Benjamin Mueller
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Research in the larger management discipline is increasingly turning towards practice as an important unit of analysis to study organizational form and function. Reflecting this practice turn, information systems research is specifically interested in what people think they do when confronted with technology, what they actually do in the process of using technology, and what using technology does to them and the organizations they are a part of. In the wake of this development, sociomateriality has been proposed as a concept to study these organizational phenomena. The concept of sociomateriality, however, is not without its difficulties. Much debate has ensued on the ontological assumptions the practice turn and the concept of sociomateriality should be based on, and many scholars using the concept report how difficult it is to empirically investigate the intertwining or entanglement of the social and the material in practice. In this paper, we revisit Parsons' and Shils' (1951) general theory of action to address some of these difficulties and develop a framework for researching the social and the material in practice. Particularly, we propose that Parsons' and Shils' orientations of action help to better understand and conceptualize what individuals do before acting, what role technology plays, and how individuals and technology shape and are being shaped by each other in action across time. Through ten methodological principles, we demonstrate that such a framework can improve conceptualization and guide the selection and design of research methods in order to generate the data needed for sociomaterial theorizing.
- Barad, K. (2003). "Posthumanist Performativity: Toward and Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter," Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 801--83 Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Barley, S. R. (1986). "Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of Ct Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments," Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 78--108. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bauer, M. W. (2000). "Classical Content Analysis: A Review," in Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook, M.W. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds.). London, UK: SAGE, pp. 131--151.Google Scholar
- Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Natutralism. Harvester Press: Sussex., (1. ed.). Sussex, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
- Bijker, W. E. (1993). "Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism," Science, Technology & Human Values Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 113--138. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bostrom, R. P., and Heinen, J. S. (1977a). "MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective Part Ii: The Application of Socio-Technical Theory," MIS Quarterly Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 11--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bostrom, R. P., and Heinen, J. S. (1977b). "MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I: The Causes," MIS Quarterly Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 17--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). "Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method," Qualitative Research Journal Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 27--40. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Boynton, A. C., and Zmud, R. W. (1987). "Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research," MIS Quarterly Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 59--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R. D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., and Vidgen, R. (2014). "The Sociomateriality of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions," MIS Quarterly Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 809--830. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davidson, E. (2006). "A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 23--39. Google ScholarCross Ref
- DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M. S. (1994). "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 121--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doctor Decade, and Tripp, J. (2012). "Sociomateriality." Retrieved October 11, 2015, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68cEbf5CaBoGoogle Scholar
- Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L. (1960). "Socio-Technical Systems," in Management Sciences, Models and Techniques (Vol. 2), C.W. Churchman and M. Verhulst (eds.). London, UK: Pergamon Press, pp. 83--97.Google Scholar
- Feldman, M. S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 1240--1253. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkley, University of Caifornia Press.Google Scholar
- Gold, R. L. (1958). "Roles in Sociological Field Observations," Social Forces Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 217--223. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. (2012). "A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field," Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 188--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hultin, L., and Mähring, M. (2014). "Visualizing Institutional Logics in Sociomaterial Practices," Information and Organization Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Introna, L. D., and Hayes, N. (2011). "On Sociomaterial Imbrications: What Plagiarism Detection Systems Reveal and Why It Matters," Information and Organization Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 107--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johri, A. (2011). "Sociomaterial Bricolage: The Creation of Location-Spanning Work Practices by Global Software Developers," Information and Software Technology Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 955--968. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, M. (1998). "Information Systems and the Double Mangle: Steering a Course between the Scylla of Embedded Structure and the Charybdis of Strong Symmetry," in: IFIP WG8.2 & WG8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. Helsinki: pp. 287--302.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. (2014). "A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care," MIS Quarterly Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 895-A896. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, M. R., and Karsten, H. (2008). "Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research," MIS Quarterly Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 127--157. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kautz, K., and Jensen, T. B. (2013). "Sociomateriality at the Royal Court of IS: A Jester's Monologue," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 15--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, (1. ed.). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
- Lauterbach, J., Kahrau, F., Mueller, B., and Maedche, A. (2014). "What Makes 'the System' Tick? - Explaining Individuals? Adaptation Behavior Towards Effective Use in an Enterprise System Implementation," in: 35. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2014). Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Lee, A. S. (2004). "Thinking About Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems," in Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (eds.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1--26.Google Scholar
- Leonardi, P. M. (2011). "When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies," MIS Quarterly Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 147--168. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leonardi, P. M. (2012). "Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How Are They Different? Do We Need Them?," in Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, P.M. Leonardi, B.A. Nardi and J. Kallinikos (eds.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 25--48.Google Scholar
- Leonardi, P. M. (2013). "Theoretical Foundations for the Study of Sociomateriality," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 59--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leonardi, P. M., and Barley, S. R. (2008). "Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory About Technology and Organizing," Information and Organization Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 159--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß Einer Allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt a.M., Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. (1988). "Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research," Management Science Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 583--598. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mueller, B., and Raeth, P. (2012). "What You See is What You Get? -- a Comparison of Theoretical Lenses to Study Technology in Organizations," in: 33. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012). Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
- Mueller, B., and Urbach, N. (2013). "The Why, What, and How of Theories in IS Research," in: 34. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). Milano, Italy (Best Paper Award nominee).Google Scholar
- Mumford, E. (2006). "The Story of Socio-Technical Design: Reflections on Its Successes, Failures and Potential," Information Systems Journal Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 317--342. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mutch, A. (2013). "Sociomateriality -- Taking the Wrong Turning?," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 28--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, M. D., and Newman, M. (2007). "The Qualitative Interview in IS Research: Examining the Craft," Information and Organization Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 2--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ochara, N. M. (2013). "Linking Reasoning to Theoretical Argument in Information Systems Research," in: 19. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2013). Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 398--427. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 404--428. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). "Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work," Organization Studies Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 1435--1448. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2010a). "Practice in Research: Phenomenon, Perspective and Philosophy," in The Cambridge Handbook on Straetgy as Practice, D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidel and E. Vaara (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23--33. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J. (2010b). "The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research," Cambridge Journal of Economics Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 125--141. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Orlikowski, W. J., and Iacono, C. S. (2001). "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research--a Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 121--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orlikowski, W. J., and Scott, S. V. (2008). "Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization," The Academy of Management Annals Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 433--474. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System, (1. ed.). Glencoe, IL, USA: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T., and Shils, E. A. (1951). Towards a General Theory of Action. New York, NY, USA: Harper Torchbooks. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pickering, A. (1993). "The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in Sociology of Science," American Journal of Sociology Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 559--589. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raeth, P., and Mueller, B. (2012). "Technology in Work and Non-Work Life: Two Sides of a Coin?," in: 72. Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2012. Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramiller, N. (2012). "Sociomateriality as Radical Ontology: Insights for Icts from the Phenomenology of Sport," in: 18. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2012), K.D. Joshi and Y. Yoo (eds.). Seattle, WA, USA.Google Scholar
- Riemer, K., and Johnston, R. B. (2014). "Rethinking the Place of the Artefact in IS Using Heidegger's Analysis of Equipment," European Journal of Information Systems Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 273--288. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schultze, U., and Avital, M. (2011). "Designing Interviews to Generate Rich Data for Information Systems Research," Information and Organization Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schultze, U., and Boland, R. (2000). "Knowledge Management Technology and the Reproduction of Knowledge Work Practices," Journal of Strategic Information Systems Vol. 9, No. 2/3, pp. 193--212. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott, S. V., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). "Sociomateriality -- Taking the Wrong Turning? A Response to Mutch," Information and Organization Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 77--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., and Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). "Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline," MIS Quarterly Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 467-A420. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stigliani, I., and Ravasi, D. (2012). "Organizing Thoughts and Connecting Brains: Material Practices and the Transition from Individual to Group-Level Prospective Sensemaking," Academy of Management Journal Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 1232--1259. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, (1. ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., and Elmes, M. B. (2007). "Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change," Organization Science Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 832--848. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wagner, E. L., Newell, S., and Piccoli, G. (2010). "Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Systems Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 276--297.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weber, R. (2003). "Editor's Comments: Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact," MIS Quarterly Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. iii-xi. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whittington, R. (2006). "Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research," Organization Studies Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 613--634. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, R., and Edge, D. (1996). "The Social Shaping of Technology," Research Policy Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 865--899. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woodward, J. (1958). Management and Technology, (1. ed.). London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., and Faraj, S. (2007). "Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization," Organization Science Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 749--762. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
-
Get Your Act Together: An Alternative Approach to Understanding the Impact of Technology on Individual and Organizational Behavior
-
Recommendations
-
New Technology and the Post-human Self: Rethinking Appropriation and Resistance
In keeping with the current appreciation for the sociomateriality of technology-enabled practice, we are now advised to de-center human beings and to situate them as but one component among many in complex networks of heterogeneous actors. More radical ...
-
Affordances for practice
This paper argues that Gibson's concept of affordance inserts a powerful conceptual lens for the study of sociomateriality as enacted in contemporary organizational practices. Our objective in this paper is to develop a comprehensive view of affordances ...
-
On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology
AbstractWhat is the role of the researcher in a world that is continuously enacted and reconfigured in sociomaterial practices, a world in which subject and object, structure and agency, body and mind, knower and known, are assumed to be ...
Highlights- The paper contributes to the development of epistemological practices available to draw upon for researchers assuming a sociomaterial approach.
Comments