The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20070216192133/http://www.mike-hawthorn.org.uk:80/lemans.php
The Mike Hawthorn Tribute Site











Visitors have viewed this page

Site Map
Contact Us
Become a Member


An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk


An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk





An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

 

 

The information shown here covering the events at Le Mans in 1955 is taken from an article that appeared in Jaguar World in June 1993 - it has been enhanced with additional text, images and videos both of the race and of the crash. It is reproduced here with kind permission from the publisher, Paul Skilleter. You may link to it but not copy it. It is in several parts


  The Story of Le Mans 1955
Part 1


"When I started racing, I wore an ordinary tie, but then I found it flapped in my face so I changed to a bow tie. Now it's a sort of trademark and that's why the French call me 'Le Papillon'." -JMH


A cavalier of the track and one of Britain's most famous motor racing sons, Mike Hawthorn culminated eight seasons of racing for fun by winning the world championship for his beloved country in 1958. Driving for Ferrari, Vanwall, BRM and Jaguar, it was with Ferrari that he gained this greatest accolade.

Yet he drove a Jaguar with such fervour and tenacity that nobody could match him. Many notable writers of the day felt no one had ever driven a Jaguar like Hawthorn. As Jaguar teamleader he enjoyed a good deal of success during the '55/'56 season, prior to the demise of the Jaguar's competitions department. Had he not experienced various mechanical problems, his successes with the 'D' type at Sebring and Le Mans in 1955 might have been repeated in 1956. His last drive in a Jaguar was at Sebring in 1957 with XKD 605; he finished third.

He had always given a consistent one hundred per cent at the wheel of any car - his 3.4 saloon car drives at Silverstone in 1957/58 are legendary - and had become a much-loved and well-respected man with the public and personnel on and off the track, despite occasional press controversy.

He was held in special regard at Browns Lane, Coventry. Those who knew him at the Jaguar factory were impressed by his personality and genuine, friendly nature. His engineering background and passion for Jaguar made him especially popular with the competitions department and he built up a particular rapport with Len Hayden and 'Lofty' England. Andrew Whyte compared the relationship between Mike and 'Lofty' with that between Jim Clark and Colin Chapman some years later.

Mike Hawthorn was not yet 30 when in 1959 he crashed his 3.4 Jaguar saloon on the Guildford by-pass and died.

One of Britain's most captivating and gifted racing drivers, John Michael Hawthorn's career included disasters as well as triumphs. Here Paul Skilleter examines his Jaguar works drive in the tragic 1955 Le Mans race.

Paul Roach



Le Mans 1955

The 1955 24-Hour race at Le Mans always was going to be an epic. Mercedes-Benz had entered its brilliant new W196 single seater-based sports car, the 300SLR. Stirling Moss -who had won the 1955 Mille Miglia in a 300SLR less than two months before - was paired with Juan Manuel Fangio in perhaps the most formidable driver combination Le Mans had ever seen. Two other Mercedes were driven by Karl Kling and Andre Simon, and John Fitch and Pierre Levegh (whose single-handed drive in the 1952 race had nearly deprived the Mercedes 3OOSL of its victory).

Ferrari was present with three enormously powerful (360bhp) 4.4-litre 121 LMs and, especially after they had beaten the new 'D' type the year before, could not be discounted. But on the grounds of reliability, Jaguar were generally viewed as a better bet -especially as the completely revised 1955 cars now had 270bhp, a more aerodynamically efficient body and the enormous asset of properly-developed disc brakes.

The full Jaguar team, and the other Jaguars entered, were as follows:-

Entrant Ch. no. Reg. no. Drivers Race no.
JC XKD505 774RW Hawthorn Bueb 6
EF XKD503 Claes/ Swaters 10
C XKD506 O32RW Rolt/ Hamilton 7
JC XKD508 194WK Beauman/ Dewis 8
BC XKD507 Spear/ Walters 9


JC Jaguar Cars;
EC Ecurie Francorchamps;
BC: Briggs Cunningham

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
Sure enough, the race soon developed into a stupendous duel between Fangio and Hawthorn who, after 15 laps, overhauled Castellotti's Ferrari. The Mercedes and Jaguar drivers, passing and re-passing each other, annihilated the lap record in turn, though it was Hawthorn who finally posted the quickest lap of all, at 4 mins 6.6 secs., an average of 122.39mph.

It was a fascinating contest, sustained by two great drivers conducting two fine but very different cars. The bulkier Mercedes was tubular-framed with independent swing-axle rear suspension that helped put the power down. Motive force was provided by the complicated downdraught inlet M196 'straight eight' engine of impressive specification (yet slated some years later by Harry Mundy who thought that, with its well-developed desmodromic valve gear, huge 1.968in inlet valves and roller bearings throughout, it should have developed more than 300bhp!).

The car's Achilles heel at Le Mans might have been its brakes; these were drum and had earlier given concern through their tendency to 'grab'. Mercedes' counter-measures at Le Mans were twofold : the 300SLR was provided with a large air-brake which rose up behind the cockpit, and with four dash-mounted plungers which were apparently intended for driver operation, to squirt oil into a grabbing brake. The air brake was somewhat controversial and while Jaguar team manager 'Lofty' England states that he didn't protest pre-race as has been suggested, the Le Mans scrutineers insisted that little windows be cut in the panel to allow something of a rear-mirror view when the air brake was applied.

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

Jaguar, on the other hand, had no Formula One technology to use. Indeed the 'D' type's mechanical aspects were largely production derived. The 3.4-litre dry-sump straight-six engine had classic twin ohc valve operation, with 7/16in lift camshafts, 2in inlet valves and a 9:1 compression ratio. The 35/40 degree cylinder head was a twin-spark type, but only one sparking plug per cylinder was actually used. Much more than the 270bhp given could have been extracted but Bill Heynes knew that reliability was paramount at Le Mans.

The car's tubular frame which penetrated the car's unique aircraft-riveted aluminium monocoque was enclosed by Malcolm Sayer's beautiful bodywork. In today's terms this was not especially 'aerodynamic' - it was the car's commendably small frontal area that probably helped give the 'D' type a slightly better top speed than the more powerful Mercedes and Ferraris.

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

The 'D' type's live axle rear suspension was crude compared to the Mercedes' but less of a handicap on the fast, smooth Le Mans circuit for which the car was exclusively designed. But to compensate were those wonderful power disc brakes, honed to reliability by Dunlop and Jaguar since first being used on a 'C type in 1952.

The Accident

The battle of technologies and wills continued for almost 2 1/2 hours, with Hawthorn just in the lead after having been - at his own later admission -initially mesmorised by the sleek silver German car. Castellotti by this time was an increasingly distant third. Then the refuelling and driver changes began, ushering in the most horrific motor racing accident of all time.

Malcolm Sayer, keeping the Jaguar team's records in the pits, wrote: "The Mercedes accident appears to have occurred at approximately 18 hrs. 27 min. 40 sec. by our timing, on No. 6's 35th lap, No . 7's 34th, No. 8's 34th and No. 10's 33rd".

Much has been written about the accident in which over 80 people (the true total has never been established) lost their lives.



Le Mans 1955 in 9 mins! Colour Video

Here's coverage of 1955 Le Mans in colour via YouTube, produced by the Standard Motor Co, all done in just over 9 minutes. Some nice shots of Mike at the beginning and, of course, his winning efforts in the Jaguar D-type, XKD 505. Also mention of the Triumph success.

You'll need the appropriate FLASH plugin to watch this in your browser (in the frame below) else nothing will happen. The late Raymond Baxter commentates. Note that the crash itself is not shown but the aftermath is.





If you go to our Pathe Videos page, they have six further videos covering the race in much more detail. Here is one that specifically covers the crash:

1955 LE MANS DISASTER

B/W. Sound. 2min 24 secs

Specific overage of the Le Mans disaster. This footage includes graphic scenes that were removed from the longer 1955 coverage. Note that the video of the crash scenes is mirrored and everything is reversed!


In Part Two of this article, we have driver Paul Frere's analysis of the crash as well as links to over 90 still images of the crash sequence . We are working on a reconstruct of the crash sequence from 60 stills to provide a video.

It appears that Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, the future publisher of The New York Times, was just beginning his career with the paper and was in the stands during the crash. He did not think to phone in the story.


Laying the Blame

More than one account lays the blame squarely on Hawthorn's shoulders. Most recently, Chris Nixon devotes three entire chapters to the accident and its consequences in his impressive and lengthy biography of Hawthorn and Peter Collins ('Mon Ami Mate', published by Transport Bookman publications at £50); and while Nixon does not indict Hawthorn directly - he sums up the whole incident as purely a 'racing accident', with which we heartily concur-nevertheless to us it seems quite clear what the author himself really thinks...

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
The crash seen from the pits area
© Life Magazine


An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
A distant view of the crash with Levegh's Mercedes still burning fiercely. One of the few images taken from this side of the track

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
A closer view of the crash with Levegh's Mercedes burning

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
The effect of putting water onto that particular chassis...

While Chris Nixon produces a wealth of opinion and facts, we do find some odd omissions. He quotes various eye-witnesses (including at length from a somewhat, in our opinion, muddled account by writer Douglas Rutherford), and is open about using much information (with permission) from Sunday Mirror journalist Mark Khan's 1976 book, 'Death Race: Le Mans 1955'. But strangely there is no reference at all to one of the most analytical dissertations on the accident, that written by journalist/ racing driver Paul Frere in 1975. Andrew Whyte used Frere's account in its entirety in his master-work on the post-1953 works Jaguars and, whether one agrees with his conclusions or not, this most detailed and closely-argued opinion, expressed by a very qualified witness, surely needs to be given consideration.

Originally written in German by Paul Frere for the Austrian magazine Autorevue of June 1975 as a reaction to another book, with his permission we reprint it here in Part 2, together with his personal conclusion that no single driver was to blame.

We also reprint eight photographs of the accident. 'Mon Ami Mate' contains just three, omitting the all-important early views showing the beginning of the incident. From these photographs alone (which to our knowledge have not appeared in any British magazine before) readers may be able to reach their own conclusions.

Horrified at what had transpired, Hawthorn had pulled up a little way down from his pit - not, says 'Lofty', because he overshot it but because he had been expecting the mechanics to wave him in "and as soon as I saw the Mercedes Benz hit the Austin Healey I stopped them getting down on to the road, plus the fact that Mike, as I did, expected more cars to become involved in a general pile-up."

A distraught Hawthorn was ordered by 'Lofty' to do another lap (reversing was not allowed) and Ivor Bueb then took over - in not the happiest circumstances for a newcomer to Le Mans. Meanwhile the race authorities elected to continue the event, fearing that a sudden exodus of spectators would hamper ambulances taking the injured to hospital. Mercedes were now in the lead, Moss as expected comfortably quicker than Bueb, with the Kling/Simon300SLR third.

But the Jaguar/Mercedes battle was not to be resolved on the road as in the early morning the German team received orders to pack up and go home. Comments 'Lofty' England:

"It seems remarkable to me that the Mercedes Benz people running the cars were not able to make their own decision regarding withdrawal, but had to ask their directors. I was in charge for Jaguar and made my own decisions... When Uhlenhaut (whom I had known from pre-war) and Kaser (Mercedes' PR director) came to our pit they told me they had been instructed by their directors in Stuttgart to retire as public feeling in Germany was so high, and did I also intend to pull out? I did not discuss who might have been to blame but said that I believed the organisers had been right to continue the race and that Mercedes Benz, having continued to race for more than six hours after the accident, I could not see the point in them now withdrawing, and I did not intend to pull out our cars."

With the departure of Mercedes, the Hawthorn/Bueb car more or less coasted to victory, though still covering a record distance. Despite the onset of bad weather. Paul Frere and Peter Collins came second in_their 2.9-litre Aston Martin, and Claes/Swaters third in the Belgian-entered 'D' type.

The debate on whether there would have been a Jaguar victory had Mercedes remained in contention will continue for ever. Perhaps half of Moss's two-lap lead had been handed to him through the delays occurring when Hawthorn stopped immediately after the accident. But there is no denying that Moss was, of course, much faster than Bueb. On the basis of combined driver abilities there is no doubt that Mercedes had a clear Advantage.

On the other hand, the 'D' type had proved itself to be the quickest car on the circuit whoever was in the Mercedes, and it was possibly the most reliable car, too, on an all-round basis. Jaguar had ‘spotters’ around the circuit logging the 300SLRs braking points, and they recorded that the mandatory brake lights were coming on earlier and earlier as the race progressed, perhaps indicating that the drum brakes were losing their efficiency. If Hawthorn had put on a mid-race charge, secure in the knowledge the Jaguar's disc brakes could take anything handed out to them, would the 300SLRs drums have wilted? At the very least, a Mercedes victory in 1955 was not a foregone conclusion.

But that's what the Mercedes-Benz organisation did its utmost to maintain in the days that followed, while also implying that Hawthorn's pit stop maneouvre was a prime cause of the accident. Jaguar had decided not to comment but felt obliged to do so after a press conference held by Mercedes on June 15. Two days later, Jaguar's PRO Bill Rankin issued a statement. Wrote Rankin to a journalist:

"We have indisputable proof....that the Germans have turned on a high pressure propaganda campaign in an endeavour to establish three things. First, that they could in no way be held responsible for the accident and that Jaguar could; second, that their cars were superior; third, that they would have won anyway and that they had the race in their pockets when they retired."

[You can read the official press statements here]

Worse appeared in the French press, sections of which were determined to place all the blame on Hawthorn. This and a variety of blatantly inaccurate reports appearing in magazines and newspapers all over the world had Rankin beside himself with anger. "Right now", he complained, "I have literally thousands of press clippings in a dozen languages, most of which I have translated and have read with mounting irritation and often with disgust."

Meanwhile Jaguar instructed all their dealers and distributors worldwide that no publicity was to be given to Jaguar's victory.

Naturally there was an official enquiry and a report was sent by the police headquarters at Angers to the French home office on July 6. It did not single out Hawthorn as responsible for the accident. Nor was the hostility shown towards Hawthorn in some (but not all) the French press reflected by the Automobile Club de I'Ouest, the average spectator or even the relatives of the accident's victims. Says 'Lofty' England: "The next year, shortly before the start, I learned that a memorial to those killed the previous year was to be unveiled opposite the pits. Thus if there had been any major (or any) anti-Hawthorn feeling among the relatives of those killed there could have been a demonstration against Mike. There was nothing. If there had been I intended to withdraw all three Jaguars there and then."

There were no Mercedes at Le Mans in 1956, and a 'D' type Jaguar won. But not with Hawthorn driving - he and Bueb were delayed by a cracked pipe in XKD 605's (our cover car) fuel injection system, and finished sixth.

The 1955 Le Mans race was a human tragedy of major proportions. Above all, perhaps, we should remember the personal grief and pain suffered by those directly involved - the ill-fated spectators, and the sadness which may still linger today among their surviving relatives. We should remember poor Lance Macklin who was projected into a nightmare scenario utterly not of his instigation; and we should mourn the loss of the veteran French driver Pierre Levegh.

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

Only then should we express regret for how both Jaguar and Mercedes were denied the chance of reaping the wonderful commercial benefits of a Le Mans success; and for how we were cheated of seeing to a conclusion what would have been one of the most exciting and closely-fought battles Le Mans has ever seen, waged between great drivers and great marques.

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk

Paul Skilleter

Part 2 details driver Paul Frere's analysis of the accident (with detail analysis images)


We also have many paintings of Mike at Le Mans like below - see our Artwork section

An image from www.Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk
Michael Turner's painting of Mike Hawthorn's victorious Jaguar D-type, XKD 505, leading the Mercedes of Juan Fangio through Whitehouse corner at Le Mans in 1955.

 
Home | Bio | Le Mans | Cars | Images | Media | Mike's Death | Memorials | Memorabilia | Links | Credits | Enquiries | Site Map  | About 
Copyright © 2006-2007 Mike-Hawthorn.Org.Uk