Skip to main content
Log in

Caught in the Middle? Worker Identity Under New Participatory Roles

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This paper assesses four theories of the determinants of work identities of workplace participants. Data come from a case study of the General Motors team concept assembly plant in Shreveport, Louisiana. The findings indicate that Marxist theories of workplace control overestimate the extent to which management influences the identity of workplace participants. Some support was found for the Weberian perspective that work identity is determined by patterns of occupational mobility, yet strongest support was found for the Durkheimian focus on workplace norms. Implications are drawn regarding the meaning of employment in late modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Paul 1995 "'Democratic Taylorism': The Toyota production system at NUMMI." In S. Babson (ed.), Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry: 207-219. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angle, H. L., and J. T. Perry 1986 "Dual commitment and labor-management relationship climates." Academy of Management Journal 29:31-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babson, Steve 1995 "Restructuring the workplace: Post-Fordism or return of the foreman'" In R. Asher and R. Edsforth (eds.), Autowork: 227-256. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baethge, Martin 1994 "Arbeit und Identität" [Work and identity]. In U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.), Riskante Freiheiten: 245-261. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugher, John Eric 2001 Solidarity Forever' Political Generations, Union Loyalty, and the Team Concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich 1994 "Jenseits von Stand und Klasse'" [Beyond status and class']. In U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.), Riskante Freiheiten: 43-60. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim 1994 "Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften-Perspektiven und Kontroversen einer subjektorientierten Soziologie" [Individualization in Modern Societies-Perspectives and Controversies of a Subject-oriented Sociology]. In U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.), Riskante Freiheiten: 10-39. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser, Terry L. 1996 Team Toyota: Transplanting the Toyota Culture to the Camry Plant in Kentucky. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael 1983 "Between the labor process and the state: The changing face of factory regimes under advanced capitalism." American Sociological Review 48:587-605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile 1985 "Professional ethics and civic morals." In K. Thompson (ed.), Readings from Emile Durkheim: 139-158. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Adrienne 1995 "The role of the union and employee involvement in lean production." In S. Babson (ed.), Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry: 70-78. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantasia, Rick 1988 Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Form, William 1985 Divided We Stand: Working-Class Stratification in America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony 1994 "Living in a post-traditional society." In U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order: 56-109. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony 1973 The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Laurie 1995 On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese Model and the American Worker. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, Guillermo J. 1988 Inhuman Relations: Quality Circles and Anti-Unionism in American Industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusky, David B., and Jesper B. Sorensen 1998 "Can class analysis be salvaged'" American Journal of Sociology 103: 1187-1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, David 1984 America's Working Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamper, Ben 1991 Rivethead. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, Martin 1996 "Die subjektive Modernisierung fortgeschrittener Arbeitsgesellschaften" [The subjective modernization of advanced industrial societies]. Soziale Welt 47:24-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy 1999a "Management citizenship behavior: A new concept and an empirical test." Social Problems 46:460-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy 1999b "Organizational anomie and worker consent." Work and Occupations 26: 292-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy 1991 "The active worker: Compliance and autonomy at the workplace." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 20:47-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy, Sandy Welsh, Sabine, Rieble, Cheryl Sorenson Jamison, and Sean Creighton 1993 "Is worker solidarity undermined by autonomy and participation' Patterns from the ethnographic literature." American Sociological Review 58:398-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, Arne L., and Peter V. Marsden 1995 "Organizational Commitment and Job Performance in the U.S. Labor Force." Research in the Sociology of Work 5:235-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Botz, Dan 1991 A Troublemaker's Handbook. Detroit: Labor Notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Nelson 1989 "'The man in the middle': A social history of automobile industry foreman." In N. Lichtenstein and S. Meyer (eds.), On the Line: Essays in the History of Auto Work: 153-89. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenau, J. M., J. E. Martin, and M. M. Peterson 1988 "Dual and unilateral commitment among stewards and rank-and-file union members." Academy of Management Journal 31:359-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, Ruth 1997 Farewell to the Factory: Auto Workers in the Late Twentieth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, Bruce 1997 Unions and Workplace Reorganization. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, Theodore V. 1960 Blue Collar Man: Patterns of Dual Allegiance in Industry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, James 1984 "Appropriating worker's knowledge: Quality control circles at a general motors plant." Studies in Political Economy 13:75-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, James, Chris Huxley, and David Robertson 1997 Just Another Car Factory' Lean Production and Its Discontents. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, Fritz J. 1945 "The foreman: Master and victim of double talk." Harvard Business Review 23:283-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Saul, Michael Bennett, and Thomas Kochan 1993 "The Saturn partnership: Co-Management and the reinvention of the local union." In B. E. Kaufman, and M. M. Kleiner (eds.), Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions: 339-370. Madison, WI: IRRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle, James 1998 "Winning hearts and minds in the era of employee-involvement programs." In K. Bronfenbrenner, S. Friedman, R.W. Hurd, R. A. Oswald, and R. L. Seeber (eds.), Organizing to Win: 213-231. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, W. Earl, Jr., and Frank S. Leonard "Let first-level supervisors do their job." Harvard Business Review 58:113-121.

  • Smith, Vicki 1997 "New forms of work organization." Annual Review of Sociology 23:315-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallas, Steven Peter 1991 "Workers, firms, and the dominant ideology: Hegemony and consciousness in the monopoly core." Sociological Quarterly 32:61-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1978 "Status groups and classes." In G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.), Economy and Society: 302-307. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Donald 1987 Empty Promises: Quality of Working Life Programs and the Labor Movement. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, Donald E. 1949 "Marginal men of industry: The foreman." American Journal of Sociology 54:298-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin 1985 Classes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanarella, Earnest J. 1996 "Worker training at Toyota and Saturn: Hegemony begins in the training center classroom." In W. C. Green and E. J. Yanarella (eds.), North American Auto Unions in Crisis: Lean Production as Contested Terrain: 125-157. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baugher, J.E. Caught in the Middle? Worker Identity Under New Participatory Roles. Sociological Forum 18, 417–439 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025717619065

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025717619065

Navigation