Screen mockup can be found in this figma file

I've missed it if we came to a conclusion earlier but could we confirm our treatment of the values?

Specifically, behaviors can return FILE_SHARING and a very long list of possible services (see https://docs.spur.us/data-types?id=client-behavior-enums). It seems reasonable to translate "File sharing" but what should we do about the others? eg.

	"behaviors": [
		"TOR_PROXY_USER",
		"FILE_SHARING",
		"SMILE_VPN_USER",
		"WARP_VPN_USER",

Presumably, whatever answer we come to here can be used for proxies and tunnel operators, which return similar lists.

Connection types and risks have reasonably enumerable lists and can be translated as expected.

cc @JSengupta-WMF @KColeman-WMF

And an example of how a very used IP could look. Many of these attributes can return more than one result.

Change 989827 had a related patch set uploaded (by STran; author: STran):

[mediawiki/extensions/IPInfo@master] Display IPoid data on IPInfo infobox

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/989827

Change 989827 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/IPInfo@master] Display IPoid data on IPInfo infobox

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/989827

Questions perhaps for @KColeman-WMF.

Do we need to review the wording in the help text?

Do we want the lists of "Behaviors", "Proxies", etc. to always be alphabetically ordered? Currently I believe the order can vary. This might make comparing data for two IP addresses harder to do.

There is also an open questions from @STran in T341395#9452875.

Otherwise, I have no other concerns and will move this along.

Test environment: IP Info 0.0.0 (19f6b7f) 08:17, 19 January 2024. ipoid commit e0250e5f4cb6942c5ccbbddc299458f624ecc01c.

In T341395#9481364, @dom_walden wrote:

Questions perhaps for @KColeman-WMF.

Do we need to review the wording in the help text?

Do we want the lists of "Behaviors", "Proxies", etc. to always be alphabetically ordered? Currently I believe the order can vary. This might make comparing data for two IP addresses harder to do.

There is also an open questions from @STran in T341395#9452875.

Hi @dom_walden

The help text provided in the table above has already been reviewed by product/design.

With regards the question from @STran: I think it makes sense to display the values as they are provided on Spur, expect when it's obvious what the ideal translation is. If we are including a line about the data source (as per design) then perhaps we can link to the Spur documentation?

If we are including a line about the data source (as per design) then perhaps we can link to the Spur documentation?

Was this superseded by the link to the legal notice? Or do we intend to show both?