Advertisement

Structure from a whale song

Probing the structure of the ocean crust requires a wave source. The most common source is an air gun, which is effective but potentially harmful for ocean life and not easy to use everywhere. Kuna and Nábělek found that fin whale songs can also be used as a seismic source for determining crustal structure. Fin whale vocalizations can be as loud as large ships and occur at frequencies useful for traveling through the ocean floor. These properties allow fin whale songs to be used for mapping out the density of ocean crust, a vital part of exploring the seafloor.
Science, this issue p. 731

Abstract

Fin whale calls are among the strongest animal vocalizations that are detectable over great distances in the oceans. We analyze fin whale songs recorded at ocean-bottom seismometers in the northeast Pacific Ocean and show that in addition to the waterborne signal, the song recordings also contain signals reflected and refracted from crustal interfaces beneath the stations. With these data, we constrain the thickness and seismic velocity of the oceanic sediment and basaltic basement and the P-wave velocity of the gabbroic lower crust beneath and around the ocean bottom seismic stations. The abundant and globally available fin whale calls may be used to complement seismic studies in situations where conventional air-gun surveys are not available.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S12
Table S1
References (2830)

Resources

File (abf3962_kuna_sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
J. V. Carretta et al., “U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2013” (NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS, NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-532, NOAA, 2014).
2
A. Aguilar, in Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, W. F. Perrin, Ed. (Elsevier, 2008), pp. 433–436.
3
J. G. Cooke, Balaenoptera physalus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2018: e.T2478A50349982 (2019); https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T2478A50349982.en.
4
W. J. Richardson, C. R. Greene Jr., C. I. Malme, D. H. Thomson, Marine Mammals and Noise (Academic Press, 2013).
5
A. Širović, J. A. Hildebrand, S. M. Wiggins, Blue and fin whale call source levels and propagation range in the Southern Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1208–1215 (2007).
6
M. J. Weirathmueller, W. S. D. Wilcock, D. C. Soule, Source levels of fin whale 20 Hz pulses measured in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 741–749 (2013).
7
W. A. Watkins, P. Tyack, K. E. Moore, J. E. Bird, The 20-Hz signals of finback whales (Balaenoptera physalus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1901–1912 (1987).
8
M. A. McDonald, J. A. Hildebrand, S. C. Webb, Blue and fin whales observed on a seafloor array in the northeast pacific. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 712–721 (1995).
9
S. A. Mizroch, D. W. Rice, D. Zwiefelhofer, J. Waite, W. L. Perryman, Distribution and movements of fin whales in the North Pacific Ocean. Mammal Rev. 39, 193–227 (2009).
10
M. Simon, K. M. Stafford, K. Beedholm, C. M. Lee, P. T. Madsen, Singing behavior of fin whales in the Davis Strait with implications for mating, migration and foraging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3200–3210 (2010).
11
W. S. D. Wilcock, Tracking fin whales in the northeast Pacific Ocean with a seafloor seismic network. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 2408–2419 (2012).
12
R. Iwase, Fin whale vocalizations observed with ocean bottom seismometers of cabled observatories off east Japan Pacific Ocean. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 07HG03 (2015).
13
O. Gaspà Rebull, J. Díaz Cusí, M. Ruiz Fernández, J. Gallart Muset, Tracking fin whale calls offshore the Galicia Margin, North East Atlantic Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2077–2085 (2006).
14
W. A. Watkins, Activities and underwater sounds of fin whales. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 33, 83–117 (1981).
15
D. C. Soule, W. S. Wilcock, Fin whale tracks recorded by a seismic network on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, Northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 1751–1761 (2013).
16
M. J. Weirathmueller, K. M. Stafford, W. S. D. Wilcock, R. S. Hilmo, R. P. Dziak, A. M. Tréhu, Spatial and temporal trends in fin whale vocalizations recorded in the NE Pacific Ocean between 2003-2013. PLOS ONE 12, e0186127 (2017).
17
J. L. Nábělek, J. Braunmiller, Plate boundary evolution and physics at an oceanic transform fault system. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks (2012); https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/X9_2012.
18
V. M. Kuna, J. L. Nábělek, J. Braunmiller, Mode of slip and crust–mantle interaction at oceanic transform faults. Nat. Geosci. 12, 138–142 (2019).
19
D. S. Wilson, Confidence intervals for motion and deformation of the Juan de Fuca Plate. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 98, 16053–16071 (1993).
20
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
21
A. K. Stimpert, S. L. DeRuiter, E. A. Falcone, J. Joseph, A. B. Douglas, D. J. Moretti, A. S. Friedlaender, J. Calambokidis, G. Gailey, P. L. Tyack, J. A. Goldbogen, Sound production and associated behavior of tagged fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in the Southern California Bight. Anim. Biotelem. 3, 23 (2015).
22
C. A. Zelt, R. B. Smith, Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure. Geophys. J. Int. 108, 16–34 (1992).
23
G. L. Christeson, J. A. Goff, R. S. Reece, Synthesis of oceanic crustal structure from two-dimensional seismic profiles. Rev. Geophys. 57, 504–529 (2019).
24
G. Horning, J. P. Canales, S. M. Carbotte, S. Han, H. Carton, M. R. Nedimović, P. E. Van Keken, A 2-D tomographic model of the Juan de Fuca plate from accretion at axial seamount to subduction at the Cascadia margin from an active source ocean bottom seismometer survey. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 5859–5879 (2016).
25
J. Zhu, J. P. Canales, S. Han, S. M. Carbotte, A. Arnulf, M. R. Nedimović, Vp/Vs ratio of incoming sediments off Cascadia subduction zone from analysis of controlled‐source multicomponent OBS records. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB019239 (2020).
26
D. E. Sawyer, J. R. DeVore, Elevated shear strength of sediments on active margins: Evidence for seismic strengthening. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, (2015).
27
J. L. Nábělek, R/V Melville, cruise MV1212. R2R (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.7284/902871.
28
J. K. Cohen Jr., J. W. Stockwell, CWP/SU: Seismic Un*x Release No. 44: An open source software package for seismic research and processing (Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, 2015).
30
D. Dondurur, in Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data, D. Dondurur, Ed. (Elsevier, 2018), chap. 2, pp. 37–169.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 371 | Issue 6530
12 February 2021

Submission history

Received: 23 October 2020
Accepted: 5 January 2021
Published in print: 12 February 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Davenport for assistance with data processing, T. Kudrnova for the whale illustration used in Figs. 1 and 3, and S. Gyles for reviewing the manuscript. Comments by A. Trehu and J. Braunmiller improved the rigor of the paper. Funding: The seismic stations for the project were provided by the U.S. Ocean Bottom Seismograph Instrument Pool (www.obsip.org), funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). This research was supported by NSF grants OCE-1031858 and OCE-1131767. Author contributions: J.L.N. collected the dataset. V.M.K. conducted the data analysis. Both authors discussed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Data and materials availability: The OBS dataset is archived at the IRIS Data Management System (www.iris.edu) under network code X9 for the Plate Boundary Evolution and Physics at an Oceanic Transform Fault System project (17). Raw bathymetry data, used in Fig. 2 and for whale location, are available from the Rolling Deck to Repository (R2R), R/V Melville, cruise MV1212 (27).

Authors

Affiliations

College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Institute of Geophysics of the CAS, 141 31 Prague, Czech Republic.
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

Notes

*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Eavesdropping at the Speed of Light: Distributed Acoustic Sensing of Baleen Whales in the Arctic, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.901348
    Crossref
  2. SMART Subsea Cables for Observing the Earth and Ocean, Mitigating Environmental Hazards, and Supporting the Blue Economy, Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.775544
    Crossref
  3. Hydroacoustic Travel Time Variations as a Proxy for Passive Deep‐Ocean Thermometry—A Cookbook, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127, 5, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018451
    Crossref
  4. Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Seismic, Hydroacoustic, and Infrasonic Waves: Waveforms and Spectral Characteristics (and Their Applicability for Sensor Calibration), Surveys in Geophysics, 43, 5, (1265-1361), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09713-4
    Crossref
  5. Monitoring fin and blue whales in the lower St. Lawrence Seaway with onshore seismometers, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 8, 4, (551-563), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.261
    Crossref
  6. Water resource prospects for the next 50 years on the water planet: personal perspectives on a shared history from Earth Day, the Fourth Industrial Revolution and One Health to the futures of alternative energy, bioconvergence and quantum computing, Water International, 46, 7-8, (1158-1186), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2021.2005332
    Crossref
  7. Auditory evoked potential in stranded melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra): With severe hearing loss and possibly caused by anthropogenic noise pollution, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 228, (113047), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113047
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media