Brazil
Brazil possesses both a strictly secular government and a richly spiritual society formed from the meeting of the Roman Catholic Church with the religious traditions of African slaves and indigenous peoples. This confluence of faiths during the Portuguese colonization of Brazil (1500-1815) led to the development of a diverse array of syncretistic practices within the overarching umbrella of Brazilian Roman Catholicism and characterized by traditional Portuguese festivities. Religious pluralism increased during the twentieth century, largely due to a Protestant community that has grown to include over 15% of the population. Catholicism was enforced during colonial rule, then in 1824 became the official religion of an independent Brazil that also guaranteed freedom of religion. The Brazilian government has been secular since its Constitution of 1891, though the Church remained politically influential into the 1970s. The Constitution of Brazil guarantees freedom of religion and strongly prohibits the establishment of any religion by banning government support or hindrance of religion at all levels.
ESSAYS ON BRAZIL
Colonial, Imperial, and Early Republican Periods
The Catholic Church arrived in Brazil with the first Portuguese settlers, and quickly established itself as a key social institution of the colonial period. However, the Church did not reach the level of institutional strength that it enjoyed in much of Spanish America, and quickly suffered from a chronic shortage of priests, leading to the proliferation of vibrant popular and syncretistic religious beliefs and practices. Following the Napoleonic Wars and the eventual establishment of an independent monarchy in Brazil, the ties between the Brazilian Church and state became increasingly close. However, this only reinforced the institutional weakness of the church, as it became dependent on the patronage of the Emperors and competed with Freemasonry for the favor of the court. At the same time, its declining influence in the everyday life of Brazilians grew more pronounced. The late 19th century witnessed the beginnings of a clerical reaction, as the Vatican began to reaffirm its authority and pushed for increasing centralization of the Church. This provoked a series of confrontations with the regime, which contributed to the weakening of the Empire, which was overthrown and replaced by a republic in 1889. Over the next few decades, the Church gradually moved toward a new relationship with the state, seeking to expand its influence among elites and to impose an orthodox Catholicism on society. The strengthening of the Brazilian state under Getulio Vargas, who ruled in one way or another from 1930-54, corresponded to the high-water mark of this type of interaction between Church and State.
Dictatorship, Democracy, and the Brazilian Catholic Church
The changes in the organization of the Brazilian Catholic Church during the first half of the 20th century set the stage for its radical transformation during the second. Increasing involvement in the education of elites led to the emergence of new and politically diverse movements among the laity, while attempts to assert more orthodox Catholicism among marginalized peoples increased awareness of the plight of peasants and Indians among the lower clergy and some bishops. Many clergy members and lay leaders thus supported the attempts at social and political reform that took place during the post-Vargas Republic (1954-64). However, growing unrest and fear of Communism led the Church hierarchy to endorse the military coup of 1964. Still, a few bishops and numerous priests, particularly in the poorer regions, strongly criticized the military government’s economic policies and human rights record. During the 1970s, the Catholic Church emerged as a key pro-democracy voice within civil society. Ecclesiastical Base Communities (CEBs), small groups of believers who focused on linking grassroots religious and secular change, spread throughout the countryside. These became the foundations of the so-called “popular church,” which assertively advocated social justice and became increasingly influential within the Church. By 1979, the Brazilian Church was the most progressive in Latin America, while managing to avoid many of the confrontations between radicals and conservatives that wracked other churches in the region. However, in the 1980s, with the gradual transition to democracy and the conservative turn in the Vatican, the “popular church” lost much of its strength. This trend continued over the following decades and was reinforced by the growing influence of evangelical Protestant churches and movements.
The Growth of Religious Pluralism
Brazilian society is extremely spiritual overall, with 97% of the population professing a belief in God. The relative weakness of the Church during the colonial and imperial periods made Brazil a fertile ground for the emergence and proliferation of various syncretistic religious practices, which blended elements of Christianity with other, particularly African, religions. Among the descendants of this long tradition, Spiritisim is the most prevalent today, as adherents account for up to 5% of the population. Protestantism, which has resisted syncretism more than other Christian churches, established a significant presence in Brazil during the first half of the 20th century and grew exponentially during the second half. Protestants accounted for fewer than 5% of the population until the 1960s, but by 2000 made up over 15% of those affiliated with a church. Pentecostals and charismatic groups account for the vast majority of this expansion. With their emphasis on personal salvation and strict moral codes as well as less ideological approach to politics, these groups have developed broad appeal, particularly among the booming urban migrant communities. The political consequences of this shift are still poorly understood, as the fragmentation of the Protestant community has weakened it as a vehicle for direct political action. Over the longer run, their development will probably have an important, if difficult to predict, effect on the cultural landscape of Brazil.
Contemporary Affairs
Recent events in Brazil have not generally focused on the intersection of religion and politics, reflecting their relatively peaceful coexistence. However, there have been some recent episodes of tension and conflict. In March 2009, President Luiz Ignacio da Silva publicly chided the Archbishop of Olinda and Recife over the latter’s excommunication of several people involved in performing an abortion on a 9-year-old girl molested by her stepfather. This resulted in a public defense of the bishop by the head of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. Meanwhile, Brazil’s growing Protestant community continued to find a public voice. Thus, the annual “March for Jesus” in Sao Paulo drew over a million members from various Evangelical churches in 2009 and 2010, despite scandals involving its leadership. In 2008, two prominent organizers of the event were arrested in the US for failing to declare over fifty thousand dollars they were carrying on a flight from Brazil to Miami. Finally, there were some incidents of social conflict relating to religion, which typically involved discrimination against followers of Afro-Brazilian faiths such as Candomble. In 2008, the Rio de Janeiro State Legislature responded to these problems by creating a religious intolerance hotline to help victims of abuse.
Religious Freedom in Brazil
The 1988 Brazilian Constitution, drafted shortly after the transition to democracy, recognizes and protects religious freedom, and does not grant special recognition to any particular faith. Religious diversity in Brazil increased dramatically over the last three decades, largely due to the expansions of Evangelical and Pentecostal communities, but this has not resulted in substantial inter-communal conflict. Members of Afro-Brazilian faith communities have been historically tolerated but often marginalized, and continue to suffer from discrimination at the social level. Followers of other religious faiths, including Spiritualism, Buddhism, Shinto, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism, do not generally experience systematic discrimination. This pattern of effective accommodation is reflected in the realm of education. Religious education is provided in public schools, with the curriculum determined by local educators and parents; attendance is optional. Schools run by religious groups do not receive state funding. The Pew Forum’s Global Restrictions on Religion report describes Brazil as having the lowest combination of government restrictions and social hostilities among the 25 most populous countries in the world.
Religion in the Brazilian Constitution
The Brazilian Constitution of 1988 protects freedom of belief and worship, and prohibits discrimination on the basis of religious affiliation. It also contains a strong anti-establishment clause, which bans any level of government from helping or hindering any particular religious denomination. Religious education in public schools is optional, and state funding may be used to support religious educational institutions. Religious marriages are recognized by law, and exemptions from military service are available on the grounds of religious objections. Finally, the traditional beliefs of native inhabitants are recognized and protected.
Article 5: Freedom of Conscience and Non-discrimination VI. Freedom of conscience and of belief is inviolable, the free exercise of religious cults being ensured and, under the terms of the law, the protection of places of worship and their rites being guaranteed;
VII. Under the terms of the law, the rendering of religious assistance in civil and military establishments of collective confinement is ensured;
VIII. No one shall be deprived of any rights by reason of religious belief or philosophical or political conviction, unless he invokes it to exempt himself from a legal obligation required of all and refuses to perform an alternative obligation established by law ...
Article 19: Disestablishment The Union, the states, the Federal District and the municipalities are forbidden to:
I. Establish religious sects or churches, subsidize them, hinder their activities, or maintain relationships of dependence or alliance with them or their representatives, without prejudice to collaboration in the public interest in the manner set forth by law;
Article 143: Exemption from Military Service Military service is compulsory as set forth by law.
Paragraph 1 - It is within the competence of the Armed Forces, according to the law, to assign an alternative service to those who, in times of peace, after being enlisted, claim imperative of conscience, which shall be understood as originating in religious creed and philosophical or political belief, for exemption from essentially military activities.
Article 210: Religion in Public Schools
Minimum curricula shall be established for elementary schools in order to ensure a common basic education and respect for national and regional cultural and artistic values.
Paragraph 1 - The teaching of religion is optional and shall be offered during the regular school hours of public elementary schools.
Article 213: Public Funding for Religious Schools Public funds shall be allocated to public schools, and may be channeled to community, religious or philanthropic schools, as defined by law, which
I. Prove that they do not seek profit and that they apply their surplus funds in education;
II. Ensure that their assets shall be assigned to another community, religious or philanthropic schools, or to the Government in case they cease their activities.
Article 226: Civil Effects of Religious Marriage The family, which is the foundation of society, shall enjoy special protection from the State.
Paragraph 2 - Religious marriage has civil effects, in accordance with the law.
Article 231: Recognition of Indigenous Traditions Indians shall have their social organization, customs, languages, creeds and traditions recognized, as well as their original rights to the lands they traditionally occupy, it being incumbent upon the Union to demarcate them, protect and ensure respect for all of their property.