ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Effect of Surfactant Type and Redox Polymer Type on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrodes

View Author Information
† ‡ § Carbon Nanotube Technology Center, University of Oklahoma Bioengineering Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, and §School of Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States
*E-mail: [email protected]. Tel: (405) 325-7944. Fax: (405) 325-5813.
Cite this: Langmuir 2013, 29, 33, 10586–10595
Publication Date (Web):July 16, 2013
https://doi.org/10.1021/la401158y
Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1038

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    22
    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options
    Supporting Info (1)»

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    Electrodes modified with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) offer a number of attractive properties for developing novel electrochemical sensors. A common method to immobilize SWNTs onto the electrode surface is by placing a droplet of a SWNT suspension onto the electrode surface and allowing the solvent to evaporate. In order to maximize the properties of individual SWNTs, surfactants are normally present in these suspensions to provide stable and homogeneous SWNT dispersions. In this study we investigated the effect of different surfactants on the electrochemical and enzymatic performance of SWNT modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs). Amperometic biosensors for glucose were fabricated by a two-step procedure. In the first step, SWNT films were deposited onto GCEs by solution casting suspensions of SWNTs in water, Triton X-100, Tween 20, sodium cholate or sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (NaDDBS). In the second step, hydrogels containing a redox polymer and the enzyme, glucose oxidase (GOX), were deposited and cross-linked onto the SWNT-modified GCE. Three different redox polymers were tested: 3-ferrocenylpropyl-modified LPEI, (Fc-C3-LPEI), 6-ferrocenylhexyl-modified LPEI, (Fc-C6-LPEI), and poly[(vinylpyridine)Os(bipyridyl)2Cl]2+/3+(PVP-Os). Biosensors constructed with SWNT films from suspensions of Triton X-100 or Tween 20 generally produced the highest electrochemical and enzymatic responses, with Triton X-100 films producing current densities of ∼1.7–2.1 mA/cm2 for the three different redox polymers. In contrast, biosensors constructed with SWNT films from sodium cholate suspensions resulted in significant decreases in the electrochemical and enzymatic response and in some cases showed no enzymatic activity. The results with SWNT films from NaDDBS suspensions were dependent upon the specific redox polymer used, but in general gave reduced enzymatic responses (∼0.05–0.4 mA/cm2). These results demonstrate the importance of surfactant type in fabricating SWNT-modified electrode films.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Cyclic voltammograms of GCEs coated with SWNT films and (i) PVP-Os/GOX hydrogels, (ii) Fc-C3-LPEI/GOX hydrogels, or (iii) Fc-C6-LPEI/GOX hydrogels in the presence and absence of 100 mM glucose. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 22 publications.

    1. Atsunori Hiratsuka, Hisanori Iwasa, Hirotaka Uzawa, Atsuya Suzuki, Hitoshi Muguruma. Direct-Electron-Transfer Bio-Nanoink with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube and Aspergillus terreus var. aureus Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide Glucose Dehydrogenase. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (3) , 5776-5783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00060
    2. Natarajan Saravanan, Pinapeddavari Mayuri, Annamalai Senthil Kumar. Improved Electrical Wiring of Glucose Oxidase Enzyme with an in-Situ Immobilized Mn(1,10-Phenanthroline)2Cl2-Complex/Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-Modified Electrode Displaying Superior Performance to Os-Complex for High-Current Sensitivity Bioelectrocatalytic and Biofuel Cell Applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2018, 1 (5) , 1758-1767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00584
    3. Jie Chen, Rujuta Munje, Nicholas P. Godman, Shalini Prasad, Daniel T. Glatzhofer, and David W. Schmidtke . Improved Performance of Glucose Bioanodes Using Composites of (7,6) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and a Ferrocene-LPEI Redox Polymer. Langmuir 2017, 33 (31) , 7591-7599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00718
    4. Hitoshi Muguruma, Hisanori Iwasa, Hiroki Hidaka, Atsunori Hiratsuka, and Hirotaka Uzawa . Mediatorless Direct Electron Transfer between Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Catalysis 2017, 7 (1) , 725-734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02470
    5. Xiaojun Chang and Dermont C. Bouchard . Surfactant-Wrapped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Aquatic Systems: Surfactant Displacement in the Presence of Humic Acid. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (17) , 9214-9222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01536
    6. Hitoshi Muguruma, Tatsuya Hoshino, and Kohei Nowaki . Electronically Type-Sorted Carbon Nanotube-Based Electrochemical Biosensors with Glucose Oxidase and Dehydrogenase. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7 (1) , 584-592. https://doi.org/10.1021/am506758u
    7. Marc Dietrich, Loïc Paillardet, Anthony Valero, Mathieu Deschanels, Philippe Azaïs, Pascal Gentile, Saïd Sadki. New PEDOT Derivatives Electrocoated on Silicon Nanowires Protected with ALD Nanometric Alumina for Ultrastable Microsupercapacitors. Materials 2022, 15 (17) , 5997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175997
    8. Xiangyu Cao, Mingang Zhang, Fengshuai Zhu, Xiuling Zhang, Jin Guo. Surfactant modified CNTs@S as cathode materials for high rate performance lithium sulfur batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2022, 911 , 165101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165101
    9. Suk-Joon Kim, Yuzhong Quan, Eunhyeon Ha, Woonsup Shin. Enhancement of Electrocatalytic Activity upon the Addition of Single Wall Carbon Nanotube to the Redox-hydrogel-based Glucose Sensor. Journal of Electrochemical Science and Technology 2021, 12 (1) , 33-37. https://doi.org/10.33961/jecst.2020.01039
    10. Toya Fukuda, Hitoshi Muguruma, Hisanori Iwasa, Takeshi Tanaka, Atsunori Hiratsuka, Tetsuo Shimizu, Katsumi Tsuji, Takahide Kishimoto. Electrochemical determination of uric acid in urine and serum with uricase/carbon nanotube /carboxymethylcellulose electrode. Analytical Biochemistry 2020, 590 , 113533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2019.113533
    11. V.R. Raphey, T.K. Henna, K.P. Nivitha, P. Mufeedha, Chinnu Sabu, K. Pramod. Advanced biomedical applications of carbon nanotube. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2019, 100 , 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.043
    12. Mustafa S. Ata, Ryan Poon, Aseeb M. Syed, Jordan Milne, Igor Zhitomirsky. New developments in non-covalent surface modification, dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2018, 130 , 584-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.066
    13. Amal Rabti, Noureddine Raouafi, Arben Merkoçi. Bio(Sensing) devices based on ferrocene–functionalized graphene and carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2016, 108 , 481-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.043
    14. Tomasz Rębiś, Marek Sobkowiak, Grzegorz Milczarek. Electrocatalytic oxidation and detection of hydrazine at conducting polymer/lignosulfonate composite modified electrodes. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2016, 780 , 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.09.030
    15. M. López-López, E. Bernal, M.L. Moyá, F. Sanchez, P. López-Cornejo. Study of ionic surfactants interactions with carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotubes by using ion-selective electrodes. Electrochemistry Communications 2016, 67 , 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2016.03.010
    16. Hiroki Hidaka, Kohei Nowaki, Hitoshi Muguruma. Mechanism of amperometric biosensor with electronic-type-controlled carbon nanotube. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2016, 55 (3S2) , 03DF01. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.03DF01
    17. Emiliano N. Primo, Fabiana Gutiérrez, María D. Rubianes, Nancy F. Ferreyra, Marcela C. Rodríguez, María. L. Pedano, Aurelien Gasnier, Alejandro Gutierrez, Marcos Eguílaz, Pablo Dalmasso, Guillermina Luque, Soledad Bollo, Concepción Parrado, Gustavo A. Rivas. Electrochemistry in One Dimension: Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. 2015, 83-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527697489.ch3
    18. Muhammad Tanzirul Alam, J. Justin Gooding. Modification of Carbon Electrode Surfaces. 2015, 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527697489.ch6
    19. Jie Chen, Daniel Bamper, Daniel T. Glatzhofer, David W. Schmidtke. Development of Fructose Dehydrogenase-Ferrocene Redox Polymer Films for Biofuel Cell Anodes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2015, 162 (3) , F258-F264. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0291503jes
    20. Arzum Erdem, Gulsah Congur. Dendrimer enriched single-use aptasensor for impedimetric detection of activated protein C. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2014, 117 , 338-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.003
    21. Yudai Ogawa, Syuhei Yoshino, Takeo Miyake, Matsuhiko Nishizawa. Surfactant-assisted direct electron transfer between multi-copper oxidases and carbon nanotube-based porous electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16 (26) , 13059-13062. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP00872C
    22. Felix A. Plamper. Changing Polymer Solvation by Electrochemical Means: Basics and Applications. 2014, 125-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2014_284

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect