Did Darwin write the Origin backwards?

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10048-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901109106. Epub 2009 Jun 15.

Abstract

After clarifying how Darwin understood natural selection and common ancestry, I consider how the two concepts are related in his theory. I argue that common ancestry has evidential priority. Arguments about natural selection often make use of the assumption of common ancestry, whereas arguments for common ancestry do not require the assumption that natural selection has been at work. In fact, Darwin held that the key evidence for common ancestry comes from characters whose evolution is not caused by natural selection. This raises the question of why Darwin puts natural selection first and foremost in the Origin.

Publication types

  • Historical Article
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Biology / history
  • History, 19th Century
  • Humans
  • Selection, Genetic*