‘When shall we three Meet Again’ PPRIG as a Practitioner–Practitioner–Researcher Collaboration Approach
Corresponding Author
Thomas Schumacher
Institute for Systemic Management and Public Governance, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Correspondence:
Thomas Schumacher, Institute for Systemic Management and Public Governance, University of St. Gallen, Dufourstrasse 40a, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland,
Tel: +49 174 3358280,
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Thomas Schumacher
Institute for Systemic Management and Public Governance, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Correspondence:
Thomas Schumacher, Institute for Systemic Management and Public Governance, University of St. Gallen, Dufourstrasse 40a, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland,
Tel: +49 174 3358280,
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper presents, discusses, and illustrates the practitioner–practitioner–researcher inquiry group (PPRIG) as a novel collaborative research approach involving practitioners as active partners instead of passive informants. Based on involvement of inside and outside practitioners vis-à-vis a particular organization, PPRIG taps into outside practitioners' specific potential for alternative ways of observing, reflecting, and sense-making, to better explore and understand the how and why of management phenomena and to develop practical solutions. By systematically adding an outside practitioner perspective to the widespread insider (practitioner) and outsider (researcher) perspective in collaborative research, PPRIG responds to certain key criticisms of collaborative methods by giving precise guidelines for achieving such collaboration. PPRIG thus complements and extends existing research methods in the field of collaborative research. Moreover, by addressing the communication and collaboration challenges with a structured three-step approach, it addresses key criticisms and answers fundamental questions about how to conduct collaboration between researchers and practitioners.
References
- Adams, N., 2006. Habermas and theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511621260 Google Scholar
- Alvesson, M. and J. Sandberg, 2013. Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. London, UK: Sage.
10.4135/9781446270035 Google Scholar
- Antonacopoulou, E., 2010, “Beyond co-production: Practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas”. Public Money and Management, 30: 219–226.
- Astley, W. G. and R. F. Zammuto, 1992, “Organization science, managers, and language games”. Organization Science, 3: 443–460.
- Balogun, J., A. S. Huff and P. Johnson, 2003, “Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing”. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 197–224.
- Bartunek, J. M., 2007, “Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Towards a relational scholarship of integration”. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1323–1333.
- Bartunek, J. M. and M. R. Louis, 1996. Insider/outsider team research. London: Sage.
- Bartunek, J. M. and S. L. Rynes, 2014, “Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships”. Journal of Management, 40: 1181–1201.
- Bartunek, J. M., J. R. Gordon and R. P. Weathersby, 1983, “Developing ‘complicated’ understanding in administrators”. The Academy of Management Review, 8: 273–284.
- Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Beech, N., R. MacIntosh and D. MacLean, 2010, “Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters”. Organization Studies, 31: 1341–1367.
- Bennett, M., 2013. Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Paradigms, principles, and practices. London, UK: Hachette UK.
- Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
10.1515/9781503621749 Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., 2002. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bradbury, H., 2008. “ Quality and ‘actionability’”. In A. B. R. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 583–600.
10.4135/9781412976671.n28 Google Scholar
- Chen, C. Y., Y. C. J. Wu and W. H. Wu, 2013, “A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics”. Management Decision, 51: 566–593.
- Chia, R., 2004, “Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda”. European Management Review, 1: 29–34.
- Chia, R. and B. MacKay, 2007, “Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice”. Human Relations, 60: 217–242.
- Coghlan, D., 2011, “Action research: Exploring perspectives on a philosophy of practical knowing”. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 53–87.
- Coghlan, D. and P. Coughlan, 2008. “ Collaborative research in and by an interorganizational network”. In A. B. R. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 443–460.
10.4135/9781412976671.n21 Google Scholar
- Coghlan, D. and P. Coughlan, 2010, “Notes toward a philosophy of action learning research”. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7: 193–203.
10.1080/14767333.2010.488330 Google Scholar
- Cohen, L. and L. Manion, 2000. Research methods in education, 5th ed. London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203224342 Google Scholar
- Collins, H. M. and R. Evans, 2002, “The third wave of science studies studies of expertise and experience”. Social Studies of Science, 32: 235–296.
- Corlett, S., 2013, “Participant learning in and through research as reflexive dialogue: Being ‘struck’ and the effects of recall”. Management Learning. 44: 453–469.
- Crabtree, A., 2010, “ Ideas of Charles Sanders Peirce”. Retrieved from https://www.esalen.org/sites/default/files/resource_attachments/crabtree-peirce.pdf (accessed 13 November 2017).
- Cunliffe, A. L., 2003, “Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities”. Human Relations, 56: 983–1003.
- Denzin, N. K., 2006, Sociological methods: A sourcebook: Aldine transaction. New York.
- Eikeland, O., 2008. The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian phronesis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research Vol. 5. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, “Building theories from case study research”. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.
- M. Elden and M. L. S. Levin (Eds), 1991. Cogenerative learning. Bringing participation into action research. London: Sage.
10.4135/9781412985383.n9 Google Scholar
- Förster, H. V., 1992, “Ethics and second-order cybernetics”. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 1: 9–19.
- Garfinkel, H., 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Ghemawat, P., 2007. Redefining global strategy: crossing borders in a world where differences still matter. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
- Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow, 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London, UK: Sage.
- Greenwood, D. J. and M. Lewin, 2007. Introduction to action research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781412984614 Google Scholar
- Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of communicative action, Vol. 1 of reason and the rationalization of society, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon.
- Habermas, J., 1985. A philosophico-political profile. New Left Review, 151: 75.
- Hatchuel, A. and A. David, 2008. “ Collaborating for management research”. In A. B. R. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management. housand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 143–162.
10.4135/9781412976671.n7 Google Scholar
- Hernes, T., 2008. Understanding organization as process. Theory for a tangled world. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Hibbert, P., C. Coupland and R. MacIntosh, 2010, “Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes”. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 5: 47–62.
10.1108/17465641011042026 Google Scholar
- Hibbert, P., J. Sillince, T. Diefenbach and A. Cunliffe, 2014, “Relationally reflexive practice: A generative approach to theory development in qualitative research”. Organizational Research Methods, 17: 278–298.
- Hodgkinson, G. P. and D. M. Rousseau, 2009, “Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening!” Journal of Management Studies, 46: 534–546.
- Hosking, D. M., 2011, “Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism”. Organization Studies, 32: 47–65.
- Huff, A. S., 2000, “1999 presidential address: Changes in organizational knowledge production”. Academy of Management Review, 25: 288–293.
- A. S. Huff, A.-K. Neyer and K. Möslein (Eds), 2010. Broader methods to support new insights into strategizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511777882.014 Google Scholar
- Huxham, C. and S. Vangen, 2005. Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Islam, G., 2015, “Practitioners as theorists: Para-ethnography and the collaborative study of contemporary organizations”. Organizational Research Methods, 18: 231–251.
- Ison, R., 2008. “ Systems thinking and practice for action research”. In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), The sage handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 139–158.
10.4135/9781848607934.n15 Google Scholar
- S. Kemmis (Ed), 2008. Critical theory and participatory action research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781848607934.n14 Google Scholar
- Kieser, A. and L. Leiner, 2009, “Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable”. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 516–533.
- Kieser, A. and L. Leiner, 2011, “Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1: 14–28.
- Kieser, A., A. Nicolai and D. Seidl, 2015, “The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program”. The Academy of Management Annals, 9: 143–233.
- Kolodny, H. and N. Halpern, 2008. “ From collaborative design to collaborative research: A sociotechnical journey”. In A. B. R. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 261–274.
10.4135/9781412976671.n13 Google Scholar
- Langley, A. and L. Royer, 2006, “Perpectives on doing case study research in organizations”. Management, 9: 81–94.
- Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social – An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lave, J. and E. Wenger, 1991. Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511815355 Google Scholar
- Lewin, K., 1946, “Action research and minority problems”. Journal of Social Issues, 2: 34–46.
- Luhmann, N., 1993, “Deconstruction as second-order observing”. New Literary History, 24: 763–782.
- Luhmann, N., 1995. Social systems. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Luhmann, N., 2000. Organisation und entscheidung. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
10.1007/978-3-322-97093-0 Google Scholar
- McLeod, J., 2003, “Why we interview now – Reflexivity and perspective in a longitudinal study”. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6: 201–211.
10.1080/1364557032000091806 Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman, 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
- Mohrman, S. A. and E. E. I. Lawler, 2011. Useful research: Advancing theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Mohrman, S. A., C. B. Gibson and A. M. Mohrman Jr., 2001, “Doing research that is useful to practice. A model and empirical exploration”. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 357–375.
- W. A. Pasmore, R. W. Woodman and A. L. Simmons (Eds), 2008. Towards a more rigorous, reflective, and relevant science of collaborative management research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781412976671.n27 Google Scholar
- Paulus, T. M., M. Woodside and M. F. Ziegler, 2010, “‘I tell you, it's a journey, isn't it?’ Understanding collaborative meaning making in qualitative research”. Qualitative Inquiry, 16: 852–862.
- Peirce, C. S., 1976. The new elements of mathematics Vol. 5th. The Hague: Mouton.
- Peirce, C. S., 1992. Reasoning and the logic of things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Pettigrew, A. M., 1987, “Context and action in the transformation of the firm”. Journal of Management Studies, 24: 649–670.
- Pettigrew, A. M., 1997, “What is a processual analysis?” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13: 337–348.
10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00020-1 Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, A. M., R. W. Woodman and K. S. Cameron, 2001, “Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research”. The Academy of Management Journal, 44: 697–713.
- Reason, P. and H. Bradbury, 2008. The sage handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781848607934 Google Scholar
- Revans, R., 2011. ABC of action learning. London, UK: Blond & Briggs.
- Riach, K., 2009, “Exploring participant-centred rReflexivity in the research interview”. Sociology, 43: 356–370.
- Riley, M., 2010. Emplacing the research encounter: Exploring farm life histories. Qualitative Inquiry, 16: 651–662.
- Rothman, J., 1997. Resolving Identity-Based Conflict in Nations, Organizations and Communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Rynes, S. L., J. M. Bartunek and R. L. Daft, 2001, “Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics”. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 340–355.
- Santoro, N. and A. Allard, 2006, “Creating spaces for pedagogy: Research as learning”. The Australian Educational Researcher, 33: 41–54.
- Schumacher, T., 2015, “Linking action learning and inter-organisational learning: The learning journey approach”. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 12: 293–313.
- Shani, A. B. R., A. David and C. Willson, 2004. “ Collaborative research: Alternative roadmaps”. In N. Adler, A. B. R. Shani and A. Styhre (eds.), Collaborative research in organizations. Foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 83–100.
10.4135/9781412983679.n5 Google Scholar
- Shani, A. B. R., S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler, 2008. Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781412976671 Google Scholar
- Shani, A. B. R., D. Coghlan and S. Cirella, 2012, “Action research and collaborative management research: More than meets the eye?” International Journal of Action Research, 8: 45–67.
- Taylor, F. W., 1911. Shop management. New York: Harper.
- R. R. V. Tenkasi and G. W. Hay (Eds), 2007. Following the second legacy of Aristotle. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Trist, E. and K. Bamforth, 1951, “Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method”. Human Relations, 4: 3–38.
- Upton, D. M. and S. E. Madacam, 1997, “Why (and how) to take a plant tour”. Harvard Business Review, 75: 97–106.
- Van de Ven, A. H., 1992, “Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note”. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 169–188.
- Vince, R., 2004, “Action learning and organizational learning: Power, politics and emotion in organizations1”. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1: 63–78.
10.1080/1476733042000187628 Google Scholar
- Von Foerster, H., 1984. Observing systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
- Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Werr, A. and L. Greiner, 2008. “ Collaboration and the production of management knowledge in research, consulting, and management practice”. In A. B. R. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne and N. Adler (eds.), Handbook of collaborative management research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, pp. 93–117.
10.4135/9781412976671.n5 Google Scholar
- Whittington, R., 2001. Learning to strategise: Problems of practice. Lyon: Paper presented at the Beitrag bei der EGOS Konferenz.
- Whittington, R., 2006, “Completing the practice turn in strategy research”. Organization Studies, 27: 613–634.