-
Archaeology, Settlement Patterns, Corded Ware Culture, Subsistence Strategy, Prehistoric Archaeology, Agriculture, and 21 moreNeolithic Archaeology, Environmental Archaeology, Archaeobotany, Neolithic & Chalcolithic Archaeology, Neolithic, Neolithic Europe, Prehistoric Settlement, Mesolithic/Neolithic, Balkans, Eurasian Prehistory, Balkan Prehistory (Archaeology), Neolithic of the Balkans, The Neolithic Revolution, Corded Ware Settlement Pattern, Neolithic Transition, Origins of Agriculture, Bronze Age Europe (Archaeology), Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology, Chronology, Eneolithic, and Radiocarbon Dating (Archaeology) edit
Although numerous settlement sites of Corded Ware culture have been discovered in Finland, only a few houses have been identified. This is in stark contrast to the abundant number of pithouses of local hunter-gatherers. This paper takes a... more
Although numerous settlement sites of Corded Ware culture have been discovered in Finland, only a few houses have been identified. This is in stark contrast to the abundant number of pithouses of local hunter-gatherers. This paper takes a closer look at the houses associated with Corded Ware culture, first, by introducing a recently excavated Corded Ware house from southern Finland and other houses connected to Corded Ware culture from Finland and the Karelian Isthmus, Russia, and second, by outlining the various types of Corded Ware houses around the Baltic Sea. After that, the emerging picture suggesting interaction between the regional variants of Corded Ware culture as well as between Corded Ware cultures and local hunter-gatherers will be discussed. Even if the remains of Corded Ware houses are few and often quite ambiguous, it will be concluded that several types of houses have existed in the area north of the Gulf of Finland, and the contacts between cultural traditions affected settlement types and house structures in each party involved in the process.
Research Interests:
Page 1. 107 Fennoscandia archaeologica XXVI (2009) Petri Halinen; Teemu Mökkönen BETWEEN LAKE AND SEA – STONE AGE SETTLEMENT BY ANCIENT LAKE LADOGA ON THE KARELIAN ISTHMUS AbstractThis paper discusses changes in the settlement... more
Page 1. 107 Fennoscandia archaeologica XXVI (2009) Petri Halinen; Teemu Mökkönen BETWEEN LAKE AND SEA – STONE AGE SETTLEMENT BY ANCIENT LAKE LADOGA ON THE KARELIAN ISTHMUS
AbstractThis paper discusses changes in the settlement pattern of the hunter-fisher-gatherers once inhabiting the shores of Ancient Lake Ladoga. So far, the study area is archaeologically the most extensively studied area on the Karelian Isthmus, Russia. Recent surveys and small-scale excavations have diversified the picture of hunter-gatherer settlement in the Kaukola–Räisälä area, nowadays located in the lower River Vuoksi Valley. This article presents new data and discusses the changes in site location with respect to environmental zones and variation in the shelteredness of the sites. Special attention is paid to the differences between housepit sites and other dwelling sites without such permanent dwelling structures. In addition, the excavated sites provide a selection of various settlement types located in different environmental zones. The occupation phase and the settlement type of the excavated sites are determined with the help of osteological and archaeological material. Research indicates that the most distinctive change in settlement pattern took place during the Middle Neolithic, at the time when Typical Comb Ware was in use (ca. 4000–3400 cal BC).
AbstractThis paper discusses changes in the settlement pattern of the hunter-fisher-gatherers once inhabiting the shores of Ancient Lake Ladoga. So far, the study area is archaeologically the most extensively studied area on the Karelian Isthmus, Russia. Recent surveys and small-scale excavations have diversified the picture of hunter-gatherer settlement in the Kaukola–Räisälä area, nowadays located in the lower River Vuoksi Valley. This article presents new data and discusses the changes in site location with respect to environmental zones and variation in the shelteredness of the sites. Special attention is paid to the differences between housepit sites and other dwelling sites without such permanent dwelling structures. In addition, the excavated sites provide a selection of various settlement types located in different environmental zones. The occupation phase and the settlement type of the excavated sites are determined with the help of osteological and archaeological material. Research indicates that the most distinctive change in settlement pattern took place during the Middle Neolithic, at the time when Typical Comb Ware was in use (ca. 4000–3400 cal BC).
Viimeisimpien maanviljelyn alkua käsittelevien julkaisujen mukaan Suomen vanhimmat viljojen siitepölyt ajoittuvat kivikauden lopulle noin 2500–1800 cal BC. 2000-luvulla Suomen lähialueilta on saatu runsaasti aiempaa vanhempia viljan... more
Viimeisimpien maanviljelyn alkua käsittelevien julkaisujen mukaan Suomen vanhimmat viljojen siitepölyt ajoittuvat kivikauden lopulle noin 2500–1800 cal BC.
2000-luvulla Suomen lähialueilta on saatu runsaasti aiempaa vanhempia viljan siitepölyjen ajoituksia. Sen sijaan Suomessa vanhimman kivikautisen viljelyn tutkimustilanne ei ole juuri muuttunut sitten 1990-luvun. Tämän artikkelin ensimmäisenä tavoitteena on esitellä vanhimmat viljelyn merkit Suomesta ja Suomen lähiympäristöstä.
Toisena tavoitteena on esittää näkemys siitä, miten vanhoja maanviljelyn merkkejä Suomesta on odotettavissa. Tätä näkemystä perustellaan olemassa olevien siitepölytutkimusten lisäksi myös arkeologisessa aineistossa näkyvillä muutoksilla yhteisöjen tavoissa asua ja toimia ympäristössään.
Kivikauti sen maanviljelyn leviämistä pohjoiseen käsitellään useimmiten yhä 1980-luvulla luotujen mallien pohjalta. Baltian pohjoisosien tutkimustilanne on kuitenkin muuttunut merkittävästi viimeisen kymmenen vuoden aikana. Artikkelissa pohditaan myös maanviljelyn leviämistä kuvaavien mallien soveltuvuutta nykyiseen tutkimustilanteeseen.
2000-luvulla Suomen lähialueilta on saatu runsaasti aiempaa vanhempia viljan siitepölyjen ajoituksia. Sen sijaan Suomessa vanhimman kivikautisen viljelyn tutkimustilanne ei ole juuri muuttunut sitten 1990-luvun. Tämän artikkelin ensimmäisenä tavoitteena on esitellä vanhimmat viljelyn merkit Suomesta ja Suomen lähiympäristöstä.
Toisena tavoitteena on esittää näkemys siitä, miten vanhoja maanviljelyn merkkejä Suomesta on odotettavissa. Tätä näkemystä perustellaan olemassa olevien siitepölytutkimusten lisäksi myös arkeologisessa aineistossa näkyvillä muutoksilla yhteisöjen tavoissa asua ja toimia ympäristössään.
Kivikauti sen maanviljelyn leviämistä pohjoiseen käsitellään useimmiten yhä 1980-luvulla luotujen mallien pohjalta. Baltian pohjoisosien tutkimustilanne on kuitenkin muuttunut merkittävästi viimeisen kymmenen vuoden aikana. Artikkelissa pohditaan myös maanviljelyn leviämistä kuvaavien mallien soveltuvuutta nykyiseen tutkimustilanteeseen.
Research Interests:
Exploitation of proxy data is typical for disciplines that are studying past environmental issues. A proxy is a dataset through which it is possible to draw conclusions on another subject. For example, tree ring records can be used as... more
Exploitation of proxy data is typical for disciplines that are studying past environmental issues. A proxy is a dataset through which it is possible to draw conclusions on another subject. For example, tree ring records can be used as proxy data to estimate changes in past annual temperatures because of the scientifi cally verifi ed knowledge on the causality between annual temperature and the thickness, and other attributes, of annually grown tree rings. Proxy data is at the heart of the natural sciences. At the moment, a lot of environmental data is available to gain a more comprehensive description of past environmental conditions. The reason for writing this discussion is that the prehistoric population model based on 14C proxy data presented by Tallavaara et al. (2010) has gained more weight than other slightly different variations on the theme (Siiriäinen 1981; Hertell 2009), and a number of recent studies rely on a recent view of Stone Age demographic development (Sundell et ...
Research Interests:
Typical Comb Ware has for a long time dominated the Finnish image of the Neolithic period. Due to its rich and voluminous material culture with high archaeological visibility and, consequently, a long research history, it seems to have an... more
Typical Comb Ware has for a long time dominated the Finnish image of the Neolithic period. Due to its rich and voluminous material culture with high archaeological visibility and, consequently, a long research history, it seems to have an elevated position in comparison with many other periods and pottery types. Typical Comb Ware is commonly said to have been defi ned by Aarne Äyräpää (before 1930 Europaeus) in his nearly canonical work Die relative Chronologie der steinzeitlichen Keramik in Finnland (Europaeus-Äyräpää 1930). The accumulation of material during the 85 years since Äyräpää’s work was published has, nevertheless, identifi ed several problems with it and given grounds to ask how valid his classifi cations actually are. In this article, we aim to trace the defi nition of Typical Comb Ware from its beginning in the early 20th century until the present day, and also to outline the criticisms and attempts made to improve the classifi cation. Because the pottery type was ori...
Research Interests:
The settlement site Pegrema I is located on a sandy pine heath by the fjord-like bay of Unitskaya Guba, on Lake Onega, on the Zaonezhe Peninsula in the Karelian Republic (Russian Federation) (Fig. 1). The area is one of the major... more
The settlement site Pegrema I is located on a sandy pine heath by the fjord-like bay of Unitskaya Guba, on Lake Onega, on the Zaonezhe Peninsula in the Karelian Republic (Russian Federation) (Fig. 1). The area is one of the major prehistoric settlement areas known in Karelia, with tens of individual locations or areas of activity dating from the Mesolithic to the Early Metal Period. The site of Pegrema I is among the best-studied of these: found in 1966, c 1000 m2 were excavated in 1970–73 (Zhuravlev 1987; 1991) (Fig. 2). It is also one of the most intensively studied Rhomb-Pit Ware sites in Karelia, and has held an important position in the study of this pottery type, as well as its dating (see Vitenkova 1996: 152, 160–1; Khoroshun 2013: 11, 116; Nordqvist & Mökkönen in press). While re-examining the find material from Pegrema I in February 2015, a peculiar artefact was encountered: a ceramic vessel with holes pierced through its walls, a strainer. This item had not previously arou...
Research Interests:
ABSTRACTThis paper presents bulk stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N, C/N ratio) measurements of14C dated carbonized crusts on 6th and 5th millennium cal BC pottery from Finland and northwestern Russia. Based on this data, it explores the... more
ABSTRACTThis paper presents bulk stable isotope (δ13C, δ15N, C/N ratio) measurements of14C dated carbonized crusts on 6th and 5th millennium cal BC pottery from Finland and northwestern Russia. Based on this data, it explores the differences in the origins of crusts attached on the inner and outer surfaces of vessels, and the changes in dietary practices and pottery use. It is argued that during the earliest phase of pottery use, mostly terrestrial ingredients were processed in the vessels, and aquatic resources became visible centuries later during the 5th millennium cal BC.
Research Interests:
Archaeology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Geology, Geochemistry, Stable Isotope Analysis, and 13 moreNorthern Europe, Neolithic Archaeology, Radiocarbon, Neolithic Transition, Neolithic Europe, Mesolithic/Neolithic, Pottery, History and archaeology, Radiocarbon Dating, Radiocarbon Dating (Archaeology), Stable Isotopes and Palaeodiet, North European Archaeology, and Pottery Archaeology
This article discusses a radiocarbon-based chronology for the Neolithic–Eneolithic period in the present-day Republic of Karelia (Russian Federation). The main goal is to present all currently available radiocarbon datings, including... more
This article discusses a radiocarbon-based chronology for the Neolithic–Eneolithic period in the present-day Republic of Karelia (Russian Federation). The main goal is to present all currently available radiocarbon datings, including the previously published dates, as well as the ones recently obtained by the authors. In total, there are 194 dates from 77 sites covering the period from the 6th to the 2nd millennium cal BC. Besides providing an up-to-date list of datings, the article also evaluates their reliability and utility in building a local chronology. Despite several shortcomings, the new AMS-supported chronology enables the study of past cultural dynamics in much greater detail than previously and allows its better integration into the wider north-east European chronological framework.
Research Interests:
History, Geography, Archaeology, Neolithic Archaeology, Neolithic & Chalcolithic Archaeology, and 15 moreNeolithic Europe, Neolithic, Pottery, Stone Age Archaeology, Chronology, Eneolithic, Radiocarbon Dating, Chalcolithic, Radiocarbon Dating (Archaeology), Radiocarbon Chronology, Periodisation, archeology of the north-western Russia, Pottery Archaeology, Karelian Republic, and Neolitik
This paper discusses the basis of Neolithic periodization used in mainland Finland. It is suggested that the periodization should be revised: boundary between the Middle and Late Neolithic periods should be moved to correspond the... more
This paper discusses the basis of Neolithic periodization used in mainland Finland. It is suggested that the periodization should be revised: boundary between the Middle and Late Neolithic periods should be moved to correspond the appearance of Corded Ware (ca. 2800 calBC), and a term Final Neolithic introduced to cover the final centuries of the Neolithic. This kind of division would reflect changes in the cultural development better than the currently used one. In addition, the chronological frames for the pottery types dated between the late 6th and mid-4th millennium calBC, i.e. the Early Neolithic and the beginning of Middle Neolithic, are presented.
Research Interests:
History, Archaeology, Neolithic Archaeology, Neolithic Europe, Finland, and 13 morePeriodization, Stone Age Archaeology, Chronology, Early Neolithic, Radiocarbon Dating, Late Neolithic, Radiocarbon Dating (Archaeology), Radiocarbon Chronology, Middle Neolithic, Periodisation, Pottery Archaeology, Documenta Praehistorica 32, and Periodizacija
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
ABSTRACT The early stages of agriculture in the Boreal forests of Northern Europe remain poorly understood. Although pottery appeared during the 6th millennium B.C., this has not been seen as an indication of a true Neolithic in the... more
ABSTRACT The early stages of agriculture in the Boreal forests of Northern Europe remain poorly understood. Although pottery appeared during the 6th millennium B.C., this has not been seen as an indication of a true Neolithic in the north. In later prehistory, vast parts of the region are thought to have remained a wilderness. In order to test these assumptions, a high-resolution pollen analysis and an archaeological survey were carried out at Lake Huhdasj ¨ arvi, SE Finland. The results indicate signs of cultivation already by the early Neolithic, 5260–4260 B.C., and slash-and-burn cultivation concentrated on deciduous forests is recorded from ca. A.D. 600 onwards. By A.D. 930, an intensive form of swidden cultivation began in the coniferous forests, indicating a well-established agricultural settlement. The discovery of Neolithic (late 6th millennium B.C.) buckwheat pollen suggests that the roots of agriculture in northernmost Europe may have to be searched for in China rather than the Near East. C � 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
In the mid-1970s, Finland's oldest wreck of a sailing vessel was discovered at Virolahti in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Dated to the Viking Age in the initial research, the wreck was named after the nearby island of... more
In the mid-1970s, Finland's oldest wreck of a sailing vessel was discovered at Virolahti in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland. Dated to the Viking Age in the initial research, the wreck was named after the nearby island of Lapuri. Subsequent radiocarbon dating and the ceramics in the cargo of the vessel have altered the date to the Middle Ages. The wreck was previously associated with the eastward route of the Vikings which was assumed to have passed along the northern coast of the Gulf of Finland. The wreck has now been dissociated from this context of the Vikings' eastward route. As a result of the new date, the medieval wreck has remained only an isolated find on the coast at Virolahti, without any actual connection with local history. The present article seeks to present a more precise date for the wreck based on a combination of its radiocarbon datings, to link the vessel with the history of the region where it was discovered, and to discuss its possible origin and use. Calibration and compined dating of the three youngest caulking datings date the ship to the 13th century, with an emphasis on the last quarter of the century (Figs. 5-6). The dating is equivalent with the dating of the proto-stoneware jug found from the wreck (Fig. 8b). The wreck lies in a natural harbour just outside a bay in the vicinity of which there was a manor in the 14th century (Fig. 10). The earliest historical document mentioning Virolahti (Virlax in Swedish) dates from 1336. It is a letter written by the bailiff of the Viborg castle in which he grants the burghers of Tallinn the right to trade in the civitas of Virolahti. There have not been towns in Virolahti in the Middle Ages or later. The term civitas must have meant the manor or a marketplace operating under the control of the manor. This makes the Lapuri strait a good candidate for the marketplace mentioned in the letter. The origin of the wreck is fin. Earlier researchers have assumed that the vessel must have been built somewhere outside Finland, because it is made of oak. The use of oak does not, however, exclude a domestic origin. Several alternative hypotheses of the origin of the vessel can be based on its structual details, on the finds of various objects, and the historical development of the find area, pointing to different areas of the Baltic region. The problem of the origin can possibly be solved in the future, if the dendrochronological samples taken from the wreck can be connected with the dendrochronological curves of some particular area. The question of origin is tied up with the use of the ship in warlike activities, in the colonization of the area by Swedish immigrants, or whether it was just an ordinary late 13th-century vessel.
Research Interests:
History, Geography, Archaeology, Radiocarbon, Ceramics, and 12 moreAge, Settlement, Habitat, Radiocarbon Dating, Calibration, Dating, New, Document, Letter, Final, Origin, and Bay
Research Interests:
Page 1. Arkeologia, historialliset kartat ja paikkatieto Lisensiaatintutkielma Teemu Mökkönen Helsingin yliopisto Kulttuurien tutkimuksen laitos Arkeologian oppiaine Kevätlukukausi 2008 Page 2. Tiedekunta/OsastoFakultet/Sektion Faculty... more
Page 1. Arkeologia, historialliset kartat ja paikkatieto Lisensiaatintutkielma Teemu Mökkönen Helsingin yliopisto Kulttuurien tutkimuksen laitos Arkeologian oppiaine Kevätlukukausi 2008 Page 2. Tiedekunta/OsastoFakultet/Sektion Faculty HUMANISTINEN TIEDEKUNTA ...
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Housepits have a remarkably short research history as compared to Fennoscandian archaeological research on the Stone Age in general. The current understanding of the numbers and the distribution of Stone Age housepits in the Nordic... more
Housepits have a remarkably short research history as compared to Fennoscandian archaeological research on the Stone Age in general. The current understanding of the numbers and the distribution of Stone Age housepits in the Nordic countries has, for the most part, been shaped by archaeological studies carried out over the last twenty to thirty years.
The main subjects of this research are Neolithic housepits, which are archaeological remains of semi-subterranean pithouses. This dissertation consists of five peer-reviewed articles and a synthesis paper. The articles deal with the development of housepits as seen in the data gathered from Finland (the Lake Saimaa area and south-eastern Finland) and Russia (the Karelian Isthmus). This synthesis expands the discussion of the changes observed in the Papers to include Fennoscandian housepit research as a whole.
Certain changes in the size, shape, environmental location, and clustering of housepits extended into various cultures and ecological zones in northern Fennoscandia. Previously, the evolution of housepits has been interpreted to have been caused by the adaptation of Neolithic societies to prevailing environmental circumstances or to re-organization following contacts with the agrarian Corded Ware/Battle Axe Cultures spreading to North. This dissertation argues for two waves of change in the pithouse building tradition. Both waves brought with them certain changes in the pithouses themselves and
in the practices of locating the dwellings in the environment/landscape. The changes in housepits do not go hand in hand with other changes in material culture, nor are
the changes restricted to certain ecological environments. Based on current information, it appears that the changes relate primarily to the spread of new concepts of housing and possibly to new technology, as opposed to representing merely a local
response to environmental factors. This development commenced already before the birth of the Corded Ware/Battle Axe Cultures. Therefore, the changes are argued to have resulted from the spreading of new ideas through the same networks that actively distributed commodities, exotic goods, and raw materials over vast areas between the southern Baltic Sea, the north-west Russian forest zone, and Fennoscandia.
The main subjects of this research are Neolithic housepits, which are archaeological remains of semi-subterranean pithouses. This dissertation consists of five peer-reviewed articles and a synthesis paper. The articles deal with the development of housepits as seen in the data gathered from Finland (the Lake Saimaa area and south-eastern Finland) and Russia (the Karelian Isthmus). This synthesis expands the discussion of the changes observed in the Papers to include Fennoscandian housepit research as a whole.
Certain changes in the size, shape, environmental location, and clustering of housepits extended into various cultures and ecological zones in northern Fennoscandia. Previously, the evolution of housepits has been interpreted to have been caused by the adaptation of Neolithic societies to prevailing environmental circumstances or to re-organization following contacts with the agrarian Corded Ware/Battle Axe Cultures spreading to North. This dissertation argues for two waves of change in the pithouse building tradition. Both waves brought with them certain changes in the pithouses themselves and
in the practices of locating the dwellings in the environment/landscape. The changes in housepits do not go hand in hand with other changes in material culture, nor are
the changes restricted to certain ecological environments. Based on current information, it appears that the changes relate primarily to the spread of new concepts of housing and possibly to new technology, as opposed to representing merely a local
response to environmental factors. This development commenced already before the birth of the Corded Ware/Battle Axe Cultures. Therefore, the changes are argued to have resulted from the spreading of new ideas through the same networks that actively distributed commodities, exotic goods, and raw materials over vast areas between the southern Baltic Sea, the north-west Russian forest zone, and Fennoscandia.