Skip to main content

Measuring Engagement: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Employee Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations

Abstract

By now, it is clear that highly engaged and committed nonprofit stakeholders—employees, volunteers, boards of directors, and community members—can enhance productivity, innovation, performance, service outcomes, and local and global impact. What is less clear is how exactly to measure whether employees are indeed engaged and meaningfully contributing to a nonprofit organization’s mission and objectives in measurable ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/employee/measure-employee-engagement/

References

  • Albdour, A. A., & Altarawneh, I. I. (2014). Employee engagement and organizational commitment: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business, 19(2), 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attridge, M. (2009). Measuring and managing employee work engagement: A review of the research and business literature. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(4), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. (2014). A primer on measuring employee engagement. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/11/a-primer-on-measuring-employee-engagement. Accessed August 24, 2022.

  • Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Agrawal, S., Blue, A., Plowman, S. K., Josh, P., & Asplund, J. (2020). The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321725/gallup-q12-meta-analysis-report.aspx. Accessed June 14, 2022.

  • Harvard Business Review Analytic Services. (2013). The impact of employee engagement on performance. https://hbr.org/resources/pdfs/comm/achievers/hbr_achievers_report_sep13.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2022.

  • He, H., Zhu, W., & Zheng, X. (2014). Procedural justice and employee engagement: Roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 681–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, J. B., McKechnie, S., & Swanberg, J. (2011). Predicting employee engagement in an age-diverse retail workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalanabhan, T. J., Sai, L. P., & Mayuri, D. (2009). Employee engagement and job satisfaction in the information technology industry. Psychological Reports, 105(3), 759–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanika, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2015). Measuring the benefits of employee engagement. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(4), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage: HR’s strategic role. HR Magazine, 52(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014). Person-organization fit and turnover intention: The mediating role of employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research, 6(3), 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, 12, 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrotryia, V. K., & Dhanda, U. (2019). Measuring employee engagement: Perspectives from literature. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(3), 26–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S., & Madan, P. (2016). Understanding the roles of organizational identification, trust and corporate ethical values in employee engagement–organizational citizenship behaviour relationship: A study on indian managers. Management and Labour Studies, 41(4), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verona, A., Simonič, M., & Vlasova, M. (2017). An analysis of the relationship between job satisfaction and employee engagement. Economic Themes, 55(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, M., Kandeil, D., Neely, A., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2016). The fallacy of the net promoter score: Customer loyalty predictive model. Cambridge Service Alliance, 10, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunle Akingbola .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akingbola, K., Rogers, S.E., Intindola, M. (2023). Measuring Engagement: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches. In: Employee Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08469-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics