Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
|
m →Go fiddle myself: addendum
|
|||
|
Line 426:
:::::::::::::Random IPs are to be encouraged, to replace us lowly peons. After all, we're just units of work. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 22:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
::::::::::::::[[WP:OTHERSTUFF]] - an admin, or anybody else, calling somebody a moron is unacceptable. ''However'', just because people have been allowed to get away with calling other people morons, doesn't make swearing acceptable. Yes, it ''all'' should be considered PAs and treated accordingly, but we can't say "X was accepted in case Z so we must accept Y in case A, even though Y is as much a PA as X". Two wrongs don't make a right. - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 22:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::It clearly isn't unacceptable, as it happens every day
{{unindent|::::::::::::::}} The issue we're talking about here, as I understand it, is whether Doncram is making personal attacks, using disruptive edit summaries, and generally being uncivil. I don't see how you're involved in this particular kerfuffle, Malleus. Yes, it's wrong that someone called you a moron and "too stupid for your own good". But, I wasn't following that discussion and I don't plan to look it up. (And if I had that sort of time free, I'd be better off improving {{la|Pipestone Public Library}} from its current pitiful three-sentence stub.) I don't see why you're trying to insert your own grievances into the discussion about Doncram. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 22:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
|
|||