Volume 55, Issue S1 p. S347-S360
Special Issue

Translational Science: A Road Map for the Science of Reading

Emily J. Solari

Corresponding Author

Emily J. Solari

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole Patton Terry

Nicole Patton Terry

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nadine Gaab

Nadine Gaab

Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Graduate School of Education, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tiffany P. Hogan

Tiffany P. Hogan

MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nancy J. Nelson

Nancy J. Nelson

University of Oregon, Eugene, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jill M. Pentimonti

Jill M. Pentimonti

University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yaacov Petscher

Yaacov Petscher

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Sayko

Sarah Sayko

National Center for Improving Literacy, and RMC Research Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 September 2020
Citations: 34

ABSTRACT

Despite scientific advances that have informed our understanding of reading acquisition and development, a profound gap exists between empirical findings and the implementation of evidence-based practices in the assessment and instruction of reading in school settings. The debate regarding the practical implications of the science of reading (SOR) and its implementation in authentic school settings is palpable. As researchers, practitioners, policymakers, parents, and other educational stakeholders engage in this latest version of the debate on how best to teach young learners to read, a familiar, almost cyclical, narrative has emerged. As an interdisciplinary group of researchers who study diverse facets of reading development, assessment, and instruction, it is troubling how little the current and past debates have focused on processes that could ensure that the instructional experience students receive in classrooms is informed by existing science. Specifically, the authors contend that the persistent gap between the SOR and its school-based implementation exists because the field has yet to invest in the appropriate methodologies and processes to develop an effective model of translational science. The authors argue not only that much can be learned from previous iterations of this debate but also that advances in translational science provide a framework for how to address the SOR debate differently and more productively in the current climate. Thus, the authors propose a road map for translational science for the SOR, acknowledging the breadth of work done in translational science in other fields and recognizing and describing the added complexities in the emerging field of translational science in educational settings.