Volume 133, Issue 9 p. 2394-2401
Original Report

Validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Children

Kelly E. Daniels MD

Kelly E. Daniels MD

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amber D. Shaffer PhD

Amber D. Shaffer PhD

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steven Garbin MD

Steven Garbin MD

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Judy H. Squires MD

Judy H. Squires MD

Division of Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin G. Vaughan MD

Kevin G. Vaughan MD

Division of Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Pushpa Viswanathan MD

Pushpa Viswanathan MD

Division of Endocrinology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Selma F. Witchel MD

Selma F. Witchel MD

Division of Endocrinology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin P. Mollen MD

Kevin P. Mollen MD

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Linwah Yip MD

Linwah Yip MD

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sara E. Monaco MD

Sara E. Monaco MD

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Umamaheswar Duvvuri MD

Umamaheswar Duvvuri MD

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey P. Simons MD

Corresponding Author

Jeffrey P. Simons MD

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Send correspondence to Jeffrey P. Simons, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 October 2022
Citations: 4

Presented at the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings (COSM), Virtual Meeting, April 9, 2021 and at the Pennsylvania Academy of Otolaryngology Annual Scientific Meeting, Virtual Meeting, June 19, 2021.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on September 14, 2022.

Abstract

Objective

To assess the validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) for evaluating thyroid nodules in children.

Methods

Patients aged <19 years with thyroid nodule(s) evaluated by ultrasound (US) from 2007–2018 at a tertiary children's hospital were included. Two radiologists scored de-identified thyroid US images using ACR TI-RADS (from 1, “benign” to 5, “highly suspicious”). The radiologists recorded size and rated vascularity for each nodule. Ultrasound findings were compared to pathology results (operative cases, n = 91) and clinical follow-up without disease progression (non-operative cases, n = 15).

Results

Thyroid images from 115 patients were reviewed. Nine patients were excluded due to the absence of an evaluable nodule. Forty-seven benign and 59 malignant nodules were included. Median age at ultrasound was 15 years (range 0.9–18 years). Twenty (18.9%) patients were male. There was moderate agreement between TI-RADS levels assigned by the two raters (kappa = 0.57, p < 0.001). When the raters' levels were averaged, >3 as the threshold for malignancy correctly categorized the greatest percentage of nodules (68.9%). Eleven (18.6%) malignant nodules received a TI-RADS level of 2 (n = 3) or 3 (n = 8). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 81.4%, 53.2%, 68.6%, and 69.4%, respectively. Although not part of TI-RADS, vascularity was similar between benign and malignant nodules (p = 0.56).

Conclusion

In a pediatric population, TI-RADS can help distinguish between benign and malignant nodules with comparable sensitivity and specificity to adults. However, the positive and negative predictive values suggest TI-RADS alone cannot eliminate the need for FNA.

Level of Evidence

3 Laryngoscope, 133:2394–2401, 2023

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.