Barriers to Peace in Civil War

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Jun 12, 2014 - Political Science
Civil wars vary greatly in their duration. This book argues that conflicts are longer when they involve more actors who can block agreement (veto players) and identifies specific problems that arise in multi-party bargaining. Quantitative analysis of over 200 civil wars since World War II reveals that conflicts with more of these actors last much longer than those with fewer. Detailed comparison of negotiations in Rwanda and Burundi demonstrates that multi-party negotiations present additional barriers to peace not found in two party conflicts. In addition, conflicts with more veto players produce more casualties, are more likely to involve genocide and are followed by shorter periods of peace. Because they present many barriers to peace, the international community has a poor track record of resolving multi-party conflicts. David Cunningham shows that resolution is possible in these wars if peace processes are designed to address the barriers that emerge in multi-party conflicts.
 

Selected pages

Contents

1 Introduction
1
2 A veto player theory of conflict bargaining
23
3 Testing the effect of veto players on duration
63
4 Bargaining and fighting in Rwanda and Burundi
132
5 The effects of veto players on conflict severity genocide and the duration of peace
183
6 Designing peace processes in multiparty civil wars
202
7 Conclusion
245
Appendix A Civil wars included in the dataset
256
Appendix B Descriptive statistics for variables in quantitative analyses
263
References
266
Index
279
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2014)

David E. Cunningham is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Iowa State University.

Bibliographic information