Working Toward the Experimenter: Reconceptualizing Obedience Within the Milgram Paradigm as Identification-Based Followership
Abstract
The behavior of participants within Milgram’s obedience paradigm is commonly understood to arise from the propensity to cede responsibility to those in authority and hence to obey them. This parallels a belief that brutality in general arises from passive conformity to roles. However, recent historical and social psychological research suggests that agents of tyranny actively identify with their leaders and are motivated to display creative followership in working toward goals that they believe those leaders wish to see fulfilled. Such analysis provides the basis for reinterpreting the behavior of Milgram’s participants. It is supported by a range of material, including evidence that the willingness of participants to administer 450-volt shocks within the Milgram paradigm changes dramatically, but predictably, as a function of experimental variations that condition participants’ identification with either the experimenter and the scientific community that he represents or the learner and the general community that he represents. This reinterpretation also encourages us to see Milgram’s studies not as demonstrations of conformity or obedience, but as explorations of the power of social identity-based leadership to induce active and committed followership.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Arendt H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York, NY: Penguin.
Blass T. (2004). The man who shocked the world: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Brehm J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Burger J. (2009a, October 15–17). In their own words: Explaining obedience through an examination of participants’ comments. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Portland, ME.
Burger J. (2009b). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11.
Castano E. (2008). On the perils of glorifying the ingroup: Intergroup violence, in-group glorification and moral disengagement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 154–170.
Cesarani D. (2004). Eichmann: His life and crimes. London, England: Heinemann.
Darley J. M. (1992). Social organization and the production of evil. Psychological Enquiry, 2, 199–218.
Gilbert S. J. (1981). Another look at the Milgram obedience studies: The role of a graduated series of shocks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 690–695.
Haslam S. A., Platow M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469–1479.
Haslam S. A., Reicher S. D. (2007a). Beyond the banality of evil: Three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 615–622.
Haslam S. A., Reicher S. D. (2007b). Identity entrepreneurship and the consequences of identity failure: The dynamics of leadership in the BBC Prison Study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 125–147.
Haslam S. A., Reicher S. D. (2012). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 154–179.
Haslam S. A., Reicher S. D., Platow M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Hilberg R. (1985). The destruction of the European Jews. New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
Hogg M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.
Kershaw I. (1993). Working towards the Führer: Reflections on the nature of the Hitler dictatorship. Contemporary European History, 2, 103–108.
Lozowick Y. (2002). Hitler’s bureaucrats: The Nazi security police and the banality of evil (Watzman H., Trans.). London, England: Continuum.
Lutsky N. (2005). When is “obedience” obedience? Conceptual and historical commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 55–65.
Mantell D. M., Panzarella R. (1976). Obedience and responsibility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 239–245.
Meeus H. J. W., Raaijmakers Q. A. W. (1986). Administrative obedience: Carrying out orders to use psychological-administrative violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 311–324.
Meeus H. J. W., Raaijmakers Q. A. W. (1995). Obedience in modern society: The Utrecht studies. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 155–175.
Milgram S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.
Milgram S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18, 57–76.
Milgram S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Miller A. (1995). Constructions of the obedience experiments: A focus upon domains of relevance. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 33–53.
Miller A. (2004). What can the Milgram obedience experiments tell us about the Holocaust? Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. In Miller A. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 193–239). New York, NY: Guilford.
Millward K. (2011). The window in the laboratory: Stanley Milgram as filmmaker. The Psychologist, 24, 658–661.
Navarick D. J. (2009). Reviving the Milgram obedience paradigm in the era of informed consent. The Psychological Record, 59, 155–170.
Novick P. (2000). The Holocaust and collective memory. London, England: Bloomsbury.
Packer D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301–304.
Passini S., Morselli D. (2009). Authority relationships between obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 96–106.
Reicher S. D., Haslam S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC Prison Study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1–40.
Reicher S. D., Haslam S. A. (2011a). After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 163–169.
Reicher S. D., Haslam S. A. (2011b). Culture of shock: A fresh look at Milgram’s obedience studies. Scientific American Mind, 22(6), 30–35.
Reicher S. D., Haslam S. A., Rath R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1313–1344.
Roccas S., Klar Y., Liviatan I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.
Rochat F., Modigliani A. (1995). The ordinary quality of resistance: From Milgram’s laboratory to the village of Le Chambon. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 195–210.
Rochat F., Modigliani A. (1997). Authority: Obedience, defiance, and identification in experimental and historical contexts. In Gold M. (Ed.), A new outline of social psychology (pp. 235–246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Russell N. J. C. (2010). The making of an (in)famous experiment. The Psychologist, 23, 780–783.
Russell N. J. C. (2011). Milgram’s obedience to authority experiments: Origins and early evolution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 146–162.
Slater M., Antley A., Davison A., Swapp D., Guger C., Barker C., . . . Sachez-Vives M. V. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE, 1, e39.
Turner J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Turner J. C., Hogg M. A., Oakes P. J., Reicher S. D., Wetherell M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Turner J. C., Oakes P. J., Haslam S. A., McGarty C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.
Vetlesen A. J. (2005). Evil and human agency: Understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Zimbardo P. (1989). Quiet rage: The Stanford prison study [video]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Zimbardo P. (2004). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In Miller A. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 21–50). New York, NY: Guilford.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: June 29, 2012
Issue published: July 2012
Keywords
PubMed: 26168469
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Perspectives on Psychological Science.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 8178
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 95 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 91
-
How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment
-
Examining the role of Donald Trump and his supporters in the 2021 assa...
-
You and I are alike, so I will hold back – The effect of directed empa...
-
Engaged followership and toxic science: Exploring the effect of protot...
-
The blind obedience of others: a better than average effect in a Milgr...
-
The Paradox of the Biblical Servant Leadership and American Presidency...
-
Sozialer Einfluss
-
Obedience to Authority
-
On the cognitive mechanisms supporting prosocial disobedience in a pos...
-
Sacrificing Animals in the Name of Scientific Authority: The Relations...
-
Reconciling identity leadership and leader identity: A dual-identity f...
-
Podcast Review: Radiolab
-
The second wave of critical engagement with Stanley Milgram's ‘obedien...
-
‘ We have a choice’: Identity construction...
-
Ecological Values Theory: Beyond Conformity, Goal-Seeking, and Rule-Fo...
-
Experiments make a good breakfast, but a poor supper
-
The paradox of the Biblical Servant Leadership and American Presidency...
-
Experimental Studies of Human–Robot Interaction: Threats to Valid Inte...
-
Cognitive Science and the Nature of Law
-
Saving a victim from himself: The rhetoric of the learner’s presence a...
-
On order and disorder during the COVID‐19 pandemic
-
Bringing together humanistic and intergroup perspectives to build a mo...
-
Why Women Are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empat...
-
Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding H...
-
Fusion with political leaders predicts willingness to persecute immigr...
-
The Context-Variable Self and Autonomy: Exploring Surveillance Experie...
-
Arguing, Obeying and Defying
-
Identity leadership: Managing perceptions of conflict for collective a...
-
Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action suppor...
-
Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology's conception of ...
-
Critique de la mesure de répartition de responsabilité chez Milgram et...
-
Multiple compliant processes: A reply to Haslam and Reicher on the eng...
-
A truth that does not always speak its name: How Hollander and Turowet...
-
From “Ridiculous” to “Glad to Have Helped”: Debriefing News Delivery a...
-
Uncertainty and Influence: The Advantages (and Disadvantages) of Being...
-
Our Followers Are Lions, Theirs Are Sheep: How Social Identity Shapes ...
-
Explaining the New Baseline Condition’s High Completion Rate
-
Explaining the Inexplicable: Differences in Attributions for the Holoc...
-
The resistance experiments: Morality, authority and obedience in Stanl...
-
Normalizing trust: Participants’ immediately post‐hoc explanations of ...
-
How the Influence of Unethical Leaders on Followers Is Affected by The...
-
50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged...
-
Disobedience of Immoral Orders from Authorities: An Issue Construction...
-
Beyond group engagement: Multiple pathways from encounters with the po...
-
Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troubles...
-
ACCEL: A New Model for Identifying the Gifted
-
No Evidence for Ideological Asymmetry in Dissonance Avoidance
-
Bibliographie
-
Restoring Agency to the Human Actor
-
Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank supp...
-
Values and indirect noncompliance in a Milgram-like paradigm
-
Milgram’s Obedience Study: A Contentious Classic Reinterpreted
-
Are They In or Are They Out? Questioning Category Relations in the Stu...
-
Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality
-
A Research Note on Delegation of Responsibility in the Observation of ...
-
ACCEL: A New Model for Identifying the Gifted
-
Questioning authority: new perspectives on Milgram's ‘obedience’ resea...
-
The reduction of employee lying behaviour
-
Compliance and the power of authority
-
A stake in the fight: When do heterosexual employees resist organizati...
-
Social identification is generally a prerequisite for group success an...
-
Destructive Obedience Without Pressure
-
Coverage of Milgram’s Obedience Experiments in Social Psychology Textb...
-
Coverage of recent criticisms of Milgram’s obedience experiments in in...
-
Milgram’s shock experiments and the Nazi perpetrators: A contrarian pe...
-
The repertoire of resistance: Non‐compliance with directives in Milgra...
-
Practicing What We Preach (and Sometimes Study): Methodological Issues...
-
Personality Predicts Obedience in a M ilgr...
-
Shock Treatment: Using Immersive Digital Realism to Restage and Re-exa...
-
‘Happy to have been of service’: The Yale archive as a window into the...
-
Les discours intérieurs associés aux comportements de soumission, de r...
-
Obedience (Research), History of
-
Prosocial Behavior, Cultural Differences in
-
Nothing by Mere Authority: Evidence that in an Experimental Analogue o...
-
Obeying, Joining, Following, Resisting, and Other Processes in the Mil...
-
“Ordinary Men,” Extraordinary Circumstances: Historians, Social Psycho...
-
The Explanatory Value of Milgram's Obedience Experiments: A Contempora...
-
Obedience, Self‐Control, and the Voice of Culture
-
What Makes a Person a Perpetrator? The Intellectual, Moral, and Method...
-
50:50 Hindsight: Appreciating Anew the Contributions of Milgram's Obed...
-
Depression and Social Identity: An Integrative Review
-
Rethinking conformity and imitation: divergence, convergence, and soci...
-
Stanley Milgram’s Obedience to Authority “Relationship” Condition: Som...
-
Meta-Milgram: An Empirical Synthesis of the Obedience Experiments
-
Social Capital and Well-Being in Times of Crisis
-
The Motivational Dynamics of Dissent Decisions...
-
Obedience
-
Towards a 'Science of Movement': Identity, Authority and Influence in ...
-
Bystander Responses to a Violent Incident in an Immersive Virtual Envi...
-
Replication-Extension of 'Not for All the Tea in China!' Political Ide...
-
Contesting the “Nature” Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Stu...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
