Volume 11, Issue 3 p. 230-240
Main Paper

Adaptive blinded sample size adjustment for comparing two normal means—a mostly Bayesian approach

Andrew M. Hartley

Corresponding Author

Andrew M. Hartley

PPD, Biostatistics, Wilmington, NC, USA

Andrew M. Hartley, PPD, Biostatistics,Wilmington, NC, USA.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 March 2012
Citations: 11

Abstract

Adaptive sample size redetermination (SSR) for clinical trials consists of examining early subsets of on-trial data to adjust prior estimates of statistical parameters and sample size requirements. Blinded SSR, in particular, while in use already, seems poised to proliferate even further because it obviates many logistical complications of unblinded methods and it generally introduces little or no statistical or operational bias. On the other hand, current blinded SSR methods offer little to no new information about the treatment effect (TE); the obvious resulting problem is that the TE estimate scientists might simply ‘plug in’ to the sample size formulae could be severely wrong. This paper proposes a blinded SSR method that formally synthesizes sample data with prior knowledge about the TE and the within-treatment variance. It evaluates the method in terms of the type 1 error rate, the bias of the estimated TE, and the average deviation from the targeted power. The method is shown to reduce this average deviation, in comparison with another established method, over a range of situations. The paper illustrates the use of the proposed method with an example. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.