Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials: A survey of registered clinical trials units to establish current practice and experiences
Abstract
Background:
The Medical Research Council Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice outlines a three-committee trial oversight structure – the day-to-day Trial Management Group, the Data Monitoring Committee and the Trial Steering Committee. In this model, the Trial Steering Committee is the executive committee that oversees the trial and considers the recommendations from the Data Monitoring Committee. There is yet to be in-depth consideration establishing the Trial Steering Committee’s role and functionality.
Methods:
A survey to establish Trial Steering Committee’s current practices, role and the use and opinion on the Medical Research Council guidelines was undertaken within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units.
Results:
Completed surveys were obtained from 38 of 47 fully and partially registered Units. Individual items in the survey were analysed and reported spanning current Trial Steering Committee practices including its role, requirement and experience required for membership; methods to identify members; and meeting frequency. Terms (a document describing the committee’s remit, objectives and functionality) were obtained and analysed from 21 of 33 Units with documents in place at their Unit. A total of 20 responders suggested aspects of the current Medical Research Council Guidelines that need improvement.
Conclusion:
We present the first survey reporting on practices within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units on the experience and remits of Trial Steering Committees. We have identified a widespread adoption of Medical Research Council Guidelines for Trial Steering Committees in the United Kingdom, but limitations in this existing provision have been identified that need to be addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Grant AM, Altman DG, Babiker AB, et al. Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9(7): 1–238, iii–iv.
2. DAMOCLES Study Group. A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well. Lancet 2005; 365: 711–722.
3. Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Gøtzsche P, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013; 346: e7586.
4. Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials, http://www.mrc.ac.uk (1998, accessed 10 November 2014).
5. National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme: Study Steering Committee or Trial Steering Committee, 2012.
6. Wellcome Trust policy position on clinical trials, http://www.wellcome.ac.uk (2013, accessed 10 November 2014).
7. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guidelines: guideline for good clinical practice, E6(R1), 1996, http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R1_Guideline.pdf (accessed 27 February 2015).
8. UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Units Network, http://www.ukcrc-ctu.org.uk/ (accessed 9 May 2013).
9. National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme. Research governance guidelines, http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk (accessed 10 November 2014).
10. National Institute of Health. Toolkit for clinical researchers. Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) guidelines, http://www.nih.gov (accessed 10 November 2014).
11. Buck DB, Gamble C, Dudley L, et al. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e006400.
12. McFadden E, Bashir S, Canham S, et al. The impact of registration of clinical trials units: the UK experience. Clin Trials 2015; 12: 166–173.
13. Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, et al. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trials development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005234.
14. Daykin A, Heawood A, Lane A, et al. An ethnographic study of group decision making to understand and improve how trial steering committees contribute to trial conduct. In: 2nd clinical trials methodology conference: methodology matters, Edinburgh, 18–19 November 2013.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: June 17, 2015
Issue published: December 2015
Keywords
PubMed: 26085545
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 540
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 12 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 20
-
Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK ...
-
Translational sports medicine
-
Governance of adaptive platform trials
-
Implementing the Trial Protocol
-
Formalising the induction of patient and public involvement contributo...
-
Implementing the Trial Protocol
-
Statistical models to predict recruitment in clinical trials were rare...
-
A third trial oversight committee: Functions, benefits and issues
-
Point-of-care testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections...
-
Point-of-care testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections...
-
Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and ...
-
"You have to keep your nerve on a DMC." Challenges for Data Monitoring...
-
Interventions to improve retention in a surgical, clinical trial: A pr...
-
A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function ...
-
‘We all want to succeed, but we’ve also got to be realistic about what...
-
Expertise and Ideology in Statistical Evaluation of Circumcision for P...
-
What are the roles and valued attributes of a Trial Steering Committee...
-
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flex...
-
EFSPI/PSI working group on data sharing: accessing and working with ph...
-
Exploring the role and function of trial steering committees: results ...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
