ABSTRACT
While studies have shown that Wikipedia articles exhibit quality that is comparable to conventional encyclopedias, research still proves that Wikipedia, overall, is prone to many different types of Neutral Point of View (NPOV) violations that are explicitly or implicitly caused by bias from its editors. Related work focuses on political, cultural and gender bias. We are developing an approach for detecting both explicit and implicit bias in Wikipedia articles and observing its evolution over time. Our approach is based on different factors of bias, with the most important ones being language style, editors, and citations. In this paper we present the approach, methodology and a first analysis.
- E. S. Callahan and S. C. Herring. Cultural bias in wikipedia content on famous persons. JASIST, 62(10), 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Dallmann, F. Lemmerich, D. Zoller, and A. Hotho. Media bias in german online newspapers. In 26th Hypertext, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Das and A. Lavoie. Automated inference of point of view from user interactions in collective intelligence venues. In ICML, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Das, A. Lavoie, and M. Magdon-Ismail. Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How wikipedia administrators mold public opinion. In 22nd CIKM. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Fetahu, A. Anand, and A. Anand. How much is wikipedia lagging behind news? In Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference, page 28. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Fetahu, K. Markert, W. Nejdl, and A. Anand. Finding news citations for wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 25th CIKM, pages 337--346. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. K. Garrett. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users1. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 2009. Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Gentzkow and J. M. Shapiro. What drives media slant? evidence from us daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Giles. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070), 2005. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Golbeck and D. Hansen. Computing political preference among twitter followers. In SIGCHI. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Graells-Garrido, M. Lalmas, and F. Menczer. First women, second sex: gender bias in wikipedia. In 26th Hypertext. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Greenstein and F. Zhu. Collective intelligence and neutral point of view: the case of wikipedia. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012. Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Keegan, D. Gergle, and N. Contractor. Hot off the wiki: dynamics, practices, and structures in wikipedia's coverage of the tōhoku catastrophes. In 7th WikiSym. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. W. Lance. News: The politics of illusion. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
- H. Lu, J. Caverlee, and W. Niu. Biaswatch: A lightweight system for discovering and tracking topic-sensitive opinion bias in social media. In 24th CIKM, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Makazhanov, D. Rafiei, and M. Waqar. Predicting political preference of twitter users. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1), 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. T. Morgan, R. M. Mason, and K. Nahon. Negotiating cultural values in social media: A case study from wikipedia. In 45th HICSS. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Pennacchiotti and A.-M. Popescu. Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In 17th SIGKDD, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Reagle and L. Rhue. Gender bias in wikipedia and britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5, 2011.Google Scholar
- D. Saez-Trumper, C. Castillo, and M. Lalmas. Social media news communities: gatekeeping, coverage, and statement bias. In 22nd CIKM. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Sumi, T. Yasseri, A. Rung, A. Kornai, and J. Kertész. Edit wars in wikipedia. arXiv preprint arXiv:1107.3689, 2011.Google Scholar
- V. Vydiswaran, C. Zhai, D. Roth, and P. Pirolli. Biastrust: Teaching biased users about controversial topics. In 21st CIKM. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Wagner, D. Garcia, M. Jadidi, and M. Strohmaier. It's a man's wikipedia? assessing gender inequality in an online encyclopedia. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.06307, 2015.Google Scholar
- D. X. Zhou, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei. Classifying the political leaning of news articles and users from user votes. In ICWSM, 2011.Google Scholar
- Y. Zhou, A. I. Cristea, and Z. Roberts. Is wikipedia really neutral? a sentiment perspective study of war-related wikipedia articles since 1945. In 29th PACLIC, 2015.Google Scholar
- Y. Zhou, E. Demidova, and A. I. Cristea. Who likes me more?: analysing entity-centric language-specific bias in multilingual wikipedia. In 31st SAC. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
-
Bias in Wikipedia
-
Recommendations
-
Detecting Biased Statements in Wikipedia
WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018Quality in Wikipedia is enforced through a set of editing policies and guidelines recommended for Wikipedia editors. Neutral point of view (NPOV) is one of the main principles in Wikipedia, which ensures that for controversial information all possible ...
-
Towards Ongoing Detection of Linguistic Bias on Wikipedia
WWW '21: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021Wikipedia is a critical platform for organizing and disseminating knowledge. One of the key principles of Wikipedia is neutral point of view (NPOV), so that bias is not injected into objective treatment of subject matter. As part of our research vision ...
-
Named entity recognition in Wikipedia
People's Web '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on The People's Web Meets NLP: Collaboratively Constructed Semantic ResourcesNamed entity recognition (NER) is used in many domains beyond the newswire text that comprises current gold-standard corpora. Recent work has used Wikipedia's link structure to automatically generate near gold-standard annotations. Until now, these ...
Comments