Skip to main content
Log in

Paleogenetic Study of Ancient Mummies at the Kurchatov Institute

  • NATURAL SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN STUDYING CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES
  • Published:
Nanotechnologies in Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interdisciplinary study of ten ancient Egyptian mummies from the collection of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, which date back to the 1st millennium BCE–beginning of the Common Era, was carried out at the NRC Kurchatov Institute. At the initial stage, they were subjected to computerized tomo-graphy (CT), which became the basis for further research: anthropological, medical, and forensic analysis. For paleogenetic and isotopic analysis, the best-preserved bone tissue samples of mummies based on CT data were taken. The article presents the results of experimental studies that determined the mitochondrial and Y-chromosomal haplogroups of some of the studied mummies, the sex previously established by anthropologists was confirmed, the DNA of certain pathogens were found, and isotope analysis was carried out. The data obtained by natural scientific methods supplement important historical information on the genetic diversity of the population of Ancient Egypt and migration processes in this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Aufderheide, The Scientific Study of Mummies (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932005216875

  2. S. Ikram and A. Dodson, Mummy in Ancient Egypt: Equipping the Dead for Eternity (Thames Hudson, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egyptian Mummies and Modern Science, Ed. by R. David (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499654.019

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Zesch, S. Panzer, W. Rosendahl, et al., Eur. J. Radiol. Open. 3, 172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Hawass and S. N. Saleem, Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies (AUC Press, New York, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. N. Saleem and Z. Hawass, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., No. 41, 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000489

  7. M. T. Gilbert, I. Darnes, M. J. Collins, et al., Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128, 110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Paabo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1939 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Paabo, Nature (London, U.K.) 314, 644 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/314644a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. J. Schuenemann, A. Peltzer, B. Welte, et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 15694 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Loreille, S. Ratnayake, A. L. Bazinet, et al., Genes (Basel). 9, 135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9030135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Oras, J. Anderson, M. Tõrv, et al., PLoS One 15, e0227446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. G. Llorente, E. R. Jones, A. Erissson, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 350, 820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hervella, E. M. Svensson, A. Alberdi, et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 25501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. B. Yatsishina, M. V. Koval’chuk, M. D. Loshak, S. V. Vasilyev, O. A. Vasilieva, O. P. Dyuzheva, V. M. Pojidaev, and V. L. Ushakov, Crystallogr. Rep. 63, 500 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. B. Yatsishina, V. M. Pozhidaev, O. A. Vasil’eva, et al., Tonk. Khim. Tekhnol. 14 (4), 45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32362/2410-6593-2019-14-4-45-58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. B. Yatsishina, S. V. Vasil’ev, S. B. Borutskaya, et al., Arkheol. Etnogr. Antropol. Evraz. 47, 136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17746/1563-0110.2019.47.3.136-144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. B. Yatsishina, V. M. Pozhidaev, Ya. E. Sergeeva, S. N. Malakhov, and I. S. Slushnaya, J. Anal. Chem. 75, 262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044450219120144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. A. Aver’yanova, A. K. Avakyan, A. V. Grushka, et al., Visn. Khark. Politekh. Inst., Ser. Nov. Pish. Suchasn. Tekhnol., No. 39, 68 (2015).

  20. F. Alberti, J. Gonzalez, J. L. A. Paijmans, et al., Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Orlando, J. L. Metcalf, M. T. Alberdi, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 21754 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903672106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. L. Sampietro, D. Caramelli, O. Lao, et al., Ann. Hum. Genet. 69, 535 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00194.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Yang, H. Y. Lee, W. I. Yang, et al., J. Forensic Sci. 58, 972 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Weissensteiner, D. Pacher, A. Kloss-Brandstätter, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 44, W58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Schubert, L. Ermini, C. Der Sarkissian, et al., Nat. Protoc. 9, 1056 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Ralf, D. M. González, K. Zhong, M. Kayser, Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1291 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Segata, L. Waldron, A. Ballarini, et al., Nat. Methods 9, 811 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. V. P. Alekseev and G. F. Debets, Craniometry. Anthropological Research Methodology (Nauka, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. A. Belova, S. V. Vasil’ev, S. B. Borutskaya, et al., Stratum Plus, No. 4, 73 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. S. Sokolov, A. V. Nedoluzhko, E. S. Boulygina, et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. 73, 138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Stevanovitch, A. Gilles, E. Bouzaid, et al., Ann. Hum. Genet. 68, 23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00057.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. W. Haak, I. Lazaridis, N. Patterson, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 522, 207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. P. de Barros Damgaard, R. Martiniano, J. Kamm, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 360, eaar7711 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7711

  34. E. Boulygina, S. Tsygankova, F. Sharko, et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 31, 102357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. F. M. Key, C. Posth, J. Krause, et al., Trends Genet. 33, 508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.05.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. E. Angelakis, O. Mediannikov, P. Parola, and D. Raoultl, Trends Parasitol. 32, 554 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Atlas of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Immunology: A Study Guide for Medical Students, Ed. by A. A. Vorob’ev and A. S. Bykov (Med. Inform. Agentstvo, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. V. Dobrovol’skaya and I. K. Reshetova, in Divnogorsk Collection: Proceedings of the Divnogorie Museum-Reserve (Nauchnaya kniga, Voronezh, 2012), p. 142.

  39. M. V. Dobrovol’skaya and A. V. Tiunov, Arkheol. Etnogr. Antropol. Evraz. 53, 78 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. Bocherens and D. Drucker, Int. J. Osteoarcheol. 13 (1), 46 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ya. V. Kuz’min, Geoarcheology: Natural Science Methods in Archaeological Research (Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Tomsk, 2017), p. 245 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors express their gratitude to the director of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts M.D. Loshak and members of the Department of Ancient Egypt O.A. Vasil’eva and O.P. Dyuzheva for providing objects for research and cooperation, as well as to employees of the Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS (St. Petersburg) N.D. Burova and O.V. Lokhova for performing the isotope analysis.

Funding

The study was carried out with financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-29-04144 ofi_m).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Bulygina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yatsishina, E.B., Bulygina, E.S., Vasilyev, S.V. et al. Paleogenetic Study of Ancient Mummies at the Kurchatov Institute. Nanotechnol Russia 15, 524–531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078020050183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078020050183

Navigation