The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, 1994 - History - 288 pages

The present international system, composed for the most part of sovereign, territorial states, is often viewed as the inevitable outcome of historical development. Hendrik Spruyt argues that there was nothing inevitable about the rise of the state system, however. Examining the competing institutions that arose during the decline of feudalism--among them urban leagues, independent communes, city states, and sovereign monarchies--Spruyt disposes of the familiar claim that the superior size and war-making ability of the sovereign nation-state made it the natural successor to the feudal system.


The author argues that feudalism did not give way to any single successor institution in simple linear fashion. Instead, individuals created a variety of institutional forms, such as the sovereign, territorial state in France, the Hanseatic League, and the Italian city-states, in reaction to a dramatic change in the medieval economic environment. Only in a subsequent selective phase of institutional evolution did sovereign, territorial authority prove to have significant institutional advantages over its rivals. Sovereign authority proved to be more successful in organizing domestic society and structuring external affairs. Spruyt's interdisciplinary approach not only has important implications for change in the state system in our time, but also presents a novel analysis of the general dynamics of institutional change.

 

Contents

CHAPTER
11
CHAPTER 2
22
CHAPTER 3
34
CHAPTER 4
62
TABLES
63
CHAPTER 5
68
The Rise of the Sovereign Territorial State in Capetian France
77
Why the Emergence of the French State Does Not Follow from
82
CHAPTER 6
109
CHAPTER 7
130
COMPETITION MUTUAL EMPOWERMENT
151
CHAPTER 9
183
NOTES
195
BIBLIOGRAPHY
265
INDEX
285
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1994)

Hendrik Spruyt is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Columbia University.

Bibliographic information