Be warned Joe Biden – centrism is no longer a safe haven in politics
This Democrat administration must deliver a radical ‘new deal’ for Americans or risk losing them to a second coming of Trumpism – or perhaps, something even darker
“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold”, wrote WB Yeats a century ago in, “The Second Coming”, his dark vision of a looming apocalypse.
Joe Biden loves Irish poetry and would do well to adopt this warning as a cautionary mantra when he returns to the west wing in January; the very future of liberal democracy may depend on his ability to realise that this time around, the pedestrian politics of centrism aren’t going to cut it.
The centre used to be the fiercely contested strategic position from which elections were won. With the biggest popular vote in history, Biden might be tempted to think that conventional wisdom still holds. But the narrowness of his victory margin is chastening.
This Democrat administration must deliver a radical “new deal” for “left behind” Americans or risk losing them to a second coming of Trumpism – or perhaps, something even darker and more disturbing in 2024.
Safe, centrist policies will not deliver material changes to ordinary people’s lives. In fact, history will see Brexit and Donald Trump as symptoms of the entrenched structural inequalities produced by centrism’s previous failure to stand up to wealthy corporate elites.
Joe Biden has vowed to reverse Trump’s tax cuts, curb Covid-19, revive the economy and limit fossil fuels, but with a Republican Senate and divided Congress, the odds are stacked against him. Gridlock may well combine with his naturally conciliatory temperament to thwart the radical agenda that America desperately needs.
In the UK, Keir Starmer has more time and space to manoeuvre before deciding where to pitch his tent on the new political continuum. Now that the pandemic has shifted the centre of gravity so far to the left that Rishi Sunak is starting to look like Che Guevara, it’s clear that this disorientating new landscape will take time to settle.
For now, Starmer is making all the right moves by standing back and exuding an air of professional competence while the government flails its way through the crisis. But with the sacking of Rebecca Long-Bailey and the suspension of Jeremy Corbyn, he’s also shown that he’s capable of making calculated decisions with tactical precision.
And soon he will need to make a stand and set out a bold strategic vision that demonstrates how a Labour government can transform the life chances of ordinary people. Starmer’s position is very similar to that faced by Clement Attlee in 1945 and radicalism is likely to be the safest route to power.
The centre is no longer a safe haven from which to play the percentages and anyway the Conservatives will already be there as their starting point before rolling back the emergency state aid plan they’ve been forced to create. That’s exactly the confused, ideologically compromised position from which Churchill’s stunned Conservatives lost the post-war election of 1945.
Like Attlee and in contrast to Jeremy Corbyn, Starmer has the one natural advantage that all truly era defining radicals need: he doesn’t look like one. He is ideally placed to define the terms of battle for the post-pandemic debate. Only a truly redistributive wealth and income tax policy where corporations pay their fair share will rebalance society and curb the inequalities that have allowed a dangerous populism to thrive on both sides of the Atlantic.
If the Democrats are tempted to spin Biden’s win as a triumph for mainstream normalcy they will be ignoring the new political reality where middle of the road politicians get flattened by the traffic coming from both directions. Ironically, a deadly virus has provided a slender lifeline to liberal democracy; it’s an opportunity they can’t afford to squander.
Just as Attlee’s legacy of the NHS and the welfare state saved us from post-war social unrest, only a radical agenda that raises living standards by pulling its citizens from a deflationary ditch will save liberal consensus politics from a second wave of populist demagogues.
Yeats’s poem “The Second Coming” warns that when the centre collapses “anarchy is loosed upon the world”, and that’s when something truly unholy starts “slouching” towards the centre of power.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.
Delete Comment
Report Comment
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.