Skip main navigation

Inhalation of Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Ozone Causes Acute Arterial Vasoconstriction in Healthy Adults

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000013838.94747.64Circulation. 2002;105:1534–1536

Abstract

Background Fine particulate air pollution and ozone are associated with increased cardiovascular events. To help explain the mechanism behind these observations, we investigated the effect of air pollution exposure on vascular function.

Methods and Results Twenty-five healthy adults underwent a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing the vascular response to the 2-hour inhalation of ≈150 μg/m3 of concentrated ambient fine particles (CAP) plus ozone (120 ppb) versus the response to the inhalation of filtered air. High-resolution vascular ultrasonography was used to measure alterations in brachial artery diameter, endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and endothelial-independent nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD). Exposure to CAP plus ozone caused a significant brachial artery vasoconstriction compared with filtered air inhalation (−0.09±0.15 mm versus +0.01±0.18 mm, P=0.03). There were no significant differences in FMD (+0.29±4.11% versus −0.03±6.63%, P=0.88), NMD (+3.87±5.43% versus +3.46±7.92%, P=0.83), or blood pressure responses between exposures.

Conclusions Short-term inhalation of fine particulate air pollution and ozone at concentrations that occur in the urban environment causes acute conduit artery vasoconstriction.

Fine particulate air pollution <2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality.1 Adults with underlying cardiopulmonary disease are at highest risk for acute cardiac events2 because even transient PM2.5 exposure may trigger myocardial infarctions in susceptible people.3 To reduce the substantial global health impact of air pollution, it is crucial to expand our limited understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying these observations.4

We recently demonstrated increases in plasma endothelin (ET) 1 and 3 after short-term exposure to PM2.5 and O3 in animals5 and humans (R. Vincent, PhD, unpublished data, 2001). ET is a potent vasoconstrictor associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction and an adverse cardiovascular prognosis at increased systemic level.6 However, venous ET concentrations may not accurately reflect actual physiological alterations in arterial function. Therefore, to determine if exposure to common air pollutants indeed alters vascular function in a manner that promotes cardiac events, we investigated the effect of PM2.5 and O3 inhalation, at environmentally relevant concentrations, on basal arterial tone and reactivity.

Methods

The study was approved by the Human Subjects Review Committee of the University of Toronto and was performed at the Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit in Toronto. Subjects signed an informed consent form and were 18- to 50-year-old nonsmokers without cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Subjects were excluded for fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL, and for use of hypertension or lipid medications, antioxidants, folate, steroids, fish oil, or aspirin.

Exposure Protocol

Subjects fasted ≥8 hours before and during each visit. Studies were performed at identical times during the morning to avoid the impact of diurnal variation on vascular tone/reactivity. Pre-exposure brachial artery vasoreactivity studies and blood pressure measurements were performed on arrival. Each subject then received 2 randomized, 2-hour exposures on separate days in the human exposure facility: a combined concentration of ≈150 μg/m3 of ambient PM2.5 (CAP) plus O3 (120 ppb); a control filtered air (FA) exposure of zero PM2.5 and very low O3. The PM2.5 and O3 levels selected represent conditions that occur during peak air pollution events and in certain outdoor microenvironments.7 Two subjects received 2.5 hours of CAP+O3, and 1 subject was exposed to 1 hour of FA. Within 10 minutes after exposure, brachial artery vasoreactivity studies and blood pressure measurements were repeated. This single postexposure analysis did not allow us to determine the duration of alterations in vascular function, but it was chosen to investigate the immediate impact of air pollution inhalation and to minimize the potential influence of other confounding variables on arterial reactivity (eg, meals). At least 2 days later, subjects repeated the protocol, crossed-over to the alternate exposure type. Subjects were blinded to and unaware of the exposure conditions during the studies.

Human Exposure Facility

PM2.5 exposures were produced with the use of a high-flow multistage virtual impactor system, which utilizes ambient particles drawn from outside the laboratory. O3 was produced by an arc generator and was introduced to the exposure upstream of the concentrator. The human exposure facility has been described previously.8

Brachial Artery Vasoreactivity Studies

Brachial artery vasoreactivity measurements were performed as previously described using an HP 4500 ultrasound system (Hewlett Packard) with a 7.5 linear array transducer.9 Basal brachial artery diameter (BAD) was measured after subjects rested supine for ≥10 minutes. In previous validation studies, the mean difference between BAD measurements performed on 2 separate mornings was 0.04±0.001 mm.9 Endothelial-dependent and -independent vasomotion were determined by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD), respectively.

When analyzing images, the technician was blinded to subject identity and exposure type. The alterations in vascular function after each exposure were determined by subtracting pre-exposure BAD, FMD, NMD, and blood pressures from the respective postexposure values. The vascular responses of 1 subject were not included in the analyses because of excessive variation (>2 standard deviations) in the baseline pre-exposure BAD between visit days, which likely reflected an error in imaging site.

Statistical Methods

Data were stored and analyzed using SPSS 9.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc). The vascular alterations after CAP+O3 were compared with those after FA by 2-tailed paired t tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Subject characteristics are presented in Table 1. Concentrations of PM2.5 and O3 during exposures are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences in gaseous pollutant levels (CO, NOx, SO2) between exposure days.

Table 1106948. Subject Characteristics

Values are reported as mean±SD.
Number 25 (15 male/10 female)
Age, y 34.9±10
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.6±2.87
Blood pressure, mm Hg 120.6/71.3±13.4/9.5
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 183.1±29.5
LDL-C, mg/dL 110.4±31.6
HDL-C, mg/dL 52.5±15.1
Triglycerides, mg/dL 101±53.2
Glucose, mg/dL 81.6±6.7

Table 2106948. Fine Particle and Ozone Concentrations

PM2.5, μg/m3 O3, ppb
Filtered Air CAP+O3 Filtered Air CAP+O3
Values are reported as mean±SD.
1.6±1.7 153.0±34.8 8.5±5.3 120.3±2.8

Vascular and blood pressure responses are shown in Table 3. Pre-exposure BAD showed no significant day-to-day variation (0.03 mm). Inhalation of CAP+O3 caused a significant reduction in the postexposure BAD compared with the response after FA (Figure). There was a significant brachial artery vasoconstriction after CAP+O3 inhalation (P=0.007), whereas FA did not alter BAD. FMD, NMD, and blood pressure responses did not significantly differ between exposure types.

Table 3106948. Vascular Responses After Exposures

Test Filtered Air CAP+O3 P*
Before After Δ Before After Δ
Values are reported as mean±SD. Δ indicates pre-exposure to postexposure change.
*Filtered air Δ vs CAP+ozone Δ, by 2-tailed, paired t test.
P=0.007 for post-BAD (CAP+ozone) vs pre-BAD (CAP+ozone), by 2-tailed, paired t test.
BAD, mm 3.89±0.68 3.90±0.68 0.01±0.18 3.92±0.65 3.82±0.62 −0.09±0.15 0.03
FMD, % 3.61±4.27 3.57±6.49 −0.03 ±6.63 4.22±4.52 4.52±3.69 0.29±4.11 0.88
NMD, % 14.69±6.40 18.15±8.94 3.46±7.92 14.88±5.25 18.76±6.12 3.87±5.43 0.83
SBP, mm Hg 120.5±13.5 121.3±8.9 0.8±10.3 120.4±10.4 120.8±11.8 0.4±8.6 0.61
DBP, mm Hg 71.2±8.7 70.8±9.2 −0.4±7.3 70.0±9.9 70.9±9.0 0.9±7.2 0.77

BAD alterations after exposures. After CAP+O3, 18 of the 24 subjects responded with a BAD vasoconstriction versus dilatation, a greater BAD vasoconstriction, or a blunted dilatation compared with FA. Bars represent mean BAD changes.

Discussion

We have demonstrated for the first time that inhalation of common air pollutants affects the systemic vasculature of humans. Short-term exposure to PM2.5 and O3 at levels that occur in urban environments causes acute conduit artery vasoconstriction without producing immediate alterations in endothelial-dependent or -independent vasomotion. This finding is important because it suggests that alterations in arterial tone may be a relevant mechanism contributing to air pollution–mediated acute cardiac events and because it provides evidence that the observations shown by large epidemiological studies are biologically plausible.1

Relevance of Conduit Artery Vasoconstriction

It is reasonable to suspect that the coronary vasculature may respond similarly to air pollution exposure because brachial and coronary reactivity strongly correlate (r=0.79, P<0.001 for brachial versus coronary FMD).10 Even so, a reduction in coronary diameter of this relatively small magnitude (≈0.1 mm) would have minimal impact on healthy adults. However, congruent with epidemiological findings that individuals at increased risk for acute air pollution–related cardiac events generally have pre-existing cardiovascular disease, 2 this degree of sudden coronary vasoconstriction could promote cardiac ischemia in those with underlying flow-limiting obstructive lesions or could trigger instability of susceptible plaques.11 Furthermore, the vasculature of patients with coronary risk factors is known to hyper-react to a variety of vasoconstrictors,12,13 which potentially increases their susceptibility for acute cardiac events after air pollution exposure. Additional investigations in the coronary circulation and in high-risk individuals are needed to confirm these hypotheses.

Mechanisms and Mediators of Vasoconstriction

Because this is the first study to investigate the effects of air pollution on the vasculature, a more complete understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying our observations and the specific pollutants involved requires further investigation. Substantial evidence links increased PM2.5 alone with cardiac mortality.1 However, our initial air pollution exposure was chosen to be PM2.5 plus O3 because this mixture occurs in “real-life” settings. At present, an effect on the vasculature partially mediated by O3 cannot be ruled out. Determinations of the relative importance of PM2.5 versus O3 and specific components in fine particulate matter await follow-up studies now that a meaningful effect of urban air pollution on vascular function has been demonstrated.

Potential biological mechanisms for the vasoconstriction include a reflex increase in sympathetic nervous system activity via stimulation of pulmonary vagal afferents14 or an acute increase in vascular ET release, analogous to cigarette smoking.15 PM2.5 inhalation has been shown to induce systemic inflammation and cytokine production,16 possibly related to free radical activity of components in particulate matter.17 In turn, these have the capacity to enhance vascular ET expression by direct mechanisms or via activation of oxidative stress pathways.6 Indeed, we have previously demonstrated the presence of increased plasma ET levels acutely after PM2.5 exposure.5

In conclusion, alterations in arterial tone and reactivity in response to PM2.5 and O3 exposure is a new arena for future research into the biological mechanisms linking air pollution with acute and potentially chronic cardiovascular events. Further investigations are needed to confirm and extend our findings to the coronary circulation and to subjects with existing heart disease.

*Drs R. Brook and J. Brook contributed equally. Dr Rajagopalan contributed equally as a senior investigator.

This study was funded by a contribution from Health Canada Toxic Substance Research Initiative and Air Quality Health Effects Research Section, Government of Canada.

Footnotes

Correspondence to Robert Brook, 3918 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail

References

  • 1 Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1742–1749.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Krewski D, Burnett RT, Goldberg MS, et al. Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study on Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. Cambridge, Mass: Health Effects Institute; 2000.Google Scholar
  • 3 Peters A, Dockery DW, Muller JE, et al. Increased particulate air pollution and the triggering of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2810–2815.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ware JH. Particulate air pollution and mortality: clearing the air. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1798–1799.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bouthillier L, Vincent R, Goegan P, et al. Acute effects of inhaled urban particles and ozone. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153: 1873–1884.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Levin ER. Endothelins. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 356–363.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chow HLC, Watson JG, Fujita EM, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol in the southern California air quality study. Atmos Environ. 1994; 28: 2061–2080.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Petrovic S, Urch B, Brook JR, et al. Cardiorespiratory effects of concentrated ambient PM2.5: a pilot study using controlled human exposures. Inhalat Toxicol. 2000; 12: (suppl 1): 173–188.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rajagopalan S, Brook RD, Rubenfire M, et al. Abnormal brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilatation in young adults with major depression. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 196–198.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Takase B, Uehata A, Takashi A, et al. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation in coronary and brachial arteries in suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 1535–1539.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muller JE, Abela GS, Nesto RW, et al. Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerable plaques: the lexicon of a new frontier. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 809–813.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lembo G, Vecchione C, Izzo R, et al. Noradrenergic vascular hyper-responsiveness in human hypertension is dependent on oxygen free radical impairment of nitric oxide activity. Circulation. 2000; 102: 552–557.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Waclawiw M, et al. Role of endothelin in the increased vascular tone of patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 753–758.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gold DR, Lintonjua A, Schwartz J, et al. Ambient pollution and heart rate variability. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1267–1273.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Haak T, Jungmann E, Raab C, et al. Elevated endothelin-1 levels after cigarette smoking. Metab: Clin Exper. 1994; 43: 267–269.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Salvi S, Blomberg A, Rudell B, et al. Acute inflammatory responses in the airways and peripheral blood after short-term exposure to diesel exhaust in healthy human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159: 702–709.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Li XY, Gilmour PS, Donaldson K, et al. Free radical activity and pro-inflammatory effects of particulate air pollution in vivo and in vitro. Thorax. 1996; 51: 1216–1222.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.