Volume 76, Issue 1 p. 55-65

On selectivity and sensitivity of synthetic multifunctional pores as enzyme sensors: Discrimination between ATP and ADP and comparison with biological pores

Nathalie Sordé

Nathalie Sordé

Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Matile

Corresponding Author

Stefan Matile

Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva 4, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 04 February 2004
Citations: 14

Abstract

This report delineates scope and limitation of the selectivity of synthetic multifunctional pores as enzyme sensors using glycolytic enzymes as example (G. Das, P. Talukdar, and S. Matile, Science, 2002, Vol. 298, pp. 1600–1602). Unproblematic detectability of hexokinase and phosphofructokinase demonstrates that the selectivity of synthetic multifunctional pore (SMPs) sensors suffices to sense ATP in mixed analytes containing ADP, whereas detection of the isomerization of glucose 6-phosphate into fructose 6-phosphate by phosphoglucose isomerase is not possible with confidence. The sensitivity of SMP sensors is sufficient for end-point detection of one picomole poly-L-glutamate hydrolyzed by papain in unoptimized assay format; the sensitivity of melittin as representative biological pore of similar charge and aggregation number to detect the same reaction is more than four orders of magnitude inferior. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) , 2004

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.