Control–Trust Dynamics in Organizations: Identifying Shared Perspectives and Charting Conceptual Fault Lines

REFERENCES

• Adler P. S. 2001. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12: 215–234. Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., & Borys B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89. Google Scholar
• Ahrens T., & Chapman C. S. 2006. Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31: 819–841. Google Scholar
• Anderson S. W., Christ M. H., Dekker H. C., & Sedatole K. L. 2013. The use of management controls to mitigate risk in strategic alliances: Field and survey evidence. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(1): 1–32. Google Scholar
• Arvey R. D. 1979. Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86(4): 736. Google Scholar
• Aryee S., Budhwar P. S., & Chen Z. X. 2002. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 267–285. Google Scholar
• Bachmann R. 2001. Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22: 337–365. Google Scholar
• Ball K. 2010. Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labor History, 51(1): 87–106. Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84: 191. Google Scholar
• Bandura A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37: 122. Google Scholar
• Barker J. R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408–437. Google Scholar
• Bendersky C. 2003. Organizational dispute resolution systems: A complementarities model. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 643–656.Link , Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A., & Putterman L. 2009. Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(1): 106–121. Google Scholar
• Bernstein E. S. 2012. The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2): 181–216. Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya R., Devinney T. M., & Pillutla M. M. 1998. A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 459–472.Link , Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema K., & Costa A. C. 2005. Understanding the trust-control nexus. International Sociology, 20(3): 259–282. Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema K., & Costa A. C. 2010. Consequences and antecedents or managerial and employee legitimacy interpretations of control: A natural open-system approach. In Sitkin S. B.Cardinal L. B.Bijlsma-Frankema K. (Eds.), Organizational control. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema K, Sitkin S. B., & Weibel A. 2015. Distrust in the balance: The emergence and development of intergroup distrust in a court of law. Organization Science, 26(4): 1018–1039. Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema K. M., & van de Bunt G. G. 2003. Antecedents of trust in managers: A “bottom up” approach. Personnel Review, 32(5): 638–664. Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway, NY: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar
• Bohnet I., Frey B. S., & Huck S. 2001. More order with less law: On contract enforcement, trust, and crowding. American Political Science Review, 95(1): 131–144. Google Scholar
• Bradach J. L., & Eccles R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97–118. Google Scholar
• Burger J. M. 1987. Increased performance with increased personal control: A self-presentation interpretation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(4): 350–360. Google Scholar
• Burger J. M. 1989. Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2): 246. Google Scholar
• Burke C. S., Sims D. E., Lazzara E. H., & Salas E. 2007. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6): 606–632. Google Scholar
• Butler J. K. 1991. Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3): 643–663. Google Scholar
• Cao Z., & Lumineau F. 2015. Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33: 15–42. Google Scholar
• Cardinal L. B., Kreutzer M., & Miller C. C. 2017. An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re-invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 559–592.Link , Google Scholar
• Cardinal L. B., Sitkin S. B., & Long C. P. 2004. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15(4): 411–431. Google Scholar
• Cardinal L. B., Sitkin S. B., & Long C. P. 2010. A configurational theory of control. In Sitkin S. B.Cardinal L. B.Bijlsma-Frankema K. (Eds.), Organizational control. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Chenhall R. H., Hall M., & Smith D. 2010. Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(8): 737–756. Google Scholar
• Chenhall R. H., Hall M., & Smith D. 2013. Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 268–287. Google Scholar
• Christ M. H. 2013. An experimental investigation of the interactions among intentions, reciprocity, and control. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 25(1): 169–197. Google Scholar
• Christ M. H., Sedatole K. L., & Towry K. L. 2012. Sticks and carrots: The effect of contract frame on effort in incomplete contracts. The Accounting Review, 87(6): 1913–1938. Google Scholar
• Christ M. H., Sedatole K. L., Towry K. L., & Thomas M. A. 2008. When formal controls undermine trust and cooperation. Strategic Finance, 89(7): 39. Google Scholar
• Coletti A. L., Sedatole K. L., & Towry K. L. 2005. The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review, 80(2): 477–500. Google Scholar
• Connell J., Ferres N., & Travaglione T. 2003. Engendering trust in manager-subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes. Personnel Review, 32(5): 569–587. Google Scholar
• Cook J., & Wall T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1): 39–52. Google Scholar
• Costa A. C., & Bijlsma-Frankema K. 2007. Trust and control interrelations new perspectives on the trust—Control nexus. Group & Organization Management, 32(4): 392–406. Google Scholar
• Creed W. D., & Miles R. E. 1996. Trust in organizations. In Kramer R. M.Tyler T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Cummings L. L., & Bromiley P. 1996. The organizational trust inventory (OTI). In Kramer R. M.Tyler T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Currall S. C., & Inkpen A. C. 2002. A multi-level approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 479–495. Google Scholar
• Das T. K., & Teng B. S. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 491–512.Link , Google Scholar
• Das T. K., & Teng B. S. 2001. Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2): 251–283. Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., & Tyler T. R. 2007. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3): 639. Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., van Dijk E., & Pillutla M. M. 2010. Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and their effects on trust: An experimental approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1): 107–126. Google Scholar
• Dekker H. C. 2004. Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1): 27–49. Google Scholar
• Dineen B. R., Lewicki R. J., & Tomlinson E. C. 2006. Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3): 622. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T. 1999. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3): 445. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T., & Ferrin D. L. 2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 611. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74.Link , Google Scholar
• Emsley D., & Kidon F. 2007. The relationship between trust and control in international joint ventures: Evidence from the airline industry. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3): 829–858. Google Scholar
• Falk A., & Kosfeld M. 2006. The hidden costs of control. The American Economic Review, 96(5): 1611–1630. Google Scholar
• Fayol H. 1949. General and industrial administration. New York: Pitman. Google Scholar
• Fehr E., & Rockenbach B. 2003. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature, 422(6928): 137. Google Scholar
• Ferrin D. L., Bligh M. C., & Kohles J. C. 2007. Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group & Organization Management, 32(4): 465–499. Google Scholar
• Ferrin D. L., & Dirks K. T. 2003. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1): 18–31. Google Scholar
• Fryxell G. E., Dooley R. S., & Vryza M. 2002. After the ink dries: The interaction of trust and control in US-based international joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6): 865–886. Google Scholar
• Fox A. 1974. Beyond contract: Work power and trust relations. London: Faber, Ltd. Google Scholar
• Fulmer C. A., & Gelfand M. J. 2012. At what level (and in whom) we trust. Journal of Management, 38: 1167–1230. Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., & Moran P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of management Review, 21(1): 13–47.Link , Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1990. Structuration theory and sociological analysis. In Clark J.Modgil C.Modgil J. (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and controversy: 297–315. Brighton, UK: Falmer Press. Google Scholar
• Gillespie N., Hurley R., Dietz G., & Bachmann R. 2012. Restoring institutional trust after the global financial crisis: A systemic approach. In Roderick M.Kramer M.Pittinsky T. L. (Eds.), Trust restoring in organizations and leaders. Enduring challenges and emerging answers: 185–2015. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Grabner I., & Moers F. 2013. Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6): 407–419. Google Scholar
• Grey C., & Garsten C. 2001. Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22(2): 229–250. Google Scholar
• Gulati R., & Nickerson J. A. 2008. Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5): 688–708. Google Scholar
• Hartmann F., & Slapničar S. 2009. How formal performance evaluation affects trust between superior and subordinate managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6): 722–737. Google Scholar
• Hayashi N., Ostrom E., Walker J., & Yamagishi T. 1999. Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11(1): 27–46. Google Scholar
• Hernandez M., Long C. P., & Sitkin S. B. 2014. Cultivating follower trust: Are all behaviors equally influential? Organization Studies, 35(12): 1867–1892. Google Scholar
• Hongo J. 2015.The Wall Street Journal—Who’s the boss? Hitachi looks to promote artificial intelligence. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2015/09/08/whos-the-boss-hitachi-looks-to-promote-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed July 6, 2016. Google Scholar
• Inkpen A. C., & Currall S. C. 2004. The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5): 586–599. Google Scholar
• Jagd S. 2010. Balancing trust and control in organizations: Towards a process perspective. Society and Business Review, 5(3): 259–269. Google Scholar
• Jermier J. M. 1998. Introduction: Critical perspective on organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2): 235–256. Google Scholar
• Kay A., Gaucher D., Napier J., Callan M., & Laurin K. 2008. God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1): 18–35. Google Scholar
• Kay A., Whilson J., Gaucher D., & Galinsky A. 2005. Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(50): 264–268. Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. 2004. Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15(4): 374–395. Google Scholar
• Khodyakov D. M. 2007. The complexity of trust-control relationships in creative organizations: Insights from a qualitative analysis of a conductorless orchestra. Social Forces, 86: 1–22. Google Scholar
• Korsgaard M. A., Schweiger D. M., & Sapienza H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 60–84.Link , Google Scholar
• Kruglanski A. W. 1970. Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(2): 214–232. Google Scholar
• Kuhn T. S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Langfield-Smith K. 1997. Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2): 207–232. Google Scholar
• Langfield-Smith K., & Smith D. 2003. Management control systems and trust in outsourcing relationships. Management Accounting Research, 14(3): 281–307. Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. 2004. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3): 385–399.Link , Google Scholar
• Lebas M., & Weigenstein J. 1986. Management control: The role of rules, market and culture. Journal of Management Studies, 23(3): 259–272. Google Scholar
• Lee C., Ashford S. J., & Bobko P. 1990. Interactive effects of “Type A” behavior and perceived control on worker performance, job satisfaction, and somatic complaints. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 870–881.Link , Google Scholar
• Leifer R., & Mills P. K. 1996. An information processing approach for deciding upon control strategies and reducing control loss in emerging organizations. Journal of Management, 22(1): 113–137. Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., & Carroll T. N. 1999. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5): 535–550. Google Scholar
• Lui S. S., & Ngo H. Y. 2004. The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. Journal of Management, 30(4): 471–485. Google Scholar
• Long C. P. 2002. Balancing organizational controls with trust-building and fairness-building initiatives. Available at: https://search.library.duke.edu/search?id=DUKE003125079. Google Scholar
• Long C. P. 2010. Control to cooperation: Examining the role of managerial authority in portfolios of managerial action. In Sitkin S. B.Cardinal L. B.Bijlsma-Frankema K. (Eds.), Organizational control. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Long C. P. 2018. How managers motivate subordinate cooperation through organizational control applications and demonstrations of their trustworthiness, forthcoming. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Google Scholar
• Long C. P., Bendersky C., & Morrill C. 2011. Fairness monitoring: Linking managerial controls and fairness judgments in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5): 1045–1068.Link , Google Scholar
• Long C. P., Burton R. M., & Cardinal L. B. 2002. Three controls are better than one: A computational model of complex control systems. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 8(3): 197–220. Google Scholar
• Long C. P., & Sitkin S. B. 2006. Trust in the balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. In Bachmann R.Zaheer A. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Lumineau F. 2015. How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of Management, 45(3): 1553–1577. Google Scholar
• Malhotra D., & Lumineau F. 2011. Trust and collaboration in the aftermath of conflict: The effects of contract structure. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5): 981–998.Link , Google Scholar
• Malhotra D., & Murnighan J. K. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3): 534–559. Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., & Davis J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123. Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709–734.Link , Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 24–59.Link , Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Perrone V., & Zaheer A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1): 91–103. Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., & Chervany N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 473–490.Link , Google Scholar
• Mellewigt T., Madhok A., & Weibel A. 2007. Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships—Substitutes and complements. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(8): 833–847. Google Scholar
• Merchant K. A. 1985. Control in business organization. New York: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Merchant K. A., & Van der Stede W. A. 2007. Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives. New York: Prentice Hall-Financial Times. Google Scholar
• Merchant K. A., Van der Stede W. A., & Zheng L. 2003. Disciplinary constraints on the advancement of knowledge: The case of organizational incentive systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2): 251–286. Google Scholar
• Miller G. 1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Mishra A. K., & Mishra K. E. 2013. The research on trust in leadership: The need for context. Journal of Trust Research, 3(1): 59–69. Google Scholar
• Mislin A. A., Campagna R. L., & Bottom W. P. 2011. After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1): 55–68. Google Scholar
• Mizrachi N., Drori I., & Anspach R. R. 2007. Repertoires of trust: The practice of trust in a multinational organization amid political conflict. American Sociological Review, 72(1): 143–165. Google Scholar
• Möllering G. 2005. The trust/control duality an integrative perspective on positive expectations of others. International Sociology, 20(3): 283–305. Google Scholar
• Murnighan J. K., Oesch J. M., & Pillutla M. 2001. Player types and self-impression management in dictatorship games: Two experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 37(2): 388–414. Google Scholar
• Neves P., & Caetano A. 2006. Social exchange processes in organizational change: The roles of trust and control. Journal of Change Management, 6(4): 351–364. Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. 1996. Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6): 985–1010. Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. 2002. Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. 1977. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 95–113. Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. 1978. The transmission of control through organizational hierarchy. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2): 173–192. Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9): 833–848. Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129–141. Google Scholar
• Pearce J. L., Branyiczki I., & Bigley G. A. 2000. Insufficient bureaucracy: Trust and commitment in particularistic organizations. Organization Science, 11(2): 148–162. Google Scholar
• Pennings J. M., & Woiceshyn J. 1987. A typology of organizational control and its metaphors. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 5: 75–104. Google Scholar
• Pillutla M. M., Malhotra D., & Murnighan J. K. 2003. Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5): 448–455. Google Scholar
• Poppo L., & Zenger T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 707–725. Google Scholar
• Poppo L., & Zheng C. 2017. Trust and contracts: Complements versus substitutes in business-to-business exchanges. In Searle R.Nienaber A.Sitkin S. (Eds.), Trust. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Reed M. I. 2001. Organization, trust and control: A realist analysis. Organization Studies, 22(2): 201–228. Google Scholar
• Righetti F., & Finkenauer C. 2011. If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5): 874. Google Scholar
• Roberts J. 2001. Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability. Human Relations, 54(12): 1547–1572. Google Scholar
• Ross A. 1994. Trust as a moderator of the effect of performance evaluation style on job-related tension: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(7): 629–635. Google Scholar
• Roth N. L., Sitkin S. B., & House A. 1994. Stigma as a determinant of legalization. In Sitkin S. B.Bies R. J. (Eds.), The legalistic organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., & Camerer C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404.Link , Google Scholar
• Rus A., & Iglič H. 2005. Trust, governance and performance the role of institutional and interpersonal trust in SME development. International Sociology, 20(3): 371–391. Google Scholar
• Sako M. 1992. Price, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Searle R., Den Hartog D. N., Weibel A., Gillespie N., Six F., Hatzakis T., & Skinner D. 2011. Trust in the employer: The role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05): 1069–1092. Google Scholar
• Searle R., Nienaber A, & Sitkin S. B. 2018. Routledge companion to trust. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Şengün A. E., & Wasti S. N. 2007. Trust, control, and risk: A test of Das and Teng’s conceptual framework for pharmaceutical buyer-supplier relationships. Group & Organization Management, 32(4): 430–464. Google Scholar
• Shapiro S. P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93: 623–658. Google Scholar
• Skinner E. A. 1996. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3): 549. Google Scholar
• Skinner D., Dietz G., & Weibel A. 2014. The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a poisoned chalice. Organization, 21: 206–224. Google Scholar
• Skinner D., & Spira L. F. 2003. Trust and control—A symbiotic relationship? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 3(4): 28–35. Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B. 1995. On the positive effect of legalization on trust. In Bies R. J.Lewicki R. J.Sheppard B. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., & Bies R. J. 1994. The legalistic organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., & George E. 2005. Managerial trust-building through the use of legitimating formal and informal control mechanisms. International Sociology, 20(3): 307–338. Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., & Roth N. L. 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4: 367–392. Google Scholar
• Snell S. A. 1992. Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2): 292–327.Link , Google Scholar
• Son H. 2015. JPMorgan algorithm knows you’re a rogue employee before you do. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-08/jpmorgan-algorithmknows-you-re-a-rogue-employee-before-you-do. Accessed July 6, 2016. Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G. M., & Mishra A. K. 1999. Giving up control without losing control trust and its substitutes’ effects on managers’ involving employees in decision making. Group & Organization Management, 24(2): 155–187. Google Scholar
• Strickland L. H. 1958. Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26(2): 200–215. Google Scholar
• Sydow J. 1998. Understanding the constitution of interorganizational trust. In Lane C.Bachmann R. (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Sydow J., & Windeler A. 2003. Knowledge, trust, and control: Managing tensions and contradictions in a regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 33(2): 69–100. Google Scholar
• Thompson S. C. 1981. Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1): 89. Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S., & Zucker L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 22–39. Google Scholar
• Tomkins C. 2001. Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(2): 161–191. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., & Lind E. A. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 115–191. Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J., & Schein E. H. 1979. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In Staw B. W.Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Vélez M. L., Sánchez J. M., & Álvarez-Dardet C. 2008. Management control systems as inter-organizational trust builders in evolving relationships: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7): 968–994. Google Scholar
• Vlaar P. W., Van den Bosch F. A., & Volberda H. W. 2007. On the evolution of trust, distrust, and formal coordination and control in interorganizational relationships toward an integrative framework. Group & Organization Management, 32(4): 407–428. Google Scholar
• Vosselman E., & van der Meer-Kooistra J. 2009. Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2): 267–283. Google Scholar
• Walgenbach P. 2001. The production of distrust by means of producing trust. Organization Studies, 22(4): 693–714. Google Scholar
• Wanous J. P. 1980. Organizational entry. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Publishers. Google Scholar
• Weber J. M., Malhotra D., & Murnighan J. K. 2004. Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26: 75–101. Google Scholar
• Weibel A. 2007. Formal control and trustworthiness shall the twain never meet? Group & Organization Management, 32(4): 500–517. Google Scholar
• Weibel A., Den Hartog D. N., Gillespie N., Searle R., Six F., & Skinner D. 2015. How do controls impact employee trust in the employer? Human Resource Management, 22(5): 1069–1092. Google Scholar
• Weibel A., & Six F. 2013. Trust and control: The role of intrinsic motivation. In Bachmann R.Zaheer A. (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Weibel A., Wildhaber I., Leicht-Deobald U., Schank C., & Busch T. 2016. Big data or big brother? Big data HR control practices and employee trust. Swiss National Science Foundation. Google Scholar
• Whitener E. M. 2001. Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5): 515–535. Google Scholar
• Whitener E. M., Brodt S. E., Korsgaard M. A., & Werner J. M. 1998. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 513–530.Link , Google Scholar
• Whitley R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Wicks A. C., Berman S. L., & Jones T. M. 1999. The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24, 99–116.Link , Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. 1993. Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 131–145. Google Scholar
• Woolthuis R. K., Hillebrand B., & Nooteboom B. 2005. Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies, 26(6): 813–840. Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., McEvily B., & Perrone V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2): 141–159. Google Scholar
• Zhou K. Z., Poppo L., & Yang Z. 2008. Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 526–534. Google Scholar
• Zucker L. 1986. The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 53–111. Google Scholar