Imposing Values: Liberalism and Regulation
A major question for liberal politics and liberal political theory concerns the proper scope of government. Liberalism has always favored limited government, but there has been wide-ranging dispute among liberals about just how extensive the scope of government should be. Included in this dispute are questions about the extent of state ownership of the means of production, redistribution of wealth and income through the tax code and transfer programs, and the extent of government regulation. One of N. Scott Arnold's goals is to give an accurate characterization of both modern liberalism and classical liberalism, explaining along the way why libertarianism is not the only form that classical liberalism can take. The main focus of Arnold's book, however, concerns regulation--specifically, the modern liberal regulatory agenda as it has taken shape in contemporary American society. This is the set of regulatory regimes favored by all modern liberals and opposed by all classical liberals. It includes contemporary employment law in all its manifestations, health and safety regulation, and land use regulation. The heart of the book consists of a systematic evaluation of arguments for and against all the items on this agenda. It turns out that there are good arguments on both sides for most of these regulatory regimes. Because of this, and because someone's vision of the proper scope of government will ultimately prevail, some procedural requirements that all liberals could agree to must be satisfied for one side to impose legitimately its values on the polity at large. These procedural requirements are identified, argued for, and then applied to the elements of the modern liberal regulatory agenda. Arnold argues that many, though not all, of these elements have been illegitimately imposed on American society.
|
Contents
1 Rights Public Goods and Externalities
|
3 |
2 Private and Public Property
|
37 |
3 Liberal Conceptions of Private Property
|
69 |
4 The Modern Liberal Regulatory Agenda
|
117 |
5 Common Ground Arguments
|
137 |
6 Regulatory Public Goods
|
165 |
Employment Law
|
189 |
Antidiscrimination Law
|
223 |
Health and Safety Regulation
|
269 |
Land Use Regulation
|
329 |
11 Imposing Values
|
347 |
12 Applications
|
391 |
Notes
|
419 |
453 | |
477 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
African Americans agency antitrust argue benefits chapter claim classical liberals common law consumer products conversion arguments costs Court CPSC disabled discrimination discussion disparate impact disparate treatment drugs economic effect employers endangered species Endangered Species Act enforcement example favor federal firms freedom of contract grounds groups harassment harm health and safety imposed income individual justified labor least legislation liberal regulatory agenda liberals and classical liberals are inclined liberals believe libertarian mandate medical products ment minimum wage modern liberal regulatory moral occupational licensure off-label one’s opportunity costs OSHA ownership people’s person philosophical political practices prescription principles productive assets prohibited proper role proper scope property rights public bads public goods problem question regulatory regime regulatory takings risk scope of government social society standards tion title VII tort transfer programs Type II errors unintended beneficiaries values wetlands workers workplace