INTRODUCTION
Persistent infection with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is widely prevalent in the human population and mostly asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals (
1). However, HCMV can cause disease upon immunosuppression, and HCMV is the most frequent infectious cause of congenital defects such as hearing loss (
2). For this reason, vaccine development against HCMV has been given high priority, and multiple approaches have been and are being tried, so far with limited success (
3). Due to its unique immunogenicity and T cell programming potential, recombinant CMV has also shown great promise as a vaccine vector for chronic infections such as HIV in nonhuman primate models, and clinical development of HCMV-based vectors is under way (
4).
The development of vaccines against HCMV and vaccines based on HCMV, as well as virological and immunological studies
in vitro and
in vivo, require the genetic manipulation of CMV genomes. However, the large size of CMV genomes (>230 kb) renders genetics challenging. Initially, recombinant CMV was generated by marker rescue (
5) or by
in vivo recombination of overlapping cosmids (
6). However, both techniques have been superseded by the cloning of CMV as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) which allowed the genetic manipulation of complete CMV genomes in
Escherichia coli (
7). BAC clones are generated by replacing a genomic region that is nonessential for growth in tissue culture with a bacterial origin of replication together with a selectable marker using
in vivo recombination in infected fibroblasts. Upon transformation of the BAC into
E. coli, the deleted region can be reinserted, thus generating a full-length viral genome containing the BAC cassette. Recombinant virus is reconstituted upon transfection of the BAC into healthy diploid fibroblast cells followed by the recombinase-mediated excision of the BAC cassette that leaves a loxP “scar” in the genome (
8).
Although BAC recombineering has revolutionized the genetic manipulation of large DNA virus genomes, several disadvantages remain. First and foremost, BAC cloning requires extensive virus passaging in tissue culture, since the insertion of the BAC cassette and subsequent selection of recombinants still use the traditional marker rescue method. This procedure prevents the direct cloning of HCMV genomic DNA isolated from clinical samples and rapidly selects for viral subpopulations and viral mutants adapted to growth in tissue culture (
9). Since recent work revealed an astounding diversity of HCMV genomes in infected individuals (
10), the requirement for tissue culture limits our ability to characterize individual clones within a swarm of genomes. As a result, relatively few HCMV genomes have been cloned as a BAC, and all of the original BAC clones show typical signs of tissue culture adaptation (
11,
12). Furthermore, the restoration of the actual sequence present in the primary isolate often requires multiple sequential cloning steps (
9).
Recent advances in the assembly and editing of large DNA fragments and entire bacterial genomes by synthetic biology methods enable microbial genome engineering at an unprecedented scale and scope (
13). Several bacterial genomes have been cloned and maintained in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and completely synthetic versions of entire chromosomes of several
Mycoplasma species were assembled from DNA fragments (
14,
15). These synthetic biology approaches thus take advantage of the unique ability of
S. cerevisiae to capture and reliably join DNA fragments into entire heterologous chromosomes that can be successfully maintained as yeast artificial chromosomes (YAC). Particularly useful for direct cloning of DNA from a given sample is transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning in which linear DNA containing a yeast plasmid flanked by sequences homologous to a target sequence is transformed together with the target sequence (
16). Upon recombination
in vivo, the target sequence is then contained within a yeast plasmid.
Here, we explore the use of TAR cloning to directly clone genomic fragments of HCMV DNA preparations after limiting passaging in tissue culture followed by assembly of a full-length genome in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. As our test case, we used the earliest available passages of the HCMV isolate Toledo, the only low-passage-number isolate that has ever been used in experimental infection of humans. Toledo was isolated from a congenitally infected child, and the fourth passage was initially characterized in seropositive individuals (
17) and later used to infect seronegative individuals or individuals who had been previously vaccinated with the serially passaged Towne strain (
18). In both instances, there were clear immunological and clinical signs of infection as well as superinfection consistent with Toledo representing a fully infectious HCMV isolate representative of circulating strains. However, cloning and sequencing of the full-length genome of Toledo as a BAC revealed that, compared to other primary isolates, Toledo displayed genome inversions and deletions consistent with tissue culture adaptations (
11). We now demonstrate that low-passage-number isolates of Toledo represented a mixture of both the fibroblast-adapted version and the parental sequence. Using TAR cloning, we generated both versions of Toledo and demonstrate that only the parental virus has the
in vitro and
in vivo hallmarks of a primary isolate.
DISCUSSION
By applying synthetic biology tools, specifically TAR cloning, we were able to generate a molecular clone of HCMV, the largest human herpesvirus, directly from DNA extracted from a primary isolate after limited passaging
in vitro. Thus, this method potentially enables the direct cloning of CMV from clinical samples, e.g., from viral DNA isolated from congenitally infected infants, without the need for tissue culture. The “TAR hooks” used to generate the 16 genome fragments were designed to represent highly conserved genome sequences so that most HCMV genomes can be cloned by this method. However, in case of sequence mismatches, TAR hooks can be easily modified according to sequencing results obtained from the same DNA sample. This cloning method can also be applied to new DNA virus isolates for which
in vitro culture conditions have not been established (
31). Probably due to the large size of the HCMV genome (>230 kb) and the presence of terminal repeats at each end of the genome, we were unable to recover a full-length genome by cotransformation of all 16 10- to 20-kb fragments. Instead, we generated two half genomes of eight fragments each, which were combined into a full-length genome in a second recombination step. In contrast, smaller herpesvirus genomes like herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) can be assembled in one step (
43). TAR cloning is thus the first method that permits direct cloning of herpesviral genomes. In addition, by synthesizing individual TAR fragments, this method can be used to generate partially or fully synthetic HCMV genomes. Synthetic viral genomes have been successfully assembled from individual fragments for smaller viruses, e.g., a 31-kb consensus severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus genome from bats (
32). However, to date, this has not been possible for large DNA viruses due to the lack of a suitable technology. As the parallel chemical synthesis of large DNA fragments is becoming feasible and affordable (
33), the assembly of synthetic HCMV genomes from individual fragments in yeast described here will ultimately enable construction of a completely synthetic genome.
By modifying the sequence of any of the 16 fragments independently, it is also possible to simultaneously change multiple genomic loci as exemplified here by the reconstruction of the Toledo-P sequence by exchanging three fragments of Toledo-F. Thus, various full-length genomes that are ready to be transfected can be assembled from the fragments in about 3 to 4 weeks under ideal conditions. In contrast, the introduction of multiple mutations by BAC technology requires multiple steps of sequential mutagenesis. Moreover, the final assembled HCMV genome does not contain any heterologous sequences once released by restriction digestion, whereas removal of the BAC cassette by Cre recombinase leaves a loxP site in the viral genome. Due to this versatility, TAR-based cloning will also enable the generation of hybrid genomes, e.g., between different cytomegalovirus (CMV) strains or species to facilitate mapping of strain- or species-specific traits. The fact that native viral DNA that does not contain residual bacterial sequences is excised from the YCpBAC prior to transfection will additionally facilitate the recovery of live virus without the need of further genome manipulations such as Cre-based excision of the BAC cassette.
As a test case for direct cloning, we used the low-passage-number isolate Toledo, a storied virus derived from a congenitally infected boy in Toledo, Ohio. Passage four of HCMV Toledo was used in human challenge studies, and these clinical trials remain the only examples for experimental infection of humans with low-passage-number HCMV (
17). It was observed that both HCMV Towne-vaccinated individuals as well as naturally seropositive individuals showed clinical symptoms such as mild mononucleosis-like syndrome when challenged with >1,000 PFU of P4 Toledo, whereas seronegative individuals developed symptoms with doses as low as 10 PFU (
18). However, in light of our deep sequencing analysis showing that the Toledo isolate is a mixture of intact Toledo-P and mutated Toledo-F, it is likely that these symptoms were caused by the intact fraction of the inoculum, suggesting that the actual PFU needed to overcome anti-CMV immunity might have been even lower.
A significant difference between Toledo-P and Toledo-F in their ability to establish persistent infection
in vivo is supported by our experiments in humanized mice. Toledo-F was barely able to establish latency in this model, and we did not observe an increase in the viral genome copy number upon mobilization of monocytes/macrophages, an indicator of reactivation and dissemination. In contrast, similar to other primary isolates, Toledo-P established robust latency and reactivation upon monocyte/macrophage mobilization. This ability correlates to some extent with the broader cell tropism displayed by pentamer-intact HCMV. However, it is also possible that the inversion of the ULb’ fragment affects gene expression within the UL133-138 gene locus which has been implicated in viral latency as well as infection of endothelial cells (
29). Thus, multiple mutations could contribute to the attenuated phenotype of Toledo-F
in vivo.
Interestingly, Toledo-P rapidly adapted to tissue culture conditions by mutating RL13 and UL128, two of the gene regions that were mutated in Toledo-F and that were repaired in the Toledo-P YCpBAC. Thus, even when HCMV Toledo-P is recovered from a molecular clone that was intact, mutations in these genes are rapidly selected for
in vitro. Thus, it seems likely that the Toledo-F variant was not present within the initial isolate but resulted from random mutation and selection upon passaging
in vitro. The rapid selection for mutations in RL13 and the nonessential pentamer subunits UL128, UL130, and UL131A from an intact molecular clone have been very well documented for the low-passage-number isolate Merlin (
9). This work demonstrated that intact RL13, a viral Fc receptor (
34,
35), limits viral propagation in all cell types, and mutants are selected upon very few passages (
12). Thus, unless RL13 is conditionally expressed, RL13 mutants will arise
in vitro. In contrast, UL128-131A mutants arise only upon passaging in fibroblasts (
36) so the selection of these types of mutants can be avoided by growing virus in nonfibroblast cells such as epithelial cells. To maintain the genetic integrity of the repairs of RL13 and UL128 in Toledo-P, it would thus be required to control RL13 and UL128 expression via a conditional promoter as demonstrated for Merlin (
37). However, despite the accumulation of mutations in both RL13 and UL128 in the majority of the viral genomes at passage 4, there was a clear difference in the ability of Toledo-P to infect endothelial cells and to infect monocyte/macrophages in NSG mice. One possible explanation is that these differences were due to the residual intact virus, similar to the situation in the passage 4 isolate used in clinical trials. Alternatively, the truncation in UL128 of P4 Toledo-P might still retain some pentamer function, a possibility that is supported by mutational studies that demonstrated a limited impact of C-terminal mutations of UL128 on endothelial cell infection (
38). Clonal separation of the intact versus mutated version of Toledo will be required to distinguish between these possibilities.
Taken together, our data thus suggest that due to multiple mutations, Toledo-F is severely limited in its ability to establish and maintain latent infection. Importantly, cosmid clones of Toledo-F were previously used to generate chimeric viruses with the Towne vaccine strain in order to generate a vaccine strain that is less attenuated than the highly passaged Towne strain (
25,
26). However, all four different chimeric viruses were unable to elicit clinical or immunological symptoms in HCMV-seropositive individuals at doses up to 1,000 PFU (
26). Moreover, although CD8
+ T cell responses were detected in seronegative individuals inoculated with two of the chimeras, the CD8
+ T cell responses were weak (
27) and did not demonstrate the typical expansion of effector memory T cells observed with CMV infection (
25). The finding that Towne/Toledo-F chimeras were unable to recapitulate the immune response naturally elicited by HCMV correlates with the lack of Toledo-F to reactivate upon monocyte mobilization, suggesting that the chimeric viruses were likely unable to establish the persistent infection required to elicit and maintain effector memory. By modifying individual TAR fragments in Toledo-P, it is now possible to design a new generation of HCMV Toledo-based vaccines and vaccine vectors with the goal of retaining the ability of HCMV to elicit lasting effector memory while introducing safety features that eliminate viral pathogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and virus preparation.
Human primary embryonic lung fibroblasts (MRC-5; purchased from ATCC, Manassas, VA) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM
l-alanyl-glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Lonza (cc-2519) and cultured in endothelial growth medium (EGM-2; Clonetics) containing 2% FBS, human recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), human epidermal growth factor (hEGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, heparin, gentamicin, and amphotericin B (1 μg/ml each) (high-serum medium). HCMV isolate TR was derived originally from a patient with AIDS-related HCMV retinitis (
39). HCMV Toledo-P and Toledo-F viral DNA was extracted from
E. coli using a Qiagen Midi-kit, digested with PacI, and electroporated into MRC-5 cells. Infectious virus was produced, and the titers of the virus were determined by plaque assay on MRC-5 cells as previously described (
40).
Plasmids.
Plasmids pCC1BAC-ura3 and pCC1BAC-his3 have been previously described (
41).
PCR for viral DNA.
Supernatant from fibroblasts infected with Toledo isolate passage 7 (P7) was used to extract viral DNA using the QIAamp MinElute virus spin kit (Qiagen). HCMV TR DNA was extracted with the same kit as a positive control. Two microliters of viral DNA was amplified with Taq 5× Master Mix (New England BioLabs [NEB]) using the following primers (indicated in the parentheses) for the regions and diagnostic PCR indicated: UL127 (5′-ATGTGCCAGCTTGATGTCGC-3′) and UL130 (5′-CGCCAAGATTTTTGGAGCGCAC-3′) (PCR-1); UL127 (5′-ATGTGCCAGCTTGATGTCGC-3′) and UL133 (5′-GGTTGTGAACTCACCGTCGG-3′) (PCR-2); UL133 (5′-GGTTGTGAACTCACCGTCGG-3′) and UL148 (5′-CGAGGCAGAACATCTCAACC-3′) (PCR-3); UL128 (5′-GAGGGCCTTACAGCCTATGG-3′) and UL148 (5′-CGAGGCAGAACATCTCAACC-3′) (PCR-4). The thermocycler parameters were 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles, with 1 cycle consisting of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min.
HCMV Toledo genome sequencing and analysis.
Viral DNA was isolated from the supernatant of fibroblasts infected with P7 Toledo as described above, and 210 μl of isolated DNA was incubated with 30 μl of shrimp DNase to remove host DNA (2 U/μl) (Affymetrix) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the shrimp DNase was inactivated by incubating at 70°C for 20 min. A 10-μl sample was removed for quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. Viral DNA was then purified from the larger remaining sample with the QIAamp MinElute virus spin kit (Qiagen) and eluted in 50 μl of buffer. qPCR was used to determine the removal of host DNA. Viral DNA was then used for sequencing using Illumina HiSeq paired-end sequencing. The sequence reads were sorted by barcode, trimmed, and mapped to HCMV Toledo (GenBank accession number
GU937742.2 ) using CLC Bio’s (Qiagen) clc_ref_assemble_long program, and variations were then extracted and reported using CLC Bio’s find_variations program. Reported variations were manually inspected using CLC Bio’s assembly_viewer program, and variations lacking sufficient evidence (lack of spanning reads or insufficient high-quality coverage) were discarded. In some cases, large structural variations were analyzed and reported manually, for example, a large inversion with indels at the termini that occurred at low frequency had to be determined by bespoke bioinformatic methods to partition sequencing reads based on the presence or absence of junction sequences, and then reassembling the partitions of reads separately and mapping contigs back to the reference sequence.
The P7 Toledo-F, P7 Toledo-P, Assembled Toledo-F, Reconstituted Toledo-F, Assembled Toledo-P, and Reconstituted Toledo-P were aligned in Geneious (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) using the PhyML package to the reference strain (HCMV Toledo, GenBank accession number
GU937742.2 ) available from NCBI and to each other for identification of insertions, deletions, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
Yeast transformation by spheroplast formation.
The
S. cerevisiae strain VL6-48N (
14) (MATα
his3-Δ
200 trp1-Δ
1 ura3-Δ
1 lys2 ade2-101 met14 cir°) was used for all yeast transformations and grown in YPD (yeast extract, peptone, dextrose) medium supplemented with adenine.
S. cerevisiae spheroplasts were prepared using previously described methods with the following modifications (
16). Overnight cultures were grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD
600) of 1.8 to 2.5 and kept overnight at 4°C in 1 M sorbitol. After the cells were harvested, they were resuspended in 10 ml of SPE solution (1 M sorbitol, 0.01 M sodium phosphate, 0.01 M Na
2EDTA) with 20 μl of β-mercaptoethanol and 20 μl of zymolyase solution. The cells were finally resuspended in 4 ml of STC solution (1 M sorbitol, 0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.01 M CaCl
2). DNA for transformation-associated recombination (TAR) cloning or assembly was added to 200 μl of spheroplasts, followed by the addition of 900 μl of 20% PEG solution (20% PEG 8000, 10 mM CaCl
2, 10 mM Tris-HCl). The suspension was incubated at room temperature for 20 min, the PEG solution was removed, and the cells were then incubated at 30°C for 30 min in SOS medium (1 M sorbitol, 6.5 mM CaCl
2, 0.25% yeast extract, 0.5% peptone). Transformed yeast spheroplasts were plated with selective top agar with sorbitol.
TAR cloning, screening, and processing of HCMV DNA fragments.
Vectors were first PCR amplified using pCC1BAC-his3 as the template with Phusion (NEB) or Q5 (NEB) DNA polymerase. This plasmid contains bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and yeast centromeric plasmid (YCp) sequences for replication in E. coli and yeast. The primers add an I-SceI or PacI restriction site, flanked by 40 bp of HCMV homology, to each end of the vector backbone. PCR products were digested with DpnI (NEB) prior to transformation.
Viral DNA, which was isolated from Toledo P7 as described above, was sheared by pipetting. Six hundred nanograms of viral genomic DNA was cotransformed with 20 ng of the appropriate vector into yeast spheroplasts. Transformants were patched on synthetic dropout medium without histidine and supplemented with adenine (SD-HIS) plates and after sufficient growth were selected and transferred into 20 μl of 25 mM NaOH and incubated at 95°C for 30 min to lyse yeast cells. PCR on DNA from lysed yeast using the appropriate detection primers (see
Table S1 in the supplemental material) was used to confirm the correct junction of the vector and HCMV fragment on each side.
Positive TAR clone candidates from yeast patches or 3 ml of liquid cultures were resuspended in 500 μl of water containing 5 μl of zymolyase 20T (MP Bio) (10 mg/ml) and 0.5 μl of β-mercaptoethanol (14.2 M) and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Fifty microliters of 2% SDS was added, and the solution was incubated for 15 min at 70°C, followed by the addition of 50 μl of 5 M potassium acetate and incubation on ice for 5 min. After clarification, the DNA in the supernatant was precipitated with isopropanol and resuspended in 50 μl of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer. Isolated DNA was then electroporated into E. coli EPI300 (Epicentre) or DH10B (Thermo Fisher) competent cells. DNA was purified from positive transformants for restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing.
Assembly of complete HCMV genomes using TAR in yeast.
Cultures of all 16 TAR clones in
E. coli were grown up, and DNA was isolated with PureLink HiPure Plasmid Midiprep kit (Thermo Fisher). Prior to assembly, the clones were digested with I-SceI and heat killed to release the HCMV fragments. Assembly of HCMV genomes was performed by TAR assembly in yeast in two steps. First, half genomes (TAR01 to TAR08 and TAR09 to TAR16) were assembled as follows. Vector DNA was amplified by PCR using pCCIBAC-ura3 as the template and either Con01R (R stands for reverse)and Con08F (F stands for forward) or CMV_1R and CMV_8F (
Table S1) as primers for TAR01 to TAR08 or Con09R and Con16F or CMV_9R and CMV_16F (
Table S1) for TAR09 to TAR16. For assembly of each half genome, 10 ng of vector DNA and 100 ng each of all other DNA fragments was added to spheroplasts. Transformants were patched on plates containing synthetic dropout medium without uracil and supplemented with adenine, and DNA was screened by PCR for the appropriate junctions with the respective detection primers (
Table S1) using NaOH lysis. Positive half genomes were transformed into
E. coli EPI300 competent cells and screened by PCR to confirm the appropriate junctions. For assembly of the full genome, the half genomes were processed with I-SceI or PacI endonuclease as described above to release the fragments. Vector DNA was amplified by PCR using pCCIBAC-his3 as the template and Con01R and Con16F or CMV_1R and CMV_16F as primers (
Table S1). Ten nanograms of vector DNA and 100 ng each of the half genomes was added for assembly to spheroplasts. Transformants were patched onto SD-HIS plates, and DNA was screened by PCR for all of the appropriate junctions with the respective detection primers (
Table S1) using NaOH lysis methods previously mentioned. As before, positive clones were transformed into
E. coli EPI300 competent cells as described above and screened by PCR to confirm the appropriate junctions.
Synthesis and purification of Cas9 and chimeric synthetic guide RNAs.
A single colony of
E. coli Alpha-Select Gold Efficiency (Bioline) harboring the pJExpress404-FLAG-Cas9-His construct was cultured overnight in 50 ml LB supplemented with 100 μg/ml carbenicillin (Teknova). The starter culture was diluted into 1 liter of antibiotic-supplemented LB broth and shaken at 220 rpm at 37°C to an OD
600 of 0.6. The culture was then cooled to 20°C, and isopropyl-β-
d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM to induce protein expression. Cas9 protein was induced overnight in a refrigerated incubator at 20°C under shaking (220 rpm). Cell pellets were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, and then resuspended in 60-ml volumes of xTractor buffer supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Clontech), 2 mg lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich), and 625 U Benzonase (Millipore). Cell suspensions were then gently rotated for 2 h at 4°C prior to mechanical lysis in a Microfluidizer M-110L (Microfluidics). Cell debris was pelleted at 8,000 ×
g for 1 h, and recombinant protein was purified from the supernatant using a HisTalon column (Clontech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified protein was stored at −80°C in Cas9 buffer (150 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 10% glycerol) at a concentration of 4.5 mg/ml. The Cas9-targeting chimeric synthetic guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed,
in vitro synthesized, and purified as described previously (
42).
Modification of Toledo-F TAR01 and TAR07.
Previously assembled HCMV Toledo-F fragments TAR01 and TAR07 contained within the E. coli-yeast shuttle pCC1BAC_HIS3 were purified using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen). Plasmid-borne genomic fragments were then independently digested with Cas9 in conjunction with two sgRNAs (fragment 1, 5′-CAAUGGACUGGCGAUUUAGUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAAGUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUUUUU-3′ and 5′-GAUGCGAUCGCAGUUACGGUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAAGUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUUUUU-3′ and fragment 7 5′-UGUGGAAUUCCGGACAUAGUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAAGUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUUUUU-3′ and 5′-UUACGUAUACCGGAUGCUGUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAAGUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUUUUU-3′ [Cas9 targeting sequences are underlined]), liberating DNA fragments of roughly 350 bp and 70 bp, respectively. One-hour digestions were performed at 37°C in 50-μl volume and contained 500 ng of plasmid DNA, 1 μg each gRNA, 10 mM spermidine (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM MgCl2 (Ambion), 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 3.6 μg of Cas9 protein. Following digestion, Cas9 was heat inactivated at 80°C for 10 min, and digested DNA was extracted with UltraPure phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, vol/vol; pH 8), precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in sterile water. DNA fragments used to generate Toledo-P insert fragments 1 and 7 were obtained from de novo-synthesized gblocks (IDT). The Toledo-P fragment 1 insert encoded a 279-bp insertion not found in the Toledo-F sequence. Conversely, the Toledo-P fragment 7 insert removed a 52-bp insert found only in Toledo-F. Both DNA inserts contained 20- to 100-bp overlap sequences homologous to regions upstream and downstream of the Cas9 digestion sites to facilitate in vitro assembly. Synthesized insert fragments were mixed with corresponding digested products at a 3:1 molar ratio (insert-vector) and covalently joined via standard Gibson Assembly reaction (SGI-DNA). Following assembly, constructs were transformed into E. coli TransforMax EPI300 electrocompetent cells (Epicentre) and plated on selective media. Transformants were verified to contain new inserts using PCR and Sanger sequencing prior to final confirmation of the full Toledo-P genome sequence by next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Modification of Toledo-F TAR013.
NGS sequencing data indicated that the Toledo-P genome contained a large 14.3-kb genomic inversion flanked by two small insertions (14 and 23 bp). This large inversion was entirely contained within the previously generated Toledo-F genomic fragment 13. Utilizing primers 5′-GCAAAGTGAACGACAAGGCGCAGTACCTGCTG-3′ and 5′-CCTAGTAACACTCGTCCGACACTTCCACCATCTCCAGC-3′ (IDT), the ends of genomic fragment 13 backbone were PCR amplified together with the E. coli-yeast shuttle pCC1BAC_HIS3 vector. In a second PCR, the 14.3-kb inverted sequence was amplified with Ultramer oligonucleotides 5′-CTCTCCAGGTACTGATCCAGGCCCACGATCCGGGTTATCTTGTCGTATTCCAGGTTGATCCATCGATAGGGAACGCTGCCAGCGGCGCCCAGCAGGTACTGCGCCTTGTCGTTCACTTTGCCGCAGCGTATTCGCCCGTCAGCTTCGAGGTATAACCTACAACACGGAGGGGAAGGGGGGTACAAAACGTGAAATTAGAC-3′ and 5′-GAGACGACGCCGCTGGTAGAGGATGCCGAACCGCCGGCCGAGCTGGAGATGGTGGAAGTGTCGGACGAGTGTTACTAGGAGATCGCCGCGGCCGATGGGCGCCGGCGGACGTGACTCGGCAGCCGCTGTAGGGATAAATAGTGCGATGGCGTTTGTGG-3′, generating an inverted sequence with the indicated terminal inserts flanked by 121-bp overlap sequences homologous to regions at the ends of the first amplicon. Both PCRs were performed with the KOD Xtreme Hot Start DNA polymerase (Millipore) using the Toledo-F genomic fragment 13 as the template and according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The amplicons were digested with DpnI (NEB) and purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Following purification, amplicons were mixed at an equal molar ratio and covalently joined via standard Gibson Assembly reaction (SGI-DNA). Following assembly, constructs were transformed into E. coli TransforMax EPI300 electrocompetent cells (Epicentre) and plated on selective media. Transformants were verified to contain new inserts using PCR and Sanger sequencing prior to final confirmation of the full Toledo-P genome sequence by NGS.
Engraftment and infection of humanized mice.
All animal studies were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (number IS00003498) at the Oregon Health & Science University. NOD-
scid IL2Rγ
cnull (NSG) mice were maintained at a pathogen-free facility at Oregon Health & Science University in accordance with procedures approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Both sexes of animals were used. Humanized mice were generated as previously described (
30). The animals (12 to 14 weeks after engraftment) were treated with 25 ng/mouse lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and after 6 h, they were infected via intraperitoneal injection of human dermal fibroblasts previously infected with HCMV TR, Toledo-P, or Toledo-F at approximately 5 × 10
5 PFU per mouse. A control group of engrafted mice were mock infected using uninfected fibroblasts. At 4 weeks postinfection, the infected mice were split into two groups, and one group was treated with 100 μl of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (300 mg/ml; Amgen) using a subcutaneous micro-osmotic pump (1007D; Alzet) and 125 μg AMD3100 [1,1′-[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis-1,4,8,11-tetra-azacyclotetradecane octahydrochloride or plerixafor] administered intraperitoneally to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). The remaining mice serve as a direct comparison for the effects of virus reactivation and dissemination that follow HPC mobilization. One week after HPC mobilization, the mice were sacrificed, their organs were harvested, and samples for PCR were frozen in RNAlater solution and stored at −80°C for subsequent analysis.
Quantitative PCR for viral genomes.
Total DNA was extracted from approximately 1-mm2 sections of mouse spleen or liver using the DNAzol kit (Life Technologies). HCMV genomes were analyzed using quantitative PCR (TaqMan) performed on 1 µg of total DNA and using TaqMan FastAdvance PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers and a probe recognizing HCMV UL141 were used to quantify HCMV genomes (probe, CGAGGGAGAGCAAGTT; forward primer, 5′-GATGTGGGCCGAGAATTATGA; reverse primer, 5′-ATGGGCCAGGAGTGTGTCA). The probe contains a 5′ FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) reporter molecule and a 3′ quencher molecule (Applied Biosystems). The reaction was initiated using TaqMan Fast Advanced master mix (Applied Biosystems) activated at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles (1 cycle consists of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C) using a StepOnePlus TaqMan thermocycler. Results were analyzed using ABI StepOne software. Data were analyzed using the statistical program GraphPad Prism 5. Statistical significance was determined using two-way analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni’s posttest correction. A P value of <0.05 or lower was considered significant.
Accession number(s).
The genome sequences of P7 Toledo-F, P7 Toledo-P as well as assembled Toledo-F and Toledo-P have been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers
MF783090 to
MF783093 .