|
Media Ownership Regulation in AustraliaE-Brief: Online Only issued 22 October 2001; updated 26 March 2002; updated 16 June 2003; updated 30 May 2006. Dr John Gardiner-Garden, Analysis and Policy, Social Policy Section |
Type of Newspaper |
Titles |
Total Circulation (million) |
Capital City & National Daily � Mon to Fri |
12 |
2.3 |
Capital City & National Daily - Saturday |
12 |
3.0 |
Capital City Sunday Papers |
11 |
3.5 |
Regional Daily |
35 |
0.6 |
Regional Non-Daily |
235 |
0.7 |
Capital City Community (free or partly paid) |
126 |
7.0 |
Regional Community (free or partly paid) |
154 |
3.7 |
The following table gives the percentage of circulation in each category for the newspapers controlled by the major owners.
Percentage of Circulation for Major Newspaper Owners
Controlling Interest |
Capital City Mon-Fri (% of circulation.) |
Capital City Saturday (% of circulation) |
Capital City Sunday (% of circulation) |
Regional Daily (% of circulation) |
Regional Non-Daily (% of circulation) |
Capital City Community (% of circulation) |
Regional Community (% of circulation) |
News Corp |
68 |
61 |
78 |
23 |
4 |
56 (1) |
18 (1) |
John Fairfax Holdings |
22 |
24 |
20 |
16 |
23 (2) |
10 |
|
Independent Print Media Group |
|||||||
West Australian Newspapers Holdings |
9 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
|
Rural Press |
2 |
2 |
1 |
21 |
31 |
2 |
21 |
APN News & Media |
27 |
9 |
17 |
||||
Other (3) |
12 |
51 |
14 |
27 |
(1) Includes joint venture with West Australian Newspapers Holdings Ltd
(2) Includes joint venture with Torch Publishing
(3) Comprises 121 companies/owners
There are 56 commercial television licences. The main operators, together with the percentage of the population that their stations reach, are as follows:
It should be noted that the three major networks are also broadcast by stations that they do not own, so that their actual reach and influence is greater than would appear from the above figures.
The national broadcasters, the ABC and SBS, also have television networks that reach most of the population. On average, the ABC is watched by around 13 million people each week. Over 7 million people watch the SBS each week.
The major pay TV operators are Austar United Communications Ltd (498 000 subscribers), Foxtel (more than 998 000 subscribers) and Optus Television (164 000 subscribers).
There are also six community television licences and eighty remote indigenous community broadcasting licences.
The following table summarises the radio services available in Australia.
Type of Radio Services |
Number of Stations/Licences |
Commercial Radio Services using the broadcasting services bands |
261 |
Commercial Radio Services not using the broadcasting services bands |
13 |
Community Radio Stations |
359 |
ABC - Four national networks (Radio National, Classic FM, Triple J, NewsRadio) broadcast on stations in each capital city and Newcastle) |
36 |
ABC - other radio stations |
57 |
Those radio networks that reach over ten per cent of the population are listed below.
Name |
Capital City Licences |
Regional Licences |
Percentage of population reached |
Austereo Group Ltd |
10 |
59 |
|
DMG Radio Australia |
7 |
1 |
53 |
Southern Cross Broadcasting (Australia) Ltd |
7 |
53 |
|
The Australian Radio Network |
7 |
1 |
51 |
Broadcast Operations P/L |
1 |
29 |
27 |
Macquarie Regional Radioworks (Macquarie Bank Ltd) |
2 |
88 |
22 |
Macquarie Radio Network Ltd |
2 |
19 |
|
Tabcorp Holdings |
1 |
19 |
|
3UZ P/L |
1 |
1 |
19 |
Pacific Star Network Ltd |
2 |
18 |
The maintenance of local regional programming first became an issue with the introduction of 'aggregation' in the late 1980s. This was the process of creating larger, more viable regional television markets by combining existing licence areas so that they could be served by three commercial services. Aggregation was introduced by the Broadcasting Amendment Act 1987. At the time, it was argued that the larger service areas provided through aggregation would provide an opportunity for licensees to expand and develop regional content and that viewer' preferences would provide an incentive for regional licensees to produce local programs.
These hopes do not appear to have been fulfilled. The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Communications, Transport and the Arts report, Local Voices: Inquiry into Regional Radio (September 2001) drew attention to the decline of local radio programming with the consolidation of ownership in the commercial radio industry and the consequent increase in networking. In 2001 there was also a decline in regional television news coverage: Prime Television cut news bulletins in Canberra, Newcastle and Wollongong, while Southern Cross Broadcasting cut local news in Canberra, Townsville, Cairns, Darwin and Alice Springs.
On 6 December 2001 the Australian Broadcasting Authority announced that it would undertake an investigation into the adequacy of local television news and information programs in regional and rural Australia. The final report was published in August 2002. The ABA inquiry focussed on the four aggregated television markets of Regional Queensland, Northern NSW, Southern NSW and Regional Victoria. It found that:
The ABA proposed an additional condition on all regional licensees in the four aggregated markets. This condition would require them to broadcast a minimum amount of programs about matters of local significance to each sub-market. Documents, compliance results and background can be obtained from this ACMA page.
It has been argued that the media ownership rules in the Broadcasting Services Act should be repealed and that the industry should be treated the same as other areas of the economy, i.e. be subject to competition regulation through the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The major difficulty with the general competition law approach is that the merger provision of section 50 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, while maintaining competition within markets, would not necessarily maintain plurality and diversity across different markets. This means that a newspaper owner would be able to acquire television and radio stations that served the same region. It was for this reason that the Productivity Commission recommended that the insertion of a media-specific public interest test into the Trade Practices Act be a precondition to the repeal of the cross-media rules. These matters are dealt with at more length in the ACCC's submission to the Productivity Commission's Broadcasting Inquiry, which can be obtained from this page (submission No.159).
More recently, the Chairman of the ACCC has discussed the possible development of new regulatory approaches appropriate for the changing media environment:
The upshot of all these changes is that in the future a media market might be defined by the content, such as, for example, classified advertising, or even just employment advertising, rather than the medium used to convey the content. In other words, the ACCC won�t simply be saying, �one newspaper, one radio and one TV� doesn�t amount to a substantial lessening of competition. In certain matters, that may no longer be the case.
It is notable that while the number of media platforms has increased, the actual sources of news and current affairs have remained stable. A recent Morgan survey indicated that the most popular Internet news sites were those operated by Fairfax, News Limited, the ABC and Channel Nine. The same point is made by Dwyer et al. (p. 42):
� it can be argued that the significance attributed to the discussion paper to the influence and availability of Internet news sources is overstated. Recent surveys and polls point to the continuing importance of free-to-air television, newspapers and radio, particularly for coverage of national politics and current affairs. For example, a Morgan Poll conducted in December 2005 revealed that for coverage of events in Australia, 56% of people used free-to-air TV, 18% turned to radio and 11% turned to newspapers (a total of 85%). For coverage of political background and analysis of events in Australia, 41 % turned to free-to-air television, 27% turned to newspapers, and 13% turned to radio (a total of 81%). A survey of Australian electoral habits in 2004 found only 2-3% of the Australian population used the Internet for political information. A more recent poll conducted by Morgan in March 2006 revealed that 'when Australians go online for news their main sources are Fairfax or News Corporation, the two giants of print media in Australia'. The next two most-visited sites were those of the free-to-air networks, ninemsn and the ABC. Morgan reported that 'the news arm on Internet portal Yahoo!, Yahoo!, was a distant fifth'.
The table below details the possible effect of the replacement of the current rules with the 5/4 rule suggested in the Government�s recent Discussion Paper. It refers to only those markets (defined by the relevant radio licence area) that have an associated daily newspaper. This constitutes around 86 per cent of the population.
Current Media Outlets |
||||||
Market |
Radio Licence Area Pop as a % of Australia |
Paper |
Radio |
TV |
Current Minimum Possible Owners |
Minimum Possible Owners under 5/4 |
Adelaide |
5.91 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
Albury Wodonga |
0.64 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Ballarat |
0.61 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Bathurst |
0.24 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Bendigo |
0.99 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Brisbane |
8.64 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
Broken Hill |
0.11 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Bundaberg |
0.37 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Burnie |
0.31 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Cairns |
0.8 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Canberra |
1.88 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Darwin |
0.64 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Devonport |
0.34 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Dubbo |
0.35 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Geelong |
1.67 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Gladstone |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
|
Gold Coast |
2.33 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Grafton |
0.26 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Gympie |
0.57 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Hobart |
1.15 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Ipswich |
0.93 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Kalgoorlie |
0.18 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
Launceston |
0.58 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Lismore |
0.72 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Mackay |
0.61 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Maroochydore |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
Maryborough |
0.39 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Melbourne |
17.91 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
11 |
5 |
Mildura |
0.3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Mt Gambier |
0.27 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Mt Isa |
0.13 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Muswellbrook |
0.25 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Nambour |
1.9 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Newcastle |
2.63 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Orange |
0.35 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Perth |
7.07 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
Rockhampton |
0.81 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Shepparton |
0.84 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Sydney |
18.97 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
11 |
5 |
Tamworth |
0.32 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Toowoomba |
0.96 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Townsville |
1 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
Tweed Heads |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
Wagga Wagga |
0.52 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Warrnambool |
0.27 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Warwick |
1 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
|
Wollongong |
1.36 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
Note: markets without given population percentages are part of other radio licence areas. It has been assumed that existing competition law would prevent any one owner from controlling more than one television licence in any one market.
There is no necessary connection between diversity of ownership and diversity of views. For example, it is possible for different licensees to broadcast the same networked program material. Alternatively, a single proprietor could maintain separate newsrooms for each of their media outlets. However, ownership is easily monitored and regulated whereas concepts such as 'diversity of views' are much more difficult to assess and regulate. The relationship between proprietors and editorial staff, which is relevant to any discussion about media ownership and influence, is a particularly difficult subject for legislative action. The House of Representatives Select Committee on the Print Media report, News and Fair Fact: The Australian Print Media Industry (March 1992) acknowledged the importance of editorial independence, but rejected calls for legislative requirements for mechanisms to support it.
The Productivity Commission's Inquiry into Broadcasting considered this issue and concluded that 'the likelihood that a proprietor's business and editorial interests will influence the content and opinion of their media outlets is of major significance. The public interest in ensuring diversity of information and opinion, and in encouraging freedom of expression in Australian media, leads to a strong preference for more media proprietors rather than fewer. This is particularly important given the wide business interests of some media proprietors (p. 314). The Commission also noted that it was not necessary for proprietors to be heavy-handed about editorial direction, as self-censorship by journalists may achieve similar outcomes.
The ABA research report, Sources of News and Current Affairs (3 May 2001; print only) involved a survey of 100 news producers and in-depth interviews with twenty key news producers and media experts. Among its conclusions:
Bond University, Sources of news and current affair: stage one, the industry : stage two, the audience, A research report in two stages conducted by Bond University for the Australian Broadcasting Authority, Australian Broadcasting Authority, Sydney, 2001, 411 p. : ill. ISBN: 0642270449.
Communications Law Centre (Vic.), Content, consolidation and clout: how will regional Australia be affected by media ownership changes?, The Centre, 2006. xxvi, 179 p.; ISBN: 1875538348, Executive summary and key findings available here.
Dept. of Communications, Ownership and control of commercial television: future policy directions, Canberra : AGPS, 1986, 2v., Contents:v.1. Report, v.2. Appendices.
House of Representatives, Select Committee on the Print Media, News & fair facts: the Australian print media industry : a report / from the House of Representatives Select Committee on the Print Media, Chairman: Michael Lee, AGPS, Canberra, c1992, 438 p. : col. ill.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.