Translational Science: A Road Map for the Science of Reading
Corresponding Author
Emily J. Solari
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNadine Gaab
Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Graduate School of Education, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorTiffany P. Hogan
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSarah Sayko
National Center for Improving Literacy, and RMC Research Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Emily J. Solari
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNadine Gaab
Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Graduate School of Education, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorTiffany P. Hogan
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSarah Sayko
National Center for Improving Literacy, and RMC Research Corporation, Arlington, Virginia, USA
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Despite scientific advances that have informed our understanding of reading acquisition and development, a profound gap exists between empirical findings and the implementation of evidence-based practices in the assessment and instruction of reading in school settings. The debate regarding the practical implications of the science of reading (SOR) and its implementation in authentic school settings is palpable. As researchers, practitioners, policymakers, parents, and other educational stakeholders engage in this latest version of the debate on how best to teach young learners to read, a familiar, almost cyclical, narrative has emerged. As an interdisciplinary group of researchers who study diverse facets of reading development, assessment, and instruction, it is troubling how little the current and past debates have focused on processes that could ensure that the instructional experience students receive in classrooms is informed by existing science. Specifically, the authors contend that the persistent gap between the SOR and its school-based implementation exists because the field has yet to invest in the appropriate methodologies and processes to develop an effective model of translational science. The authors argue not only that much can be learned from previous iterations of this debate but also that advances in translational science provide a framework for how to address the SOR debate differently and more productively in the current climate. Thus, the authors propose a road map for translational science for the SOR, acknowledging the breadth of work done in translational science in other fields and recognizing and describing the added complexities in the emerging field of translational science in educational settings.
References
- Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2016). Using collaborative inquiry to foster equity within school systems: Opportunities and barriers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.939591
- Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G., & Mossholder, K.W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601
- Barton, E.A., & Tindle, K. (2019). Educator voices on education research. Charlottesville, VA: Jefferson Education Exchange. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AnLli4KeRD8fkFc-HULM45b4_mnt3viR/view
- Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2000). An implementation revolution as a strategy for fulfilling the democratic promise of university-community partnerships: Penn-West Philadelphia as an experiment in progress. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291003
- Brown, C.H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L.A., Aarons, G.A., Wells, K.B., Jones, L., … Cruden, G. (2017). An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215
- Cabrera, N.J. (2013). Positive development of minority children. Social Policy Report, 27(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2013.tb00075.x
10.1002/j.2379-3988.2013.tb00075.x Google Scholar
- Cain, K., Compton, D.L., & Parrila, R.K. (Eds.). (2017). Theories of reading development. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
10.1075/swll.15.15cai Google Scholar
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
- Chicago Beyond. (2019). Why am I always being researched? A guidebook for community organizations, researchers, and funders to help us get from insufficient understanding to more authentic truth. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from https://chicagobeyond.org/researchequity/
- Coburn, C.E., Penuel, W.R., & Geil, K.E. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
- Coburn, C.E., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161.
- Cook, C.R., Kilgus, S.P., & Burns, M.K. (2018). Advancing the science and practice of precision education to enhance student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.004
- Creemers, B.P.M., & Scheerens, J. (1994). Developments in the educational effectiveness research programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(2), 125–140.
10.1016/0883-0355(94)90028-0 Google Scholar
- Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., Stanovich, K.E., & Stanovich, P.J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K–3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y
- Curran, G.M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J.M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
- Douglas, N.F., Campbell, W.N., & Hinckley, J. (2015). Implementation science: Buzzword or game changer? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6), S1827–S1836. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0302
- Durlak, J.A., & DuPre, E.P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3/4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
- Finnigan, K.S., Daly, A.J., & Che, J. (2013). Systemwide reform in districts under pressure: The role of social networks in defining, acquiring, using, and diffusing research evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325668
10.1108/09578231311325668 Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900206
- Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A., Friedman, R.M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication No. 231). Tampa: National Implementation Research Network, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
- Francis, G. (2012). The psychology of replication and replication in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459520
- Gilliland, C.T., White, J., Gee, B., Kreeftmeijer-Vegter, R., Bietrix, F., Ussi, A.E., … Austin, C.P. (2019). The fundamental characteristics of a translational scientist. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science, 2(3), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.9b00022
- Harris, K.R., Lane, K.L., Graham, S., Driscoll, S.A., Sandmel, K., Brindle, M., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategies development in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111429005
- Holtrop, J.S., Rabin, B.A., & Glasgow, R.E. (2018). Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: Rationale and methods. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), article 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2938-8
- Kim, Y.-S.G., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S.S. (2020). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 91(2), 638–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13204
- Kretlow, A.G., & Helf, S.S. (2013). Teacher implementation of evidence-based practices in Tier I: A national survey. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(3), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413489838
- Lindo, E.J. (2006). The African American presence in reading intervention experiments. Remedial and Special Education, 27(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270030301
- Lyon, G.R., & Weiser, B. (2009). Teacher knowledge, instructional expertise, and the development of reading proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338741
- Malin, J., & Brown, C. (Eds.). (2019). The role of knowledge brokers in education: Connecting the dots between research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.4324/9780429462436 Google Scholar
- Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
- Moats, L.C., & Foorman, B.R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7
- Moullin, J.C., Dickson, K.S., Stadnick, N.A., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G.A. (2019). Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implementation Science, 14, article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. (2020). Translational science spectrum. Retrieved from https://ncats.nih.gov/translation/spectrum
- National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. (1996). A review of the literature on dissemination and knowledge utilization. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
- National Institutes of Health. (2009). Part II—full text of announcement: Section I. Funding opportunity description (Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54): RFA-RM-07-007) (Rev. ed.). Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-07-007.html
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education ( R.J. Shavelson & L. Towne, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2003). Strategic education research partnership ( M.S. Donovan, A.K. Wigdor, & C.E. Snow, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Olson, D.R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033001024
10.3102/0013189X033001024 Google Scholar
- Penuel, W.R., Briggs, D.C., Davidson, K.L., Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H.C., … Allen, A.-R. (2017). How school and district leaders access, perceive, and use research. AERA Open, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417705370
- Petscher, Y., Terry, N.P., Gaab, N., & Hart, S.A. (2020). Widening the lens of translational science through team science. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/a8xs6
10.31234/osf.io/a8xs6 Google Scholar
- Race, A. (2010). Science for non-scientists: Communicating the importance of child development to business and policy leaders [PowerPoint presentation]. Cambridge, MA: Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University.
- Riehl, C. (2006). Feeling better: A comparison of medical research and education research. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005024
10.3102/0013189X035005024 Google Scholar
- Rubio, D.M., Schoenbaum, E.E., Lee, L.S., Schteingart, D.E., Marantz, P.R., Anderson, K.E., … Esposito, K. (2010). Defining translational research: Implications for training. Academic Medicine, 85(3), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618
- Schneider, M. (2018, December 17). A more systematic approach to replicating research. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/12-17-2018.asp
- Sciuchetti, M.B., McKenna, J.W., & Flower, A.L. (2016). Teacher knowledge and selection of evidence-based practices: A survey study. Journal of Vincentian Social Action, 1(2), 20–31.
- Shi, L., & Stevens, G.D. (2010). Vulnerable populations in the United States ( 2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Slavin, R.E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
10.3102/0013189X031007015 Google Scholar
- Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Soriano-Ferrer, M., Echegaray-Bengoa, J., & Joshi, R.M. (2016). Knowledge and beliefs about developmental dyslexia in pre-service and in-service Spanish-speaking teachers. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0111-1
- Travers, J.C., Cook, B.G., Therrien, W.J., & Coyne, M.D. (2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648462
- Tseng, V., Fleischman, S., & Quintero, E. (2018). Democratizing evidence in education. In B. Bevan & W.R. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement: Ethical and equitable approaches (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S40–S46. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036
- Washburn, E.K., Binks, E.S., & Joshi, R.M. (2014). What do preservice teachers from the USA and the UK know about dyslexia? [Letter to the editor]. Dyslexia, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1459
- Weiner, B.J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, article 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
- Yin, L., Joshi, R.M., & Yan, H. (2019). Knowledge about dyslexia among early literacy teachers in China. Dyslexia. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1635
Citing Literature
Special Issue:The Science of Reading: Supports, Critiques, and Questions
September 2020
Pages S347-S360