skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3053375acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bias in Wikipedia

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

While studies have shown that Wikipedia articles exhibit quality that is comparable to conventional encyclopedias, research still proves that Wikipedia, overall, is prone to many different types of Neutral Point of View (NPOV) violations that are explicitly or implicitly caused by bias from its editors. Related work focuses on political, cultural and gender bias. We are developing an approach for detecting both explicit and implicit bias in Wikipedia articles and observing its evolution over time. Our approach is based on different factors of bias, with the most important ones being language style, editors, and citations. In this paper we present the approach, methodology and a first analysis.

References

  1. E. S. Callahan and S. C. Herring. Cultural bias in wikipedia content on famous persons. JASIST, 62(10), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Dallmann, F. Lemmerich, D. Zoller, and A. Hotho. Media bias in german online newspapers. In 26th Hypertext, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Das and A. Lavoie. Automated inference of point of view from user interactions in collective intelligence venues. In ICML, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Das, A. Lavoie, and M. Magdon-Ismail. Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How wikipedia administrators mold public opinion. In 22nd CIKM. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Fetahu, A. Anand, and A. Anand. How much is wikipedia lagging behind news? In Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference, page 28. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Fetahu, K. Markert, W. Nejdl, and A. Anand. Finding news citations for wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 25th CIKM, pages 337--346. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. K. Garrett. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among internet news users1. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Gentzkow and J. M. Shapiro. What drives media slant? evidence from us daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Giles. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Golbeck and D. Hansen. Computing political preference among twitter followers. In SIGCHI. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Graells-Garrido, M. Lalmas, and F. Menczer. First women, second sex: gender bias in wikipedia. In 26th Hypertext. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Greenstein and F. Zhu. Collective intelligence and neutral point of view: the case of wikipedia. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Keegan, D. Gergle, and N. Contractor. Hot off the wiki: dynamics, practices, and structures in wikipedia's coverage of the tōhoku catastrophes. In 7th WikiSym. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. B. W. Lance. News: The politics of illusion. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Lu, J. Caverlee, and W. Niu. Biaswatch: A lightweight system for discovering and tracking topic-sensitive opinion bias in social media. In 24th CIKM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Makazhanov, D. Rafiei, and M. Waqar. Predicting political preference of twitter users. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. T. Morgan, R. M. Mason, and K. Nahon. Negotiating cultural values in social media: A case study from wikipedia. In 45th HICSS. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Pennacchiotti and A.-M. Popescu. Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In 17th SIGKDD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Reagle and L. Rhue. Gender bias in wikipedia and britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Saez-Trumper, C. Castillo, and M. Lalmas. Social media news communities: gatekeeping, coverage, and statement bias. In 22nd CIKM. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Sumi, T. Yasseri, A. Rung, A. Kornai, and J. Kertész. Edit wars in wikipedia. arXiv preprint arXiv:1107.3689, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. V. Vydiswaran, C. Zhai, D. Roth, and P. Pirolli. Biastrust: Teaching biased users about controversial topics. In 21st CIKM. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Wagner, D. Garcia, M. Jadidi, and M. Strohmaier. It's a man's wikipedia? assessing gender inequality in an online encyclopedia. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.06307, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. X. Zhou, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei. Classifying the political leaning of news articles and users from user votes. In ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. Zhou, A. I. Cristea, and Z. Roberts. Is wikipedia really neutral? a sentiment perspective study of war-related wikipedia articles since 1945. In 29th PACLIC, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Y. Zhou, E. Demidova, and A. I. Cristea. Who likes me more?: analysing entity-centric language-specific bias in multilingual wikipedia. In 31st SAC. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bias in Wikipedia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
      April 2017
      1738 pages
      ISBN:9781450349147

      Publisher

      International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

      Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate164of966submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader