Survival. Working Paper. School of Government and Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.
Svolik Milan W (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations (2015) UNDOC Statistics. New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/index.html.
Wig Tore, Rød Espen Geelmuyden (2016) Cues to Coup Plotters: Elections as coup triggers in dictatorships. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(5): 787–812.
World Bank Group (2015) Data on Statistical Capacity. The World Bank Group. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/data-on-statistical-capacity.
World Bank Group (2011) CPIA 2011 Criteria. The World Bank Group. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/IDA/Resources/73153-1181752621336/CPIAcriteria2011final.pdf

Biographies

Jonathan Hanson is a lecturer in statistics for public policy at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. His research in the political economy of development includes projects on economic growth and human development, state capacity, authoritarian politics, economic inequality, and the effects social heterogeneity.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 20, 2017
Issue published: January 2018

Keywords

  1. Authoritarianism
  2. state capacity
  3. electoral authoritarian regimes
  4. measurement
  5. regime survival

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2017.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jonathan K Hanson

Notes

Jonathan K Hanson, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, 735 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in International Political Science Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2589

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 22 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 26

  1. It’s the state, indeed! How state capacity facilitates social equality...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Influence of elite rotation on authoritarian resilience
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. COVID‐19 and the state: Exploring a puzzling relationship in the early...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Measures of state capacity: so similar, yet so different
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Unpacking the blackbox of responsible pandemic governance: of COVID-19...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Between Scylla and Charybdis: Land Reform and Local Agents Under the C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Resiliency
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political inst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. What types of political regimes subsidize fuel consumption?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Resiliency
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Stateness and Democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Providing Goods: Health Mandates and Authoritarian Performance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Institutional foundations of global well-being: Democracy, state capac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Producing state capacity through corruption: the case of immigration c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Political institutions, state capacity, and crisis management: A compa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. How State Capacity Helps Autocrats win Elections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Introduction: Rethinking Stateness and Democracy in East Asia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Stateness and Democracy: Evidence from East Asia and Cross-Regional Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime surv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Managing the People’s Liberation Army
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Whose Resilience? Resilience and Regime Strength in EU-Azerbaijan Rela...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Как и зачем измерять и сравнивать государственную состоятельность разн...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. High capacity, low resilience: The ‘developmental’ state and military–...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. State and regime capacity in authoritarian elections: Egypt before the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Strong states, weak elections? How state capacity in authoritarian reg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text