Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Articles

Abusive Supervision and Retaliation: A Self-Control Framework

    Published Online:26 Nov 2012https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0977

    Abstract

    There are conflicting perspectives on whether subordinates will or will not aggress against an abusive supervisor. To address this paradox we develop a self-control model of retaliatory behavior, wherein subordinates' self-control capacity and motivation to self-control influence emotional and retaliatory reactions to provocations by enabling individuals to override their hostile impulses. In Study 1, we demonstrate that self-control capacity, motivation to self-control (supervisor coercive power), and abusive supervision interact in such a way that the strongest association between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed aggression occurs when subordinates are low in self-control capacity and perceive their supervisor to be low in coercive power. In Study 2, we extend this finding, testing a moderated mediation model, wherein hostility toward a supervisor represents the hostile impulse resulting in retaliatory behavior, mediating the relation between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed aggression. Results from Study 2 indicate that self-control capacity allows individuals to regulate the hostile feelings experienced following abusive supervision, while self-control capacity and supervisor coercive power jointly moderate the tendency to act on one's hostile feelings toward an abusive supervisor. We discuss implications for retaliatory behaviors at work.

    REFERENCES

    • Anderson C. A. , Bushman B. J. 2002. Human aggression. In Fiske S. T.Schacter D. L.Zahn-Waxler C. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 53: 27–51. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
    • Andersson L. M. , Pearson C. M. 1999. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24: 452–471.Link , Google Scholar
    • Aquino K. , Lamertz K. 2004. A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 1023–1034. Google Scholar
    • Aquino K. , Tripp T. M. , Bies R. J. 2006. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 653–668. Google Scholar
    • Averill J. 1982. Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
    • Baron R. A. , Neuman J. H. , Geddes D. 1999. Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression: Evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the type A behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior, 25: 281–296. Google Scholar
    • Baumeister R. F. , Bratslavsky E. , Finkenauer C. , Vohs K. D. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5: 323–370. Google Scholar
    • Baumeister R. F. , DeWall C. N. , Ciarocco N. J. , Twenge J. M. 2005. Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 589–604. Google Scholar
    • Baumeister R. F. , Gailliot M. , DeWall C. N. , Oaten M. 2006. Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74: 1773–1802. Google Scholar
    • Baumeister R. F. , Heatherton T. F. , Tice D. M. 1994. Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic. Google Scholar
    • Baumeister R. J. , Vohs K. D. 2007. Self-regulation, ego-depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10: 1–14. Google Scholar
    • Berkowitz L. 1989. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106: 59–73. Google Scholar
    • Bordia P. , Restubog S. L. , Tang R. L. 2008. When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1104–1117. Google Scholar
    • Brief A. P. , Weiss H. M. 2002. Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. In Fiske S. T.Schacter D. L.Zahn-Waxler C. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 53: 279–307. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
    • Brown K. W. , Ryan R. M. 2003. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 822–848. Google Scholar
    • Carlson J. G. , Hatfield E. 1992. Psychology of emotion. San Diego: Harcourt Brace. Google Scholar
    • Chan D. 2009. So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In Lance C. E.Vandenberg R. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences: 309–336. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Ciarocco N. , Twenge J. M. , Muraven M. , Tice D. M. 2007. The state self-control capacity scale: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology , San Diego . Google Scholar
    • de Quervain D. J. , Fischbacher U. , Treyer V. , Schellhammer M. , Schnyder U. , Buck A. , Fehr E. 2004. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305: 1254–1258. Google Scholar
    • DeWall C. N. , Baumeister R. F. , Stillman R. G. , Gailliot M. T. 2007. Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43: 62–76. Google Scholar
    • Dillman D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Dollard J. , Doob L. W. , Miller N. E. , Mowrer O. H. , Sears R. R. 1939. Frustration and aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
    • Edwards J. R. , Lambert L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12: 1–22. Google Scholar
    • Elliot A. J. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34: 169–189. Google Scholar
    • Evans M. G. 1985. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36: 305–323. Google Scholar
    • Ferris D. L. , Brown D. J. , Lian H. , Keeping L. M. 2009. When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1345–1353. Google Scholar
    • Ferris D. L. , Lian H. , Pang F. X. J. , Brown D. J. , Keeping L. M. 2010. Self-esteem level and job performance: The moderating role of self-esteem contingencies. Personnel Psychology, 63: 561–593. Google Scholar
    • Folger R. 1987. Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In Masters J. C.Smith W. P. (Eds.), Social comparison, justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives: 183–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
    • Fornell C. , Larcker D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39–50. Google Scholar
    • French J. R. P. , Raven B. 1959. The bases of social power. In Cartwright D. (Ed.), Studies in social power: 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Google Scholar
    • Frijda N. H. 1993. The place of appraisal in emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 7: 357–387. Google Scholar
    • Gosling S. D. , Vazire S. , Srivastava S. , John O. P. 2004. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59: 93–104. Google Scholar
    • Gottfredson M. R. , Hirschi T. 1990. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Greenberg L. , Barling J. 1999. Predicting employee aggression against coworkers, subordinates and supervisors: The roles of person behaviors and perceived workplace factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 897–913. Google Scholar
    • Gross J. J. 2001. Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6: 214–219. Google Scholar
    • Harmon-Jones E. , Allen J. J. 1998. Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1310–1316. Google Scholar
    • Heider F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Hershcovis M. S. , Barling J. 2010. Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 24–44. Google Scholar
    • Hershcovis M. S. , Reich T. C. , Parker S. K. , Bozeman J. 2012. The relationship between workplace aggression and target deviant behavior: The moderating roles of power and task interdependence. Work and Stress, 26: 1–20. Google Scholar
    • Highhouse S. , Gillespie J. Z. 2009. Do samples really matter that much? In Lance C. E.Vandenberg R. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences: 249–268. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Hinkin T. R. , Schriesheim C. A. 1989. Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 561–567. Google Scholar
    • Hoobler J. M. , Brass D. J. 2006. Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1125–1133. Google Scholar
    • Hu L. , Bentler P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1–55. Google Scholar
    • Inness M. , Barling J. , Turner N. 2005. Understanding supervisor targeted aggression: A within-person, between jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 731–739. Google Scholar
    • Inness M. , LeBlanc M. M. , Barling J. 2008. Psychosocial predictors of supervisor-, peer, subordinate-, and service provider-targeted aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 1401–1411. Google Scholar
    • Kiewitz C. , Restubog S. L. D. , Zagenczyk T. J. , Scott K. L. , Garcia P. R. J. M. , Tang R. L. 2012. Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors' previous experience of family undermining and subordinates' perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadership Quarterly, 23: 869–882. Google Scholar
    • Knutson B. 2004. Behavior: Sweet revenge? Science, 305: 1246–1247. Google Scholar
    • Lazarus R. S. 1991. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46: 819–834. Google Scholar
    • Lee K. , Allen N. J. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 131–142. Google Scholar
    • Leiter M. P. , Laschinger H. K. , Day A. , Oore D. G. 2011. The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1258–1274. Google Scholar
    • Leith K. P. , Baumeister R. F. 1996. Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 1250–1267. Google Scholar
    • Lian H. , Ferris D. L. , Brown D. J. 2012a. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 41–52. Google Scholar
    • Lian H. , Ferris D. L. , Brown D. J. 2012b. Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 107–123. Google Scholar
    • Liu J. , Kwan H. A. K. , Wu L. , Wu W. 2010. Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 835–856. Google Scholar
    • MacDonald K. B. 2008. Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions. Psychological Review, 115: 1012–1031. Google Scholar
    • Mayer D. M. , Thau S. , Workman K. M. , Van Dijke M. , De Cremer D. 2011. Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 24–40. Google Scholar
    • Mischel W. 1974. Processes in delay of gratification. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: 249–292. New York: Academic. Google Scholar
    • Mitchell M. S. , Ambrose M. L. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1159–1168. Google Scholar
    • Mitchell M. S. , Ambrose M. L. 2012. Employees' behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1148–1170. Google Scholar
    • Muraven M. , Slessareva E. 2003. Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 894–906. Google Scholar
    • Myrseth K. O. R. , Fishbach A. 2009. Self-control: A function of knowing when and how to exercise restraint. Psychological Science, 18: 247–252. Google Scholar
    • Ochsner K. N. , Gross J. J. 2005. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 242–249. Google Scholar
    • Paulhus D. L. 1991. Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson J. P.Shaver P. R.Wrightsman L. S. (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes, vol. 1: Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: 17–59. San Diego: Academic. Google Scholar
    • Rothbart M. K. , Ahadi S. A. , Evans D. E. 2000. Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 122–135. Google Scholar
    • Shrout P. E. , Bolger N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7: 422–445. Google Scholar
    • Spielberger C. D. 1988. Manual for the state trait anger expression inventory. Odessa, FL: PAR. Google Scholar
    • Sutton R. I. 2007. The no asshole rule: Building a civilized workplace and surviving one that isn't. New York: Warner Business Books. Google Scholar
    • Tangney J. P. , Baumeister R. F. , Boone A. L. 2004. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 271–322. Google Scholar
    • Tepper B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178–190.Link , Google Scholar
    • Tepper B. J. , Almeda M. 2012. Negative exchanges with supervisors. In de Tormes Eby L. T.Allen L. D. (Eds.), Personal relationships: The effect of employee attitudes, behavior, and well-being (SIOP Frontiers Series): 67–93. Essex, UK: Taylor-Francis/Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Tepper B. J. , Carr J. C. , Breaux D. M. , Geider S. , Hu C. , Hua W. 2009. Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 156–167. Google Scholar
    • Tepper B. J. , Duffy M. K. , Shaw J. D. 2001. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 974–983. Google Scholar
    • Thau S. , Mitchell M. S. 2010. Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1009–1031. Google Scholar
    • Tice D. M. , Bratslavsky E. 2000. Giving in to feel good: The place of emotion regulation in the context of general self-control. Psychological Inquiry, 11: 149–159. Google Scholar
    • Wagner D. T. , Barnes C. M. , Lim V. K. , Ferris D. L. 2012. Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1068–1076. Google Scholar
    • Watson D. , Clark L. A. 1994. The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. Google Scholar
    • Weiss H. M. , Cropanzano R. 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw B. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 18: 1–74. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
    • Wilkowski B. M. , Robinson M. D. 2008. The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12: 3–28. Google Scholar
    • Wilkowski B. M. , Robinson M. D. 2010. Associative and spontaneous appraisal processes independently contribute to anger elicitation in daily life. Emotion, 10: 181–189. Google Scholar
    • Williams L. J. , Hartman N. , Cavazotte F. 2010. Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 477–514. Google Scholar
    • Zellars K. L. , Tepper B. J. , Duffy M. K. 2002. Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 1068–1076. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2024 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum