skip to main content
article
Free Access

Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class

Published:01 September 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The online encyclopedia's method of adding information risks conflating facts with popular opinion.

References

  1. Rosenzweig, R. Can history be open source? Journal of American History 93, 1 (June 2006), 117--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tucker, J. (editor and translator). Ogyu Sorai's Philosophical Masterworks. Association for Asian Studies and University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 2006, 12--13, 48--51; while Ogyu sought to redefine the sources of Tokugawa legitimacy, his purpose was clearly to strengthen the authority of the Tokugawa shogunate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          David Bruce Henderson

          The author recounts an incident where several students provided the same incorrect information on an examination, each using similar language. The source of the incorrect information was quickly traced to Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.org/). As a consequence, the college department concerned has banned the use of Wikipedia as an acceptable citation. The author describes the processes involved in the review and editing of articles by professional journals in order to ensure a level of reliability and accuracy. These processes, however, also increase publishing lead times and cost. Wikipedia is able to engage the enormous user base of the Internet in order to enter, update, and edit material, which makes it instantly available online. This democratization of publishing is both Wikipedia’s advantage, through access to a large pool of eager, unpaid authors and editors, and its disadvantage in that these same people may produce material that is wrong, distorted, or malicious. The author notes that Wikipedia’s internal editors review content, but prioritize their work according to the popularity of a page. Consequently, popular items may well receive editorial scrutiny, but because of the enormous volume of material involved, the total percentage of material reviewed is likely to be small. The article provides an interesting and timely reminder that the easy-to-access material available on Wikipedia and other online systems, that anyone can edit, is likely to reflect popular opinion more than fact, and deserves no more or less credence than the opinions of your local bartender. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Communications of the ACM
            Communications of the ACM  Volume 50, Issue 9
            ACM's plan to go online first
            September 2007
            104 pages
            ISSN:0001-0782
            EISSN:1557-7317
            DOI:10.1145/1284621
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2007 Authors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 September 2007

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format