Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published March 2001

Improving Environmental Behavior in Companies: The Effectiveness of Tailored Versus Nontailored Interventions

Abstract

Workshop managers in garages (N = 153) received a message by mail with recommendations on how their subordinates should behave to reduce oil pollution of wastewater. The recommendations were either tailored or not tailored to the current behavior routines in each specific workshop. Tailored messages resulted in more accurate knowledge (assessed 1 week postintervention) and in more pro-environmental behavior (assessed 3 months postintervention and compared to pretest data). Tailored messages were as effective with or without additional information on behavior routines in other garages. Compared to no message (control group, n = 60), the tailored messages resulted in more pro-environmental behavior. The nontailored messages were hardly more effective than no message. The nontailored messages remained as ineffective when readers were helped (via a routing procedure) to select those parts of the message relevant to their workshop. It is concluded that tailoring is a promising new approach when campaigning for pro-environmental behavior in organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1. Participants in this study who already performed the environmentally optimal behavior received verbal reinforcement in the tailored messages. This part of the intervention can be categorized as a consequence condition.
2. As described in the Method section, the total index as well as the subindexes of proenvironmental behavior change consists of the sum of the behavior change scores (–1 or 0 or +1) divided by the number of performed behaviors. The implication of this choice for the mean of the change scores (instead of the sum) is that the index scores represent the relative improvement in environmental performance and not the absolute improvement. For example, if in two garages all performed behaviors are environmentally incorrect at the pretest and correct at the posttest, but in one garage all 13 behaviors are performed and in the other garage only 5 behaviors, then the total index of pro-environmental behavior change is identical and maximal for both garages (i.e., 1). From an environmental impact perspective, one might argue that it is interesting to use the sum of the change scores because then the index scores represent the absolute improvement in environmental performance (i.e., environmental impact). We repeated all analyses in the Results section with sums (instead of means) as Index scores: The pattern of results was equal (support for the main hypothesis and negative answers to the research questions).
3. ANOV As revealed that the effect of messages was not influenced by the number of employees (M = 6) in the garages.

References

Brug, J., Campbell, M., & Van Assema, P. (1999). The application and impact of computergenerated personalized nutrition education: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 145-156.
Bull, F. C., Kreuter, M. W., & Scharff, D. W. (1999). Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 181-192.
Campbell, M. K., Devellis, B. M., Strecher, V. J., Ammerman, A. S., Devellis, R. F., & Sandler, R. S. (1994). Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 783-787.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
De Vries, H., & Brug, J. (1999). Computer tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: Introduction to a new approach. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 99-105.
De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick. The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment & Behavior, 25, 485-505.
Dijkstra, A., & De Vries, H. (1999). The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 193-203.
Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H., & Roijackers, J. (1998). Computer tailored feedback to change cognitive determinants of smoking: A Dutch field experiment. Health Education Research, 13, 197-206.
Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H., & Roijackers, J. (1999). Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials. Preventive Medicine, 28, 203-211.
Drossaert, C.H.C., Boer, H., & Seydel, E. R. (1996). Health education to promote repeat participation in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: Evaluation of a leaflet tailored to previous participants. Patient Education and Counseling, 28, 121-131.
Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment. Research since 1980. Environment & Behavior, 25, 275-321.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Kreuter, M. W., & Strecher, V. J. (1996). Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. Health Education Research, 11, 97-105.
Liebrand, W.B.G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H.A.M. (Eds.). (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248-277.
Paperny, D.M.N. (1997). Computerized health assessment and education for adolescent HIV and STD prevention in health care settings and schools. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 54-70.
Paulus, R., & Duijghuisen, R. (1995). Afscheidingssystemen voor olie en benzine. [Separation systems for oil and petrol]. Woerden, The Netherlands: Nationaal Milieucentrum.
Pols, H. B., Staats, H., & Baars, P. J. (1995). Entrepreneurs’ behaviour in water management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3, 153-159.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., Velicer, W. F., & Rossi, J. S. (1993). Standardized, individual, interactive and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 12, 399-405.
Ramelson, H. Z., Freedman, R. H., & Ockene, J. K. (1999). An automated telephone based smoking cessation education and counseling system. Patient Education and Counseling, 28, 131-144.
Rimer, B. K., Orleans, C. T., Fleisher, L., Cristinzio, S., Resch, N., Telepchak, J., & Keintz, M. K. (1994). Does tailoring matter? The impact of a tailored guide on ratings and short-term smoking-related outcomes for older smokers. Health Education Research, 9, 69-84.
Roberts, D. F., & Maccoby, N. (1985). Effects of mass communication. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105-121.
Skinner, C. S., Strecher, V. J., & Hospers, H. (1994). Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? American Journal of Public Health, 84, 43-49.
Sprangers, M., & Hoogstraten, J. (1989). Subject bias in three self-report measures of change. In M. Sprangers (Ed.), Response shift and retrospective pretest (pp. 57-70). The Hague, The Netherlands: SVO.
Strecher, V. J. (1999). Computer tailored smoking cessation materials: A review and discussion. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 107-117.
Strecher, V. J., Kreuter, M., Den Boer, D.-J., Kobrin, S., Hospers, H. J., & Skinner, C. S. (1994). The effects of smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. Journal of Family Practice, 39, 262-270.
Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 915-934.
Velicer, W. F., & Prochaska, J. O. (1999). An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 119-129.
Vlek, C., & Cvetkovich, G. (Eds.). (1989). Social decision methodology for technological projects. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic.
Wallack, L. M. (1981). Mass media campaigns: The odds against finding behavior change. Health Education Quarterly, 8, 209-260.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: March 2001
Issue published: March 2001

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dancker D. L. Daamen
Centre for Energy & Environmental Research; Department of Social and Organizational Psychology at Leiden University, the Netherlands
Henk Staats
Centre for Energy & Environmental Research; Department of Social and Organizational Psychology at Leiden University
Henk A. M. Wilke
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology; Centre for Energy & Environmental Research at Leiden University
Mirjam Engelen
Research voor Beleid, Leiden, the Netherlands

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Environment and Behavior.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 519

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 39 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 44

  1. The communication preferences of University of Idaho Extension profess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. An examination of the factors influencing engagement in gardening prac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Leader expectations facilitate employee pro‐environmental behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Buy Three to Waste One? How Real-World Purchase Data Predict Groups of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The how and what of bottom-up governance to change household energy co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The State of Interdependence with Nature Scale: Development and Initia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Intelligent Web-platform for Enabling Microgrids and Energy Sharing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Environmental viewfinders program: Empowerment for an environmentally ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Environmental attitudes and contextual stimuli in emerging environment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Why consumers shift from single-use to reusable drink cups: An empiric...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Developing a gamified mobile application to encourage sustainable ener...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Habitually green: integrating the concept of habit into the design of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. What if the company’s “charity of the year” is an organisation that de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Building community support for coastal management — What types of mess...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Public acceptance of household energy-saving measures in Beijing: Hete...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Navigating behavioral energy sufficiency. Results from a survey in Swi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Development of a Sustainable Design Lexicon. Towards Understanding the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Public acceptability towards environmental policy measures: Value-matc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Applying Behavioral Science for Environmental Sustainability
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Embedding intelligent eco-aware systems within everyday things to incr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Improving the visibility of energy use in home heating in England: The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Segmenting Florida residential irrigation users by utility-bill “bothe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. A Review of Approaches for Sensing, Understanding, and Improving Occup...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Energizing organizational research: Advancing the energy field with gr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Employee Green Behavior...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Future-oriented women will pay to reduce global warming: Mediation via...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. A Persuasive Robot to Stimulate Energy Conservation: The Influence of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. A Review of Determinants of and Interventions for Proenvironmental Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Climate Change: Psychological Solutions and Strategies for Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. High reduction potentials for energy user behavior in public buildings...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Using Tailored Information and Public Commitment to Improve the Enviro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Developing Strategies for Waste Reduction by Means of Tailored Interve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and res...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Addressing Barriers to Changing Environmentally Relevant Behaviors: To...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Promoting household energy conservation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Applications of social psychology to increase the impact of behaviour-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Designing environmental campaigns by using agent-based simulations: St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Exploring Individual‐Level Factors Related to Employee Energy‐Conserva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedbac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Behavior Analysis and Environmental Protection: Accomplishments and Po...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub