ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Synthesis of Strongly Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots by Cage-Opening Buckminsterfullerene

View Author Information
Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
§ Centre of Instrumental Techniques, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the AS CR, v.v.i., Husinec-Rez c.p. 1001, 250 68 Rez, Czech Republic
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
*Address correspondence to [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3, 2548–2555
Publication Date (Web):March 11, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn505639q

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

11075

Altmetric

-

Citations

241
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Graphene quantum dots is a class of graphene nanomaterials with exceptional luminescence properties. Precise dimension control of graphene quantum dots produced by chemical synthesis methods is currently difficult to achieve and usually provides a range of sizes from 3 to 25 nm. In this work, fullerene C60 is used as starting material, due to its well-defined dimension, to produce very small graphene quantum dots (∼2–3 nm). Treatment of fullerene C60 with a mixture of strong acid and chemical oxidant induced the oxidation, cage-opening, and fragmentation processes of fullerene C60. The synthesized quantum dots were characterized and supported by LDI-TOF MS, TEM, XRD, XPS, AFM, STM, FTIR, DLS, Raman spectroscopy, and luminescence analyses. The quantum dots remained fully dispersed in aqueous suspension and exhibited strong luminescence properties, with the highest intensity at 460 nm under a 340 nm excitation wavelength. Further chemical treatments with hydrazine hydrate and hydroxylamine resulted in red- and blue-shift of the luminescence, respectively.

The properties of graphene are closely governed by its geometry and chemical compositions. Such size-dependent properties can be observed in graphene nanoribbons and graphene nanoplatelets. (1, 2) Graphene quantum dots (graphene QDs) represent a class of zero-dimensional carbon nanoparticles with typical dimensions of ca. <20 nm. (3, 4) The low dimension of graphene QDs leads to unique quantum confinement (5) and edge effects resulting in exceptional fluorescence properties. (6, 7) Due to the high surface area, potential biocompatibility or low toxicity, and the availability of a π–π conjugated network with functionalizable surface groups, graphene QDs have been envisioned to fuel the development of research in electrochemical biosensors, drug delivery, bioimaging, and energy conversion. (6, 8)
Akin to the synthesis of graphene, graphene QDs can be prepared by either a top-down or bottom-up approach. The top-down approach involves cutting graphene sheets into graphene QDs by chemical ablation, (9-13) mechanical grinding, (14) or electrochemical synthesis. (15) On top of the requirement for expensive equipment, such treatments are usually difficult to control and often provide graphene QDs of various diameters (3–25 nm). Apart from that, the bottom-up approach includes chemical synthesis (16, 17) and ruthenium-catalyzed cage-opening of fullerene C60. (18) Although the synthesis of graphene QDs with specific sizes can be anticipated, the former involves tedious synthetic procedures, while the latter requires sophisticated equipment. With the current challenges and limitations, it is thus worthwhile to develop more efficient and affordable alternatives that are able to produce high-quality graphene QDs of specific sizes. Besides that, the fabrication of well-defined tiny graphene QDs (∼2–3 nm) will be advantageous for numerous applications. For example, the low toxicity of graphene QDs as compared to standard fluorescence probes using AIIBVI semiconductors like CdSe or rare earth fluorides rendered it valuable.
In fact, this has motivated us to investigate the possibility of cage-opening fullerene C60, which is a well-defined carbon nanomaterial with a diameter of ∼1 nm, via a top-down wet chemistry approach. As a spherical molecule, fullerene C60, or buckminsterfullerene, is made up of 60 carbon atoms packed into fused hexagons and pentagons. (19) As the main chemical reactivity principle of fullerene C60 is based on relieving the strain of the fullerene C60 cage, various derivatization reactions including cycloaddition, free radical addition, nucleophilic addition, and halogenation have been achieved. (20) In conjunction, the unzipping of carbon nanotubes to produce graphene nanoribbons under the presence of strong acid and oxidant has inspired us to investigate the possible cage-opening of fullerene C60 based on similar chemical treatment. As such, the treatment of fullerene C60 with concentrated sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate oxidant based on the modified Hummers method is anticipated to yield graphene quantum dots with well-defined diameters of 2–3 nm. The obtained graphene QDs were characterized by laser desorption ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LDI-TOF MS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and luminescence analyses.
Further confirmation of the generation of graphene QDs, which should be highly oxidized due to the usage of concentrated acid and strong oxidant, was achieved by subsequent extensive chemical modifications. This includes esterification with trifluoroacetic anhydride and 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, reduction with hydrazine hydrate, and reactions with hydroxylamine. In fact, the chemical modifications were accompanied by obvious changes on the luminescence properties of the modified graphene QDs.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The cage-opening of fullerene C60 was attempted by subjecting it to a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium permanganate according to the modified Hummers method. (21) Similar chemical treatment has been performed to yield carbon nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. (22) The reaction scheme is shown in Figure 1A. It was observed in the case of fullerene C60 that the quenched reaction mixture was clear yellow with negligible precipitation. In order to remove any soluble reaction byproducts, the clear yellow solution was dialyzed using a membrane with a cutoff below 1 kDa. The dialyzed material exhibited strong luminescence, as clearly visible in Figure 1B, where a blue laser pointer (405 nm) was used for luminescence excitation.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Illustration of the oxidation and cage-opening of fullerene C60 with treatment of strong acid and chemical oxidant. (B) Luminescence of graphene QDs excited with a blue laser pointer (405 nm).

The successful oxidation/cage-opening of fullerene C60 was first investigated by LDI-TOF MS. This is a very sensitive method to detect highly stable fullerene clusters. The LDI-TOF MS spectra of fullerene C60 before and after the oxidation/cage-opening procedure are shown in Figure SI1 (Supporting Information) for comparison. Although the disappearance of the fullerene C60 peak upon oxidation/cage-opening was anticipated, it was by no means a definite indicator of the exact structure of the graphene QDs. Indeed as shown in Figure SI1A (Supporting Information), the presence of an intense peak at m/z = 720 confirmed the presence of fullerene C60. Smaller carbon clusters were detected as well. The origin of small carbon clusters such as C6+, C7+, and C8+ has been reported not only for fullerenes (23) but also for graphite oxide that has undergone thermal reduction. (24) The disappearance of the peak at m/z = 720 in the LDI-TOF MS spectrum of graphene QDs in Figure SI1B (Supporting Information) confirmed the successful oxidation/cage-opening of fullerene C60 into graphene QDs. Moreover, the absence of obvious peaks beyond m/z = 720 ruled out the presence of fullerenols and suggested possible fragmentation processes of the cage-opened C60. In fact, only peaks of low m/z corresponding to small clusters that were composed of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen were present.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) AFM image of graphene QDs and the corresponding height profile for the indicated particle. (B) STM image of graphene QDs and the corresponding height profile for the indicated particle.

The morphology of graphene QDs was further investigated using AFM and STM. The aggregation of graphene QDs during solvent evaporation was observed by AFM analysis in Figure 2A. Such aggregation originated from the formation of noncovalent interactions or weak hydrogen bonding between oxygen functional groups present on the graphene QDs’ surface. The height of graphene QDs was about 0.6–1 nm and corresponded to typical values reported for graphene oxide and graphene nanoribbons. (1, 25) Subsequent analysis with STM performed under constant-current mode showed graphene QDs with lateral sizes within the range 7–10 nm and a height of approximately 0.7 nm, as shown in Figure 2B. This corresponded to the DLS measurement, whereby particles of sizes up to 15 nm were observed. In fact, the particle size measured by DLS in Figure SI2 (Supporting Information) showed a hydrodynamic radius in the range 1–15 nm with a maximum at 3 nm, which coincided with the estimated lateral size of graphene QDs upon successful oxidation/cage-opening of C60. The aggregation of graphene QDs in solution cannot be excluded since noncovalent interactions and hydrogen bonding between the oxygen functionalities are likely to occur. It should also be noted that the platelet characters of graphene QDs should be taken into account, and the relatively broad distribution indicated various orientations of platelet particles toward the laser and detector used for the measurements.
High-resolution TEM images were also collected to resolve the structure of the graphene QDs obtained from the oxidation/cage-opening of fullerene C60 (Figure SI3, Supporting Information). During the solvent evaporation process of the graphene QD suspension, aggregates were formed as also observed from AFM and STM analyses. Figure SI3A (Supporting Information) shows a low-magnification image of the graphene QD aggregates, while the electron diffraction pattern on the yellow-colored rectangular area in the inset confirmed the amorphous character of the graphene QD aggregates. A high-resolution image of the same aggregate shown in Figure SI3B (Supporting Information) supported the fully packed fullerene structure (fully packed graphene QDs were formed during the process of solvent evaporation). Subsequent high-resolution imaging in Figure SI3C (Supporting Information), which corresponded to the peripheral region of the aggregate (within the yellow oblong) in Figure SI3B (Supporting Information), showed the network geometry of graphene QDs in two adjacent blocks.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Raman spectra of graphene QDs measured with a (A) 532 nm laser at 5 W and (B) 325 nm laser at 2 mW. (C) FT-IR spectrum of graphene QDs obtained from the cage-opening of fullerene C60. (D) Survey, high-resolution (E) C 1s and (F) O 1s core-level XPS spectra of graphene QDs. High-resolution N 1s core-level spectrum is provided in Figure SI4C in the Supporting Information.

Raman spectroscopy was subsequently performed to investigate the structure of graphene QDs. Two characteristic bands were observed on the graphene-based materials, mainly the D-band at 1350 cm–1 and G-band at 1580 cm–1. The D-band is associated with sp3-hybridized carbon atoms originating from defects and oxygen functional groups covalently bonded to the graphenic structure. The G-band arises from sp2-hybridized carbon atoms. The computed intensity of D-band to G-band (D/G ratio) reflects the crystalline quality of the graphene-based material. It should be noted that the majority of Raman signals for materials exhibiting strong luminescence properties are often masked by the intense luminescence background. The Raman spectrum of graphene QDs measured with a 532 nm laser is shown in Figure 3A (Raman spectrum of fullerene C60 is shown in Figure SI4A, Supporting Information). The strong luminescence background formed by this excitation wavelength revealed only a weak G-band signal originating from sp2-hybridized carbon atoms. To improve the signal-to-background ratio, a UV laser was subsequently used for the Raman measurement. The Raman spectrum of graphene QDs measured with a 325 nm laser is shown in Figure 3B. The strong G-band relative to the broad and low-intensity D-band indicated low disorder in the graphene QDs. The D/G ratio of graphene QDs was 0.41. This was drastically lower than typical values of D/G ratio observed on graphene oxide prepared from graphite. To note, contrasting Raman spectra obtained from lasers in the UV and vis regions have been reported by several authors on various carbon nanomaterials such as nanodiamonds and carbon nanotubes. (26-28) UV Raman spectroscopy typically exhibits a higher sensitivity toward carbon atoms with sp3 hybridization (D-band), whereas excitation in the visible region leads to enhancement of signals originating from sp2-hybridized carbon atoms (G-band). Due to this reason, the actual D/G ratio of graphene QDs can be even lower.
FT-IR spectroscopy enables the investigation of oxygen functional groups formed by the oxidation/cage-opening process of fullerene C60. The FT-IR spectrum in Figure 3C clearly shows O–H stretching located around 3400 cm–1. The peak at 1720 cm–1 due to C═O stretching proved the presence of a carboxylic acid group. Moreover, a C═O vibrational band was observed at 1370 cm–1, whereas a weak shoulder at 1390 cm–1 was attributed to the C–O vibration of a carboxylic acid group. The C═C vibration of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms was detected at 1600 cm–1, while a strong band with a maximum at 1050 cm–1 was designated as C–O stretching. It was surprising to note that C–O stretching of the hydroxyl group resulted only in a very weak vibrational band at 1230 cm–1. As a matter of fact, the presence of hydroxyl, ketone, and carboxylic acid functional groups indicated the successful cage-opening and a high degree of oxidation of fullerene C60.
XPS analysis was consequently carried out to determine the chemical composition of graphene QDs. The XPS survey spectrum of graphene QDs presented in Figure 3D clearly shows C 1s and O 1s peaks at ∼284.5 and ∼533 eV, respectively. Na 1s and N 1s peaks were also detected at ∼198 and ∼400.5 eV, respectively. Further quantitative analysis indicated a distribution of 63.96 at. % of C, 30.87 at. % of O, 3.19 at. % of N, and 1.98 at. % of Na. A trace amount of nitrogen observed in graphene QDs was introduced during the oxidation/cage-opening procedure from the usage of NaNO3 in conjunction with KMnO4 as an oxidation agent. (29) Moreover, residues of sodium also originated from NaNO3 as well as from NaOH, which was added to neutralize sulfuric acid prior to the dialysis purification process of graphene QDs. In fact, the relatively high content of oxygen confirmed the successful oxidation/cage-opening of fullerene C60. The survey spectrum of fullerene C60 (Figure SI4B, Supporting Information) contained only a C 1s peak at ∼285 eV without any traces of oxygen. Subsequently, a high-resolution C 1s core-level spectrum of graphene QDs was obtained. The C 1s peak in Figure 3E was fitted with Guassian–Lorentzian curves to quantitatively differentiate six different carbon moieties: C═C (284.4 eV), C–C/C–H (285.4 eV), C–O (286.3 eV), C═O (288.0 eV), O–C═O (289.0 eV), and a π–π* interaction (290.5 eV). The positions of the peaks were fitted according to typical fittings for graphite oxide. (30) The calculated abundances for the carbon functional groups were 0.8% C═C, 37.4% C–C/C–H, 48.9% C–O, 9.0% C═O, 3.8% O–C═O, and 0.1% π–π* interactions. In addition, a high-resolution O 1s core-level spectrum is shown in Figure 3F. The shape and binding energy peak position supported the C 1s core-level fitting results, whereby the majority of oxygen was bonded to carbon in the form of C–O. This was also in a good agreement with the data obtained from FT-IR spectroscopy that showed strong bands originating from the vibrations of the hydroxyl functional group.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) Luminescence of graphene QDs in dry form obtained by excitation with a 325 nm laser using various laser powers of 20 nW, 0.1 mW, and 0.2 mW. Measurement was performed using a microphotoluminescence spectrometer (see Experimental Section). (B) Dependence of graphene QD luminescence on the wavelength of excitation light. High-intensity line originated from the scattering of excitation light. The measurement was performed on dialyzed graphene QDs on a Cary Eclipse (see Experimental Section).

Apart from that, the luminescence properties of graphene QDs were investigated using a tunable xenon light source and a microphotoluminescence system equipped with a He–Cd laser as excitation source. The almost linear dependence of luminescence intensity was observed for the excitation energy in the range from 20 nW to 0.2 mW. The obtained spectra are shown in Figure 4A. Broad luminescence was observed in the yellow-red region of the spectra with two maxima located at 630 and 700 nm. Especially for the application of quantum dots, it is very important to determine the luminescence intensity over the excitation wavelength. As such, graphene QDs were analyzed by a fluorimeter with a tunable excitation source using a Xe lamp on an aqueous suspension of the graphene QDs (Figure 4B). The highest intensity of luminescence was observed for 340 nm excitation wavelength with a maximum intensity at 460 nm. Obvious differences observed from the measurements on dry form and an aqueous suspension of graphene QDs indicated that the protonation of the carboxylic acid group as well as the interaction of other oxygen functional groups with water may critically affect the luminescence properties. Such drastic influences can originate from the very small size of the graphene QDs, which was formed only by several tenths of aromatic rings with a high concentration of oxygen functional groups, as determined by previous characterizations using various spectroscopic techniques. In fact, the synthesis of graphene QDs, which was performed several times to ascertain the reproducibility of the method, consistently gave graphene QDs with luminescence maxima in the range 450–465 nm (Figure SI5, Supporting Information).
Further chemical treatments on graphene QDs were performed to ascertain the presence and types of oxygen-containing groups. As summarized in Figure 5A, graphene QDs were subjected to treatment with trifluoroacetic anhydride, 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, hydrazine hydrate, and hydroxylamine to target specific oxygen functionalities. The chemical modifications of graphene QDs were mainly determined by XPS analyses (Figures SI6–9, Supporting Information). The presence of hydroxyl groups on graphene QDs was verified by esterification reactions with trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFA) and 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride (NBC). The reactions were performed in dry phase whereby graphene QDs were suspended on a gold surface and treated with vapors of the reactants. XPS analyses on TFA-functionalized graphene QDs showed up to 2.9 at. % of fluorine (F/C ratio of 0.07). On the other hand, the reactivity of NBC with graphene QDs was lower than TFA given the moderate content of nitrogen (N/C ratio of 0.05). Nevertheless, the presence of a peak at 406 eV corresponding to the presence of a nitrophenyl group in the N 1s core-level spectrum of NBC-functionalized graphene QDs suggested the success of the functionalization. This characteristic peak was however not present on graphene QDs.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) Chemical transformation of functional groups on graphene QDs upon reactions with trifluoroacetic anhydride, 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, hydrazine hydrate, and hydroxylamine. Dependence of graphene QD luminescence on the wavelength of excitation light for graphene QDs treated with (B) hydroxylamine and (C) hydrazine hydrate. High intensity of line originated from the scattering of excitation light.

Graphene QDs were subsequently reacted with hydroxylamine, in which carboxylic acid and ketone functionalities would form hydroxamic acid and oximes, respectively. The significant broadening of a peak toward higher energy (up to 403 eV) in the N 1s core-level spectrum represented N–O bonds of oxime and hydroxamic acid and suggested the success of the functionalization. More importantly, the functionalization was accompanied by changes in its luminescence properties. The aqueous solution of NH2OH-functionalized graphene QDs showed a blue-shift phenomenon. An excitation wavelength of 310 nm resulted in an emission maximum of 425 nm, as shown in Figure 5B.
Subsequent treatment with hydrazine hydrate was performed to reduce the highly oxidized graphene QDs. Hydrazine-reduced graphene oxide has been previously reported to contain N–N moieties of pyrazole structure whereby one of the N atoms is pyridinic-like, while the other is quaternary-like. (31) In fact, the presence of pyrazole was obvious in the N 1s core-level spectrum, as the peak at 401.2 eV, which corresponded to the presence of quaternary-like nitrogen atoms, was prominent. This particular peak for quaternary nitrogen was absent in the N 1s core-level spectrum of graphene QDs. Moreover, a N/C ratio of 0.28 registered by the hydrazine-reduced graphene QDs compared to 0.05 of graphene QDs signified the unintentional covalent functionalization with nitrogen moieties, mainly pyrazole, upon hydrazine treatment. Interestingly, the hydrazine-reduced graphene on graphene QDs resulted in a red-shift of the emission maximum to 520 nm when an excitation wavelength of 420 nm was applied, as shown in Figure 5C.

Conclusion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In conclusion, the present work has demonstrated the simultaneous oxidation and cage-opening of fullerene C60 to provide graphene quantum dots. The graphene QDs were synthesized by treating fullerene C60 with a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium permanganate. Detailed characterization including LDI-TOF MS, TEM, AFM, STM, XPS, DLS, FT-IR, and Raman spectroscopy analyses revealed the formation of aggregated small fragments consisting of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen elements, which favored the production of graphene QDs. More importantly, the graphene QDs exhibited strong luminescence properties when excited at 340 nm. The highly oxygenated graphene QDs showcased their broad prospects for modifications through successful functionalization reactions. The luminescence properties varied according to the types of chemical treatments, whereby hydroxylamine-functionalized graphene QDs showed a blue-shift of the emission maximum, while hydrazine-reduced graphene QDs showed a red-shift of the emission maximum. All in all, the simplicity of this method in producing graphene QDs shows potential for further development for integration into practical devices or applications including optoelectronics and biological labeling.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Materials

The fullerene C60 (99.9%) was obtained from SES Research, TX, USA. Sulfuric acid (98%), potassium permanganate (99.5%), sodium nitrate (99.5%), hydrogen peroxide (30%), sodium hydroxide, hydrazine hydrate, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were obtained from Penta, Czech Republic. Hydroxylamine, 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, and trifluoroacetic anhydride were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Czech Republic.

Procedures

Synthesis of Graphene QDs

The fullerene C60 was oxidized using Hummers method. (21) Fullerene C60 (2.5 g) and sodium nitrate (1.3 g) were stirred with sulfuric acid (98%, 57 mL). The mixture was then cooled to 0 °C. Potassium permanganate (7.5 g) was then added over a period of 2 h. During the next 4 h, the reaction mixture was allowed to reach room temperature before being heated to 35 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was then poured into a flask containing deionized water (125 mL) and heated to 70 °C for 15 min. The mixture was then poured into deionized water (0.3 L). The unreacted potassium permanganate and manganese dioxide were removed by the addition of 3% hydrogen peroxide. The reaction mixture was then neutralized using 1 M NaOH at pH = 8. The obtained graphene QD solution was purified by dialysis.

Reaction with Hydrazine Hydrate

Dialyzed graphene QDs (5 mL) were diluted with water (10 mL), and hydrazine hydrate (1 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was slightly alkalized with potassium hydroxide and heated under reflux for 24 h. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was concentrated under vacuum in order to remove unreacted hydrazine and to increase the concentration of graphene QDs. For the XPS analysis, 0.1 mL of the modified graphene QD solution was drop-casted onto a gold-coated silicon wafer and dried under vacuum for 5 h.

Reaction with Hydroxylamine

Dialyzed graphene QDs (5 mL) were diluted with water (10 mL), and hydroxylamine (1 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 24 h. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was concentrated under vacuum to remove unreacted hydroxylamine and to increase the concentration of graphene QDs. For the XPS analysis, 0.1 mL of modified graphene QD solution was drop-casted onto a gold-coated silicon wafer and dried under vacuum for 5 h.

Reaction with 4-Nitrobenzoyl Chloride

A dialyzed graphene QD solution (0.2 mL) was drop-casted onto a gold-coated silicon wafer and dried under vacuum. The wafer with graphene QDs was placed in 10 wt % of 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride in tetrahydrofuran (5 mL) for 24 h. Subsequently the wafer was removed from the solution, and unreacted 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride was washed off with dry THF and methanol and dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 24 h. The modified graphene QDs on the Au/Si wafer were directly used for XPS measurement.

Reaction with Trifluoroacetic Anhydride

A dialyzed graphene QD solution (0.2 mL) was drop-casted onto a gold-coated silicon wafer and dried under vacuum. The wafer with graphene QDs was placed on a holder over trifluoroacetic anhydride, and the flask was evacuated to 1 mbar. After 24 h, the wafer was removed from the trifluoroacetic anhydride atmosphere and dried under vacuum at 50 °C for 48 h. The modified graphene QDs on the Au/Si wafer were directly used for XPS measurement.

Equipment

An inVia Raman microscope (Renishaw, England) with a CCD detector was used for Raman and luminescence spectroscopy in backscattering geometry. A Nd:YAG laser (532 nm, 50 mW) with 50× magnification objective and He–Cd laser (325 nm, 22 mW) with 20× NUV objective were used for measurements. Instrument calibration was performed with a silicon reference which gave a peak centered at 520 cm–1 and a resolution of less than 1 cm–1. In order to avoid radiation damage, the laser power output used for this measurement was kept in a range of 20 nW to 5 mW. Prior to measurements, the dialyzed sample was ultrasonicated for 5 min, and then the suspension was deposited on a small piece of silicon wafer and dried.
Fluorescence measurement was performed on a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer (Varian, USA). The measurement was performed in quartz glass cuvettes using 1 mL of the graphene QD suspension.
For the measurement of atomic force microscopy images, the dialyzed sample was ultrasonicated for 5 min and the suspension of graphene QDs was drop-casted onto a freshly cleaved mica substrate. These measurements were carried out on an Ntegra Spectra from NT-MDT. The surface scans were performed in tapping (semicontact) mode. Cantilevers with a strain constant of 1.5 kN·m–1 equipped with a standard silicon tip with curvature radius less than 10 nm were used for all measurements. The measurement was performed under ambient conditions with a scan rate of 1 Hz and scan line of 512.
For the measurement of scanning tunneling microscopy images, the dialyzed sample was ultrasonicated for 5 min and the suspension of graphene QDs was drop-casted onto freshly cleaved highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. These measurements were carried out on an Ntegra Spectra from NT-MDT. The surface scans were performed in a constant current mode using a Pt–Ir tip.
High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was performed on an ESCAProbeP (Omicron Nanotechnology Ltd., Germany) spectrometer equipped with a monochromatic aluminum X-ray radiation source (1486.7 eV). Wide-scan surveys with subsequent high-resolution scans of C 1s and O 1s core levels were performed. The relative sensitivity factors were used in the evaluation of the carbon-to-oxygen (C/O) ratios from the survey spectra. The dialyzed sample was ultrasonicated for 5 min, and the suspension of graphene QDs was drop-casted (0.1 mL) onto a layer of gold (200 nm) freshly evaporated on a silicon wafer.
The morphology and structure of the cage-opened fullerenes were studied by using HR-TEM JEOL JEM-3010 operated at 300 kV (LaB6 cathode and point-to-point resolution 0.19 nm). For investigation of graphene, the suspension with water (1 mg/mL) was ultrasonicated for 15 min (75 W) before use. As specimen support for TEM investigation, a microscopic copper grid covered by a thin transparent carbon film was used. The samples were studied in both bright field and electron diffraction (SEAD) modes.
Samples for laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight detector mass spectrometry were prepared similarly to the method described by Kuckova etal. (32) Dialyzed graphene QDs were ultrasonicated for 5 min, and 1 μL was directly dropped on the steel sample plate and air-dried. The mass spectra were acquired in positive reflector (for masses in the range 0–2000 Da) with a mass accuracy of 0.4 Da on the Bruker-Daltonics Biflex IV mass spectrometer fitted with a standard nitrogen laser (337 nm, 120 μJ). The spectra were analyzed using the XMASS (Bruker) and mMass software. (33) Each mass spectrum was the result of at least 100 laser pulses. The spectra were calibrated by Pepmix (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy measurements were performed on a Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). A Diamond ATR crystal and DTGS detector were used for all measurements, which were carried out in the range 4000–400 cm–1 at a resolution of 2 cm–1. A 0.1 mL amount of a dialyzed graphene QD suspension was drop-casted onto a silicon wafer and dried at room temperature. The measurement was performed directly on the material placed on the silicon wafer.
The dynamic light scattering was performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern, England). The measurement was performed at room temperature using disposable plastic cuvettes.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

LDI-TOF MS analyses; particle size distribution analyses by DLS; HRTEM images; Raman and XPS spectra of fullerene C60; luminescence properties from another batch of graphene QDs; XPS survey and high-resolution spectra of TFA-, NBC-, and NH2OH-functionalized graphene QDs as well as hydrazine-reduced graphene QDs. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Martin Pumera - Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Chun Kiang Chua - Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore
    • Zdeněk Sofer - Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Petr Šimek - Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Ondřej Jankovský - Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Kateřina Klímová - Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Snejana Bakardjieva - Centre of Instrumental Techniques, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the AS CR, v.v.i., Husinec-Rez c.p. 1001, 250 68 Rez, Czech Republic
    • Štěpánka Hrdličková Kučková - Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

M.P. acknowledges a Tier 2 grant (MOE2013-T2-1-056; ARC 35/13) from the Ministry of Education, Singapore. Z.S, P.Š., O.J., and K.K. were supported by Czech Science Foundation (Project GACR No. 15-09001S) and by specific university research (MSMT No. 20/2015).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    Kosynkin, D. V.; Higginbotham, A. L.; Sinitskii, A.; Lomeda, J. R.; Dimiev, A.; Price, B. K.; Tour, J. M. Longitudinal Unzipping of Carbon Nanotubes to Form Graphene Nanoribbons Nature 2009, 458, 872 876
  2. 2
    Luo, J.; Cote, L. J.; Tung, V. C.; Tan, A. T. L.; Goins, P. E.; Wu, J.; Huang, J. Graphene Oxide Nanocolloids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17667 17669
  3. 3
    Li, L.-s.; Yan, X. Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2572 2576
  4. 4
    Bacon, M.; Bradley, S. J.; Nann, T. Graphene Quantum Dots Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 415 428
  5. 5
    Ponomarenko, L. A.; Schedin, F.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Yang, R.; Hill, E. W.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. Chaotic Dirac Billiard in Graphene Quantum Dots Science 2008, 320, 356 358
  6. 6
    Shen, J. H.; Zhu, Y. H.; Yang, X. L.; Li, C. Z. Graphene Quantum Dots: Emergent Nanolights for Bioimaging, Sensors, Catalysis and Photovoltaic Devices Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3686 3699
  7. 7
    Zhu, S. J.; Tang, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Yang, B. Control the Size and Surface Chemistry of Graphene for the Rising Fluorescent Materials Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4527 4539
  8. 8
    Sun, H.; Wu, L.; Wei, W.; Qu, X. Recent Advances in Graphene Quantum Dots for Sensing Mater. Today 2013, 16, 433 442
  9. 9
    Pan, D. Y.; Zhang, J. C.; Li, Z.; Wu, M. H. Hydrothermal Route for Cutting Graphene Sheets into Blue-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 734 738
  10. 10
    Zhu, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Wang, X. F.; Tang, S. J.; Meng, Q. N.; Li, Y. F.; Shi, C.; Hu, R.etal. Graphene Quantum Dots with Controllable Surface Oxidation, Tunable Fluorescence and Up-Conversion Emission RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 2717 2720
  11. 11
    Zhu, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Qiao, C. Y.; Tang, S. J.; Li, Y. F.; Yuan, W. J.; Li, B.; Tian, L.; Liu, F.; Hu, R.etal. Strongly Green-Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots for Bioimaging Applications Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6858 6860
  12. 12
    Ye, R.; Xiang, C.; Lin, J.; Peng, Z.; Huang, K.; Yan, Z.; Cook, N. P.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Hwang, C.-C.; Ruan, G., etal. Coal as an Abundant Source of Graphene Quantum Dots. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2943.
  13. 13
    Dong, Y.; Lin, J.; Chen, Y.; Fu, F.; Chi, Y.; Chen, G. Graphene Quantum Dots, Graphene Oxide, Carbon Quantum Dots and Graphite Nanocrystals in Coals Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7410 7415
  14. 14
    Shang, N. G.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Sharma, S.; Lubarsky, G.; Li, M. X.; McNeill, D. W.; Quinn, A. J.; Zhou, W. Z.; Blackley, R. Controllable Selective Exfoliation of High-Quality Graphene Nanosheets and Nanodots by Ionic Liquid Assisted Grinding Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1877 1879
  15. 15
    Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, G. Q.; Deng, L. E.; Hou, Y. B.; Qu, L. T. An Electrochemical Avenue to Green-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots as Potential Electron-Acceptors for Photovoltaics Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 776 780
  16. 16
    Yan, X.; Cui, X.; Li, L. S. Synthesis of Large, Stable Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots with Tunable Size J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5944 5945
  17. 17
    Liu, R. L.; Wu, D. Q.; Feng, X. L.; Mullen, K. Bottom-Up Fabrication of Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots with Uniform Morphology J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15221 15223
  18. 18
    Lu, J.; Yeo, P. S. E.; Gan, C. K.; Wu, P.; Loh, K. P. Transforming C60 Molecules into Graphene Quantum Dots Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 247 252
  19. 19
    Kroto, H. W.; Heath, J. R.; Obrien, S. C.; Curl, R. F.; Smalley, R. E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene Nature 1985, 318, 162 163
  20. 20
    Hirsch, A.; Brettreich, M.; Wudl, F. Fullerenes: Chemistry and Reactions; Wiley, 2006.
  21. 21
    Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 1339
  22. 22
    Chua, C. K.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Graphene Sheet Orientation of Parent Material Exhibits Dramatic Influence on Graphene Properties Chem.—Asian J. 2012, 7, 2367 2372
  23. 23
    Mcelvany, S. W.; Ross, M. M.; Callahan, J. H. Characterization of Fullerenes by Mass-Spectrometry Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 162 168
  24. 24
    Jankovsky, O.; Hrdlickova Kuckova, S.; Pumera, M.; Simek, P.; Sedmidubsky, D.; Sofer, Z. Carbon Fragments are Ripped Off from Graphite Oxide Sheets during Their Thermal Reduction New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 5700 5705
  25. 25
    Schniepp, H. C.; Li, J.-L.; McAllister, M. J.; Sai, H.; Herrera-Alonso, M.; Adamson, D. H.; Prud’homme, R. K.; Car, R.; Saville, D. A.; Aksay, I. A. Functionalized Single Graphene Sheets Derived from Splitting Graphite Oxide J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 8535 8539
  26. 26
    Ravindran, T. R.; Jackson, B. R.; Badding, J. V.; Raman, U. V. Spectroscopy of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 4187 4191
  27. 27
    Gruen, D. M. Nanocrystalline Diamond Films Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 211 259
  28. 28
    Ferrari, A. C. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and Graphite: Disorder, Electron-Phonon Coupling, Doping and Nonadiabatic Effects Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47 57
  29. 29
    Chua, C. K.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Graphite Oxides: Effects of Permanganate and Chlorate Oxidants on the Oxygen Composition Chem.—Eur. J. 2012, 18, 13453 13459
  30. 30
    Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Selective Removal of Hydroxyl Groups from Graphene Oxide Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 2005 2011
  31. 31
    Park, S.; Hu, Y.; Hwang, J. O.; Lee, E.-S.; Casabianca, L. B.; Cai, W.; Potts, J. R.; Ha, H.-W.; Chen, S.; Oh, J.etal. Chemical Structures of Hydrazine-Treated Graphene Oxide and Generation of Aromatic Nitrogen Doping Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 638
  32. 32
    Kuckova, S.; Hynek, R.; Nemec, I.; Kodicek, M.; Jehlicka, J. Critical Comparison of Spectrometric Analyses of Non-Mineral Blue Dyes and Pigments Used in Artworks Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 963 967
  33. 33
    Strohalm, M.; Hassman, M.; Kosata, B.; Kodicek, M. Mmass Data Miner: An Open Source Alternative for Mass Spectrometric Data Analysis Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 905 908

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 241 publications.

  1. Goncagül Serdaroğlu . Graphene Quantum Dots: Basics, Properties, and Fundamentals. , 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2024-1465.ch005
  2. Ankarao Kalluri, Bhushan Dharmadhikari, Debika Debnath, Prabir Patra, Challa Vijaya Kumar. Advances in Structural Modifications and Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots for Biomedical Applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (24) , 21358-21376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08183
  3. Han Lin, Zhenfang Zhang, Huihui Zhang, Keng-Te Lin, Xiaoming Wen, Yao Liang, Yang Fu, Alan Kin Tak Lau, Tianyi Ma, Cheng-Wei Qiu, Baohua Jia. Engineering van der Waals Materials for Advanced Metaphotonics. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (19) , 15204-15355. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00048
  4. Yingchun Niu, Yajie Yan, Xiangcheng Ouyang, Ziji Yang, Jiapeng Li, Peiyu Han, Chuan-Fan Ding, Yang Zhou, Lifeng Yang, Yingguo Yang, Ali Heydari, Lina Li, Wenjie Lan, Chunming Xu. Highly Fluorescent Collagen-Based Quantum Dots as an Efficient Interlinkage in the 2D Perovskite Bulk for Improved Solar Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (30) , 34706-34713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c07097
  5. Subhangi Subedi, Avinash K. Rella, Le Gia Trung, Vineet Kumar, Shin-Woong Kang. Electrically Switchable Anisometric Carbon Quantum Dots Exhibiting Linearly Polarized Photoluminescence: Syntheses, Anisotropic Properties, and Facile Control of Uniaxial Orientation. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (4) , 6480-6492. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c00758
  6. Mohammed A. Jabed, Julia Zhao, Dmitri Kilin, Tao Yu. Understanding of Light Absorption Properties of the N-Doped Graphene Oxide Quantum Dot with TD-DFT. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (27) , 14979-14990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03012
  7. Manik Chandra Biswas, Md Tariqul Islam, Pranab Kumar Nandy, Md Milon Hossain. Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) for Bioimaging and Drug Delivery Applications: A Review. ACS Materials Letters 2021, 3 (6) , 889-911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00550
  8. Lisandro Cunci, Viviana González-Colón, Brenda Lee Vargas-Pérez, Joed Ortiz-Santiago, Miraida Pagán, Paola Carrion, Jomari Cruz, Agustin Molina-Ontoria, Namyr Martinez, Walter Silva, Luis Echegoyen, Carlos R. Cabrera. Multicolor Fluorescent Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots for Sensing Cancer Cell Biomarkers. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (1) , 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02526
  9. You-Xiao Chen, Dong Lu, Gui-Gen Wang, Jiashun Huangfu, Qi-Bao Wu, Xiao-Fei Wang, Long-Fei Liu, Da-Ming Ye, Bo Yan, Jiecai Han. Highly Efficient Orange Emissive Graphene Quantum Dots Prepared by Acid-Free Method for White LEDs. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2020, 8 (17) , 6657-6666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00106
  10. Yang Liu, Ying Zhou, Shan Yu, Zhanghui Xie, Yi Chen, Kaiwen Zheng, Susanne Mossin, Weihua Lin, Jie Meng, Tonu Pullerits, Kaibo Zheng. Defect State Assisted Z-scheme Charge Recombination in Bi2O2CO3/Graphene Quantum Dot Composites For Photocatalytic Oxidation of NO. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (1) , 772-781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b02276
  11. Rosemary L. Calabro, Dong-Sheng Yang, Doo Young Kim. Controlled Nitrogen Doping of Graphene Quantum Dots through Laser Ablation in Aqueous Solutions for Photoluminescence and Electrocatalytic Applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2019, 2 (11) , 6948-6959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b01433
  12. Md Tanvir Hasan, Roberto Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Conor Ryan, Jeffery L. Coffer, Anton V. Naumov. Variation of Optical Properties of Nitrogen-doped Graphene Quantum Dots with Short/Mid/Long-wave Ultraviolet for the Development of the UV Photodetector. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (42) , 39035-39045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b10365
  13. Daniela Iannazzo, Alessandro Pistone, Stefania Ferro, Laura De Luca, Anna Maria Monforte, Roberto Romeo, Maria Rosa Buemi, Christophe Pannecouque. Graphene Quantum Dots Based Systems As HIV Inhibitors. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2018, 29 (9) , 3084-3093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00448
  14. Krishanu Ghosal, Kishor Sarkar. Biomedical Applications of Graphene Nanomaterials and Beyond. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2018, 4 (8) , 2653-2703. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00376
  15. Susmita Maiti, Somashree Kundu, Chandra Nath Roy, Tushar Kanti Das, and Abhijit Saha . Synthesis of Excitation Independent Highly Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots through Perchloric Acid Oxidation. Langmuir 2017, 33 (51) , 14634-14642. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02611
  16. Kateřina Holá, Mária Sudolská, Sergii Kalytchuk, Dana Nachtigallová, Andrey L. Rogach, Michal Otyepka, and Radek Zbořil . Graphitic Nitrogen Triggers Red Fluorescence in Carbon Dots. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (12) , 12402-12410. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b06399
  17. Dipsikha Bhattacharya, Manish Kumar Mishra, and Goutam De . Carbon Dots from a Single Source Exhibiting Tunable Luminescent Colors through the Modification of Surface Functional Groups in ORMOSIL Films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (50) , 28106-28116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08039
  18. Satyaprakash Ahirwar, Sudhanshu Mallick, and Dhirendra Bahadur . Electrochemical Method To Prepare Graphene Quantum Dots and Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots. ACS Omega 2017, 2 (11) , 8343-8353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01539
  19. Hui Ding, Ji-Shi Wei, Ning Zhong, Qing-Yu Gao, and Huan-Ming Xiong . Highly Efficient Red-Emitting Carbon Dots with Gram-Scale Yield for Bioimaging. Langmuir 2017, 33 (44) , 12635-12642. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02385
  20. Victor W. Brar, Andrew R. Koltonow, and Jiaxing Huang . New Discoveries and Opportunities from Two-Dimensional Materials. ACS Photonics 2017, 4 (3) , 407-411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00194
  21. Jaeeun Song, Shin Wook Kang, Young Wook Lee, Yangsun Park, Jun-Hyun Kim, and Sang Woo Han . Regulating the Catalytic Function of Reduced Graphene Oxides Using Capping Agents for Metal-Free Catalysis. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (2) , 1692-1701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13970
  22. Dominique Mombrú, Mariano Romero, Ricardo Faccio, and Álvaro W. Mombrú . Tuning Electrical Transport Mechanism of Polyaniline–Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots Nanocomposites for Potential Electronic Device Applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (43) , 25117-25123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08954
  23. Nozomu Suzuki, Yichun Wang, Paolo Elvati, Zhi-Bei Qu, Kyoungwon Kim, Shuang Jiang, Elizabeth Baumeister, Jaewook Lee, Bongjun Yeom, Joong Hwan Bahng, Jaebeom Lee, Angela Violi, and Nicholas A. Kotov . Chiral Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2) , 1744-1755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b06369
  24. Hui Ding, Shang-Bo Yu, Ji-Shi Wei, and Huan-Ming Xiong . Full-Color Light-Emitting Carbon Dots with a Surface-State-Controlled Luminescence Mechanism. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (1) , 484-491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05406
  25. Liwei Hui, Jianliu Huang, Guanxiong Chen, Yanwu Zhu, and Lihua Yang . Antibacterial Property of Graphene Quantum Dots (Both Source Material and Bacterial Shape Matter). ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2016, 8 (1) , 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b10132
  26. Svetlana P. Jovanović, Zois Syrgiannis, Zoran M. Marković, Aurelio Bonasera, Dejan P. Kepić, Milica D. Budimir, Dušan D. Milivojević, Vuk D. Spasojević, Miroslav D. Dramićanin, Vladimir B. Pavlović, and Biljana M. Todorović Marković . Modification of Structural and Luminescence Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots by Gamma Irradiation and Their Application in a Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7 (46) , 25865-25874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08226
  27. Vimukthi Dananjaya, Sathish Marimuthu, Richard (Chunhui) Yang, Andrews Nirmala Grace, Chamil Abeykoon. Synthesis, properties, applications, 3D printing and machine learning of graphene quantum dots in polymer nanocomposites. Progress in Materials Science 2024, 144 , 101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101282
  28. Wenkai Yu, Hossein Chamkouri, Lei Chen. Recent advancement on quantum dot-coupled heterojunction structures in catalysis:A review. Chemosphere 2024, 357 , 141944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141944
  29. Rahul Patil, Stella Alimperti. Graphene in 3D Bioprinting. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 2024, 15 (4) , 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15040082
  30. Archna Talwar, Shruti Anand, Avni Nayyar, Faria Fatima, Manaal Zahera. Hybrid Nanomaterials. 2024, 63-96. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1261-2.ch003
  31. Raul Simões, Joana Rodrigues, Victor Neto, Teresa Monteiro, Gil Gonçalves. Carbon Dots: A Bright Future as Anticounterfeiting Encoding Agents. Small 2024, 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202311526
  32. Tanmoy Majumder, Abhishek Bhattacharjee. Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Nanoscience 2024, 23 (01) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X23300092
  33. Fan Yang, Zhaorui Liu, Xumin Ding, Yang Li, Cong Wang, Guozhen Shen. Carbon-based memristors for RRAM and neuromorphic applications. Chip 2024, 14 , 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chip.2024.100086
  34. Yaru Wang, Shuhuai Li, Xionghui Ma, Chaohai Pang, Yuwei Wu, Mingyue Wang, Bei Li, Sixin Liu. Fluorescent Probes Based on Ag NPs@N/GQDs and Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Sensitive Detection of Noradrenaline in Bananas. Journal of Fluorescence 2024, 25 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-023-03565-w
  35. Joao A. Ferreira, Luccas L. Name, Laura C. Lieb, Daniel Y. Tiba, Mariana M. da Silva, Aprys C. Oliveira, Thiago C. Canevari. Carbon Dots Hybrid Nanostructure-based Electrochemical Sensors: Applications in Determining Different Species in a Real Sample. Current Nanoscience 2024, 20 (1) , 31-46. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413719666221221095901
  36. Athira Sreedevi Madhavikutti, Mohana Priya Subramaniam, Geevargheese V. Jacob, Jitha S. Jayan. Advances in the synthesis approaches of carbon and graphene quantum dots. 2024, 17-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99535-1.00003-2
  37. Muhammad Panachikkool, T. Pandiyarajan. Graphene quantum dots as game-changers in solar cell technology: a review of synthetic processes and performance enhancement. Carbon Letters 2024, 34 (1) , 445-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00617-w
  38. Brijesh Kumar, Pushpendra Kumar, Santhosh Penta, S. P. Mahapatra. Synthesis, characterization and dielectric relaxation studies of graphene quantum dots prepared by hydrothermal treatment method. Ferroelectrics 2023, 617 (1) , 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2023.2271135
  39. Peiwei Gong, Changmin Qi, Dandan Wang, Mianran Chao, Jianxi Liu, Meirong Cai, Weimin Liu. Fluorinated graphene quantum dots with long-term lubrication for visual drug loading and joint inflammation therapy. Friction 2023, 11 (12) , 2204-2220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0714-6
  40. Zhong-fu Cheng, Xue-yan Wu, Lei Liu, Long He, Zu-guo Yang, Chang Cao, Yan Lu, Ji-xi Guo. A highly efficient, rapid, room temperature synthesis method for coal-based water-soluble fluorescent carbon dots and its use in Fe3+ ion detection. New Carbon Materials 2023, 38 (6) , 1104-1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(23)60706-1
  41. Wenjun Xu, Qiurui Han, Chunyu Ji, Fanhao Zeng, Xingshou Zhang, Jiwen Deng, Changsheng Shi, Zhili Peng. Solid‐State, Hectogram‐Scale Preparation of Red Carbon Dots as Phosphor for Energy‐Transfer‐Induced High‐Quality White LEDs with CRI of 97. Small 2023, 19 (52) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202304123
  42. Linhong Liao, Xiao Lin, Jie Zhang, Zhiyuan Hu, Fengshou Wu. Facile preparation of carbon dots with multicolor emission for fluorescence detection of ascorbic acid, glutathione and moisture content. Journal of Luminescence 2023, 264 , 120169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.120169
  43. Fariba Beigmoradi, Masoud Rohani Moghadam, Zahra Garkani-Nejad, Alireza Bazmandegan-Shamili, Hamid Reza Masoodi. Dual-template imprinted polymer electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of malathion and carbendazim using graphene quantum dots. Analytical Methods 2023, 15 (38) , 5027-5037. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AY01054F
  44. Sneha Mathew, Beena Mathew. A review on the synthesis, properties, and applications of biomass derived carbon dots. Inorganic Chemistry Communications 2023, 156 , 111223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111223
  45. Xiaojie Hu, Yanxing Xu, Si Liu, Fredrick Owino Gudda, Wanting Ling, Chao Qin, Yanzheng Gao. Graphene Quantum Dots Nonmonotonically Influence the Horizontal Transfer of Extracellular Antibiotic Resistance Genes via Bacterial Transformation. Small 2023, 19 (37) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202301177
  46. Haifa S. Al Ghamdi, Ahmed A. Al-Ghamdi. Opening band gap of multi-color graphene quantum dots using D-fructose as a green precursor. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2023, 79 , 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.019
  47. Chenyue Niu, Zhiliang Yao, Shanxue Jiang. Synthesis and application of quantum dots in detection of environmental contaminants in food: A comprehensive review. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 882 , 163565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163565
  48. Chiara Olla, Antonio Cappai, Stefania Porcu, Luigi Stagi, Marzia Fantauzzi, Maria Francesca Casula, Francesca Mocci, Riccardo Corpino, Daniele Chiriu, Pier Carlo Ricci, Carlo Maria Carbonaro. Exploring the Impact of Nitrogen Doping on the Optical Properties of Carbon Dots Synthesized from Citric Acid. Nanomaterials 2023, 13 (8) , 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13081344
  49. Shalmali Hui. Carbon dots (CDs): basics, recent potential biomedical applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2023, 25 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05701-w
  50. Poonam R. Kharangarh, Nuggehalli M. Ravindra, Gurmeet Singh, Siva Umapathy. Synthesis of luminescent graphene quantum dots from biomass waste materials for energy‐related applications—An overview. Energy Storage 2023, 5 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.390
  51. Kobra Bahrampour Juybari, Komal Rizwan, Sanaz Faramarz, Asie Sadeghi, Arian Amirkhosravi, Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Mehrnaz Mehrabani. Carbon Quantum Dots as Multi‐Purpose Nanomaterial in Stem Cell Therapy. Chemistry & Biodiversity 2023, 20 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200721
  52. Connor R. Bourgonje, Belinda Heyne, Max Anikovskiy. On the Molecular Origin of the Red Emission in the Newly Synthesized Carbon‐Based Quantum Dots. ChemPhotoChem 2023, 7 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/cptc.202200166
  53. Zahra Nazari, Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi, Fatemeh Zareh, Behjat Pouramiri, Mehrnaz Mehrabani. An Electrochemical Sensor Based on Carbon Quantum Dots and Ionic Liquids for Selective Detection of Dopamine. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202203630
  54. Rim M Alsharabi, Suyash Rai, Hamed Y Mohammed, Maamon A Farea, Sesha Srinivasan, Preeti S Saxena, Anchal Srivastava. A comprehensive review on graphene-based materials as biosensors for cancer detection. Oxford Open Materials Science 2023, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfmat/itac013
  55. Yunhui Wu, Jiurong Li, Xiujian Zhao, Xiao Gong. Nickel-doped carbon dots with enhanced and tunable multicolor fluorescence emission for multicolor light-emitting diodes. Carbon 2023, 201 , 796-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.09.060
  56. Elif S. Seven, Emel Kirbas Cilingir, Mattia Bartoli, Yiqun Zhou, Rachel Sampson, Wenquan Shi, Zhili Peng, Raja Ram Pandey, Charles C. Chusuei, Alberto Tagliaferro, Steven Vanni, Regina M. Graham, Yasin B. Seven, Roger M. Leblanc. Hydrothermal vs microwave nanoarchitechtonics of carbon dots significantly affects the structure, physicochemical properties, and anti-cancer activity against a specific neuroblastoma cell line. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 630 , 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.010
  57. Javad B.M. Parambath, Maryam M.H. Mouselly, Ahmed A. Mohamed. Graphene quantum dot-based nanocomposite hydrogels as anticancer drug delivery systems. 2023, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99638-9.00007-1
  58. Risheng Yu, Sen Liang, Yi Ru, Lu Li, Zhikun Wang, Junlang Chen, Liang Chen. A Facile Preparation of Multicolor Carbon Dots. Nanoscale Research Letters 2022, 17 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-022-03661-z
  59. Shuang Chai, Yutao Xie, Lihua Yang. Antibacterial applications of elemental nanomaterials. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 2022, 26 (6) , 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2022.101043
  60. Xian Wei, Dan Yang, Liming Wang, Zhuoqi Wen, Zhongjie Cui, Le Wang, Haiyang He, Wanlu Zhang, Zhongkang Han, Shiliang Mei, Songnan Qu, Ruiqian Guo. Facile synthesis of red-emissive carbon dots with theoretical understanding for cellular imaging. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2022, 220 , 112869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112869
  61. Yang Liu, Ying Zhou, Mohamed Abdellah, Weihua Lin, Jie Meng, Qian Zhao, Shan Yu, Zhanghui Xie, Qinying Pan, Fengying Zhang, Tonu Pullerits, Kaibo Zheng. Inorganic ligands-mediated hole attraction and surface structural reorganization in InP/ZnS QD photocatalysts studied via ultrafast visible and midinfrared spectroscopies. Science China Materials 2022, 65 (9) , 2529-2539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-021-1992-3
  62. Aniket Chakraborthy, Suresh Nuthalapati, Anindya Nag, Nasrin Afsarimanesh, Md. Eshrat E Alahi, Mehmet Ercan Altinsoy. A Critical Review of the Use of Graphene-Based Gas Sensors. Chemosensors 2022, 10 (9) , 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10090355
  63. Ajaypal Kaur, Komal Pandey, Ramandeep Kaur, Nisha Vashishat, Manpreet Kaur. Nanocomposites of Carbon Quantum Dots and Graphene Quantum Dots: Environmental Applications as Sensors. Chemosensors 2022, 10 (9) , 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10090367
  64. Guangmin Ji, Jingkun Tian, Fei Xing, Yu Feng. Optical Biosensor Based on Graphene and Its Derivatives for Detecting Biomolecules. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (18) , 10838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810838
  65. Qingqing Xu, Huawei Cai, Wenjing Li, Min Wu, Yongzhong Wu, Xiao Gong. Carbon dot/inorganic nanomaterial composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2022, 10 (28) , 14709-14731. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA02628G
  66. Ebrahim Rezaii, Leila Nazmi Miardan, Mehrdad Mahkam, Behzad Soltani, Christopher J. Ziegler. New rout for synthesizing triammonium citrate crystal with unique crystallography and its application in synthesizing nitrogen doped graphene quantum dot. Main Group Chemistry 2022, 21 (2) , 467-480. https://doi.org/10.3233/MGC-210132
  67. Jialu Shen, Yanyi Xu, Zuo Wang, Weifeng Chen, Haiyu Zhao, Xiang Liu. Facile and green synthesis of carbon nanodots from environmental pollutants for cell imaging and Fe 3+ detection. New Journal of Chemistry 2022, 46 (26) , 12581-12588. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ02236B
  68. Vrushti Kansara, Rahul Shukla, Swaran Jeet Singh Flora, Pratap Bahadur, Sanjay Tiwari. Graphene quantum dots: Synthesis, optical properties and navigational applications against cancer. Materials Today Communications 2022, 31 , 103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103359
  69. Boyang Wang, Huijuan Cai, Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse, Xiaoli Qu, Bai Yang, Siyu Lu. Carbon Dots in Bioimaging, Biosensing and Therapeutics: A Comprehensive Review. Small Science 2022, 2 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202200012
  70. Gayathri Somaraj, Sneha Mathew, Thomas Abraham, K. G. Ambady, Chitra Mohan, Beena Mathew. Nitrogen and Sulfur Co‐Doped Carbon Quantum Dots for Sensing Applications: A Review. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202200473
  71. Neha Agrawal, Dolly Bhagel, Priyanka Mishra, Dipti Prasad, Ekta Kohli. Post-synthetic modification of graphene quantum dots bestows enhanced biosensing and antibiofilm ability: efficiency facet. RSC Advances 2022, 12 (20) , 12310-12320. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA00494A
  72. Pradip Kumar, Chetna Dhand, Neeraj Dwivedi, Shiv Singh, Raju Khan, Sarika Verma, Archana Singh, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Surender Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, Avanish Kumar Srivastava. Graphene quantum dots: A contemporary perspective on scope, opportunities, and sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022, 157 , 111993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111993
  73. Rahul S. Tade, Mahesh P. More, Sopan N. Nangare, Pravin O. Patil. Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) nanoarchitectonics for theranostic application in lung cancer. Journal of Drug Targeting 2022, 30 (3) , 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2021.1987442
  74. Cheng Yang, Yanyan Wang, Zhekun Wu, Zhanbo Zhang, Nantao Hu, Changsi Peng. Three-Dimensional MoS2/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanosheets/Graphene Quantum Dots Hybrids for High-Performance Room-Temperature NO2 Gas Sensors. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (6) , 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060901
  75. Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi, Seyyed Alireza Hashemi, Masoomeh Yari Kalashgrani, Navid Omidifar, Sonia Bahrani, Neralla Vijayakameswara Rao, Aziz Babapoor, Ahmad Gholami, Wei-Hung Chiang. Bioactive Graphene Quantum Dots Based Polymer Composite for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14 (3) , 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030617
  76. Canhua Hao, Xiaojing Wang, Xianhui Jia, Teng Liu, Jie Sun, Zhong Yan. The applications of two-dimensional materials and the derivative quantum dots in photodynamic therapy. APL Materials 2022, 10 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0068996
  77. Jinxia Xu, Jingru Sun, Fanyong Yan, Hao Zhang, Ran Ma, Yueyan Zang, Shan Guan, Xiang Wang. Fluorescence Sensing Performance of Carbon Dots of Functionalization toward Sunset Yellow. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 2022, 39 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.202100207
  78. Reza Umami, Fitri Aulia Permatasari, Diva Addini Maghribi Muyassiroh, Arum Sinda Santika, Citra Deliana Dewi Sundari, Atthar Luqman Ivansyah, Takashi Ogi, Ferry Iskandar. A rational design of carbon dots via the combination of nitrogen and oxygen functional groups towards the first NIR window absorption. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2022, 10 (4) , 1394-1402. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC04951H
  79. Li Zhang, Cheng Zhi Huang. Preparation and structure tuning of graphene quantum dots for optical applications in chemosensing, biosensing, and bioimaging. 2022, 41-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90244-1.00011-2
  80. Zhixin Liu, Qian Ling, Yawen Cai, Linfeng Xu, Jiahao Su, Kuai Yu, Xinyi Wu, Jiayi Xu, Baowei Hu, Xiangke Wang. Synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials and their application in pollution management. Nanoscale Advances 2022, 19 https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NA00843A
  81. Meenakshi Gusain, Ritika Nagpal, Yiqiang Zhan. Analysis and characterization of quantum dots. 2022, 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85457-3.00027-X
  82. Yan Zhang, Kelly Hawboldt, Lijuan Zhang, Jie Lu, Lantian Chang, Anna Dwyer. Carbonaceous nanomaterial-TiO2 heterojunctions for visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of aqueous organic pollutants. Applied Catalysis A: General 2022, 630 , 118460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118460
  83. Ahmadreza Ghaffarkhah, Ehsan Hosseini, Milad Kamkar, Ali Akbari Sehat, Sara Dordanihaghighi, Ahmad Allahbakhsh, Colin van der Kuur, Mohammad Arjmand. Synthesis, Applications, and Prospects of Graphene Quantum Dots: A Comprehensive Review. Small 2022, 18 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202102683
  84. Thiago A. S. Soares, Johan R. González-Moya, Yearin Byun, Anderson Thesing, Christopher Dares, Ali Coskun, Giovanna Machado. One-step anodization-electrophoretic deposition of titanium nanotubes-graphene nanoribbon framework for water oxidation. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2021, 902 , 115802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115802
  85. Shuo Li, Lin Li, Hanyu Tu, Hao Zhang, Debbie S. Silvester, Craig E. Banks, Guoqiang Zou, Hongshuai Hou, Xiaobo Ji. The development of carbon dots: From the perspective of materials chemistry. Materials Today 2021, 51 , 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.07.028
  86. Alok Pandya, Khush Shah, Harsh Prajapati, Gajendra Singh Vishwakarma. GQD embedded bacterial cellulose nanopaper based multi-layered filtration membranes assembly for industrial dye and heavy metal removal in wastewater. Cellulose 2021, 28 (16) , 10385-10398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04174-1
  87. Jiafeng Wan, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Kun Fu, Xin Zhang, Li Shang, Zhiqiang Su. Highly fluorescent carbon dots as novel theranostic agents for biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (41) , 17236-17253. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR03740D
  88. Chunxia Wang, Caiwen Pan, Zitong Wei, Ji Liu, Zhaoyi Song, Wenjun Ma, Ming Wang, Lanqun Mao. One-step synthesis of nitrogen-doped multi-emission carbon dots and their fluorescent sensing in HClO and cellular imaging. Microchimica Acta 2021, 188 (10) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-021-04973-0
  89. Slađana Dorontić, Svetlana Jovanović, Aurelio Bonasera. Shedding Light on Graphene Quantum Dots: Key Synthetic Strategies, Characterization Tools, and Cutting-Edge Applications. Materials 2021, 14 (20) , 6153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206153
  90. Murilo H. M. Facure, Rodrigo Schneider, Jessica B. S. Lima, Luiza A. Mercante, Daniel S. Correa. Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Nanocomposites Applied in Electrochemical Sensors: A Recent Survey. Electrochem 2021, 2 (3) , 490-519. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem2030032
  91. Guannan Liu, Dehao Kong, Jiayin Han, Ri Zhou, Yuan Gao, Zepei Wu, Lianjing Zhao, Chenguang Wang, Lijun Wang, Geyu Lu. Solvent-controlled synthesis of full-color carbon dots and its application as a fluorescent food-tasting sensor for specific recognition of jujube species. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 342 , 129963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129963
  92. Şifa Kir, İlyas Dehri, Yunus Önal, Ramazan Esen. Graphene quantum dots prepared from dried lemon leaves and microcrystalline mosaic structure. Luminescence 2021, 36 (6) , 1365-1376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.4060
  93. Hyewon Yoon, Minsu Park, Jungmo Kim, Travis G. Novak, Sukki Lee, Seokwoo Jeon. Toward highly efficient luminescence in graphene quantum dots for optoelectronic applications. Chemical Physics Reviews 2021, 2 (3) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049183
  94. Ashish Kalkal, Sachin Kadian, Rangadhar Pradhan, Gaurav Manik, Gopinath Packirisamy. Recent advances in graphene quantum dot-based optical and electrochemical (bio)analytical sensors. Materials Advances 2021, 2 (17) , 5513-5541. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00251A
  95. Li Yang, Qi Zhang, Ying Han, Hongjuan Li, Shiguo Sun, Yongqian Xu. The selective deprotonation of carbon quantum dots for fluorescence detection of phosphate and visualization of latent fingerprints. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (30) , 13057-13064. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR02432A
  96. Kawaljeet Singh Samra, Manpreet, Amandeep Singh. Facile synthesis of graphene quantum dots and their optical characterization. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 2021, 29 (8) , 638-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2021.1878152
  97. Yanyan Wu, Cong Li, Henny C. van der Mei, Henk J. Busscher, Yijin Ren. Carbon Quantum Dots Derived from Different Carbon Sources for Antibacterial Applications. Antibiotics 2021, 10 (6) , 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060623
  98. Bingyang Li, Yanxin Wang, Linjun Huang, Huaijiao Qu, Zhenyang Han, Yao Wang, Matt J. Kipper, Laurence A. Belfiore, Jianguo Tang. Review of performance improvement strategies for doped graphene quantum dots for fluorescence-based sensing. Synthetic Metals 2021, 276 , 116758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2021.116758
  99. Kashmitha Muthamma, Dhanya Sunil, Prakasha Shetty. Carbon dots as emerging luminophores in security inks for anti-counterfeit applications - An up-to-date review. Applied Materials Today 2021, 23 , 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101050
  100. Xiaokai Xu, Guangqi Hu, Luoqi Mo, Yadong Li, Haopeng Wei, Bingfu Lei, Xuejie Zhang, Chaofan Hu, Jianle Zhuang, Yingliang Liu. Red, orange, yellow and green luminescence by carbon dots: hydrogen-bond-induced solvation effects. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (14) , 6846-6855. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR08128K
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Illustration of the oxidation and cage-opening of fullerene C60 with treatment of strong acid and chemical oxidant. (B) Luminescence of graphene QDs excited with a blue laser pointer (405 nm).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) AFM image of graphene QDs and the corresponding height profile for the indicated particle. (B) STM image of graphene QDs and the corresponding height profile for the indicated particle.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Raman spectra of graphene QDs measured with a (A) 532 nm laser at 5 W and (B) 325 nm laser at 2 mW. (C) FT-IR spectrum of graphene QDs obtained from the cage-opening of fullerene C60. (D) Survey, high-resolution (E) C 1s and (F) O 1s core-level XPS spectra of graphene QDs. High-resolution N 1s core-level spectrum is provided in Figure SI4C in the Supporting Information.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) Luminescence of graphene QDs in dry form obtained by excitation with a 325 nm laser using various laser powers of 20 nW, 0.1 mW, and 0.2 mW. Measurement was performed using a microphotoluminescence spectrometer (see Experimental Section). (B) Dependence of graphene QD luminescence on the wavelength of excitation light. High-intensity line originated from the scattering of excitation light. The measurement was performed on dialyzed graphene QDs on a Cary Eclipse (see Experimental Section).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (A) Chemical transformation of functional groups on graphene QDs upon reactions with trifluoroacetic anhydride, 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, hydrazine hydrate, and hydroxylamine. Dependence of graphene QD luminescence on the wavelength of excitation light for graphene QDs treated with (B) hydroxylamine and (C) hydrazine hydrate. High intensity of line originated from the scattering of excitation light.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      Kosynkin, D. V.; Higginbotham, A. L.; Sinitskii, A.; Lomeda, J. R.; Dimiev, A.; Price, B. K.; Tour, J. M. Longitudinal Unzipping of Carbon Nanotubes to Form Graphene Nanoribbons Nature 2009, 458, 872 876
    2. 2
      Luo, J.; Cote, L. J.; Tung, V. C.; Tan, A. T. L.; Goins, P. E.; Wu, J.; Huang, J. Graphene Oxide Nanocolloids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17667 17669
    3. 3
      Li, L.-s.; Yan, X. Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2572 2576
    4. 4
      Bacon, M.; Bradley, S. J.; Nann, T. Graphene Quantum Dots Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 415 428
    5. 5
      Ponomarenko, L. A.; Schedin, F.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Yang, R.; Hill, E. W.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. Chaotic Dirac Billiard in Graphene Quantum Dots Science 2008, 320, 356 358
    6. 6
      Shen, J. H.; Zhu, Y. H.; Yang, X. L.; Li, C. Z. Graphene Quantum Dots: Emergent Nanolights for Bioimaging, Sensors, Catalysis and Photovoltaic Devices Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3686 3699
    7. 7
      Zhu, S. J.; Tang, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Yang, B. Control the Size and Surface Chemistry of Graphene for the Rising Fluorescent Materials Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4527 4539
    8. 8
      Sun, H.; Wu, L.; Wei, W.; Qu, X. Recent Advances in Graphene Quantum Dots for Sensing Mater. Today 2013, 16, 433 442
    9. 9
      Pan, D. Y.; Zhang, J. C.; Li, Z.; Wu, M. H. Hydrothermal Route for Cutting Graphene Sheets into Blue-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 734 738
    10. 10
      Zhu, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Wang, X. F.; Tang, S. J.; Meng, Q. N.; Li, Y. F.; Shi, C.; Hu, R.etal. Graphene Quantum Dots with Controllable Surface Oxidation, Tunable Fluorescence and Up-Conversion Emission RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 2717 2720
    11. 11
      Zhu, S. J.; Zhang, J. H.; Qiao, C. Y.; Tang, S. J.; Li, Y. F.; Yuan, W. J.; Li, B.; Tian, L.; Liu, F.; Hu, R.etal. Strongly Green-Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots for Bioimaging Applications Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6858 6860
    12. 12
      Ye, R.; Xiang, C.; Lin, J.; Peng, Z.; Huang, K.; Yan, Z.; Cook, N. P.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Hwang, C.-C.; Ruan, G., etal. Coal as an Abundant Source of Graphene Quantum Dots. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2943.
    13. 13
      Dong, Y.; Lin, J.; Chen, Y.; Fu, F.; Chi, Y.; Chen, G. Graphene Quantum Dots, Graphene Oxide, Carbon Quantum Dots and Graphite Nanocrystals in Coals Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7410 7415
    14. 14
      Shang, N. G.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Sharma, S.; Lubarsky, G.; Li, M. X.; McNeill, D. W.; Quinn, A. J.; Zhou, W. Z.; Blackley, R. Controllable Selective Exfoliation of High-Quality Graphene Nanosheets and Nanodots by Ionic Liquid Assisted Grinding Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1877 1879
    15. 15
      Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, G. Q.; Deng, L. E.; Hou, Y. B.; Qu, L. T. An Electrochemical Avenue to Green-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots as Potential Electron-Acceptors for Photovoltaics Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 776 780
    16. 16
      Yan, X.; Cui, X.; Li, L. S. Synthesis of Large, Stable Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots with Tunable Size J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5944 5945
    17. 17
      Liu, R. L.; Wu, D. Q.; Feng, X. L.; Mullen, K. Bottom-Up Fabrication of Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots with Uniform Morphology J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15221 15223
    18. 18
      Lu, J.; Yeo, P. S. E.; Gan, C. K.; Wu, P.; Loh, K. P. Transforming C60 Molecules into Graphene Quantum Dots Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 247 252
    19. 19
      Kroto, H. W.; Heath, J. R.; Obrien, S. C.; Curl, R. F.; Smalley, R. E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene Nature 1985, 318, 162 163
    20. 20
      Hirsch, A.; Brettreich, M.; Wudl, F. Fullerenes: Chemistry and Reactions; Wiley, 2006.
    21. 21
      Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 1339
    22. 22
      Chua, C. K.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Graphene Sheet Orientation of Parent Material Exhibits Dramatic Influence on Graphene Properties Chem.—Asian J. 2012, 7, 2367 2372
    23. 23
      Mcelvany, S. W.; Ross, M. M.; Callahan, J. H. Characterization of Fullerenes by Mass-Spectrometry Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 162 168
    24. 24
      Jankovsky, O.; Hrdlickova Kuckova, S.; Pumera, M.; Simek, P.; Sedmidubsky, D.; Sofer, Z. Carbon Fragments are Ripped Off from Graphite Oxide Sheets during Their Thermal Reduction New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 5700 5705
    25. 25
      Schniepp, H. C.; Li, J.-L.; McAllister, M. J.; Sai, H.; Herrera-Alonso, M.; Adamson, D. H.; Prud’homme, R. K.; Car, R.; Saville, D. A.; Aksay, I. A. Functionalized Single Graphene Sheets Derived from Splitting Graphite Oxide J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 8535 8539
    26. 26
      Ravindran, T. R.; Jackson, B. R.; Badding, J. V.; Raman, U. V. Spectroscopy of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 4187 4191
    27. 27
      Gruen, D. M. Nanocrystalline Diamond Films Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29, 211 259
    28. 28
      Ferrari, A. C. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and Graphite: Disorder, Electron-Phonon Coupling, Doping and Nonadiabatic Effects Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47 57
    29. 29
      Chua, C. K.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Graphite Oxides: Effects of Permanganate and Chlorate Oxidants on the Oxygen Composition Chem.—Eur. J. 2012, 18, 13453 13459
    30. 30
      Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Selective Removal of Hydroxyl Groups from Graphene Oxide Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 2005 2011
    31. 31
      Park, S.; Hu, Y.; Hwang, J. O.; Lee, E.-S.; Casabianca, L. B.; Cai, W.; Potts, J. R.; Ha, H.-W.; Chen, S.; Oh, J.etal. Chemical Structures of Hydrazine-Treated Graphene Oxide and Generation of Aromatic Nitrogen Doping Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 638
    32. 32
      Kuckova, S.; Hynek, R.; Nemec, I.; Kodicek, M.; Jehlicka, J. Critical Comparison of Spectrometric Analyses of Non-Mineral Blue Dyes and Pigments Used in Artworks Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 963 967
    33. 33
      Strohalm, M.; Hassman, M.; Kosata, B.; Kodicek, M. Mmass Data Miner: An Open Source Alternative for Mass Spectrometric Data Analysis Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 905 908
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    LDI-TOF MS analyses; particle size distribution analyses by DLS; HRTEM images; Raman and XPS spectra of fullerene C60; luminescence properties from another batch of graphene QDs; XPS survey and high-resolution spectra of TFA-, NBC-, and NH2OH-functionalized graphene QDs as well as hydrazine-reduced graphene QDs. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect