Radiologic Findings in Intimate Partner Violence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019180801

Victims of intimate partner violence undergo more imaging studies and have a higher frequency of potential violence-related imaging findings, such as acute fractures and obstetric-gynecologic findings, when compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects.

Purpose

To assess the radiologic findings associated with intimate partner violence (IPV).

Materials and Methods

Electronic medical records of 185 patients referred to the IPV support program from the emergency department (ED) between January 2015 and October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with an age- and sex-matched control group of 555 subjects (1:3 ratio of IPV victims to control subjects) who presented to the ED. Reports of all imaging studies performed within 5 years prior to the index ED visit were reviewed.

Results

The majority of patients who experienced IPV (mean age, 34.2 years ± 12.2 [standard deviation]) were female (178 of 185 [96.2%]) and were largely African American (69 of 185 [37.3%]). Demographic and clinical variables independently associated with IPV were race (odds ratio [OR] range, 3.2–5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 12.7), psychiatric comorbidities (OR, 5.4; 95% CI: 3.4, 8.8), and homelessness (OR, 13.0; 95% CI: 5.4, 31.2). IPV victims underwent more imaging studies in the preceding 5 years (median, four studies) than did control subjects (median, one study). Obstetric-gynecologic findings (OR, 4.4; 95% CI: 2.1, 9.6) and acute fractures (OR, 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 5.3) seen on images were independently associated with IPV. The addition of imaging findings to demographic and clinical variables increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the multivariate model to detect IPV (0.87 vs 0.86, P < .01), and the cross-validated multivariate model had an AUC of 0.85. Acute fractures involved the face or skull (range, P < .01 to P = .05), and chronic fractures affected the extremities and nasal bone (P < .01 and P = .05, respectively) more frequently in the IPV group than in the control group.

Conclusion

Intimate partner violence victims undergo more imaging studies and have a higher frequency of potential violence-related imaging findings when compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects.

© RSNA, 2019

See also the editorial by Flores and Narayan in this issue.

References

  • 1. Violence against women. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/. Published 2017. Accessed November 27, 2018. Google Scholar
  • 2. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf. Published 2010. Accessed November 27, 2018. Google Scholar
  • 3. US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: US Preventive Services Task Force final recommendation statement. JAMA 2018;320(16):1678–1687. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C; WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team . Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet 2008;371(9619):1165–1172. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Fredland N, McFarlane J, Symes L, Maddoux J. Exploring the association of maternal adverse childhood experiences with maternal health and child behavior following intimate partner violence. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(1):64–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Rivara FP, Anderson ML, Fishman P, et al. Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(2):89–96. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(7):CD007007. Google Scholar
  • 8. Dicola D, Spaar E. Intimate partner violence. Am Fam Physician 2016;94(8):646–651. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Rosen T, Bloemen EM, Harpe J, et al. Radiologists’ training, experience, and attitudes about elder abuse detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207(6):1210–1214. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Wong NZ, Rosen T, Sanchez AM, et al. Imaging findings in elder abuse: a role for radiologists in detection. Can Assoc Radiol J 2017;68(1):16–20. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. McDowell JD, Kassebaum DK, Stromboe SE. Recognizing and reporting victims of domestic violence. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123(9):44–50. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Kwako LE, Glass N, Campbell J, Melvin KC, Barr T, Gill JM. Traumatic brain injury in intimate partner violence: a critical review of outcomes and mechanisms. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011;12(3):115–126. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Bhole S, Bhole A, Harmath C. The black and white truth about domestic violence. Emerg Radiol 2014;21(4):407–412. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Karangelis D, Karkos CD, Tagarakis GI, et al. Thoracic injuries resulting from intimate partner violence. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18(3):119–120. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Malek AM, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, et al. Patient presentation, angiographic features, and treatment of strangulation-induced bilateral dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery. report of three cases. J Neurosurg 2000;92(3):481–487. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Puentes K, Ribeiro C, Jardim P, Santos A, Magalhães T. Non-fatal gunshot wounds in the context of intimate partner violence: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach—a case report. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18(5):221–224. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. FactFinder. United States Census Bureau. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml?src=bkmk. Accessed November 20, 2018. Google Scholar
  • 18. Sugg N. Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention. Med Clin North Am 2015;99(3):629–649. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Rosner B, Glynn RJ. Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models. Biometrics 2009;65(1):188–197. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Karakurt G, Patel V, Whiting K, Koyutürk M. Mining electronic health records data: domestic violence and adverse health effects. J Fam Violence 2017;32(1):79–87. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Matteoli M, Piacentino D, Kotzalidis GD, et al. The clinical and radiological examination of acute intimate partner violence injuries: a retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort of women. Violence Vict 2016;31(1):85–102. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Arosarena OA, Fritsch TA, Hsueh Y, Aynehchi B, Haug R. Maxillofacial injuries and violence against women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11(1):48–52. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Hartzell KN, Botek AA, Goldberg SH. Orbital fractures in women due to sexual assault and domestic violence. Ophthalmology 1996;103(6):953–957. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, Ross S, et al. Can MRI of the neck compete with clinical findings in assessing danger to life for survivors of manual strangulation? a statistical analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2010;12(5):228–232. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Armstrong M Jr, Strack GB. Recognition and documentation of strangulation crimes: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;142(9):891–897. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Glass N, Laughon K, Campbell J, et al. Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. J Emerg Med 2008;35(3):329–335. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Intimate Partner Violence. National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Office for Victims of Crime. https://ovc.ncjrs.gov/ncvrw2017/images/en_artwork/Fact_Sheets/2017NCVRW_IPV_508.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed March 4, 2018. Google Scholar
  • 28. Pavao J, Alvarez J, Baumrind N, Induni M, Kimerling R. Intimate partner violence and housing instability. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(2):143–146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Rees S, Silove D, Chey T, et al. Lifetime prevalence of gender-based violence in women and the relationship with mental disorders and psychosocial function. JAMA 2011;306(5):513–521. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Bailey BA. Partner violence during pregnancy: prevalence, effects, screening, and management. Int J Womens Health 2010;2:183–197. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Ferdos J, Rahman MM, Jesmin SS, Rahman MA, Sasagawa T. Association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and maternal pregnancy complications among recently delivered women in Bangladesh. Aggress Behav 2018;44(3):294–305. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Mahenge B, Stöckl H, Mizinduko M, Mazalale J, Jahn A. Adverse childhood experiences and intimate partner violence during pregnancy and their association to postpartum depression. J Affect Disord 2018;229:159–163. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Palladino CL, Singh V, Campbell J, Flynn H, Gold KJ. Homicide and suicide during the perinatal period: findings from the National Violent Death Reporting System. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(5):1056–1063. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Mehta PK, Bachhuber MA, Hoffman R, Srinivas SK. Deaths from unintentional injury, homicide, and suicide during or within 1 year of pregnancy in Philadelphia. Am J Public Health 2016;106(12):2208–2210. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Campbell JC, Glass N, Sharps PW, Laughon K, Bloom T. Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007;8(3):246–269. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received: Apr 6 2018
Revision requested: May 4 2018
Revision received: Nov 29 2018
Accepted: Dec 12 2018
Published online: Feb 05 2019
Published in print: Apr 2019