Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published online March 25, 2010

Barriers and opportunities for implementation of adaptive designs in pharmaceutical product development

Abstract

Background This review discusses barriers to implementing adaptive designs in a pharmaceutical R&D environment and provides recommendations on how to overcome challenges. A summary of findings from a survey conducted through PhRMA’s working group on adaptive designs is followed by a report based on our experience as statistical and clinical consultants to project teams charged with establishing the clinical development strategy for investigational compounds and interested in applying innovative approaches.
Findings and recommendations Adaptive designs require additional work in that clinical trial simulations are needed to develop the design. Some project teams, due to time and resource constraints, are unable to invest the additional effort required to conduct necessary scenario analyses of options through simulation. We recommend formally integrating the planning time for scenario analyses and to incentivize optimal designs (e.g., designs offering the highest information value per resource unit invested). Regardless of the trial design ultimately chosen, quantitatively comparing alternative trial design options through simulation will enable earlier and better decision making in the context of the overall clinical development plan. Adhering to ‘Good Adaptive Practices’ will be key to achieving this goal.
Outlook Implementing adaptive designs efficiently requires top—down and bottom— up support and the willingness to invest into integrated process and information technology infrastructures. Success is conditional on the willingness of the R&D environment to embrace the implementation of adaptive designs as a Change Management Initiative in the spirit of the Critical Path of the Food and Drug Administration. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: 167—173. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Krams M., Sharma M., Dragalin V., et al. Adaptive approaches in clinical drug development. Opportunities and challenges in design and implementation. Pharm Med 2009; 23: 139-48.
Bretz F., Branson M., Burman CF, et al. Adaptivity in drug discovery and development. Drug Dev Rev 2009; 70: 169-90.
Gallo P., Chuang-Stein C., Dragalin V., et al. Executive summary of the PhRMA working group on adaptive designs in clinical drug development. J Biopharm Stat 2006; 16: 275-83.
Gallo P., Krams M. PhRMA working group on adaptive designs: introduction to the full white paper . Drug Info J 2006; 40: 421-3.
Quinlan JA, Krams M. Implementing adaptive designs: logistical and operational considerations. Drug Info J 2006; 40: 437-44.
Fardipour P., Littman G., Burns D., et al. Planning and executing response-adaptive learn-phase clinical trials: 1. The process. Drug Info J 2009; 43: 713-23.
Gaydos B., Anderson K., Berry DA, et al. Good practices for adaptive clinical trials in pharmaceutical product development. Drug Info J 2009; 43: 539-56.
Gallo P. Confidentiality and trial integrity issues for adaptive designs. Drug Info J 2006; 40: 445-50.
Chmp. CHMP reflection paper on ‘‘Methodological issues in confirmatory clinical trials planned with an adaptive design.’’ Available at: www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/245902enadopted.pdf . (accessed 20 December 2009).
Dragalin V. Designing, monitoring, and modifying an adaptive trial. Am Pharm Outsourc 2008; 9: 12-16.
Enas G., Anderson K., Bedding A., et al. Global harmonization of standards for adaptive clinical trial designs. Regul Focus 2008; 13: 8-17.
Chuang-Stein C., Bretz F., Komiyama O., Quinlan J. Interactions with regulatory agencies to enhance the understanding and acceptance of adaptive designs. Regul Focus 2009; 14: 36-42.
Dick Clark in an interview with the Financial Times 2006. Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e7bde0ee-bb4d-11da-8f51-0000779e2340.html?nclick_check=1 . (accessed 20 December 2009).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 25, 2010
Issue published: April 2010

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s), 2010.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 20338900

Authors

Affiliations

Judith Quinlan
Cytel Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
Brenda Gaydos
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IL, USA
Jeff Maca
Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA
Michael Krams
Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Clinical Trials.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 209

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 44 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 47

  1. Feasibility of a Platform Trial Design for the Development of Mobile H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reporting quality was suboptimal in a systematic review of randomized ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Point estimation for adaptive trial designs I: A methodological review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Design and implementation of an adaptive confirmatory trial in Japanes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Stakeholder perspectives on adaptive clinical trials: a scoping review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A review of available software for adaptive clinical trial design
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  9. Changing platforms without stopping the train: experiences of data man...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clini...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Adaptive Designs: Results of 2016 Survey on Perception and Use
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  12. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Development process of a consensus-driven CONSORT extension for random...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Efficiency Considerations for Group Sequential Designs with Adaptive U...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Practical characteristics of adaptive design in phase 2 and 3 clinical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The Real‐World Ethics of Adaptive‐Design Clinical Trials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A conceptual model for the development process of confirmatory adaptiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  18. DIA’s Adaptive Design Scientific Working Group (ADSWG)...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  19. Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Adaptive designs undertaken in clinical research: a review of register...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Attitudes and opinions regarding confirmatory adaptive clinical trials...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. CBER’s Experience With Adaptive Design Clinical Trials
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  23. Missing steps in a staircase: a qualitative study of the perspectives ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Cross-sector surveys assessing perceptions of key stakeholders towards...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. An Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Sample Size Re-estimation Designs In Confirmatory Clinical Trials—Curr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Book Reviews
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Effective Drug Supply for Adaptive Clinical Trials...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  29. Adaptive Design: Results of 2012 Survey on Perception and Use
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  30. Precision Medicine Clinical Trials: Defining New Treatment Strategies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. The Need for and the Future of Adaptive Designs in Clinical Developmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Implementation Issues in Adaptive Design Trials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. INHANCE: An Adaptive Confirmatory Study with Dose Selection at Interim
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Raf/MEK/ERK pathways in the treatment ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages in comparative effectiveness...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. On the choice of doses for phase III clinical trials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  38. Panel discussion 1
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  39. An Overview of the Adaptive Designs Accelerating Promising Trials Into...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Sample size re-estimation in an on-going NIH-sponsored clinical trial:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Bayesian adaptive clinical trials: a dream for statisticians only?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. The Sequence of Clinical Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Adaptive Design Across Stages of Therapeutic Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Implications of comparative effectiveness research for radiation oncol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Food and drug administration′s critical path initiative and innovation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub